Micheál pummelled from all sides over Government's latest plan to ease rental crisis
Micheál Martin isn't losing the run of himself as he jets around the globe, rubbing shoulders with world leaders.
He's still just a lad from Turner's Cross who did well for himself above in the Dáil – and anyway, being Taoiseach is a very humbling job.
But at those rare times when he might be in danger of succumbing to notions, Micheál asks himself a simple question: 'What would the king of Jordan say?'
We learned this a little later in Tuesday's proceedings, after he had survived yet another torrid round of Opposition questions on the subject of housing and attention turned to the continuing horror in Gaza.
READ MORE
The Taoiseach prefaced one reply with this memorable line: 'As the king of Jordan said to me ...'
But back to the intractable issue of housing, Micheál was pummelled from all sides over his Government's latest plan to ease the rental crisis.
Thankfully, he had his Minister for Housing there for guidance and moral support, which must have been a comfort. Situated almost by his side, a mere six seats away on the front bench, James Browne was a tower of strength. At one point during Micheál's lengthy grilling at the hands of Mary Lou McDonald, Ivana Bacik, Cian O'Callaghan and Paul Murphy, the Minister even passed him a short note.
This was most dramatic. The Taoiseach had been under pressure over the confusing details of these new proposals which have the twin objectives of further protecting tenants' security while ensuring decent profits for institutional landlords in an effort to get them building again.
James, the man at the epicentre of what everyone in Dáil Éireann agrees is the single biggest issue facing Ireland today, was sandwiched between Minister for Children Norma Foley and Minister for the Arts Patrick O'Donovan. From his exalted pew, he scribbled a few words on a piece of paper and handed it under the ledge to Norma, who passed it underarm to Noel Grealish, who sneaked it to Dara Calleary who slipped it swiftly across the empty seat to his boss.
[
Proposed changes to rent rules will incentivise evictions, housing charity warns
Opens in new window
]
Presumably it was a reminder to Micheál to continue saying the proposed measures 'won't affect existing tenants'. A clear enough statement in that it clearly did nothing to clear up the continuing confusion.
The Taoiseach was doing his level best to convince the chamber he feels good about James Browne's big production number. But he was hampered by a press release sent out by the Minister's department about an hour before the Dáil resumed for the week. Sinn Féin, Labour, the Social Democrats and People Before Profit had copies of it and it seemed to cast huge doubt on the 'won't affect existing tenants' aspect of the plan.
This statement – with pertinent lines highlighted in neon – was waved with abandon at Micheál from across the floor. Time and again he was asked to explain it. He didn't, leading People Before Profit's Paul Murphy to put the question yet again when he grabbed the baton for the last lap and bore down on what he called the Taoiseach's 'incredibly brazen performance'.
Here's the particular detail which had everyone in a tizzy: 'All landlords will have the right to reset rent where the rent is below market at the end of each six-year tenancy.' Paul read it 'very slowly' for the Taoiseach, in case he missed the point when it was made by the three previous speakers.
The TD for Dublin South-West was puzzled – like a lot of people. How could he say sitting tenants will keep their existing 2 per cent/Consumer Price Index rent cap indefinitely when the Minister for Housing has it down in black-and-white that 'all landlords' will have the right to adjust upwards after six years?
'It's not just new landlords, not just big landlords, not just small landlords, but every single landlord. That means it affects existing tenants and new tenants,' said Paul, his Opposition colleagues nodding in agreement.
Maybe the Minister could enlighten him as to the finer details of this policy?
Sinn Féin's Louise O'Reilly chimed in: 'Do you want to phone a friend?'
Micheál was sticking to his guns. He had the note from James in front of him on the ledge. The measure is due to come into effect next March. After that, all new tenants will be subject to the six-year rule, be they students returning after the summer and looking for a place to stay again or renters who left accommodation for whatever reason and are in the market again.
A short time after Leaders' Questions, the housing body Threshold issued a statement giving a qualified welcome to the proposed rental sector reforms. This will have come as some solace to Micheál, who may just have to mention this intervention when the subject comes up again on Wednesday.
Meanwhile, in her contribution, Labour's Ivana Bacik quoted her own housing spokesperson, Conor Sheehan, who had been out on the plinth earlier in the day voicing his reservations about the proposals.
[
Rules for renters: What are the planned reforms and will they work?
Opens in new window
]
She had to agree with him when he said there were 'more holes in the policy announced today than there were in the Titanic'.
Conor has a flair for the dramatic. He also said that renters were 'thrown to the wolves' and 'thrown under a bus' by the Government.
As for the Titanic, wasn't it just one big iceberg-inflicted hole which did the damage?
Almost all Dáil business on Tuesday was taken up with the housing crisis. But during Questions on Policy, the horrendous situation in Gaza was discussed. Ruth Coppinger asked if the Naval Service could be used to deliver humanitarian aid to the stricken population there.
'If 12 activists can go on a ship, how can a professional Navy not do that?'
This wasn't possible, replied the Taoiseach, applauding the crew of the Madleen for their actions. However, its crew acknowledged this was a symbolic gesture.
And then he added: 'As the king of Jordan said to me at the weekend, the people need trucks and trucks of aid. Not drops. They need absolute unimpeded aid going into Gaza at huge scale ...'
The king of Jordan, like.
As you do.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
AG says he cannot help on legal query over Shannon flights that may aid Israel's Gaza war
Attorney General Rossa Fanning has told the Social Democrats that he is not in a position to assist after the party appealed to him to check whether Irish policy on flight inspection at Shannon Airport is consistent with EU customs law. The party's foreign affairs spokeswoman Patricia Stephenson had previously called on the EU anti-fraud watchdog, OLAF, to launch an investigation into the inspection of flights into Shannon which she said may be facilitating Israel's bombardment of Gaza . She also wrote to the Attorney General, along with her party colleague Gary Gannon, asking whether Irish policy is consistent with the State's legal duties under both EU law and the Genocide Convention. In a response, Mr Fanning wrote that while he appreciated the party had written to him 'with the public-spirited concern of conscientious members of the Oireachtas', he was unable to assist as his constitutional role 'does not extend to providing analysis of legal matters to individual members of the Oireachtas'. READ MORE He said that furthermore, 'it would be neither appropriate, nor in accordance with my legal position, for me to act as a conduit in bringing such concerns to the attention of the Government'. [ Ireland seeks 'legal clarity' over Shannon stopover for US deportation flights Opens in new window ] 'As members of the Oireachtas, I trust you will have the opportunity to express to Government directly the concerns you raise in the correspondence to DG TAXUD [Directorate-General for Taxation and Customs Union] and OLAF.' The Social Democrats have said there is credible evidence that military contractors and private aircraft carrying dual-use goods are moving through Irish airspace and Irish territory en route to Israel. Ms Stephenson has previously said that under EU customs law, Ireland is required to carry out risk-based inspections. 'That means prioritising flights operated by arms brokers or those on known weapons trade routes. That's what the law says - and right now, Ireland isn't following it,' she said. [ New aircraft inspection system planned to prevent illegal transport of weapons through Ireland Opens in new window ] Speaking on Friday after receiving the AG's letter, Ms Stephenson said: 'Given the response of the Attorney-General, it's now important that the Taoiseach clarifies if the Irish State is indeed in breach of EU law in choosing not to inspect planes that are arriving in Shannon and then travelling out of the European Union directly from Ireland. 'Obviously our concern is one of moral failure, regarding Gaza and the weapons travelling through Ireland, but the State can't continue to operate outside of EU Customs and VAT requirements while maintaining this appalling indifference to what is happening in Shannon Airport.'
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on caring for older people: deserving of dignity, gratitude and respect
Much is rightly made of the statements of intent and idealism that characterised the foundation documents of this Republic. These included the Democratic Programme unveiled at the meeting of the first Dáil in January 1919, in which 'The Irish Republic fully realises the necessity of abolishing the present odious, degrading and foreign Poor Law System, substituting therefor a sympathetic native scheme for the care of the Nation's aged and infirm, who shall not be regarded as a burden, but rather entitled to the Nation's gratitude and consideration'. At the centre of that poor law system established under British rule was the workhouse, which was feared and detested in equal measure. While independent Irish governments subsequently sought to develop a more humane and empathetic social contract, the care of our elderly population has for far too long been compromised, sometimes egregiously. There is excessive reliance on nursing homes, a dependency more alarming given the shortcomings in Ireland's history of institutional care. There has also been a dramatic shift towards the privatisation of these homes. In the 1980s, public nursing homes accounted for roughly 60 per cent of total beds nationally, but a report from the ESRI last year highlighted that in 2022, '83 per cent of all Long-Term Residential Care (LTRC) home beds were provided by voluntary/private sector LTRC homes, with private for-profit operators alone contributing 74 per cent'. Considering the recent revelations by RTÉ Investigates, the Minister of State for Older People and Housing, Kieran O'Donnell, has said he has 'concerns' about the scale of privatisation and has ordered officials to study this issue . The Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA) has highlighted the need to give it more power in relation to private nursing homes and their corporate owners. READ MORE The current controversies are all the more disturbing given it is 20 years since distressing images of the use of Buxton chairs to restrain elderly nursing home residents at the Leas Cross home in Dublin. A subsequent report by consultant geriatrician Desmond O'Neill described the care shortcomings at the home as 'institutional abuse'. As was often and remains the case, various concerns had been raised but it took journalistic exposé to bring matters to a head. In 2022, our population aged 65 years and over was 781,400 and is set to reach over one million by 2030. The number aged over 85 is projected to rise to 301,000 by 2051. What has been uncovered must generate an urgent dynamic to address the care of our elderly, who now, no more than when their needs were voiced by the architects of Irish independence, need to be treated with the dignity, gratitude and respect they deserve.
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Delays to housing plan could push it back to September
The Government is discussing a delay to publishing its new housing plan until after the summer. The plan, which is to replace the last coalition's Housing for All approach, was due to be published during July, but it looks as though it could slip into September before it is made publicly available. Senior Government figures said the new plan could not be completed until the publication of a review of how the State is going to fund its multi-year infrastructure delivery programme, which is now expected in late July. That review – of the National Development Plan (NDP) – is expected to add many billions in allocations for roads, public transport, the electricity grid and water infrastructure, among other things. But it needs to be completed before Minister for Housing James Browne publishes the coalition's roadmap for how it will hit its housing targets. READ MORE The potential to push back publication of the housing plan until September is said to have been discussed at a meeting of the Cabinet housing subcommittee. [ No 'special exemptions' for students under latest Rent Pressure Zone system, James Browne says Opens in new window ] While some Government sources believe there is concern about pushing back its publication, others say a delay would have support around the Cabinet table. A final decision on what to do regarding the publication date will have to be made in the coming weeks. It is unlikely that the plan can be unveiled in August, when much of the political system shuts down for the summer break, many civil servants are on leave, and the Dáil is not sitting. A spokeswoman for Mr Browne would not be drawn on a specific date for publication of the report, beyond saying it would be as soon as possible after the publication of the NDP review, which in turn will cover all public capital investment to 2035 and allocate funds from the Apple tax case and AIB share sales, among other sources of capital. Mr Browne's spokeswoman said work on the plan is 'at an advanced stage'. [ The Government is finally showing some political courage in tackling the housing crisis Opens in new window ] 'The next housing plan is due to be published after the publication of the National Development Plan as a matter of priority,' she said. 'This sequencing is necessary, as the housing plan must have certainty around the investment plans and capital programmes for the Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage before the next plan can be finalised and published.' She said Mr Browne was not waiting for publication of the new plan before pushing forward with measures, including on Rent Pressure Zones reform, planning extensions and exemptions. The previous government also encountered delays when it was seeking to bring forward Housing for All under the former minister for housing, Darragh O'Brien. That document was due to be launched in July 2021, but was ultimately pushed back to September of that year, which drew criticism from the opposition.
