Deputy CM Pawan Kalyan warns anti-socials, trouble mongers
VIJAYAWADA: Deputy Chief Minister Pawan Kalyan has issued a stern warning to individuals and groups attempting to disrupt law and order in the State.
Underlining the importance of upholding democratic values, he said the government will not tolerate any actions or rhetoric that undermine peace and security.
Mentioning recent developments, Pawan Kalyan said the coalition government has already instructed the police to act firmly against anti-social elements. 'We will not spare anyone who creates fear among the public. Rowdy sheets will be opened against such individuals, and strong measures will be taken to control their unlawful activities,' he asserted.
Taking a dig at provocative statements made by some individuals, he said, 'Dialogues in films are effective within the cinema hall, but applying them in real life against the law is not acceptable in a democracy. Everyone must respect the law and the Constitution.'
He urged citizens to remain vigilant against those who speak in support of disruptive forces. 'People should be cautious of those promoting undemocratic ideas. Supporting anti-social elements or defending their actions is also a punishable offence,' he warned.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Row between Raj Bhavan and Kerala govt. over Bharat Mata portrait escalates
The row between Raj Bhavan and the Kerala government over the former's use of an image of Bharat Mata sitting astride a lion and holding a saffron flag, arguably a symbol of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), at the official State functions hosted by the Raj Bhavan appeared to escalate on Saturday (June 21, 2025). On Saturday, despite protests from the government that the Raj Bhavan's use of the picture of Bharat Mata with the saffron flag at constitutional offices or State events was a mockery of the national flag and the Constitution, Kerala Governor Rajendra Vishwanath Arlekar began the International Yoga Day celebrations by lighting a lamp in front of the very same garlanded picture, making it clear that his idea of patriotism aligned with the image of Bharat Mata with the saffron flag. On Thursday when the General Education Minister, V. Sivankutty, had walked out of an official function at the Raj Bhavan, protesting over the use of Bharat Mata picture at the State function, Mr. Arlekar had stood his ground, ruling out the removal of the picture from the Raj Bhavan's Central hall, the customary venue of official events. Following this, ABVP workers as well as SFI activists had taken out separate protests in the city, with the former showing the black flag at Mr. Sivankutty, while the SFI marched to the Raj Bhavan shouting slogans against Mr. Arlekar violating constitutional propriety. However, the BJP, which had thrown a surprise by posting a picture of Bharat Mata with the national flag in place of the saffron flag on an official Facebook post, did a volte face on Saturday. In an endorsement of the Raj Bhavan, it organised a programme at the Secretariat gate in the morning, with senior BJP leader V. Muraleedharan garlanding a picture of Bharat Mata with the saffron flag and lighting a lamp in front of it. This is the second day that the row over the saffron flag and Bharat Mata is spilling onto the streets. The Centre of Indian Trade Unions (CITU) is also marching to the Raj Bhavan later in the day to protest against the Governor's continued use of RSS imagery to depict the country as a Hindu nation Meanwhile, All Kerala Private College Teachers' Association (AKPCTA), said in a statement here that the Raj Bhavan should not be treated as a museum to display Sangh Parivar symbols. It said that it was highly objectionable that the picture of Bharat Mata with the saffron flag was being repeatedly used by the Raj Bhavan even at the Scouts and Guides events. The CPI(M)'s official mouthpiece, Deshabhimani, also used its editorial on Saturday to condemn the Governor and to proclaim that he cannot turn the Raj Bhavan into an office of the RSS. Meanwhile, Congress leader Cherian Philip issued a statement here that the position of the Governor was 'a worthless remnant' of the colonial age and that the post was a refuge for politicians who have lost their foothold on the ground. The continued disputes between the Raj Bhavan and the government was heading for a governance crisis, he added.
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Two-day workshop on Indian Constitution begins in Shivamogga
Justice H.N. Nagamohan Das, chairperson of the one-man commission on the internal reservation of Scheduled Castes, has stressed the need for preparing activists to spread the significance of the Indian Constitution. Speaking at the inauguration of a two-day workshop on the Indian Constitution in Shivamogga on Saturday, Mr. Das said that understanding the essence of the Constitution was important for the progress of all in society. 'No matter who rules the country, we should ensure they rule as per the Constitution. I firmly believe that we can resolve many of our problems and achieve progress if we tread the path shown by the Constitution,' he said. Elaborating on the Samvidhana Odu, a campaign launched in 2018, he said that he had addressed hundreds of gatherings over the past few years, spreading the importance of the Indian Constitution. 'I have addressed at least 2,000 meetings in the last five years. However, I cannot reach the entire State in my lifetime. Hence, my team and I decided to conduct workshops in district centres so that we prepare people who can take the message further to rural areas,' Mr. Das said. He called upon the activists who participated in the workshop to engage actively in the campaign and spread the importance of the Constitution. Minister for School Education Madhu Bangarappa said that as a student he hardly studied about the Indian Constitution. However, after becoming a Minister, he made reciting of the Preamble of the Constitution compulsory in all schools. 'The initiative will help us a great deal in the coming days,' he said. Highlighting teachers' vacancies in government schools, Mr. Madhu Bangarappa appealed to Justice Nagamohan Das to clear the issue of internal reservation at the earliest so that his department could recruit teachers. 'There are 51,000 vacancies in our department. We are preparing to recruit around 18,000 teachers. We will do it as soon as the reservation is finalised,' he said. Sharath Ananthamurthy, Vice-Chancellor of Kuvempu University said that many among the youth had misunderstood the reservation policy. 'There is a need for debate on reservation in colleges and universities and address the misunderstanding. The students should be told about the importance of reservation and the actual meaning of merit,' he said. Deputy Commissioner Gurudatta Hegde, Zilla Panchayat Chief Executive Officer N. Hemanth, advocate K.P. Sripal and others were present.
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Blinded by devotion to power and her son
Wednesday is the 50th anniversary of Indira Gandhi's Emergency. Her most authoritative and profound biographer, Srinath Raghavan, whose book Indira Gandhi and the Years That Transformed India is published this month, believes the Emergency was 'the single most traumatic experience in independent India's political history'. Today let's remind ourselves of how terrible it was. The truth is, as Srinath Raghavan's book points out, Indira Gandhi never thought very highly of democracy The cold facts of the Emergency are chilling; 34,988 people were detained under the Maintenance of Internal Security Act whilst 75,818 were arrested under the Defence of India rules; practically the entire Opposition was jailed; the press was censored; the Constitution brutally amended; and even the judiciary accepted that the right to life had been suspended. At the height of the Emergency, LK Advani wrote in his diary that Indian democracy was over and done with. At the time, most people would have agreed with him. There can be little doubt that the Emergency was declared to protect Gandhi's political career after the Allahabad High Court struck down her election and the Supreme Court only gave her a conditional stay. Her claim that it was necessary because the Opposition was trying to paralyse the government and Jayaprakash Narayan had called on the Army and the police to disobey orders was just a trumped-up excuse. Raghavan believes the actual declaration of the Emergency on June 25, 1975 was 'a coup d'etat'. First, under the Constitution there can only be one emergency at a time and in 1975 there was already an external emergency going back to the Bangladesh war of 1971. Second, under Article 352, the President can only proclaim an emergency on the written recommendation of the council of ministers. President Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed didn't wait for that. He did it at the Prime Minister's personal request. Third, the mass arrests and the cutting of power to newspaper establishments on the night of June 25 /26 'had no legal basis and were done entirely at the behest of the Prime Minister'. At this point let's ask if Indira Gandhi was justified in claiming there was an 'imminent threat to the security of India'? The Intelligence Bureau had not submitted any such report nor did the state governments convey such information to the Union home ministry. So, did Indira Gandhi make up and manufacture this alleged internal threat? It seems like it. The truth is, as Raghavan's book points out, Indira Gandhi never thought very highly of democracy. She once wrote to the violinist Yehudi Menuhin: 'Democracy is not an end. It is merely a system by which one proceeds towards the goal. Hence democracy cannot be more important than the progress, unity or survival of the country.' Most people remember the Emergency for the two campaigns it is closely associated with – sterilisation and slum clearance. Both had at their head Gandhi's younger son, Sanjay. And both destroyed the credibility of the Emergency and Gandhi's personal reputation. Yet so dependent was Indira Gandhi on Sanjay that she was blind to this. She's even on record claiming he was like an elder brother. Certainly, she considered him her strongest and most loyal supporter after the Allahabad High Court verdict. As her principal secretary, PN Haksar, points out: 'She was absolutely blind as far as that boy was concerned.' To everyone's astonishment, in January 1977 Indira Gandhi called elections even though they weren't due for another year. It led to the collapse of her rule and the end of the Emergency. Did she do it because she thought she could win and legitimise the Emergency? Or was this a way of accepting it was a mistake and getting off the tiger's back? The truth is Indira Gandhi never apologised for the Emergency nor accepted it was a mistake. She only regretted aspects of it which she considered excesses. Asked by Paul Brass on March 26, 1978: 'Would you have done anything differently in relation to the Emergency?', her answer began with the word 'No'. It couldn't have been more pointed. Karan Thapar is the author of Devil's Advocate: The Untold Story. The views expressed are personal
