UNIRAJ result 2025: Rajasthan University announces semester exam results for BSc, BA courses: Check direct link to download here
The
University of Rajasthan
(UNIRAJ) has announced the results for the 2025 semester examinations for undergraduate courses including Bachelor of Arts (BA) and Bachelor of Science (BSc). Students who appeared for the first and third semester exams can now check their results online through the official result portal — result.uniraj.ac.in.
With the results now available, students can review their performance, plan for future semesters, and take necessary steps for revaluation or further academic processes, if required. The university will release official mark sheets in due course.
How to check UNIRAJ results
2025?
Students should follow these steps to access their semester scores:
Visit the official results portal: result.uniraj.ac.in
Look for the link titled 'BA/BSc 1st & 3rd Semester Results 2025'
Enter your Roll Number and Date of Birth (or other required details)
Click Submit to view the result
Download and print the provisional marksheet for records and future use
Direct link to download UNIRAJ results 2025
Official mark sheets will be provided by the colleges at a later date.
What is mentioned in UNIRAJ scorecards?
The following details will be mentioned in the
Rajasthan University
result scorecards:
Student's name
Parents' names
Roll number
Category
Course
Semester
Subject wise marks obtained
Overall percentage
Pass status
Students who did not pass in one or two subjects or scored below expectations will have the opportunity to reappear for those exams in the following academic year. The results for the BA, BSc, and BCom examinations conducted in April 2025 are expected to be released next. Once announced, the result links will be made available on the official website — uniraj.ac.in.
Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
2 days ago
- Hindustan Times
Changes in engineering admission rules announced, institutional admissions to follow merit
Jun 21, 2025 08:52 AM IST MUMBAI: The department of higher and technical education on Friday officially announced the long-awaited changes to the engineering admission process. Representative photo (by AP) (Brandon-Gudenius-University-of-Maryland-engineering-student-measures-underneath-part-of-a-helicopter-blade-in-Baltimore-AP) As per the new rules, there will now be four Centralised Admission Process (CAP) rounds instead of three. Additionally, institutional-level admissions will only take place after all four CAP rounds and be strictly based on merit. For the first time, students can also apply for institutional admission through the CET Cell portal if a college refuses their application. Vinod Mohitkar, director of the directorate of technical education, provided detailed information about these updated rules. He clarified that these changes would apply not just to engineering but also to all unaided private professional courses across Maharashtra.
Time of India
6 days ago
- Time of India
Exposing Systemic Flaws: The Sinking of MSC ELSA-3 and Its Lessons for Global Shipping, ET Infra
Advt Advt By , ETInfra On Saturday, May 24 around 1.30 p.m., container ship MSC ELSA-3 was just 38 nautical miles off the coast of Kochi when it developed a list or tilt to one side due to flooding in one of its holds, prompting a distress call from the ship's Captain Alexander Ivanov , a Russian call triggered panic among the authorities and as the news spread, the maritime and fishermen community feared the the 640 containers the ship carried (some of which had already fallen into the Arabian Sea due to the listing), 12 were loaded with calcium carbide, a hazardous chemical known for its violent reaction with water. In its tanks, the ship had 367.1 metric tonnes of very low sulphur fuel oil and 84.4 metric tonnes of oil/hazardous chemical spill would be disastrous for the environment and coastal communities apart from the expensive clean limited capacity to mount a coordinated emergency response and the absence of Tier 1 oil spill and salvage capacity in Indian ports such as Cochin, where the ship was headed, played on the minds of the authorities as the day wore on and the ship listed dangerously to Cochin Port Authority did not even have ocean going tugs or oil spill response units to assist the oil or chemical spill response equipment from abroad (nearest being Singapore and Bahrain) can take anywhere between 24 to72 hours, a delay that could prove the morning of Sunday, May 25, the ship capsized and sank in one of the biggest shipping disasters on the Indian the authorities scampered to get details of the ship to pin responsibility for the next course of action and check environmental hazards, they encountered, first-hand, what is regarded as one of the most opaque and under-regulated dimensions of global maritime commerce: the fragmented ownership, registration, management, and manning structures that define global shipping operations from being an anomaly or an isolated incident, the ship's convoluted configuration is emblematic of a deliberate design that prioritizes legal insulation over the 28-year-old container ship went down, it was flying the flag of Liberia - a classic Flag of Convenience ( FoC ) choice known for minimal regulatory intervention. A Flag of Convenience (FoC) or open registry is a business practice whereby a ship owner registers a vessel in the ship register of a country other than that of his own. The FoC regime does not levy any tax on ship owners but charge an annual amount based on the gross registered tonnage (GRT) of a ELSA-3's Liberian registry was only the beginning of a deeper maze. The vessel is owned by a German company, chartered on a slot-sharing basis by Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A., the world's biggest container line headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland and managed operationally by a firm based in Cyprus. The ship classification responsibilities were assigned to the French classification society Bureau Veritas (ship classification societies such as BV certifies a ship for its sea worthiness), while the ship was manned by a multinational crew comprising seafarers from Russia, Philippines, Ukraine, and other complex matrix of international ownership and management represents a microcosm of jurisdictional detachment that bedevils modern day implications of this web of opaque configuration are enormous. When the MSC ELSA-3 capsized and sank, it became virtually impossible to pin down a single point of liability or even a coherent chain of operational command. The flag state, Liberia, declined to participate in the investigation. The classification society that had certified the ship as seaworthy only months prior was not accountable for oversight failures. The German ship owner has maintained a legal distance through limited liability constructs. The manager in Cyprus held operational control, but not ultimate legal liability. MSC, the container shipping behemoth, claimed only a commercial interest through chartering of the fragmented control structure – typical of FoC regimes – obstructs clear liability and limits enforceability. The flag state's (Liberia) refusal, in writing, to participate in the post-incident investigation exemplifies the dilution of responsibility that FoC registration extreme fragmentation of responsibility is not accidental; it is engineered. It allows shipowners and charterers to dilute exposure to environmental damage claims, labour violations, tax liabilities, and safety lapses. In the case of MSC ELSA-3, this is further evidenced by the vessel's documented history of frequent name changes and ship registry shifts. From ' CSAV Barcelona ' to 'TMM Hidalgo' to ' Delmas Tourville ' to 'Jan Richter' to 'MSC ELSA-3', the ship had changed its identity at least ten times in less than two decades. Each change of name, flag, or manager coincided with opportunities to shed liability, evade scrutiny, or reposition under a more favourable regulatory practices, while not illegal, are at odds with the principles of transparency and responsibility embedded in the global maritime regulatory framework. The International Maritime Organization (IMO), the United Nations agency that regulates global shipping, has long promoted uniform safety and environmental standards, but in reality, fragmented governance severely weakens container ship had a history of deficiencies, the most recent of which were detected at Tuticorin Port in a ship like MSC ELSA-3, legally registered in Liberia, owned by a German company, managed from Cyprus, classed with a French entity, operated from the Mediterranean, and manned by a multilingual crew, suffers a major casualty, coastal states like India are left to manage the colossal crisis involving a clean-up costing hundreds of crores with minimal issue is compounded by the lack of mandatory public disclosure on beneficial ownership, the actual role of commercial operators in daily navigation decisions, and the operational influence of ship managers. Even in cases where insurers such as the Protection and Indemnity (P&I) Clubs (third party liability underwriters) are involved, jurisdictional complications and multi-layered contracting structures delay compensation, investigation, and India is to protect its coast, trade routes, and maritime environment, it must challenge this structural opacity. Ships calling at Indian ports must be subjected to stricter requirements on transparency in ownership, crew composition, and management accountability. India must also push the IMO for reforms mandating full disclosure of beneficial ownership, enhanced flag state obligations, and clearer delineation of managerial versus operational control MSC ELSA-3 was not just a casualty of rough seas or human error. It was the predictable outcome of a system designed to divide responsibility to the point of disappearance. If left unchecked, this model will continue to shift the consequences of maritime failures onto states and communities least equipped to bear them. It is time for coastal nations to reclaim regulatory authority over ships that enter their waters, regardless of the paper trail they carry.
Indian Express
14-06-2025
- Indian Express
CISCE Class 10th ICSE, 12th ISC 2025 improvement exam time tables out
The Council for the Indian School Certificate Examinations (CISCE) which administers the Indian Certificate of Secondary Education (ICSE) Class 10 and Indian School Certificate (ISC) Class 12 annual exams, on June 13 announced the exam dates for the 2025 improvement exams. The ICSE Class 10 and ISC Class 12 exams will be held from July 1. The detailed time table is available on the official website – The Class 10 exams will begin with English language – English paper 1 and environmental science on the first day of exam. The Class 10 ICSE exam will conclude on July 14. The Class 12 exams will start with the mathematics, environmental science, sociology and legal studies papers. The Class 12 exams will end on July 17. In the ICSE and ISC improvement exams, candidates will be given the opportunity to improve their marks and grades. Candidates are allowed to appear in a maximum of two subjects. The ISC Class 12 exams were started on February 13, 2025, and concluded on April 5, 2025. The ICSE Class 10 exams started on February 18 and ended on March 27, 2025. The CISCE results for both classes were declared on April 30. The ICSE Class 10 exam was conducted in 67 written subjects, of which 20 were Indian languages 14 were foreign languages and one was a classical language. The ISC Class 12 exam was conducted in 47 written subjects, 12 of them Indian languages, four foreign languages and two classical languages. A total of 2,52,557 students from 2,803 schools took the Class 10 exams, of which 2,308 students could not clear the exams. Out of 1,184 students who had learning difficulties such as dyslexia, 112 have scored above 90 per cent. 13 out of 48 visually challenged candidates scored above 90 per cent. The western region has achieved the best pass percentage in Class 10 exams at 99.83 per cent, followed by the southern region with a pass percentage of 99.73 per cent. In the class 10 exams, the pass percentage of girls stood at 99.45 per cent while that of boys was marginally lower at 98.64 per cent. In the ISC Class 12 exams, there were 99,551 students from 1,460 schools, and 973 of them could not clear the test. Girls performed better than boys in class 12 too, with girls' pass percentage at 99.45 per cent and boys' pass percentage at 98.64 per cent. Among the 257 otal students with learning difficulties who appeared for the Class 12 exams, 29 students scored above 90 per cent. Six out of 17 visually challenged candidates scored above 90 per cent. The southern region has the best pass percentage at 99.76 per cent in class 12 results, followed by the western region with a pass percentage of 99.72 per cent. The CISCE in 2024 discontinued compartment exams. Instead, they introduced the re-evaluation of answer scripts and improvement exams for students who wish to improve their marks in the same year of the examination. The CISCE improvement exams can be taken in a maximum of two subjects.
