Hagens Berman: Ford Hit with New Lawsuit Following Fatal F-350 Rollover Crash and Roof Crush Defect

PUEBLO, Colo.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Automaker Ford is in the crosshairs of a new lawsuit following the fatal crash of a Colorado father who attorneys say experienced a cabin roof crush defect present in millions of 1999–2016 Ford trucks and leading to fatal rollovers, according to personal injury attorneys at Hagens Berman and Brooks Law Firm.
"In the years of development leading to the release of the Super Duty, Ford weakened almost every component of the roof structure to save money,' the lawsuit states.
The lawsuit was filed June 12, 2025, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma on behalf of Jamie Horn, the surviving widow of Steven Horn, and accuses the automaker of negligence and wrongful death regarding a roof crush defect in Ford Super Duty pickup trucks. Attorneys at Hagens Berman and Brooks Law Firm say Ford knew about this defect which was allegedly responsible for the tragic death of Mr. Horn, a husband and father of two, in a rollover accident in March 2025 on an Oklahoma highway.
'But when the Horns bought their Super Duty, Ford already knew that Super Duty roofs were collapsing in rollover accidents,' the lawsuit states. 'Ford knew, and it had been hiding this defect from consumers for years.''
'As stated in our lawsuit, Mr. Horn is dead because Ford wanted to save a few dollars per truck,' said Jacob Berman, the attorney leading the case. 'We intend to hold Ford accountable under the full extent of the law for what we believe is blatant negligence that led to his wrongful death and robbed this family of a father and husband.'
If you or a loved one suffered a serious injury in a Ford Super Duty truck rollover incident, find out more about Hagens Berman's personal injury representation.
Design Defect Makes Frightening Rollover Fatal
On March 4, 2025, Horn, whose family and estate are represented by personal injury attorneys at Hagens Berman, was traveling with his family from their home in Pueblo, Colorado to visit his father in Seminole on rural Oklahoma highway US-412. The Horns' 2012 Super Duty F-350 and the trailer it was pulling were hit by a gust of wind. Mr. Horn slowed down because of the wind, but the gust caused both the trailer and the truck to roll at least one and a half times, coming to rest on the roof. The F-350's roof collapsed on the driver's side, and Oklahoma Highway Patrol who responded pronounced Mr. Horn dead at the scene.
'In a properly designed truck, this would have been frightening, but not deadly,' the lawsuit states. 'But the driver's-side roof of the Horns' F-350 collapsed during the rollover, crushing Mr. Horn and killing him.'
Horn's wife and daughter who were seated on the passenger side of the F-350 were able to crawl out of the vehicle, according to the lawsuit, 'evidence that when the roof doesn't crush, people can survive rollovers without catastrophic injuries.'
The Smoking Gun – Ford's Internal Testing & Safety Evaluations
According to the lawsuit, Ford's Super Duty roofs were routinely crushed in rollovers, but Ford chose not to warn consumers. 'Mr. Horn's fatal injuries are the direct result of a roof design that Ford knew was extraordinarily weak,' the lawsuit states.
Ford's internal testing and safety evaluations show that prior to the development of the 1999–2016 Ford Super Duty, Ford knew rollovers were far more dangerous to vehicle occupants than other types of crashes, the lawsuit states. These documents also show that Ford knew strong vehicle roofs were fundamental to minimizing serious injury in a rollover, according to the lawsuit.
'Despite this knowledge, Ford repeatedly weakened the roof structure on Super Duty trucks to save money on labor and tooling costs. In the years of development leading to the release of the Super Duty, Ford weakened almost every component of the roof structure to save money,' the lawsuit states. 'It never performed any physical testing of the Super Duties' roof strength, and it conveniently lost records of the computerized testing it claims it did perform.'
'Ford knew Super Duty roofs were weak before the first truck rolled off the assembly line,' Berman said. 'Instead of doing what was right and making changes to its patently unsafe designs, Ford doubled down, continuing to sell the same defective design until 2016, all the while entering into secret settlements with victims and their families to try to hide the deadly nature of its cabin roof design.'
According to the lawsuit, Ford still hasn't taken any steps to warn the public about the risk posed by roof collapse in 1999–2016 Super Duty trucks. Hagens Berman represents the families of two other individuals who lost their lives due to the roof crush defect present in millions of Super Duty pickup trucks.
In September 2022, Hagens Berman also filed a class-action lawsuit on behalf of owners of Ford Super Duty pickups nationwide, accusing the automaker of selling more than 5 million pickup trucks it was well aware were equipped with a dangerously weak and defective roof. The firm's subsequent lawsuit illuminated an even starker timeline of Ford's alleged negligence, demonstrating that the automaker had over the course of nearly a decade continually downgraded or entirely removed key structural features of the roof design to cut costs.
Hagens Berman is a global plaintiffs' rights complex litigation law firm with a tenacious drive for achieving actual results for those harmed by corporate negligence and fraud. Since its founding in 1993, the firm's determination has earned it numerous national accolades, awards and titles of 'Most Feared Plaintiff's Firm,' MVPs and Trailblazers of class-action law. More about the law firm and its successes can be found at www.hbsslaw.com. Follow the firm for updates and news at @ClassActionLaw.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

2 hours ago

• Yahoo

Ford Apparently Doesn't Care About Engines Anymore

Read the full story on The Auto Wire We have bad news for Ford fans: a top executive just said the automaker doesn't care about engines anymore. His justification is that consumers don't care about them, either. And boy, do people have a lot of hot takes about at a recent Bernstein conference, Ford Vice Chair John Lawler shared his controversial thoughts. 'I don't think that consumers really think about powertrains the way they did 30 years ago. Where combustion engines defined what a vehicle was; the horsepower, the displacement, the torque, and everything about the vehicle; I think a lot of that is gone.' As Ford and other Western automakers face the looming threat of Chinese brands which sell vehicles at unbelievably low prices, the Blue Oval and others are looking for every competitive advantage possible. That includes outsourcing engine development and manufacturing to suppliers. In other words, your Ford might have the exact same engine as a Honda or Chevy or Kia. Lawler believes car shoppers won't care. Unfortunately, we think for a portion of the market this is true. For some people, all they care about is when they push the ignition button the car turns on and it goes. They don't know or care about how many cylinders it has, the displacement, or how much power it makes. But there's always been a subset of society that has this kind of attitude. Suddenly, Lawler and others in the industry believe they should cater to them, but really it's a pretense. The real reason isn't because there are consumers who don't care about engines. What it comes down to is automakers are scared spitless they're going to get mowed over by Chinese automakers. Instead of leaning into what they do best and riding out the storm, they're going to try beating the Chinese at their game. It's a dumb move. The thing is your average person who buys a Nissan Rogue or some other beige vehicle doesn't care about the engine, until they do. If the thing is sluggish because it doesn't make much power and they have trouble merging onto the highway, they care. If the engine blows up at 80,000 miles because it was engineered or manufactured poorly, they care. They might not obsess over engine specs like enthusiasts, but there's a reason why Toyota sells so many Camrys: everyone knows they're super reliable and that's largely because of the proprietary engine design. Take that away and what is the Camry? It's revealing how the automotive media is largely agreeing with Lawler, even if begrudgingly because they've all bought into the narrative that electric cars are inevitably the future. That's the other thing driving this move. Automakers want to justify killing off internal combustion engines and taking away resources to further develop them is a wonderful way to do that. But Ford and others can't just turn away from ICE engines. They have to turn public opinion against them, salting the earth for Toyota or anyone else who might try to keep innovating in that space. They want to force the industry into electrification now that EV mandates won't be happening. We hope they fail and miserably so. Long live ICE. Source: Automotive News Image via Ford Join our Newsletter, subscribe to our YouTube page, and follow us on Facebook.

Gizmodo

3 hours ago

• Gizmodo

Are Ford and GM Still American?

For decades, Ford and General Motors have been symbols of American industry, blue-collar pride, and heartland grit. From the rugged Ford F-150 to the all-American Chevy, the Detroit Big Three — Ford, GM, and Chrysler (now part of Stellantis) — have dominated the auto market with vehicles built and sold across the United States. The Ford F-150 is a cultural symbol. For many, Detroit remains the heartland of the U.S. auto industry, a perception reinforced by billions of dollars in recent investments aimed at conquering the electric and autonomous vehicle markets. But a new ranking calls that entire identity into question. The annual American-Made Index from now in its 20th year, was just released, and it paints a startling picture. The list, which ranks vehicles based on factors like U.S. factory jobs, manufacturing plants, and the percentage of domestic parts, reveals how 'American' a car truly is. And this year, the results are a PR nightmare for the old guard. In a top 20 list dominated by Tesla, the legacy American brands are almost nowhere to be found. GM managed to place just one vehicle, the Chevy Colorado pickup, at a lowly number 19. Ford has no models in the top 20 at all. Meanwhile, every single Tesla model—except the Cybertruck—made the list, with the Model 3 taking the top spot. Even Stellantis saved face with the Jeep Gladiator and Wrangler, both assembled in Toledo, Ohio. Meanwhile, Japanese and Korean automakers—including Honda, Toyota, Nissan, and Kia—also placed strongly, with several models assembled in American plants. This ranking lands at a politically charged time. President Donald J. Trump has launched a new trade war, recently imposing a 25% tariff on all imported cars that went into effect on April 3. The administration has championed an 'America First' manufacturing philosophy, yet the country's most iconic automakers are building cars that are, by this metric, less American than their foreign competitors. When contacted by Gizmodo, both GM and Ford deflected, choosing to highlight their investments and job creation numbers rather than address their poor showing in the ranking. 'We've added approximately 13,000 jobs in the US since 2008,' a Ford spokesperson said, noting that the company employs more hourly autoworkers than anyone else in the U.S. '80% of the vehicles we sell in the U.S are assembled here.' GM pointed to a recent announcement promising a $4 billion investment in its domestic plants. 'We've been committed to American manufacturing and are expanding production in the US,' a spokesperson told Gizmodo. To be fair, both companies are massive U.S. employers. At the end of 2024, GM employed 90,000 people in the country (56% of its global workforce), while Ford employed nearly 89,000 (52% of its total). GM is still the largest automaker in the U.S. by market share. But criteria are about more than just assembly. It scrutinizes the origins of engines and transmissions and the percentage of U.S. and Canadian parts. The website warns that 'just because a model may be made in a U.S. assembly plant doesn't necessarily mean it's exclusively made here.' For companies that have built their brands on a foundation of American identity, the fact that their vehicles don't even crack the top 15 is a terrible look. It suggests that in the globalized auto industry, the 'American-made' label is far more complicated than it seems.

WIRED

7 hours ago

• WIRED

The Ford Ranger Plug-In Hybrid Has Arrived in Rugged Style

Fitness for purpose. Take a deftly aimed power tool to all the marketing flim-flam, and you can't go far wrong with that mantra. There's no messing around when it comes to a pick-up truck, a vehicle that has a clear job to do, and in most cases does it admirably. Except that even this segment isn't immune to mission creep, and these hardy vehicles are now expected to double as workhorse and acceptable all-round family transport. The Ford F-150 may typify the breed, but outside of the US the Ranger has been in active duty for more than 40 years. A global player since 2011, it sells in 180 territories worldwide, and is particularly dominant in the European pick-up market. But get this, 80 percent of the Rangers sold in the UK last year were in Wildtrak spec, the version that swaddles the hard plastics in leather and ladles on the decals. It's—deep breath—a genuine lifestyle vehicle, beloved by the sort of buyers who actually do stuff rather than just think about it. Now, at last, there's an electrified version, though we're talking hybrid rather than the whole enchilada. Ford sells the fully electric Lightning in the US, where it's locked in battle with Tesla's Cybertruck (though neither is setting the sales chart aflame), but this is the closest Brits are going to get for the foreseeable at least. Only Chinese maker Maxus sells an electric pick-up in the UK, a vehicle we wouldn't recommend, and Toyota's indestructible Hi-Lux makes do with a mild hybrid setup. This makes the Ranger PHEV a significant new arrival. It shares its platform hardware with the VW Amarok, and is manufactured in Ford's Silverton plant in South Africa. Until now, engine options have been limited to a 2.0-liter petrol or 3.0-liter diesel. The new car uses Ford's excellent 2.3-liter 'Ecoboost' turbo petrol unit (as previously seen in the Focus and Mustang), bolstered by a 75-kW (100-bhp) electric motor, packaged within the bell-housing of the 10-speed automatic transmission. Pick-Up Philosophy It's fed by an 11.8-kWh battery (usable) that sits under the Ranger's load bed. Despite its compact size, that still necessitated modifications to the vehicle's ladder frame chassis, resulting in a 20-millimeter bulge. (It has a 1-metric-ton payload and can accommodate a Euro pallet between the wheelhouses.) An electronically controlled clutch engages and disengages the e-motor and combustion engine, switching between petrol, hybrid, and electric propulsion. Visual differences are limited to a second filler flap on the near-side rear wing, with a lightning bolt logo on it, which hides the charging port for the battery. On a 7-kW wall charger, it takes about 2.5 hours to charge. Here's how it works. EV Auto is the default setting, blending electric and petrol power in a way best suited to everyday use, or if you're towing or lugging a heavy load. EV Now does what it says: This is for electric driving only, Ford claiming a range of around 26 miles (WLTP). EV Later allows the driver to store electric energy, particularly useful if you're heading into the city or a zero-emission zone. Finally, there's EV Charge, which sees the petrol engine charge the high-voltage battery, though it won't top it up by all that much. In addition to those, the PHEV maintains the driving modes used in extant Ranger models: Normal, Eco, Slippery, Tow/Haul, Mud/Ruts, and Sand. This new Ranger variant is clearly messing with the sacred strictures of the pick-up philosophy.