AMERICAS Markets now eye government shutdown after trade row

LONDON, March 13 (Reuters) - What matters in U.S. and global markets today
By Mike Dolan, opens new tab, Editor-At-Large, Financial Industry and Financial Markets
From one crunch to another, markets are finding it hard to catch a break as we go from tit-for-tat trade wars one day to U.S. government shutdown fears the next.
Today I'll take a look at how all of the U.S. policy uncertainty and diplomatic upheavals have sparked a conversation in global investment circles about trust and transparency in U.S. governance and how eroding that could undermine the U.S. position as the world's dominant investment destination.
Find this and more on today's major market news below.
Today's Market Minute
President Donald Trump threatened on Wednesday to escalate a global trade war with further tariffs on European Union goods, as major U.S. trading partners said they would retaliate for trade barriers already erected by the U.S. president.
Germany's outgoing lower house of parliament will hold a special session on Thursday to debate a 500 billion euro fund for infrastructure and sweeping changes to borrowing rules in Europe's largest economy to bolster defence.
The Bank of Canada trimmed its key policy rate by 25 basis points on Wednesday to 2.75% and raised concerns about inflationary pressures and weaker growth stemming from trade uncertainty and U.S. tariffs.
The Kremlin said on Wednesday it would review details from Washington about a proposal for a 30-day ceasefire in Ukraine before responding, while U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio hoped a deal would be struck within days.
U.S. consumer prices increased less than expected in February, Wednesday data showed, but the improvement is likely temporary against the backdrop of aggressive tariffs on imports that are expected to raise the costs of most goods in the months ahead.
Can't catch a break
This week's U.S. metal tariff hikes and the instant retaliation from Europe and Canada are likely only the opening salvos in a global trade conflict that President Donald Trump appears intent on ratcheting up in less than three weeks' time.
The rhetoric shows no sign of compromise.
"Whatever they charge us, we're charging them," Trump told reporters at the White House. "We will not stand idly by," Canada's Finance Minister Dominic LeBlanc said of the latest tariffs moves.
There is background tension in Europe too as Germany's dramatic fiscal reforms and defence reboot now need to pass through parliament, with the Green Party's necessary support still not secured.
The Bundestag lower house of parliament will on Thursday hold the first reading of the proposal, which electrified European markets last week. A vote is due next Tuesday.
Back stateside, the focus will be on the Senate. If it doesn't support the Republican-backed stopgap funding bill, a partial government shutdown could be triggered as soon as this weekend.
The whole picture means U.S. stock futures have reversed all of Wednesday's modest bounce in the S&P500 (.SPX), opens new tab. And stock benchmarks across Europe and Asia are also in the red.
Meanwhile, Treasury yields pushed higher, batting away better-than-forecast consumer price inflation numbers on Wednesday, as the tentative stock market stabilisation reduced Federal Reserve easing bets once again. The dollar index (.DXY), opens new tab was also off slightly.
CPI numbers are now very much in the rear-view mirror for a Fed waiting to see the impact of tariff hikes, so today's producer price numbers should also have little market impact.
But what could have quite a bit of market impact over the long term is the growing sense that the tumult in Washington could threaten the U.S. position as the world's safe haven.
Exorbitant disruption risks undermining US 'privilege'
There's something more than U.S. tariffs and recession risks gnawing at financial markets. There's the growing sense that the chaotic policy disruption in Washington is eroding the world's trust in U.S. institutions and its assets.
Broken political alliances and economic wars with major trade partners are having many effects - not least heightened business uncertainty over what will happen next - but one of the most notable is the brewing investor concern that America could lose a chunk of its "exorbitant privilege".
This term, first coined in the 1960s by then French finance minister Valéry Giscard d'Estaing, essentially refers to the benefits the U.S. gains from the outsize demand the world has for U.S. assets as a safe haven. The privilege hinges variously on the extensive use of the dollar internationally, the U.S. rule of law and institutional rigor as well as the projection of its soft power.
The list is much longer than that, but you get the picture. The sheer size, depth and transparency of U.S. markets, in combination with the reliability and openness of its governance, have - for decades - given the U.S. a disproportionate slice of world capital and the cheaper financing that goes with that.
Could Donald Trump's avowedly disruptive administration call all that into question and whittle this advantage away?
Financing metrics, such as long-term U.S. borrowing costs, don't yet suggest that a major fracture is afoot.
But U.S. equity prices have started to correct over the past month, even as the dollar has weakened - an ominous combination.
Ultimately, though, the very fact that trust - or the lack thereof - is part of the U.S. conversation at all is the most remarkable thing.
On Wednesday, JPMorgan's chief global economist Bruce Kasman spoke openly about the challenges during a roadshow in Singapore. He opined about how the U.S. secured its "exorbitant privilege", citing many of the reasons noted above and including things like the "integrity of information flow".
The administration's cutbacks to government agencies and moves to disband the advisory committees assisting with data collection are also potentially jarring, he said.
"All of those things are part of the uncertainties that have moved into U.S. policy, and that part of the risk in the outlook this year I don't think has been appreciated."
'Exorbitant burden'?
Referring to exorbitant privilege, Kasman added: "The risk that stuff starts to come under pressure and becomes a structural issue in the markets is not something I would, by any means, underplay."
This is likely what investors and strategists both within the United States and around the world have been thinking for weeks - even if relatively few have verbalized it.
And Kasman is not alone in saying something.
Writing about speculation surrounding the prospect of a " Mar-a-Lago Accord" to correct U.S. deficits and global imbalances, former Reserve Bank of India governor Raghuram Rajan, opens new tab questioned the diagnosis of Trump adviser Stephen Miran and said it was dangerous for America to play around with its exorbitant privilege.
Rajan expressed doubt that reforming U.S. macroeconomic policy would somehow deter overseas savers from the U.S., thereby weakening an overvalued dollar or helping to cut U.S. deficits.
"It is not clear where the Trump administration's current path of 'shock and awe' is supposed to lead," the former International Monetary Fund chief economist wrote in Project Syndicate this week.
"The claim that the dollar's attractiveness is an exorbitant burden rather than an exorbitant privilege is unpersuasive, especially when those making such arguments are so reluctant to give up the burden," he said, referring to the administration's regular support for the dollar's global status while promoting policies that undermine it.
"Markets are unnerved by the punishment that the administration, convinced that the U.S. is a victim, is willing to inflict on close allies," he concluded. "If such behavior reduces the attractiveness of the dollar, perhaps it really will become an exorbitant burden. But that is not a future that any American should want."
It's good to remember that foreign holdings of U.S. financial assets nearly doubled over the past decade to some $60 trillion before the recent market ructions.
Given the scale of this cross-border money, if faith in the U.S. truly is shaken, the outcome could make the year's market shakeout to date seem very small indeed.
Chart of the day
Stock markets have voted clearly over the past month on the brewing trade wars and lack of policy visibility in the U.S., as they've repeatedly hit the "sell" button. Regular voters now seem to be following suit. A Reuters/Ipsos poll found 57% of Americans think Trump is being too erratic in his efforts to shake up the U.S. economy, and 70% expect that tariffs will make goods more expensive.
Today's events to watch
* U.S. February producer price report, weekly jobless claims
* Federal Reserve reports on financial health of U.S. households in its Flow of Funds update for 4Q2024
* Bank of France Governor Francois Villeroy de Galhau and Bundesbank President Joachim Nagel speak together in Paris
* Germany's Bundestag holds first reading of budget reform proposal
* U.S. Treasury sells $22 billion of 30-year bonds
* U.S. corporate earnings: Dollar General, Ulta Beauty
Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, opens new tab, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias.
By Mike Dolan; Editing by Lisa Shumaker

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Guardian

16 minutes ago

• The Guardian

Hegseth claims US ‘obliterated' Iranian nuclear sites despite lack of assessment

The US defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, on Sunday repeated claims by Donald Trump that US strikes had completely destroyed Iran's nuclear facilities and its ability to acquire nuclear weapons even as the Pentagon acknowledged it was too early to provide a full damage assessment. At a news conference, Hegseth and the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, Gen Dan Caine, said the strikes, codenamed Operation Midnight Hammer, devastated the Iranian nuclear program. The remarks from Hegseth in particular amounted to repeated praise for Trump and the operation that targeted the nuclear enrichment sites at Natanz and Fordow, the key facility buried deep underground, and a third site at Esfahan where Iran was seen to store enriched uranium. 'It was an incredible and overwhelming success. The order we received from our commander in chief was focused,' Hegseth said wearing a blue suit and US flag motif pocket square in the Pentagon briefing room, the first time he has appeared there since becoming the secretary. 'Thanks to President Trump's bold and visionary leadership and his commitment to peace through strength, Iran's nuclear ambitions have been obliterated,' Hegseth said. 'The operation President Trump planned was bold and it was brilliant.' According to Caine, who was seen in pictures released by the White House to have been in the Situation Room as the operation unfolded, the bombing raid involved a two-part strike package of B-2 bombers and fourth- and fifth-generation fighter jets launching from the US. The operation started around midnight on Friday, when the main contingent of bombers departed from the Whiteman air force base in Missouri and flew towards Iran, while another contingent flew in the opposite direction over the Pacific Ocean as a decoy effort. The main contingent involved seven B-2 bombers flying for 18 nonstop hours into Iranian airspace, refueling multiple times in the air, while unidentified fighter jets swept ahead of the group for possible Iranian fighter jets and surface-to-air missile threats over the nuclear sites. Caine said the Pentagon was not aware of any shots fired at the bombers as they flew into Iran and dropped the first of 14 so-called 'bunker buster' bombs, technically known as GBU-57s on the Fordow enrichment facility under the cover of darkness around 2.10am local time. After the bombers dropped the GBU-57s on Fordow and Natanz, Caine said, a navy submarine fired a series of Tomahawk missiles at the Esfahan site, as the aircraft turned around to fly back to the US. 'We are unaware of any shots fired at the Package on the way out. Iran's fighters did not fly, and it appears that Iran's surface-to-air missile systems did not see us throughout the mission. We retained the element of surprise,' Caine added. The actual extent of the damage in particular to Fordow, the site Trump has been most focused on destroying because of its hard-to-reach nature, was not immediately clear. Neither Hegseth nor Caine provided details beyond their initial assessment that it had been 'obliterated'. Following Trump's remarks in a televised address from the White House on Saturday night that the US could launch more attacks on Iran unless they started peace talks, Hegseth said the administration was in contact with the country's leadership through public and private channels. 'They understand precisely what the American position is, precisely what steps they can take to allow for peace – and we hope they do so,' Hegseth told reporters. 'I think Tehran is certainly calculating the reality that planes flew from the middle of America and Missouri overnight, completely undetected over three of their most highly sensitive sites,' Hegseth added. 'We believe that will have a clear psychological impact on how they view the future.' Hegseth also said at the news conference that congressional leaders were notified about the strikes after the bombers left Iranian airspace – a decision that is sure to draw criticism from Democrats that Trump engaged in a conflict without the authorization of Congress.

Wales Online

36 minutes ago

• Wales Online

Iran update as it declares it has struck back against US bombing action

Iran update as it declares it has struck back against US bombing action The nation has been bombed by American B-2 stealth bombers that US President Donald Trump said had 'obliterated' their targets Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian in January 2025 (Photo) (Image: Getty/ 2025 Contributor#8523328 ) Iran has announced it has retaliated against US military strikes on three of its nuclear facilities. The eyes of the world had been waiting to see how Iran might respond after the bombings by B-2 stealth bombers. Nuclear sites in Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan were targeted by the Trump administration overnight. The US President said the sites had been completely 'obliterated' - although subsequent US statements have not gone this far. ‌ There has been intense speculation Iran might target US military sites in the Middle East or take other measures such as shutting off the vital shipping route the Strait of Hormuz. Reports from Reuters and elswhere this afternoon suggest action in the strait remains under discussion. ‌ But as USA warned Iran of the risks of retaliating, Iran announced that it had actually already responded. The Financial Times reports that Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian said 'powerful strikes' on Israel on Sunday morning were actually retaliation for the US activity. 'The attacks were in fact a response to the US aggressive policies, because the Zionist regime basically lacks the capacity and courage to stage attacks on the Islamic republic by itself,' Pezeshkian said at a cabinet meeting. 'The US attacks on our nuclear installations clearly showed that it was the main driver behind the Zionist regime's hostile actions against the Islamic republic." An Iranian strike hit a residential neighbourhood in Tel Aviv on Sunday morning. At least 16 people were reportedly injured. Article continues below Israel announced on Sunday that it had closed its airspace to both inbound and outbound flights in the wake of the US attacks. What has US military said about the US strikes on Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan? In new media briefings within the last hour, America said it 'does not seek war' with Iran. Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth made the claim in the aftermath of the US attack. The mission, called Operation Midnight Hammer, involved decoys and deception, and met with no Iranian resistance, Mr Hegseth and US Air Force General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said at a Pentagon news conference on Sunday. Article continues below Mr Hegseth said it is important to note the US strikes did not target Iranian troops or the Iranian people. The words might be seen as a veiled effort to indicate to Tehran they do not want retaliation on American targets in the region. 'This mission was not and has not been about regime change,' Mr Hegseth added. Mr Caine said the aim of the operation – destroying nuclear sites in Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan – had been achieved. US President Donald Trump earlier claimed the facilities had been 'completely and fully obliterated'. 'Final battle damage will take some time, but initial battle damage assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction,' Mr Caine said.

The Guardian

42 minutes ago

• The Guardian

Keir Starmer backs US strike on Iran's nuclear facilities

The UK prime minister, Keir Starmer, has backed the US strike on Iran's nuclear facilities and called on Tehran to return to negotiations. Donald Trump, the US president, announced overnight that the US had bombed three nuclear sites in Iran, joining Israel's attacks. There was no UK involvement in the action. Starmer said on Sunday there was a 'risk of escalation' after the US strikes, including 'beyond the region'. He added: 'It is important that we now de-escalate the situation, stabilise the region and get the parties back around the table to negotiate.'