DWP measures to stop people fraudulently claiming monthly PIP of up to £749

DWP said £330 million was lost to fraud and error within the PIP system last year.
The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) recently confirmed it is 'committed' to tackling fraud and error within the benefits system, including recovering debts generated by Personal Independent Payments (PIP). Conservative MP Sir John Hayes asked DWP what steps it is taking to 'tackle people fraudulently claiming PIP'.
In a written response, DWP Minister Andrew Western, explained new measures being introduced to 'prevent fraud entering the system based on the types of cases and trends we have seen'. This includes 'introducing more rigorous checks for customers changing personal details, including bank accounts'.
Mr Western said: ' DWP is committed to tackling fraud and error in the benefits system and to the recovery of debts, including those generated by Personal Independent Payments. Working closely with counter fraud experts, the DWP has introduced measures to prevent fraud entering the system based on the types of cases and trends we have seen.'
New DWP measures to tackle benefit fraud
These include:
Strengthening the Identity and Verification Process to prevent fraudulent cases entering the system
Introducing more rigorous checks for customers changing personal details, including bank accounts
Delivering awareness sessions for Case Managers and Healthcare Professionals, reinforcing action to take when suspicious cases are identified - for example, fake documents
The Minister continued: 'DWP is delivering against key counter fraud activity, including investing in counter fraud professionals and building data analytical capabilities. The new Fraud, Error and Debt Bill will bring forward new measures to tackle fraud in the system.
'Details on the measures the Government will be legislating will be presented to Parliament in due course.'
The DWP pays benefits to nearly 24 million people across Great Britain, including 3.7m on PIP. The latest DWP report shows £330m was lost to fraud and error in the PIP system last year, up from £90m in 2023/24.
Fraud and error in the welfare system cost the taxpayer £9.5bn in overpayments last year, compared to £9.7bn in 2023/24.
Fraud
This guidance on GOV.UK explains that this relates to claims where all three of the following conditions apply:
the conditions for receipt of benefit, or the rate of benefit in payment, are not met
the claimant can reasonably be expected to be aware of the effect on their entitlement
benefit payment stops or reduces as a result of a review of the claim.
Claimant error
These are overpayments where claimants have provided inaccurate or incomplete information, or failed to report a change in their circumstances which has led to an overpayment, but there is no evidence of fraudulent intent on the claimant's part.
Official error
This is where benefits have been paid incorrectly due to a failure to act, a delay or a mistaken assessment by the Department, a local authority or His Majesty's Revenue and Customs, to which no one outside of that department has materially contributed, regardless of whether the business unit has processed the information.
Last year, Mr Western clarified that the proposed Fraud, Error and Debt Bill 'will not give DWP access to any bank accounts, nor any information on how claimants spend their money'adding that banks and financial institutions will share 'limited information' with the Department to 'help verify benefit eligibility by flagging possible conflicts with eligibility rules'.
The DWP Minister said: 'As set out by the National Audit Office, access to data is key to prevention and detection of incorrect payments. The Eligibility Verification Measure (EVM) in the proposed Fraud, Error and Debt Bill will not give DWP access to any bank accounts, nor any information on how claimants spend their money.
‌
'It will require banks and financial institutions to share limited information with the DWP to help verify benefit eligibility by flagging possible conflicts with eligibility rules - for example the £16,000 capital limit in Universal Credit. The information gathered will help DWP identify incorrect payments, prevent debts from accruing for the claimant and help identify where there may be fraudulent activity.'
He added: 'The legislation will set out key safeguards, including reporting mechanisms and independent oversight. No benefit entitlement decision will be made solely because of the data obtained under EVM and a final decision on benefit entitlement will always involve a human agent.
'If a claimant wishes to challenge or appeal a benefit decision, they can do so following DWP's appeals processes.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

ITV News

2 hours ago

• ITV News

Keir Starmer says Kneecap Glastonbury set 'not appropriate'

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has said he does not think Kneecap's planned Glastonbury Festival performance is 'appropriate'. Kneecap member Liam Og O hAnnaidh appeared in court on Wednesday, after being charged for allegedly displaying a flag in support of proscribed terrorist organisation Hezbollah while saying 'up Hamas, up Hezbollah' at a gig in November last year. In an interview with The Sun, Sir Keir was asked if he thought the trio should perform at Glastonbury, to which he replied: 'No, I don't, and I think we need to come down really clearly on this. 'This is about the threats that shouldn't be made, I won't say too much because there's a court case on, but I don't think that's appropriate.' His comments come after Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said in a post on X, with an article from The Times that claimed the BBC had not banned the group: 'The BBC should not be showing Kneecap propaganda. 'One Kneecap band member is currently on bail, charged under the Terrorism Act. 'As a publicly funded platform, the BBC should not be rewarding extremism.' Badenoch has previously called for the group to be banned from Glastonbury, and last year Kneecap won a discrimination case against the UK Government in Belfast High Court after she tried to refuse them a £14,250 funding award when she was a minister. In their latest single, The Recap, released just before their headine set at London's Wide Awake festival in May, the trio took aim at the Tory leader mocking her failed attempts to block their arts funding and the party's election loss. On Wednesday, O hAnnaidh, who performs under the stage name Mo Chara, was cheered by hundreds of supporters as he arrived with bandmates Naoise O Caireallain and JJ O Dochartaigh at Westminster Magistrates' Court in 'Free Mo Chara' T-shirts. During the proceedings, a prosecutor told the court the 27-year-old is 'well within his rights' to voice his opinions on Israel and Palestine, but the alleged incident at the O2 Forum in Kentish Town, north London, is a 'wholly different thing'. O hAnnaidh was released on unconditional bail until his next hearing at the same court on August 20. Following the hearing, the rapper said: 'For anybody going to Glastonbury, you can see us there at 4pm on the Saturday. 'If you can't be there we'll be on the BBC, if anybody watches the BBC. We'll be at Wembley in September. 'But most importantly: free, free Palestine.' A BBC spokesperson said: 'As the broadcast partner, the BBC will be bringing audiences extensive music coverage from Glastonbury, with artists booked by the festival organisers. 'Whilst the BBC doesn't ban artists, our plans will ensure that our programming will meet our editorial guidelines. Decisions about our output will be made in the lead-up to the festival.' The terror charge came following a counter-terrorism police investigation after the historical gig footage came to light, which also allegedly shows the group calling for the deaths of MPs. In April, Kneecap apologised to the families of murdered MPs but said footage of the incident had been 'exploited and weaponised'. In an initial post in response to the charge, Kneecap said: '14,000 babies are about to die of starvation in Gaza, with food sent by the world sitting on the other side of a wall, and once again the British establishment is focused on us. 'We deny this 'offence' and will vehemently defend ourselves, this is political policing, this is a carnival of distraction. 'We are not the story, genocide is, as they profit from genocide, they use an 'anti-terror law' against us for displaying a flag thrown on stage. A charge not serious enough to even warrant their crown court, instead a court that doesn't have a jury. What's the objective? 'To restrict our ability to travel. To prevent us speaking to young people across the world. To silence voices of compassion. To prosecute artists who dare speak out. 'Instead of defending innocent people, or the principles of international law they claim to uphold, the powerful in Britain have abetted slaughter and famine in Gaza, just as they did in Ireland for centuries. Then, like now, they claim justification. 'The IDF units they arm and fly spy plane missions for are the real terrorists, the whole world can see it.'

Wales Online

8 hours ago

• Wales Online

‘Wales is being treated with contempt' say campaigners as bill on PIP presented in Westminster before Welsh consultation is held

'Wales is being treated with contempt' say campaigners as bill on PIP presented in Westminster before Welsh consultation is held Wales is expected to be hardest hit by the proposed reforms People had decended to the streets of Cardiff and Swansea to protest against the proposed reforms to disability benefits (Image: Mark Lewis ) Activists campaigning against proposed reforms to disability benefits are furious after the concerned bill was tabled in Westminster before an in-person public consultation was held in Wales. The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill was introduced in Westminster on June 18, 2025 — this was five days before a public consultation for Wales is held on Monday, June 23. Under the proposed UK government plans, people currently availing PIP will need to score at least four points in at at least one daily living activity to avail support for everyday tasks. ‌ Data released by Liberal Demoracts following a written parliamentary question, shows that currently, throughout Wales, every local authority has at least 80% of those receiving the standard rate of PIP at a risk of losing support with more than half of Welsh Local authorities seeing 90% at risk. ‌ Ben Golighty, a member of DPAC Cymru who is at risk of losing PIP under new reforms (Image: Shaurya Shaurya ) Wales is said to be particularly hard hit by the proposed reforms, making it more painful for campaigners that the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill was introduced before a public consultation is held here. Read the biggest stories in Wales first by signing up to our daily newsletter here 'I think it's outrageous. The consultation was always going to be unfair because half the proposals, like the most important proposals they were never up for discussion at all from the beginning,' said Ben Golighty, a member of Disabled People Againt Cuts (DPAC) Cymru. Article continues below 'And they'll be voting on it three days after the consultation ends, basically before the ink is even dry in the consultation responses, before they've had a chance to read it,' he said. 'It's just a mockery. They're not even pretending to listen. 'I think it treats disabled people with contempt, it treats Wales with contempt…It's outrageous that they're not listening to disabled people and carers.' The public consultation has already drawn ire from campaigners as it was cancelled once at the last minute by the venue. ‌ 'I think it's really important to note that whey they cancelled it, they didn't plan to reschedule it,' Ben said. 'The original one was it was totally inaccessible, it was so badly organised, it was basically disability discrimination and the only reason we have one at all now is because Disabled People Against Cuts protested, we got media scrutiny and we got a member of the Senedd to wave a letter in the Welsh Parliament. 'So the only reason we have a consultation in Wales at all is because we forced them to do better and I think it's just another example of how badly we've been treated.' A DWP spokesperson has said: 'It is crucial that the views and voices of sick or disabled people across Wales are at the heart of our reforms, which is why we've rescheduled a consultation event in Cardiff after it was cancelled by the venue. ‌ 'We are determined to create a welfare system that supports people into work and out of poverty. That is why we have today introduced a Bill to Parliament to reform the welfare system, putting social security spending on a more sustainable footing while ensuring protection for those who need it most. 'We will continue to look at the specific impacts for those living in Wales as we seek to support people back into work if they are able, while also protecting those who rely on our social security system.' Many people on PIP says they will be pushed into poverty if their support is withdrawn (Image: Mark Lewis ) ‌ DPAC Cymru members have also expressed their discontent at some of the language used by Labour leaders, and have alleged that they have received 'copy paste' replies from their MPs when they have sought a meeting regarding the proposed changes. 'MPs would be telling us, 'don't worry, take part in the consultation'. The consultation was always going to be unfair, but, the bill is in parliament before the consultation has even ended. The consultation isn't enough,' Ben said. 'So there's got to be that leadership from MPs who're supposed to be representing us. Also, in particular, we just need clear answers from them and not copy and paste responses.' He added: 'A lot of Labour MPs and ministers have been able to go on the news and say quite offensive things like Rachael Reeves comparing disability benefits to children's pocket money. ‌ 'She never actually apologised. The news headline said she apologised, but she didn't. And I think disabled people should be able to have a right of reply and should be able to argue.' Chief Secretary to the Treasury, Darren Jones had been criticised for drawing up an analogy between the disability benefits and children's pocket money, for which he had later apologised. When asked about the chief Secretary's comments by LBC, Chancellor Rachel Reeves had said: "My children and the chief secretary's children are too young, but if you have a 16-year-old and you say, 'Do you know what I'm not going to give you so much pocket money. I want you to go out to work'. ‌ "And then the OBR [Office for Budget Responsibility] does an impact assessment and says your child is going to be worse off - well, they're going to be worse off if they don't go and get themselves a Saturday job. "But if they do go and get themselves a Saturday job, they'll probably be better off and they probably might enjoy it as well. Now, I know, that's not the right analogy, but there are lots of people who have a disability that are desperate to work." Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves has refused making comments comparing PIP to children's pocket money (Image: Getty Images ) ‌ When Ms Reeves was later asked at a select committee if she would apologise for for the minister's comments, which it was said that she repeated, she replied: 'The Chief Secretary to the Treasury has apologised for the clumsy language that he used. "It wasn't the right language. I was asked a specific question, I did not, first of all hear, the previous interview of the chief secretary and so the question to me was put about pocket money but it's not a right analogy and apologies have already been made.' When asked if she would apologise for the comments that she made, the Chancellor said: 'I don't think I made the same comments but that analogy of comparing pocket money and personal independence payment is clearly not right.' ‌ DPAC Cymru members have also expressed particular discontent with Swansea West MP Torsten Bell, who they accuse of calling them 'keyboard warriors' and have alleged that the minister has refused to have a discussion with them on numerous occasions. However, the a spokesperson for Mr Bell has refuted all their claims and has said that his statements have been taken out of context. A spokesperson for Torsten Bell has said: 'It is simply untrue that Torsten has refused to meet with Swansea DPAC. Torsten has been meeting regularly with constituents about proposed changes to the welfare system and will continue to do so – as individuals and as part of groups. ‌ 'Every constituent that has approached our office asking for a meeting has been offered one. This is the same approach as taken by neighbouring MPs, and is in accordance with strict rules that prohibit MPs from pursuing issues raised by people who are not resident in their constituency.' A placard held at the DPAC Cymru protest in May, accusing Mr Bell of avoiding the campaign group (Image: Shaurya Shaurya ) Ben from DPAC Cymru said: 'On the day of the spring statement when we had our protest in Swansea, and there were like dozens and dozens of comments from disabled people. ‌ 'Because the spring statement, all the focus was on the disability cuts. So it was taken very badly by lots of disabled people on the day." 'Then later he used the word burden in the context of carers, which disabled people are quite sensitive about that word,' Ben said. 'It's one that most guidelines about language say you shouldn't really use that word, so that was one we pointed out to him. Without acknowledging it, when the media asked questions about it, he deleted that many called us liars.' Ben said: 'I just think there's no need. He's using this language all the time... ‌ 'Recently, just about a week ago, he made a video and he attacked what he called garbage meme muppets and recently as well, he was talking to pension economists and he called them cheap and lazy. He's accused us of saying things that are disgracefully untrue, spreading falsehoods, liars.' The Facebook post by MP Torsten Bell where DPAC member says the word 'burden' was used in context of carers for disabled people (Image: Facebook Screengrab Torsten Bell MP ) The Swansea West Labour Party post, where DPAC say they were called "keyboard warriors" (Image: Facebook Screengrab Swansea West Labour Party ) ‌ The spokesperson for Mr Bell added: 'The proposed changes to disability and incapacity benefits need to be discussed in a manner reflecting the complexity and sensitivity of the issue. Torsten will continue to do that with constituents and always encourages people to get in touch. 'Torsten has categorically never used this language to describe disabled people. These quotes are made-up, using language that was never used in the context of this issue, but will cause real distress to some extremely vulnerable people.' As of now, and according to figures released by Liberal Democrats post their written parliamentary question, 90.19% of PIP claimants recieiving the standard rate in Mr Bell's constituency, Swansea West scored less than four points in daily living activities, meaning they are at risk of losing support. ‌ 'It'll [proposed bill] push people away from work. They've mentioned the so-called support that's going to help people. They haven't said what that will be yet,' Ben said. 'They're cutting support before they've even told us what they're going to help people with.' He added: 'I don't think it'll even save money. You know it's supposed to be about cuts, about saving money for taxpayer. I don't think it will even do that. A lot of government departments and a lot of economists have warned it's not going to save the money they think it will. 'All I think it's about is, it's quite cynical, I think they think it is about votes, it is about electoral strategy from the Labour Party.' ‌ Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall has said: 'Our social security system is at a crossroads. Unless we reform it, more people will be denied opportunities, and it may not be there for those who need it. 'This legislation represents a new social contract and marks the moment we take the road of compassion, opportunity and dignity. 'This will give people peace of mind, while also fixing our broken social security system so it supports those who can work to do so while protecting those who cannot - putting welfare spending on a more sustainable path to unlock growth as part of our Plan for Change.' ‌ Phil Coleman says he'll be pushed into poverty with the new disability reforms (Image: Shaurya Shaurya ) Phil Coleman, 58, from Pontardawe, who once thrived as a maintenance technician at Swansea's National Waterfront Museum is now grappling with the debilitating effects of long-Covid, unable to continue his work. Now reliant on benefits and his life savings for income, he told WalesOnline during the DPAC postest in Swansea against the proposed reforms in May this year: "I've got long Covid, and I got long Covid three years ago. Before that, I was a very fit, healthy person, and I've paid tax and national insurance for 40 years. ‌ "So I feel I've already paid into the system. So I think it's absolutely atrocious now that the benefits of some of the most vulnerable people in society are being cut." He emphasised the difficulty he faces if his financial support is slashed further. Phil outlined: "I'm on a benefit, I'm on employment support allowance, which is not a lot of money. It's great and I'm lucky that I've got savings because I've worked for 40 years and I am actually using my savings because the benefit is not enough to live on. It's as simple as that. It [reduction in benefits] will plunge me into poverty, basically." ‌ Addressing his bleak retirement prospects, he shared: "I'm 10 years off retiring. I've been denied early retirement on grounds of ill health because at the moment I've been told, 'Well, you've got long Covid, you could get better.' "I also have a heart problem that was caused by long Covid. So I can't retire early. If likely I lose my benefit... that's my only income at the moment." You can read more about the experiences of those on PIP at risk of losing support by clicking here. Article continues below

The Independent

10 hours ago

• The Independent

Why the ‘individual conscience vote' of MPs had its own assisted death last week

Two votes in the Commons split by four days laid the ground for a seismic shift in British social policy making last week one of the most significant in the modern history of Parliament. But while the votes on abortion (Tuesday) and assisted dying (Friday) were officially matters of individual conscience the evidence from both suggests that the UK is now closer than ever to a US-style party politicisation of moral issues. If you vote Labour or Lib Dem you are much more likely to get a pro-choice MP, if you vote Conservative or Reform you are more likely to get a pro-life MP. This is not an accident, it is increasingly by design. How parties voted on life and death On Tuesday the decriminalisation of abortion up to birth amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill laid down by Labour Gower MP Tonia Antoniazzi won by 379 to 137. Of this 291 Labour MPs voted in favour and just 25 against while 63 Lib Dems were in favour and just two against. On the other side 92 Tory MPs voted against and just four in favour. Another four abstained by voting in both lobbies. No Reform MPs supported and four voted against. The split is not as stark on Friday's assisted dying vote but nevertheless reveals a trend. Kim Leadbeater 's bill had the support of 224 fellow Labour MPs with 160 against and 56 Lib Dems with 15 against. On the other side the Tories split 92 against to 20 in favour while Reform were three against and two in favour. Kemi Badenoch put a two line whip on the abortion vote rather than allowing a completely free vote. This indicated a party position without the threat of disciplinary action which would come with a three line whip. But, remarkably, after the abortion vote senior Tories were complaining that Ms Badenoch had not withdrawn the whip of the four MPs who voted for decriminalisation. It was different in 1967 The last time the UK saw Parliament vote on such seismic social change was back in 1967 with Liberal MP David Steel 's abortion legislation and Labour MP Leo Abse's Sexual Offences Act which decriminalised homosexuality. In both those cases parties split down the middle on conscience votes which saw the odd alliance of rightwing Tory MP Enoch Powell and leftwing Labour MP Tony Benn coming together to support legalising homosexuality. The Ed Miliband effect The erosion of the conscience vote in the UK has actually come more from a hardening of positions from progressive leftwing parties in Britain and exacerbated by the so-called culture wars. In 2012 Ed Miliband imposed a three-line whip on gay marriage on Labour MPs. LGBTQ+ matters ended there as something of individual conscience for the first time. Then in 2019 former MP Roger Godsiff was dropped as a Labour candidate for supporting parents in his Birmingham constituency who were protesting over primary school children being taught about same-sex relationships. This year we see Reform UK banning LGBTQ+ flags from county halls where they have taken control of the council and attempting to purge councils of diversity, equity and inclusion officers and policies. While abortion officially remained a matter of conscience a comment by the now home secretary Yvette Cooper in 2017 about Jacob Rees-Mogg being unfit to be a party leader because of his views on abortion was enlightening. What has happened over a number of years is that the majority of socially conservative, mostly Catholic tradition in Labour has been removed through selection processes. David Campanale versus the Lib Dems An ongoing legal case involving the Liberal Democrats and one of its former candidates has highlighted an apparent major shift in British politics to the party politicisation of conscience issues. Former BBC journalist David Campanale was kicked out as the candidate for Sutton ahead of the last election because, he claims, of his Christian beliefs. According to documents presented in the case, Luke Taylor, who replaced him as the candidate, is alleged to have claimed that 'the party of past prominent Liberal Democrats with Christian beliefs, such as Shirley Williams and Charles Kennedy, was 'over', and that he and others were building a 'secular party' which would have no place for Christians expecting to 'hold to their religious or conscientious opinions'. Mr Taylor was the teller for the votes in favour of the abortion amendment on Tuesday, who also described the assisted dying vote, which he supported, as a good way to 'neatly bookend the week.' If Mr Campanale wins his case it will for the first time provide evidence that selection is taking place on conscience issues as well as other matters. The Lib Dems have denied the claims and pointed out that their leader Sr Ed Davey goes to church. But the Christian Lib Dems including former deputy leader Simon Hughes have voiced concerns and the party has been condemned by two bishops. and a former Archbishop of Canterbury. Added to that Tim Farron, who voted against abortion and assisted dying last week, was ousted as leader over his Christian beliefs in 2017. During the assisted dying vote a number of supporters of the bill suggested that religious belief had no place in deciding such issues. A real departure from conscience. But a brand of conservatism is emerging in the UK which openly embraces traditional Christian values. Reflecting on the assisted dying vote, Tory MP Danny Kruger, a leading opponent of the bill, said: 'If we are to withstand our enemies, bring our society together, and tame the technium (somehow ensure that human values govern the new age of machines), we are going to need values that are up to the job. 'I don't think humanist atheism or progressive liberalism or whatever the new religion should be called, is up to it. Christianity is. Only Christianity is.' A warning from America In America, the conscience vote rapidly became more party-politicised as a result of the Roe vs Wade abortion ruling in in 1973. Social conservatives gradually began to take over the Republicans on the right and social progressives the Democrats. It has played out ferociously in the selection of Supreme Court justices, who recently in effect overturned Roe v Wade with a conservative majority. The most interesting US development is the way that a man like Donald Trump, previously ambiguous over abortion, has adopted a strong anti-abortion line to please his base. This played out in the 2022 midterms to the detriment of the Republicans with the Democrats using the threat to abortion rights to great effect. But it did little to help Kamala Harris in 2024. What that shows though is that parties with very strong views one way or the other can be elected largely on economic grounds but bring with them a great deal of baggage on conscience issues. After this week some would argue the same thing has happened in the opposite direction in the UK.