GM plans $4 billion push to move production from Mexico to US
General Motors Co. plans to invest $4 billion to move production from Mexico to three plants in the United States, including its Orion Assembly Plant in suburban Detroit, three sources familiar with the situation told The Detroit News.
Full-size SUVs and light-duty pickups are coming to Orion, which was being retooled to build electric trucks before market demand waned. The gas-powered Equinox compact SUV is slated for Fairfax, Kansas. And the gas-powered Blazer, controversial when it was launched at a GM plant in Mexico, will be produced in Spring Hill, Tennessee, the sources confirmed.
After The Detroit News contacted GM Tuesday afternoon about the developments, the automaker posted details on its website.
"We believe the future of transportation will be driven by American innovation and manufacturing expertise," GM CEO Mary Barra said in a statement. "Today's announcement demonstrates our ongoing commitment to build vehicles in the U.S and to support American jobs. We're focused on giving customers choice and offering a broad range of vehicles they love."
The move is partly driven by increased demand for high-profit SUVs and partly an effort to limit exposure to pricey import tariffs enacted by President Donald Trump. His goal: to force a manufacturing renaissance in the industrial heartland and beyond. When GM announced plans to reopen Orion in 2022, the state estimated the project would create 2,300 jobs and retain 1,000.
GM's manufacturing reshoring is likely to be considered a major victory for Trump's trade-and-tariffs policy - and could be a harbinger of additional moves by manufacturers foreign and domestic. The move likely ranks among the largest - if not the largest - reshoring of U.S. auto manufacturing since Trump took office for a second term.
Reshoring American auto jobs has been a longstanding promise from Trump, on the campaign trail in Michigan and during his two stints in the Oval Office. Since returning to Washington in January, Trump has used tariff policies to up pressure on automakers to locate more of their production in the United States.
"We give them a little bit of time before we slaughter them if they don't do this," Trump said during an April visit to Macomb County to mark the first 100 days of his second term.
That evening, Trump also announced that he planned to offer "partial tariff rebates" for about two years to companies that assemble cars in the United States. He had previously planned to impose a 25% tariff on foreign auto parts to take effect in May. He said the new rebates would provide a "little bit of a flexibility."
The Republican president, separately, has also enacted a 25% tariff on all imported vehicles and auto parts from Canada and Mexico that do not comply with the countries' U.S.-Mexico-Canada free trade agreement.
He granted the USMCA exemption after intense lobbying and direct conversations with leaders of the Detroit Three automakers. The companies warned of dire consequences from disrupting North America's highly interconnected automotive supply chain, with Michigan likely to suffer the most.
Last month, GM announced an $888 million investment in V-8 propulsion engines at the company's Tonawanda Propulsion plant in Buffalo, New York. At the time, CEO Mary Barra said the massive capital infusion shows "our commitment to strengthening American manufacturing and supporting jobs in the U.S."
GM last month amended its guidance for the year to include tariff exposure of $4 billion to $5 billion, although that was before Trump offered some relief to automakers.
Barra had said the company expected to offset tariff costs by about 30% in part by tightening budgeting and moving more supplies and manufacturing to the United States. The Mexico-to-United States shift in production, expected to take effect in 2027, marks a large step toward fulfilling that promise.
GM has said it's increasing full-size, light-duty truck volume at its Fort Wayne Assembly plant in Indiana. And it cited Trump's tariffs in its decision to cut a shift at its Oshawa Assembly plant in Ontario that produces light- and heavy-duty pickups.
GM previously planned to retool the Orion Assembly plant to make electric trucks beginning in mid-2026 after repeatedly delaying production. Orion Assembly, which previously built the all-electric Chevrolet Bolt, was supposed to have EV truck production launch there in late 2024.
GM's Ramos Arizpe, Mexico, production facility makes the Equinox EV, Optiq EV, Blazer and Blazer EV. The San Luis Potosi Assembly makes the Equinox and GMC Terrain, and the Silao Assembly produces the light-duty Silverado and Sierra trucks.
The Blazer's return to the United States comes after a contested hiatus in Mexico. The old full-size model was last built in the United States in a now-shuttered plant in Janesville, Wisconsin. GM in 2018 announced plans to bring back the crossover SUV for production in Ramos Arizpe, Mexico, much to the disappointment of the United Auto Workers.
When GM tried to show off the Blazer at the Tigers' ballpark fountain briefly in 2019, a local television station published a poll asking if viewers agreed with it being highlighted despite being built in Mexico. GM responded by replacing the Blazer with a Chevrolet Traverse.
Stellantis NV has not announced any production moves to the United States because of tariffs. But early this year, within days of Trump taking office, the automaker did recommit to several major U.S. plant investments, including reopening an assembly plant in Illinois, building the next-generation Dodge Durango in Detroit, and making improvements at key Ohio and Indiana facilities.
Those announcements allayed concerns by the UAW that the automaker was ready to move some of that work outside the country. But union officials are pushing for more U.S. plant investment, and have pointed out that Stellantis has available capacity at many of its major facilities.
Chief Financial Officer Doug Ostermann said late last month that the automaker wants to reduce its tariff costs by shifting more of its parts suppliers stateside. In the longer term, he said the company will also explore moving some of its own production.
The automaker imports more than 40% of its annual U.S. sales, and some of its big foreign plants - including in Mexico and Canada - have temporarily paused or cut production due to the tariffs in recent months.
Ford Motor Co. often boasts that 80% of its vehicles for sale in the United States are already built in its home country. And all of its full-size pickups and profit-rich, full-size SUVs are assembled in the United States.
(Staff writer Luke Ramseth contributed.)
Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
27 minutes ago
- The Hill
Netanyahu praises Trump Iran strikes: ‘Peace through strength'
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu thanked President Trump on Saturday for directing U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. 'President Trump and I often say, 'Peace through strength.' First comes strength, then comes peace. And tonight, President Trump and the United States acted with a lot of strength,' Netanyahu said in a video on the social platform X. 'President Trump, I thank you. The people of Israel thank you. The forces of civilization thank you. God bless America. God bless Israel. And may God bless our unshakable Alliance our unbreakable faith,' he continued. Trump announced on Saturday evening that the U.S. had bombed three Iranian nuclear sites and said, 'NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE!' Netanyahu congratulated Trump for making the 'bold decision to target Iran's nuclear facilities with the awesome and righteous might of the United States,' saying it 'will change history.' Netanyahu touted the efforts Israel has made in its strikes against Iran, adding, 'but in tonight's action against Iran's nuclear facilities, America has been truly unsurpassed.' 'It has done what no other country on Earth could do. History will record: President Trump acted to deny the world's most dangerous regime, the world's most dangerous weapons,' the Israeli leader said. 'His leadership today has created a pivot of history that can help lead the Middle East and beyond to a future of prosperity and peace,' he continued, referring to Trump. The announcement of U.S. action against Iran came two days after the White House said Trump would decide whether to get involved in the conflict between Iran and Israel 'in the next two weeks' to give a window for negotiations. White House sources indicated the U.S. had given Israel a heads up before it struck the Iranian sites and that Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke after the strikes. It marked a significant entrance by the U.S. into a conflict that Israel and Iran had been in for more than a week. It also indicated a shift by Trump, who said he was seeking a diplomatic solution with Iran and sent U.S. officials to make a deal with Tehran on its nuclear program.
Newsweek
32 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump's SNAP Benefit Cut Plans Suffer Blow
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A plan by Republicans to shift a portion of federal food stamp costs to state governments suffered a major setback after the Senate parliamentarian found it would violate chamber rules. Why It Matters The blocked provision was an attempt to reduce federal spending on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), affecting more than 40 million low-income Americans who rely on food aid. The shift would have transferred major SNAP costs to the states, requiring them to pay at least 5 percent—and potentially more—of benefit costs, which analysts warned could result in significant cuts to nutrition support. The parliamentarian's decision places additional pressure on the bill's champions to find alternative means to fund tax cuts without imperiling food assistance, Medicaid, or other federal support programs. What To Know The provision, a cornerstone of Republican efforts to offset the costs of President Donald Trump's multitrillion-dollar tax and spending legislation, has been ruled inadmissible under Senate rules, sending GOP leaders scrambling to revise the mega bill. The ruling, issued by Senate parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough, came as the package prepared for a vote. While her opinions are advisory, they are rarely ignored in lawmaking practice. Republican lawmakers are now searching for new savings as they continue to advance Trump's legislative priorities despite the setback. Activists with the Poor People's Campaign protest against spending reductions across Medicaid, food stamps and federal aid in President Donald Trump's spending and tax bill being worked on by Senate Republicans this week, outside the... Activists with the Poor People's Campaign protest against spending reductions across Medicaid, food stamps and federal aid in President Donald Trump's spending and tax bill being worked on by Senate Republicans this week, outside the Supreme Court in Washington D.C. on Monday, June 2, 2025. More J. Scott Applewhite/AP Photo Parliamentarian Ruling and Byrd Rule Compliance MacDonough declared the SNAP cost-sharing plan noncompliant with the chamber's budget reconciliation rules, specifically the Byrd Rule, which bars certain policy measures from being attached to budget bills. The proposal would have shifted billions of dollars in SNAP costs from the federal government to the states, creating a new fiscal obligation for state governments and threatening coverage for millions. House Passes Bill with GOP SNAP Cuts The House passed the broader tax and spending package along party lines in May 2025, including a provision to require states to fund at least 5 percent of SNAP benefits and more for high error rates. The House-passed measure's SNAP provision was projected to save about $128 billion. Republican leaders had hoped these savings would help offset the bill's $4.5 trillion in tax cuts and new spending. Other Key Provisions Beyond SNAP, the package includes an extension and expansion of individual and business tax cuts, new work requirements for Medicaid recipients, cuts to federal health and nutrition programs, increased military and border security funding, and the elimination of taxes on tips for service workers. GOP Paths Forward Republican leaders, including Senate Agriculture Committee Chair John Boozman of Arkansas, said they were exploring options to keep the legislation on track while still delivering savings elsewhere. Options range from modifying the disputed SNAP provision to removing it entirely or risking a procedural vote requiring 60 votes—an unlikely scenario in the current Senate. Impact on SNAP Recipients The plan would have expanded work requirements to older adults (up to age 65), a component that remains in the bill for now. Democrats and anti-hunger advocates warned of significant harm to those in need, with more than 3 million individuals projected to lose food stamp access based on Congressional Budget Office estimates. Additional Rulings Expected The Senate parliamentarian is also expected to rule on other elements in the bill, including limits on immigrant eligibility for nutrition aid and changes to federal agencies, with further decisions likely to shape the final legislation. What People Are Saying Minnesota Senator Amy Klobuchar, the top Democrat on the Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee, said: "We will keep fighting to protect families in need," opposing shifts in SNAP costs to states, which she said would result in significant benefit cuts. Arkansas Senator John Boozman, chair of the Senate Agriculture Committee, said Republicans are "exploring options" to comply with Senate rules, while supporting those reliant on SNAP. What Happens Next Senate Republicans are expected to revise the bill to comply with the parliamentarian's rulings or drop the contested SNAP provisions. Further decisions from the adviser on other elements of the megabill are anticipated before any final Senate vote. This article contains reporting from The Associated Press.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US strikes escalate Israel-Iran conflict as geopolitics overshadow economics: What to know this week
Stocks drifted lower last week as investors continued to digest the impacts of a growing conflict between Israel and Iran while closely watching how President Trump's tariffs could impact the US economy. In the week ahead, geopolitics look set to dominate the conversation. On Saturday, President Trump said the US military struck three sites in Iran, marking the first entry of the US strike since the conflict escalated on June 13. In a speech at the White House on Saturday night, Trump suggested the US could take further action if "peace does not come quickly." The ripple effects of the US' involvement in this broadening conflict will almost certainly set the tone for markets in the early going this week and likely overshadow the latest economic data and earnings reports set for release. Last week, the S&P 500 (^GSPC) fell 0.15%, while the Nasdaq Composite (^IXIC) gained 0.2%. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (^DJI) finished the holiday-shortened trading week narrowly above the flat line. A reading of the Fed's preferred inflation gauge will highlight economic releases in the upcoming week. Updates on activity in the manufacturing and services sectors, consumer confidence, and the final reading of first quarter economic growth are also expected. A two-day semiannual monetary policy testimony from Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell will also be in focus starting on Tuesday. Quarterly results from Carnival Corporation (CCL), FedEx (FDX), Micron (MU), and Nike (NKE) lead the list of expected corporate releases. The conflict between Iran and Israel has been in focus over the past week but hasn't significantly rattled markets yet. This weekend's actions from the US will likely test this dynamic. "The key for equities from here will come from energy commodity pricing," Citi US strategist Scott Chronert wrote in a note to clients on Friday when detailing how the S&P 500 has largely traded flat since the initial missile strike from Israel on June 13. Oil is up roughly 10% since the outbreak of the Israel-Iran conflict, with West Texas Intermediate futures (CL=F) trading hands around $75 per barrel on Friday. As DataTrek Research co-founder Nicholas Colas pointed out in a research note on June 16, the biggest risk for markets would be a large increase in oil prices that would weigh on economic growth. Colas analyzed the time period from 1987 through 2019 and found that WTI crude prices typically double compared to the previous year prior to recessions. Colas argued this puts the key level to watch for WTI crude at $120 a barrel, a far cry from the roughly $75 it sat at on Friday. This much of a jump in oil would require a "protracted bout of military action," per Colas. The Federal Reserve Open Market Committee's June meeting came and went with few surprises. As expected, the central bank didn't move interest rates. And even its forecast for interest rates through the rest of the year didn't move much, with the median forecast projecting 50 basis points of interest rate cuts, or two reductions, coming by the end of 2025. The biggest changes came elsewhere in the Fed's Summary of Economic Projections (SEP) in which the central bank revised up its forecast for inflation while lowering its expectations for economic growth. In sum, strategists and economists agreed the Fed's forecasts showed the potential for"stagflation," where economic growth slows while inflation remains above the Fed's 2% target. But even that outcome had already been heavily discussed amid the tariff whipsaw. With seven officials forecasting no interest rate cuts this year and eight penciling in two cuts, there's clear debate about whether rising inflation or a weakening labor market will drive the Fed's policy decisions over the next few months. "As the data come in, you should see those differences diminish," Powell said. A key data point is set for release in the week ahead, with the May Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) report due out for release on Friday. Economists expect annual "core" PCE — which excludes the volatile categories of food and energy — to have clocked in at 2.6%, up from the 2.5% seen in April. Over the prior month, economists project "core" PCE at 0.1%, unchanged from May. "Overall, this would be a good number for the Fed, but it's hard to take too much signal given the uncertainty tariffs pose around the inflation path," Bank of America US economist Stephen Juneau wrote in a note to clients. The S&P 500 has been near a new record high for weeks now but continuously failed to surpass its Feb. 19 close of 6,144.15. Research from Exhibit A co-founder Matt Cerminaro shows that this is often the case as the S&P 500 chases a new record high following a large drawdown. Cerminaro analyzed each time the S&P 500 has come back to new records following a 20% fall and found that on average, the index takes more than three months to hit a new record high once it's back within 5% of its all-time high. In the current instance, the S&P 500 has only been within 5% of its record high since May 12. Economic data: Chicago Fed activity index, February (-0.14 expected, -0.03 prior); S&P Global US Manufacturing PMI, March preliminary (51.5 expected, 52.7 prior); S&P Global US services PMI, March preliminary (51 expected, 51 prior); S&P Global US Composite PMI, March preliminary (51.6 prior) Earnings: FactSet (FDS), KB Home (KBH) Economic data: FHFA house price index, month over month, January (0.3% expected +0.4 prior); S&P CoreLogic CS 20-city year over year, non-seasonally adjusted, January (4.7% expected, 4.48 prior); Conference Board Consumer Confidence, March (94 expected, 98.3 prior); Richmond Fed manufacturing index, March (6 prior); Earnings: Carnival Corporation (CCL), FedEx (FDX), BlackBerry (BB) Economic data: MBA Mortgage Applications, week ending June 20 (-2.6% prior); New home sales month over month, May (-6.9% expected, +10.9% previously); Building permits month-over-month, May final (-2% prior); Earnings: General Mills (GIS), Jefferies (JEF), Micron (MU), Paychex (PAYX), Winnebago Industries (WGO) Thursday Economic data: First quarter GDP, third revision (-0.2% annualized rate expected, -0.2% previously); First quarter personal consumption, third revision (+1.2% previously); Initial jobless claims, week ended June 21 (247,000 expected, 245,00 previously); Pending home sales month over month, May (0% expected, -6.3% previously); Durable goods orders, May preliminary (+7.5% expected, -6.3% prior); Wholesale inventories, May preliminary (+0.2% prior) Earnings: McCormick (MKC), Nike (NKE), Walgreens Boots Alliance (WBA) Economic data: PCE inflation, month over month, May (+0.1% expected, +0.1% previously); PCE inflation, year over year, May (+2.3% expected, +2.1% previously); "Core" PCE, month over month, May (+0.1% expected, +0.1% previously); "Core" PCE, year over year, May (+2.6% expected; +2.5% previously); University of Michigan consumer sentiment, June final (60.5 expected, 60.5 prior); Kansas City Fed services activity, June (11 prior); Personal income, May (+0.3% expected, +0.8% prior); Peresonal spending, May (+0.2% expected, +0.2% prior) Earnings: No notable earnings releases. Josh Schafer is a reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow him on X @_joshschafer. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
