Supreme Court greenlights nuclear waste sites in Texas
Supreme Court greenlights nuclear waste sites in Texas
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Growing US nuclear power resurgence reaches the nation's heartland
A nuclear power comeback is starting to take shape in the U.S. as officials consider reopening the Duane Arnold Energy Center in Iowa.
Straight Arrow News
WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court on June 18 rejected challenges to a nuclear waste storage site near Texas' border with New Mexico, a win for the federal government in a decadeslong struggle over what to do with waste that is byproduct of nuclear power plants.
In a 6-3 decision, the court said Texas and oil industry interests cannot fight the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's approval of the site because they hadn't sufficiently participated in the commission's licensing proceedings.
The commission approved temporary storage sites in Texas in 2021 because nuclear power plants were running out of room and the permanent underground storage facility planned for Nevada's Yucca Mountain stalled largely due to local opposition.
But Texas and oil industry interests objected to the waste being stored above ground in the Permian Basin, a prominent oil field region known for its underpopulated wide-open spaces in southwestern Texas. They also questioned the 'temporary' nature of the storage site, which was designed to last decades.
More: Nobody wants to live near nuclear waste. The Supreme Court mulls where to put it
The federal government said the waste has to go somewhere until a permanent location is created.
Nuclear power supplies about one-fifth of the nation's electricity.
The company proposing to run the Texas facility argues it's more economical to have security in one centralized location, allowing time for the land around former nuclear reactors to be restored for long-term use.
While two federal appeals courts in Denver and Washington, D.C., rejected challenges to the private facility, the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sided with Texas. The court also blocked operations at a similar site in New Mexico that officials in that state opposed.
Since the U.S. began large-scale nuclear power generation in the late 1950s, nuclear fuel has powered reactors along with an ongoing political debate over the disposal of spent fuel, once it can no longer efficiently generate electricity.
The "not in my backyard" dilemma ended up at the high court because the federal government never followed through on a 1982 law that was supposed to have created a permanent dumping ground for nuclear power plant waste – which continues to be considered dangerous for thousands of years.
After lawmakers designed Nevada's Yucca Mountain as the only authorized site where the Department of Energy could permanently store spent nuclear fuel, the Obama administration effectively nixed the project over political and environmental concerns.
It's unclear if the Trump administration, which defended the Nuclear Regulator Commission's authority to approve temporary sites, will try to revive the Yucca Mountain option as a place to store nuclear waste.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
36 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
What to know about U.S. ‘bunker-buster' bombs unleashed on Iran's Fordo nuclear facility
BANGKOK — In inserting itself into Israel's war against Iran, the United States unleashed its massive 'bunker-buster' bombs on Iran's Fordo nuclear fuel enrichment plant. Those bombs were widely seen as the best chance of damaging or destroying Fordo, built deep into a mountain and untouched during Israel's weeklong offensive. U.S. Air Force Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said 14 of the bombs were used in Sunday's attack on Fordo and a second target. The U.S. is the only military capable of dropping the weapons, and the movement of B-2 stealth bombers toward Asia on Saturday had signaled possible activity by the U.S. Israeli leaders had made no secret of their hopes that President Trump would join their week-old war against Iran, though they had also suggested they had backup plans for destroying the site. The U.S. hit three nuclear sites in all, and Caine told reporters Sunday that 'initial battle damage assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage.' The mission could have wide-ranging ramifications, including jeopardizing any chance of Iran engaging in Trump's desired talks on its nuclear program and dragging the U.S. into another Mideast war. Here's a closer look. 'Bunker buster' is a broad term used to describe bombs that are designed to penetrate deep below the surface before exploding. In this case, it refers to the latest GBU-57 A/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator bomb in the U.S. arsenal. The roughly 30,000-pound, precision-guided bomb is designed to attack deeply buried and hardened bunkers and tunnels, according to the U.S. Air Force. It's believed to be able to penetrate about 200 feet below the surface before exploding, and the bombs can be dropped one after another, drilling deeper and deeper with each successive blast. It was not immediately known how many were used in total in the Sunday morning strikes. The bomb carries a conventional warhead, but the International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations nuclear watchdog, has confirmed that Iran is producing highly enriched uranium at Fordo, which had raised the possibility that nuclear material could be released into the area if the GBU-57 A/B were used to hit the facility. Initial assessments by the IAEA, however, were that this had not happened. Fordo is Iran's second nuclear enrichment facility after Natanz, its main facility, which already has been targeted by Israeli airstrikes and was also hit by the U.S. on Sunday, along with Isfahan. The IAEA says it believes those earlier strikes have had 'direct impacts' on the facility's underground centrifuge halls. Fordo is smaller than Natanz and is built into the side of a mountain near the city of Qom, about 60 miles southwest of Tehran. Construction is believed to have started around 2006, and it became operational in 2009, the same year Tehran publicly acknowledged its existence. In addition to being an estimated 260 feet under rock and soil, the site is reportedly protected by Iranian and Russian surface-to-air missile systems. Those air defenses, however, probably have already been struck by Israel, which claims to have knocked out most of Iran's air defenses, and the U.S. bombers were not fired upon during their mission. Still, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said the goal of attacking Iran was to eliminate its missile and nuclear program, which he described as an existential threat to Israel, and officials have said Fordo was part of that plan. 'This entire operation ... really has to be completed with the elimination of Fordo,' Yechiel Leiter, Israel's ambassador to the U.S., told Fox News. In theory, the GBU-57 A/B could be dropped by any bomber capable of carrying the weight, but at the moment the U.S. has configured and programmed only its B-2 Spirit stealth bomber to deliver the bomb, according to the Air Force. The B-2 is only flown by the Air Force, and is produced by Northrop Grumman. According to the manufacturer, the B-2 can carry a payload of 40,000 pounds, but the Air Force has said it has successfully tested the B-2 loaded with two GBU-57 A/B bunker busters — a total weight of some 60,000 pounds. In the attack on Fordo, Caine said the first B-2 dropped two of the bunker busters on the facility. The strategic long-range heavy bomber has a range of about 7,000 miles without refueling and 11,500 miles with one refueling, and can reach any point in the world within hours, according to Northrop Grumman. The mission against Iran was flown from its home base in Missouri. Whether the U.S. would get involved had been unclear in recent days. At the Group of 7 meeting in Canada, Trump was asked what it would take for Washington to become involved militarily, and he said: 'I don't want to talk about that.' Then on Thursday, the president said he would decide within two weeks whether to get involved, to give another chance to the possibility of negotiations with Iran over its nuclear program. In the end, it took just two days to decide. Sunday's attack was restricted to the three nuclear sites, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said. 'The scope of this was intentionally limited, that's the message that we're sending, with the capabilities of the American military nearly unlimited,' he told reporters. 'So Iran, in that sense, has a choice.' Rising writes for the Associated Press.
Politico
39 minutes ago
- Politico
Rep. Jim Himes warns Iran strike could lead to ‘dead soldiers and sailors'
Connecticut Rep. Jim Himes, the ranking member on the House Intelligence Committee, warned on Sunday that President Donald Trump's decision to strike Iran could lead to a 'worst-case scenario' that draws the U.S. into another prolonged conflict in the Middle East. Himes, a Democrat, told host Jonathan Karl on ABC's 'This Week' the Iran strike is a 'massive, massive gamble' that could embroil the nation in an overseas conflict similar to previous U.S. military operations in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya. 'We've seen this movie before,' Himes said, referencing the ascension of the Taliban in Afghanistan following the U.S. withdrawal in 2021 after maintaining a military presence in the country for 20 years. Himes outlined the 'worst-case scenario' as the possibility that Iran suffered minimal damage to its nuclear facilities and strikes back at U.S. military personnel leading to 'dead soldiers and sailors in the region.' On Sunday, Chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine said the U.S. inflicted 'severe damage' on the three Iranian nuclear sites it targeted, but added it was too soon to determine whether Iran still possessed nuclear capabilities. When asked if it's possible that Trump's strike on Iran would result in a best-case scenario, Himes conceded there is 'some chance' of a positive outcome. 'But if you look at the history — and again, all we have is history to go on, if you look at the history of our military involvements in the region, they almost never end with the best-case scenario,' Himes said. 'In fact, they usually end in something approximating the worst-case scenario.' Himes also expressed concern that the strike on Iran could destabilize other nations in the region, inciting further danger to U.S. allies. He highlighted Jordan as an example, citing popular unrest in the country. 'It's not inconceivable that his people may decide, 'Hey, we've had it with you being allied with the Israelis and the United States,'' he said. 'And now we have chaos in Jordan.' Himes reiterated that it may take 'months or years' to determine whether Trump made the right decision in striking Iran, but said it would be 'crazy' to expect the best-case scenario to play out. 'Looking at history, you would be sort of crazy to put all your chips on the best outcome anytime we enter into military conflict in the Middle East,' he said.
Los Angeles Times
42 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Suicide bomber kills at least 9 in Syrian church near Damascus during Mass
DWEILA, Syria — A suicide bomber in Syria on Sunday detonated his explosives inside a church filled with people, killing at least nine, Syrian state media reported. The explosion in Dweila, on the outskirts of Damascus, took place as people were praying inside the Mar Elias Church. The state-run Syrian Arab News Agency, or SANA, citing the Health Ministry, said that at least 15 others were wounded. The Britain-based war monitor the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights says there were 30 casualties, but it did not give exact numbers of dead and wounded. Some local media reports said that children were among the casualties. The attack was the first of its kind in Syria in years and comes as Damascus under its de facto Islamist rule is trying to win the support of minorities. As President Ahmad al-Sharaa struggles to exert authority across the country, there have been concerns about the presence of sleeper cells of extremist groups in the war-torn country. No group immediately claimed responsibility Sunday, but the Syrian Interior Ministry said an extremist from the Islamic State group entered the church and fired at the people there before detonating an explosives vest. Some witness testimonies supported that account. A witness who identified himself as Rawad told the Associated Press he saw the attacker, who was accompanied by two others who fled as he was driving near the church. 'He was shooting at the church. … He then went inside the church and blew himself up,' he said. Syrian Information Minister Hamza Mostafa condemned the bombing, calling it a terrorist attack. 'This cowardly act goes against the civic values that brings us together,' he said in a post on X. 'We will not back down from our commitment to equal citizenship … and we also affirm the state's pledge to exert all its efforts to combat criminal organizations and to protect society from all attacks threatening its safety.' Security forces and first responders rushed to the church. Panicked survivors wailed; one woman fell to her knees and burst into tears. A photo circulated by SANA showed the church's pews covered in debris and blood. Shaheen and Chehayeb write for the Associated Press and reported from Dweila and Beirut, respectively.
