AI Godfather Geoffrey Hinton Warns: Plumbing Safer Than Coding in Automation Era
As artificial intelligence continues to revolutionize industries at an unprecedented pace, one of the field's founding fathers is offering a sobering perspective on the future of work. Geoffrey Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian computer scientist widely regarded as the 'Godfather of AI,' is urging people to rethink their career paths—recommending plumbing as a more secure option than coding.
In a recent interview on The Diary of a CEO podcast hosted by Steven Bartlett, Hinton expressed deep concerns about job displacement driven by automation. 'A good bet would be to be a plumber,' he said, suggesting that physical labor is much harder to automate than tasks rooted in data and information processing. 'It's going to be a long time before [AI is] as good at physical manipulation as us.'
While AI can swiftly process legal documents, generate marketing material, and handle countless other intellectual tasks, it falters when it comes to jobs requiring hands-on dexterity and adaptability. Trades like plumbing, carpentry, and electrical work often involve unpredictable environments and real-time decision-making—areas where machines still struggle to compete with humans.
'Fixing a leaking tap or rewiring a house demands judgment and skills that are hard to replicate with current AI capabilities,' Hinton explained. That's why he believes these trades are likely to remain resilient in the face of rapid technological change.
In contrast, many traditional white-collar roles are already being reshaped by AI tools. Jobs once seen as stable—such as legal assistants or paralegals—are now being threatened by language models that can analyze contracts, predict case outcomes, and produce detailed summaries faster than a human ever could.
Hinton, now 77, has played a crucial role in the development of neural networks—the technology that powers today's advanced AI systems. Yet he admits to struggling with the emotional implications of the revolution he helped spark. 'Intellectually, you can see the threat,' he said. 'But it's very hard to come to terms with it emotionally.'
One of his deeper fears is the widening gap between those who benefit from AI and those who don't. 'In a society which shares things fairly, everybody should be better off,' he noted. 'But if you can replace lots of people by AIs, then the people who get replaced will be worse off."
He even envisioned a scenario where AI could eventually control critical infrastructure like power stations with minimal human oversight. 'If AI ever decided to take over,' he speculated, 'it would need people for a while to run the power stations, until it designed better analogue machines. There are so many ways it could get rid of people, all of which would, of course, be very nasty.'
Hinton's warnings aren't meant to incite panic, but rather to encourage society to reflect critically on how AI is shaping our economic and social structures. If current trends continue, the plumber—not the programmer—may emerge as one of the most future-proof professions.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
20 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Iran-Israel fighting distorted by tech-fuelled misinformation
AI deepfakes, video game footage passed off as real combat, and chatbot-generated falsehoods; such tech-enabled misinformation is distorting the Israel-Iran conflict, fuelling a war of narratives across social media. The information warfare unfolding alongside ground combat, sparked by Israel's strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities and military leadership, underscores a digital crisis in the age of rapidly advancing AI tools that have blurred the lines between truth and fabrication. The surge in wartime misinformation has exposed an urgent need for stronger detection tools, experts say, as major tech platforms have largely weakened safeguards by scaling back content moderation and reducing reliance on human fact-checkers. After Iran struck Israel with barrages of missiles last week, AI-generated videos falsely claimed to show damage inflicted on Tel Aviv and Ben Gurion Airport. The videos were widely shared across Facebook, Instagram and X. Using a reverse image search, AFP's fact-checkers found that the clips were originally posted by a TikTok account that produces AI-generated content. There has been a "surge in generative AI misinformation, specifically related to the Iran-Israel conflict," Ken Jon Miyachi, founder of the Austin-based firm BitMindAI, told AFP. "These tools are being leveraged to manipulate public perception, often amplifying divisive or misleading narratives with unprecedented scale and sophistication." GetReal Security, a U.S. company focused on detecting manipulated media including AI deepfakes, also identified a wave of fabricated videos related to the Israel-Iran conflict. The company linked the visually compelling videos, depicting apocalyptic scenes of war-damaged Israeli aircraft and buildings as well as Iranian missiles mounted on a trailer, to Google's Veo 3 AI generator, known for hyper-realistic visuals. The Veo watermark is visible at the bottom of an online video posted by the news outlet Tehran Times, which claims to show "the moment an Iranian missile" struck Tel Aviv. "It is no surprise that as generative-AI tools continue to improve in photo-realism, they are being misused to spread misinformation and sow confusion," said Hany Farid, the co-founder of GetReal Security and a professor at the University of California, Berkeley. Farid offered one tip to spot such deepfakes: the Veo 3 videos were normally eight seconds in length or a combination of clips of a similar duration. "This eight-second limit obviously doesn't prove a video is fake, but should be a good reason to give you pause and fact-check before you re-share," he said. The falsehoods are not confined to social media. Disinformation watchdog NewsGuard has identified 51 websites that have advanced more than a dozen false claims ranging from AI-generated photos purporting to show mass destruction in Tel Aviv to fabricated reports of Iran capturing Israeli pilots. Sources spreading these false narratives include Iranian military-linked Telegram channels and state media sources affiliated with the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB), sanctioned by the US Treasury Department, NewsGuard said. "We're seeing a flood of false claims and ordinary Iranians appear to be the core targeted audience," McKenzie Sadeghi, a researcher with NewsGuard, told AFP. Sadeghi described Iranian citizens as "trapped in a sealed information environment," where state media outlets dominate in a chaotic attempt to "control the narrative." Iran itself claimed to be a victim of tech manipulation, with local media reporting that Israel briefly hacked a state television broadcast, airing footage of women's protests and urging people to take to the streets. Adding to the information chaos were online clips lifted from war-themed video games. AFP's fact-checkers identified one such clip posted on X, which falsely claimed to show an Israeli jet being shot down by Iran. The footage bore striking similarities to the military simulation game Arma 3. Israel's military has rejected Iranian media reports claiming its fighter jets were downed over Iran as "fake news." Chatbots such as xAI's Grok, which online users are increasingly turning to for instant fact-checking, falsely identified some of the manipulated visuals as real, researchers said. "This highlights a broader crisis in today's online information landscape: the erosion of trust in digital content," BitMindAI's Miyachi said. "There is an urgent need for better detection tools, media literacy, and platform accountability to safeguard the integrity of public discourse."
Fibre2Fashion
40 minutes ago
- Fibre2Fashion
92% respondents in North America intentional with purchases: Report
About 92 per cent of respondents consider themselves at least somewhat intentional with their purchases, while 40 per cent say they are very intentional, revealed new data from Lightspeed Commerce's survey of 2,000 consumers across the US and Canada. Today's shoppers aren't just buying products—they're also buying into values. Nearly half (45 per cent) say brand values will play a bigger role in future purchases, signalling a clear shift toward mindful, purpose-driven consumption—what Lightspeed calls Valuespending. While price (78 per cent) and quality (67 per cent) remain key priorities, more consumers (62 per cent) now say it's important that their purchases align with their personal values or identity. A Lightspeed Commerce survey has revealed that 92 per cent of North American consumers shop intentionally, with 40 per cent being highly intentional. Values like sustainability, identity, and national pride now influence 62 per cent of shoppers, especially Gen Z. Social media drives brand discovery, while Canadians show stronger local loyalty. 'Consumers today are balancing cost with conscience,' said Dax Dasilva, CEO and founder of Lightspeed . 'It's not always about the lowest price—it's about choosing brands that reflect their values. And when those values align, loyalty can follow more easily. This new era of intentional spending—Valuespending—is reshaping retail and pushing businesses to be more transparent and authentic.' For 32 per cent of shoppers who report making values-based buying decisions, this is a new behaviour. Driving this shift are a stronger belief that their spending has more impact than before (50 per cent), a sense of living in a more divided world (45 per cent), and influence from social media (23 per cent), as per the survey. Younger shoppers are leading the movement. An impressive 96 per cent of Gen Z consumers say they shop intentionally, with 66 per cent noting that it's important their purchases reflect their values. For this cohort, sustainability (37 per cent), national pride (29 per cent), and cultural alignment (26 per cent) top the list of decision drivers. More than half (51 per cent) say their most recent purchases were made with thought and intention Social media plays a major role—61 per cent of Gen Z discover value-aligned brands online, far more than other generations. Notably, 32 per cent of Gen Z shoppers say they fear being judged for buying from the 'wrong' brands—highlighting a generational mix of purpose and peer pressure reshaping the retail space. Canadian consumers are taking principled spending even further. While just 16 per cent of US respondents say they've made purchases in the past six months based on local or national campaigns like 'Buy American,' that number jumps to 38 per cent in Canada. Similarly, 45 per cent of Canadian consumers say supporting local businesses best reflects their values, compared to 36 per cent of US shoppers. This trend points to a growing sense of national alignment at the checkout—especially in the context of trade tensions. 'These insights show us that consumer expectations are evolving,' Dasilva added. 'From sustainability to social impact, the brands that listen, adapt, and 'walk the talk' can thrive in this age of Valuespending.' Fibre2Fashion News Desk (RR)
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Early vs. late college applications: When should you apply to study abroad?
When it comes to studying abroad, most students focus on where to go and what to study. But one of the most critical and overlooked questions is when to apply. Whether you're aiming for a top-ranked US university, a Canadian co-op program, or a fully funded scholarship in Europe, application timing can directly impact your chances of admission, scholarships, visa processing, and overall peace of mind. So, is it smarter to apply as early as possible or wait until your profile is stronger—even if it's close to the deadline? Let's unpack both paths to help you make a well-timed, strategic decision. Do early applications give a head start? Early applications are usually submitted 6–12 months before the course begins. In most cases, this falls within Round 1 or priority deadlines, especially in countries like the US, UK, Canada, Germany, and Australia. Higher Admission Chances Most universities have limited seats and operate on a first-evaluated, first-considered basis—especially for high-demand programs like Computer Science, Engineering, MBA, or Data Science. At many Canadian universities, Computer Science programs are filled during the first two rounds. Late applicants might be automatically redirected to less popular courses or waitlisted. Better Scholarship Opportunities Scholarships—particularly merit-based ones—are often reviewed alongside early applications. Funds are limited, and many scholarship committees work independently of admission deadlines. The Chevening Scholarship in the UK, DAAD in Germany, and many US university-specific awards require application months before the course begins. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Memperdagangkan CFD Emas dengan salah satu spread terendah? IC Markets Mendaftar Undo More Time for Post-Acceptance Planning Early admission gives you a longer runway to: Apply for student visas without panic Secure ideal housing Plan finances, including forex transfers or education loans Attend pre-departure orientation sessions Wider Choice of Programs Applying early means you can target multiple universities without worrying that your dream program might already be full or closed. How late applications can work in your favour Late applications—usually submitted in the final window before the deadline—can still succeed under the right circumstances, especially if you've used the extra time wisely. Improving Your Application Profile If you're retaking standardized tests (IELTS, TOEFL, GRE, GMAT), updating your resume, or polishing your Statement of Purpose (SOP), waiting a few extra months can help you submit a stronger, more competitive application. Tip: A high IELTS score (e.g., 8.0) can help offset a low GPA. If you're close to that, it may be worth the wait. Sorting Out Finances Some students need extra time to: Finalize bank statements Apply for or get approval for education loans Wait for external or government scholarships This makes late applications practical—just ensure you don't miss visa or course cutoffs. Making Informed Choices Maybe you're still choosing between countries or waiting to hear back from your first-choice school. Applying late allows you to: Compare offers Research more options Avoid making impulsive decisions Taking Advantage of Rolling Admissions Some universities (especially in the US and Europe) continue to accept applications until all seats are filled. If you're a strong applicant and the course isn't yet full, late submission can still get you in. Risks of applying too late Despite the flexibility, late applications come with significant risks—especially for popular courses, visa-heavy countries, and scholarship applicants. Fewer Program Seats Available Many courses fill up before the official deadline. For late applicants, it's often a case of 'apply now, hope for a waitlist.' For example, in the UK, UCAS applications submitted by January have better chances. Those submitted by June face reduced options. Little to No Scholarship Access Most internal and external scholarships follow early timelines. By the time you apply, the funding might be fully allocated—even if you're eligible. Housing Issues Student housing is often assigned on a first-come basis. Late applicants may have to settle for: Expensive private housing Long commutes to campus Shared rooms without basic amenities Visa Delays Late applicants often face several challenges when it comes to visa processing. One of the most common issues is delayed document verification, as application volumes tend to surge close to deadlines, slowing down processing times. In addition, embassy appointment slots can become scarce, especially during peak intake seasons. This creates further delays and uncertainty, leaving students with little room to navigate unexpected issues. As a result, there's a real risk of not receiving the visa in time for the course start date. When should you apply? The ideal time to apply depends on how prepared you are. Ask yourself: Are your test scores (like IELTS, TOEFL, GRE, or GMAT) ready? Have you finalized your list of target universities and their requirements? Is your Statement of Purpose (SOP) carefully written, reviewed, and aligned with your goals? Do you have your supporting documents—such as academic transcripts, letters of recommendation, and financial papers—organized and ready to go? If you can answer "yes" to most of these questions, it's a strong signal that you're ready to apply early. If not, that's okay—use the extra time to polish your application and improve your profile. Just make sure to set a personal deadline well before the university's official cut-off, so you're not scrambling at the last minute. Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
