US visa policy and rise of new academic orders
President Donald Trump's second-term administration has embarked on a dramatic overhaul of the US foreign student visa regime, signaling a new phase in the country's immigration and education policy. These changes, announced over the first half of 2025, represent the most extensive rollback in decades of America's role as the global leader in higher education. From suspending new visas for certain universities, including a brief ban targeting Harvard, to implementing sweeping social media surveillance, the administration has shown a clear intent to politicise and securitise student inflows. What was once a meritocratic and relatively open system has now become fraught with ideological scrutiny and administrative unpredictability, transforming the landscape of global higher education and prompting shifts that could redefine international academic mobility for years to come.
In June 2025, the Trump administration issued a proclamation temporarily barring new F, M, and J visas for students attending institutions deemed non-cooperative or ideologically problematic, with Harvard being controversially singled out. The justification cited concerns over national security, political activism, and infiltration by hostile actors. This move was paired with the rollout of aggressive new vetting procedures that compel foreign applicants to disclose social media handles and online activities, with discretionary visa rejections being issued for applicants expressing views contrary to what is now labelled 'American constitutional values.' Students from China, particularly in STEM fields, have been disproportionately affected, with additional scrutiny being directed at those with links to Chinese government-affiliated institutions. Similarly, pro-Palestinian activism has been flagged by visa officers as a potential basis for denial or revocation.
These developments have introduced a chilling effect among aspiring international students. The US, long considered the apex destination for higher learning, innovation, and research collaboration, is no longer viewed as a predictable or safe environment by a growing number of students and their families. Universities in the US are already experiencing a downturn in international applications, with early 2025 data showing declines in graduate STEM enrollments from key countries such as India, China, and South Korea. Academic institutions reliant on foreign students for tuition revenue and research output are sounding alarms about future financial instability and diminished global competitiveness. Top-tier US universities face mounting legal challenges against the administration's policies, but the political messaging has been unmistakable: Foreign students are now a strategic filter point in America's broader ideological recalibration.
As the US tightens its doors, other nations are positioning themselves to benefit from this vacuum. Canada has enhanced its immigration-to-education pipeline, streamlining pathways for international students to attain permanent residency. Australian universities have revived aggressive outreach programmes, while the United Kingdom, in its post-Brexit realignment, is offering more flexible visa norms and post-study work options. Germany, the Netherlands, Ireland, and Scandinavian countries are scaling up English-language graduate programmes, many with substantially lower tuition costs and a less adversarial immigration regime. These countries are not merely alternative destinations; they are increasingly perceived as stable, inclusive, and academically dynamic, providing an environment of intellectual freedom and cross-cultural engagement that is no longer guaranteed in the US.
India, in particular, is uniquely positioned to gain from the evolving global realignment of educational flows. As a major source of international students and a rising knowledge economy, India can leverage the moment to become both a sending and receiving hub. Indian students, who traditionally gravitated toward American universities for STEM and management studies, are now exploring options in Europe and Asia. Meanwhile, India's top-tier institutions such as the IITs, IIMs, and new central universities can attract talent from neighboring countries and the Global South by promoting transnational academic programs, English-language instruction, and competitive research opportunities. The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 already envisions India as a global study destination, and this geopolitical opening provides the momentum to actualise that vision. Furthermore, as Indian diaspora students face uncertainty abroad, New Delhi can deepen its education diplomacy and build new regional education corridors aligned with its strategic interests in South Asia and the Indo-Pacific.
This moment also signals a potential shift in the geography of elite academia. For over a century, the Ivy League has functioned as a quasi-sacred brand in global education combining prestige, wealth, and influence. Yet prestige is not immutable. As US universities become embroiled in political policing and uncertainty, top students and faculty may pivot toward emerging centers of academic excellence. Universities in Canada, Australia, Germany, and Singapore are already attracting scholars with robust funding, transparent governance, and academic freedom. Institutions such as the University of Toronto, ETH Zurich, the University of Melbourne, and the National University of Singapore are being considered serious alternatives to their American counterparts, particularly for research-intensive programmes.
While it is difficult to replicate the financial endowments and alumni networks of Ivy League institutions overnight, global alternatives are maturing rapidly. These universities are developing their brand equity through Nobel-calibre research, global partnerships, and diaspora-driven innovation. Some countries are even pursuing the creation of transnational education cities such as Education City in Qatar or the Knowledge Hub in Egypt designed to host world-class institutions under one roof. Over the next decade, these emerging ecosystems may not just rival, but in some cases outpace the traditional Ivy League in specific fields such as artificial intelligence, clean energy, and public health.
Other nations, particularly those with stable democratic systems and global academic ambitions, are rising to fill the void. They stand to gain not only economically, but in soft power and human capital. India, with its vast educational network and strategic positioning, can also emerge as both a beneficiary and a bridge in this realignment. And as new academic superclusters gain ground globally, the mythos of the Ivy League will increasingly share the stage with new contenders. The US, once the undisputed beacon of global scholarship, is now at risk of becoming just another gatekeeper in a world where academic excellence knows no borders.
This article is authored by Gunwant Singh, scholar, international relations and security studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Los Angeles Dodgers spark outrage after blocking Donald Trump-backed ICE agents from stadium access
Los Angeles Dodgers spark outrage after blocking Donald Trump-backed ICE agents from stadium access (Image via Getty) On June 19, a daring action thrust the Los Angeles Dodgers into the national limelight as they barred federal ICE agents, associated with a Trump endorsed immigration enforcement effort, from Dodger Stadium. The impromptu showdown elicited a wave of responses online and among activists in the streets of Los Angeles. What happened in front of the stadium and why are some fans cheering the action? Los Angeles Dodgers refuse entry to ICE agents at Dodger Stadium on June 19 On June 19, 2025, early morning, a fleet of unmarked vans carrying ICE agents linked to Donald Trump 's administration pulled up near Dodger Stadium. The agents sought permission to access the parking lots but were told 'no' by the Dodgers organization. Within minutes, dozens of protestors who oppose immigration raids gathered outside the gates in response. While ICE later denied being there, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) clarified the vehicles belonged to Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and were not on enforcement duty. The Dodgers president Stan Kasten confirmed the team's stance on X (formerly Twitter), stating the request was official and the team denied access. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Seniors Born 1941-1979 Receive 55 Benefits This Month if They Ask WalletJump Learn More Undo Los Angeles police then facilitated a safe departure for agents amid the crowd presence. Los Angeles Dodgers face public reaction and political pressure after bold action The decision shocked many. Fans and public officials weighed in loudly. California Governor Gavin Newsom praised the Dodgers for opposing raids that threaten immigrant communities. Dodgers player Kiké Hernández also spoke out, calling the enforcement 'wrong for our city' on X. Conversely, critics questioned the team's stance, asking if sports venues should mix with politics. Also Read: Dodgers' Andy Pages Accuses Dylan Cease Of Intentionally Hitting Him With 98 MPH Pitch The incident sparked debate across social platforms like Reddit's r/law and X, where users shared memes such as 'Ice has been run off' to highlight the blow to the Trump-aligned ICE agency. Some argue the Dodgers are setting a national example, while others say they overstepped. This development comes amid a wave of anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles since June 6, following a surge in raids under President Trump's directives. For the Dodgers, who have a large Latino fan base, today's move not only showed solidarity but also amplified questions about public venues' roles in political and community issues. Game On Season 1 kicks off with Sakshi Malik's inspiring story. Watch Episode 1 here
The Hindu
34 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Left stages protest in Ballari condemning attacks on Palestine and Iran
On the occasion of National Communal Harmony Day, various Left parties staged a protest in front of the Deputy Commissioner's office in Ballari, condemning the 'imperialist aggression' against Palestine and Iran. The demonstration strongly denounced the alleged massacre being carried out by Israel in Gaza with the support of the United States, as well as the recent bombing of Iran. Protesters urged the Indian government to oppose the war-mongering policies of the United States and Israel and to adopt an unequivocal anti-war stance. Addressing the gathering, district secretary of SUCI(C) S. Radhakrishna Upadhya said that creating conflict zones across the globe to sell arms and increase profits is the business model of American capitalists. 'U.S. President Donald Trump represents these capitalist interests. Facing an economic crisis, the United States seeks revival through artificial means like war. To counter this war-hungry agenda of America, Israel and other imperialist nations, global anti-war and workers movements must be intensified to push back against imperialist designs,' he said. CPI(M) district secretary Satyababu stated that Israel, emboldened by U.S. support, has been conducting barbaric bombing campaigns on Gaza for the past two years, violating ceasefire agreements. 'Schools, hospitals, and mosques have been targeted and over 55,000 Palestinian civilians, including a large number of women and children, have been killed. Now, it has launched airstrikes on Iran, killing several 'key figures',' he said. Veteran trade union leader T.G. Vitthal remarked that the BJP-led Union government aligned itself with the interests of the U.S. and Israel, thereby undermining India's anti-imperialist legacy rooted in the freedom movement. Many labour leaders, including Pramod, A. Devadas, Chandra Kumari, Guru Murthy, Somashekhar Gowda, Shanta, Nagarathna and Hanumappa, participated in the agitation.
News18
34 minutes ago
- News18
Pakistan, Bangladesh-based Social Media Accounts Boosting Assam Congress' Online, Says Himanta
Last Updated: Assam CM alleges over 5,000 foreign-run social media accounts are backing state Congress. Assam chief minister Himanta Biswa Sarma on Friday alleged that over 5,000 social media accounts run from Pakistan and Bangladesh and other Islamic nations are boosting the online presence of the state Congress unit. 'It is surprising that they do not comment on or like posts by Rahul Gandhi or even the Indian National Congress. They are only focused on a particular leader and the Assam Congress," Sarma was quoted as saying by news agency PTI. Himanta Biswa Sarma did not name the Assam Congress leader in question, but it appeared he was referring to Gaurav Gogoi, who took charge as the Assam Pradesh Congress Committee president in the last week of May. The Assam CM claimed that social media accounts from 47 countries, mostly from Pakistan and Bangladesh, have been unusually focused on Gogoi's activities and the state Congress unit's recent moves. He said this is the first time he saw 'so much foreign involvement in Assam politics". 'We are not concerned with the change in the party's leadership in the state, but this development has taken place in the last month and there must be some link. For the first time, there is so much foreign involvement in Assam politics in the run-up to the 2026 assembly elections," Sarma said. He said the issue is related to 'national security" and added that the government is not ruling out that 'some of the accounts may be from within the state". Sarma then revealed that he has 'ordered a forensic audit" of the accounts while pointing out that some of the 5,000 accounts are being run with their location marked as Guwahati. He also said these social media accounts, apart from posting about Assam politics, are also reportedly sharing content linked to Islamic fundamentalist causes, including pro-Palestine messaging, Iranian narratives and statements by Bangladesh's chief advisor Mohammad Yunus. He said a forensic audit revealed that 700 of the accounts originated from Bangladesh, 350 from Pakistan, 246 from Saudi Arabia, 86 from Kuwait and 35 from Afghanistan. First Published:
