New York City mayoral candidate forcefully detained by US immigration agents at Manhattan court

Hi, this is Meg Barnette, Brad's wife.
While escorting a defendant out of immigration court at 26 Federal Plaza, Brad was taken by masked agents and detained by ICE.
This is still developing, and our team is monitoring the situation closely.
pic.twitter.com/jekaDFjsT1
— Brad Lander (@bradlander)
June 17, 2025
BRAD LANDER, A candidate in New York City's upcoming mayoral election, was arrested by US immigration agents today while leaving an immigration court in Manhattan.
Lander, who also holds the elected role of the city's chief financial watchdog, was detained after he reportedly attempted to accompany an immigrant out of the courthouse whose deportation case had just been dismissed.
According to his campaign, Lander was approached by masked federal agents, reportedly from ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) and other agencies outside the court.
Witnesses told local media that Lander linked arms with the man and demanded to see a judicial warrant, before agents forcibly separated and arrested him.
Footage shared on social media shows Lander being handcuffed and pushed against a wall by officers.
Advertisement
Brad lander being detained by US officials.
Alamy Stock Photo
Alamy Stock Photo
'Show me your warrant,' he is heard saying. 'You don't have the authority to arrest U.S. citizens.'
The 55-year-old Democrat is a prominent political figure in in New York, and has long been critical of ICE's presence at New York courthouses.
In recent months, he has publicly condemned federal immigration tactics as heavy-handed and legally questionable.
His arrest comes just weeks after he called for increased legal aid for migrants and denounced courthouse arrests as a violation of due process.
The arrest has sparked outcry, as Lander's wife, Meg Barnette, and several New York officials held a press conference calling for his immediate release.
Barnette said that the masked agents refused to identify themselves or produce legal documentation.
Public Advocate Jumaane Williams described the incident as 'immoral,' while fellow mayoral hopeful Zohran Mamdani labelled it 'fascism'.
US federal authorities, including ICE, have not yet commented on the incident.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Journal

6 hours ago

• The Journal

Sitdown Sunday: 'How many?' The mysterious heist of 280,000 eggs from the US's biggest producer

IT'S A DAY of rest, and you may be in the mood for a quiet corner and a comfy chair. We've hand-picked some of the week's best reads for you to savour. 1. The great egg heist Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo 280,000 stolen eggs worth $100,000. A ransom note. A company founded by a farmer nicknamed 'The Big Chicken'. These are some of the components of this cracking investigation, accompanied by egg-celent illustrations. ( The Washington Post , approx 16 mins reading time) The staff began explaining what happened. 'That many eggs?' the deputy said. 'Holy shit.' They showed him internal invoices that valued the stolen loot at $36,621, or roughly $1.57 per dozen — a fraction of what consumers would have paid at the store. The deputy asked for the name of the victim in the case. Previously, the egg farm had been owned by ISE America. But in 2024, Cal-Maine had paid about $110 million for around 4,000 acres and 4.7 million chickens, expanding its empire along the East Coast. It was one of more than two dozen companies Cal-Maine had acquired since it was founded in 1957 by a 6-foot-4-inch Mississippi farmer named Fred Adams Jr. He was known to many as 'The Big Chicken.' 'If we had a Mount Rushmore,' the head of United Egg Producers once said, 'Mr. Adams would most definitely be our George Washington.' The Big Chicken's big strategy was to own almost every step of the process: the hen breeding, the chick hatching, the pullet growing, the feed milling, the egg processing, the carton packaging, the wholesale distributing. After he died in 2020, Adams's four daughters maintained majority control of the publicly traded company, which churns out more than 8 million eggs an hour — a dozen for just about every person in Boston — and sells more than 13 billion a year. 2. Crimes of the century Israel and the US continue to deny that the former is committing genocide in Gaza, but there is insurmountable evidence that they have committed potentially thousands of war crimes. Suzy Hansen details it thoroughly in this well-written piece. ( Intelligencer , approx 50 mins reading time) Even the most hardened cynic may ask, What system could possibly have allowed this? Unlike the Holocaust, whose horrors were properly understood by the outside world only after the fact, the evidence of Gaza's horrors is immediately known and ubiquitous thanks to smartphones, despite the lack of on-the-ground reporting from western journalists barred from the Strip. The postwar legal order established to prevent the atrocities of World War II has failed, and worse, the U.S., which nominally took on the responsibility of preserving that order, is abetting the killing and abandoning any pretense of adhering to the law. 'It's not that huge numbers of potential incidents of war crimes don't happen in places like Ukraine or Congo,' Kenneth Roth, the former head of Human Rights Watch, told me, and he could have added Sudan or China. 'What has brought a lot of attention to Gaza is that it's a very sophisticated military backed by the United States, which is essentially bombing and starving at will. The outrage is about the relentless and very one-sided nature of the conflict.' 3. Jaws Roy Scheider and the eponymous shark in a still from Jaws (1975). Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo Friday marked 50 years since the release of the iconic film, and with it the scariest two musical notes in cinema history. Five filmmakers discuss why it remains a classic. ( The Ringer , approx 8 mins reading time) Jon Turteltaub still remembers the first time he saw Jaws. The director of National Treasure, Cool Runnings, and The Meg was 12 years old when the 1975 blockbuster came out. Back then, the summer was an unceremonious burial ground for lousy movies. So Turteltaub walked into the theater halfway through a screening and sat down. He wound up watching Jaws through to the end and then sticking around to see the entire thing from start to finish. He was glued to his seat, with one exception. 'Right after the shark popped up in the chumming sequence with Chief Brody [Roy Scheider], I went to the lobby to use the pay phone. I called my mother and told her I thought I was having a heart attack,' Turteltaub says. 'I was serious. I was also an idiot. But I was completely overwhelmed by the entire experience.' Advertisement 4. The end of reading? Nowadays, reading a physical book seems anachronistic for some. The shift from page to screen has taken decades. With literacy rates dropping and the rise of AI, how will we read in the future? Joshua Rothman asks the question in this thought-provoking piece. ( The New Yorker , approx 13 mins reading time) In our current reading regime, summarized or altered texts are the exception, not the rule. But over the next decade or so, that polarity may well reverse: we may routinely start with alternative texts and only later decide to seek out originals, in roughly the same way that we now download samples of new books to our Kindles before committing to them. Because A.I. can generate abridgments, summaries, and other condensed editions on demand, we may even switch between versions as circumstances dictate—the way that, today, you might decide to listen to a podcast at '2x' speed, or quit a boring TV show and turn to Wikipedia to find out how it ended. Pop songs often come in different edits—the clean edit, and various E.D.M. remixes. As a writer, I may not want to see my text refracted in this way. But the power of refraction won't be mine to control; it will lay with readers and their A.I.s. Together, they will collapse the space between reading and editing. 5. Labubu dolls Labubu toys in a store in Shanghai. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo Have you heard of these weird little toys? They've gone viral, with some countries having to pause sales due to demand. Why is everyone going mad over them, and are they a symbol of Chinese soft power? ( BBC , approx 6 mins reading time) Before the world discovered Labubu, their fame was limited to China. They started to become a hit just as the country emerged from the pandemic in late 2022, according to Ashley Dudarenok, founder of China-focused research firm ChoZan. 'Post-pandemic, a lot of people in China felt that they wanted to emotionally escape… and Labubu was a very charming but chaotic character,' she says. 'It embodied that anti-perfectionism.' The Chinese internet, which is huge and competitive, produces plenty of viral trends that don't go global. But this one did and its popularity quickly spread to neighbouring South East Asia. Fiona, who lives in Canada, says she first heard about Labubu from Filipino friends in 2023. That's when she started buying them – she says she finds them cute, but their increasing popularity is a major draw: 'The more popular it gets the more I want it.' 6. Poison in the water A small Swedish town discovered their drinking water contained extremely high levels of synthetic chemicals. It turned out to be the worst known case – but the residents were left to figure out what it meant for themselves. ( The Guardian , approx 22 mins reading time) To many in Ronneby, including municipality staff, forever chemicals were still largely a mystery. 'In December 2013, Pfas was completely unknown to us,' said Roger Fredriksson, who was mayor at the time. Ninnie Wikström, a green tech entrepreneur now in her early 40s who has lived in the area on and off since she was a child, was not unduly worried by the announcement. 'Nobody knew what it was and how dangerous it was,' she recalled. Herman Afzelius, Wikström's ex-husband, an IT business manager with startling blue eyes who moved to Kallinge in 2002, also saw no great cause for alarm: yes, there had been something in the water, but now it was fine. He got on with his life. It was almost Christmas, after all. …AND A CLASSIC FROM THE ARCHIVES… Women cyclists in the early 1900s. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo How the invention of the bicycle revolutionised freedom for women. ( Bicycling , approx 8 mins reading time) As bikes began to crowd the streets of America, they transformed women's lives. Women now had an accessible option for independent travel, but also, as anyone who's ever ridden a bike can confirm, riding bikes changes the way you see yourself in the world. It gives you power. Once they got on bicycles, women traveled farther and started to dress more practically; they were literally moving forward completely under their own power. A girl on a bike in the 1800s was a giant middle finger to people everywhere who were telling women what they couldn't do. In 1894, Annie Cohen Kopchovsky became the first woman to ride a bicycle around the world, simply because a man made a bet that it couldn't be done. Note: The Journal generally selects stories that are not paywalled, but some might not be accessible if you have exceeded your free article limit on the site in question. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal

Irish Times

a day ago

• Irish Times

Mahmoud Khalil released after US judge says standards for detention ‘clearly not met'

Columbia University graduate Mahmoud Khalil was released from US immigration detention, where he had been held for more than three months over his activism against Israel's war on Gaza . Khalil, the most high profile of the students to be arrested by the Trump administration for their pro-Palestinian activism, and the last of them still in detention, was ordered to be released by a federal judge on Friday afternoon from an Ice facility in Jena, Louisiana, where he had been held since shortly after plainclothes immigration agents detained him in early March in the lobby of his Columbia building. The 30-year-old emerged from the remote detention centre just after 6.30pm local time, walking through two towering gates topped with razor wire and accompanied by two attorneys into the late afternoon sun and intense humidity. He briefly addressed the small group of media assembled outside. READ MORE 'Although justice prevailed it's very long overdue and this shouldn't have taken three months,' he said. 'I leave some incredible men behind me, over 1,000 people behind me, in a place where they shouldn't have been.' Asked to respond to allegations made by the Trump administration, which has fought for months to keep him detained, that his pro-Palestinian organising constituted a national security threat, he said: 'Trump and his administration, they chose the wrong person for this. That doesn't mean there is a right person for this. There is no right person who should be detained for actually protesting a genocide.' Khalil told reporters he was looking forward to returning home to spend time with his infant son, who was born while his father was detained. 'I can actually hug him,' Khalil said. The federal judge, Michael Farbiarz, said during the hearing on Friday that Khalil is not a flight risk, and 'is not a danger to the community. Period, full stop.' 'It is highly, highly unusual to be seeking detention of a petitioner given the factual record of today,' Farbiarz also said during the hearing. Farbiarz said that the government had 'clearly not met' the standards for detention. Later on Friday, Khalil was ordered to surrender his passport and green card to Ice officials in Jena as part of his conditional release. The order also stipulated that Khalil's travel be limited to a handful of US states, including New York, as Louisiana, Michigan and New Jersey for court appearances. Khalil's arrest was widely decried as a dangerous escalation in the Trump administration's campaign against speech protected by the first amendment to the US constitution. Khalil has not been charged with a crime. His detention was the first in a series of arrests of international student activists, and his release marks the latest in a series of defeats for the administration, which had promised to deport pro-Palestinian international students en masse. Three other students detained on similar grounds – Rümeysa Öztürk, Badar Khan Suri and Mohsen Mahdawi – were previously released while their immigration cases are pending. A number of others voluntarily left the country after deportation proceedings against them were opened; another is in hiding as she fights her case. Farbiarz, of the federal district court in Newark, New Jersey, had previously found that the law invoked to detain Khalil – a rarely used immigration provision allowing the secretary of state to order the deportation of anyone found to have an adverse effect on US foreign policy – is probably unconstitutional. Government officials had accused Khalil of anti-Semitism and of pro-Hamas advocacy, without providing any evidence. Jewish students and faculty had submitted court documents on Khalil's behalf, and he was quoted last year on CNN saying that 'the liberation of the Palestinian people and the Jewish people are intertwined and go hand-by-hand, and you cannot achieve one without the other'. Farbiaz ordered Khalil's release in his federal court case, which was brought to challenge his detention. His immigration case will proceed on a separate track. While the government has suffered setbacks to its foreign policy argument in multiple courts, it is likely to continue arguing that its efforts to deport Khalil are also supported by alleged omissions in his green card application – arguments it brought several weeks after he was first detained, and which his attorneys have rejected. Khalil is married to a US citizen, Noor Abdallah, who gave birth to their first child during her husband's detention. 'I fight for you, and for every Palestinian child whose life deserves safety, tenderness and freedom,' Khalil wrote to his newborn son, Deen, last month. 'I hope one day you will stand tall knowing your father was not absent out of apathy, but out of conviction.' In a statement provided by Khalil's lawyers, Abdalla said she can finally 'breathe a sigh of relief' after the ruling. 'We know this ruling does not begin to address the injustices the Trump administration has brought upon our family, and so many others, but today we are celebrating Mahmoud coming back to New York to be reunited with our little family.' In response to the news that the judge had ordered Khalil to be released on Friday, Amnesty International USA celebrated the decision, calling it 'overdue' and called on the Trump administration to 'immediately comply with this order'. - Guardian

Irish Examiner

2 days ago

• Irish Examiner

Donald Trump calls for special prosecutor to investigate 2020 election

President Donald Trump has called for the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate the 2020 election won by Democrat Joe Biden, repeating his baseless claim that the contest was marred by widespread fraud. 'Biden was grossly incompetent, and the 2020 election was a total FRAUD!' Mr Trump said in a social media post in which he also sought to favourably contrast his immigration enforcement approach with that of the former president. 'The evidence is MASSIVE and OVERWHELMING. A Special Prosecutor must be appointed. This cannot be allowed to happen again in the United States of America! Let the work begin!' Donald Trump has also instructed his administration to investigate Joe Biden's actions as president, alleging aides masked his 'cognitive decline' (David J Phillip/AP) Mr Trump's post, made as his Republican White House is consumed by a hugely substantial foreign policy decision on whether to get directly involved in the Israel-Iran war, is part of an amped-up effort by him to undermine the legitimacy of Mr Biden's presidency. Earlier this month, Mr Trump directed his administration to investigate Mr Biden's actions as president, alleging aides masked his predecessor's 'cognitive decline'. Mr Biden has dismissed the investigation as 'a mere distraction'. The post also revives a long-running grievance by Mr Trump that the election was stolen even though courts around the country and a Trump attorney general from his first term found no evidence of fraud that could have affected the outcome. The Department of Homeland Security's cybersecurity arm pronounced the election 'the most secure in American history'. President Donald Trump (Alex Brandon/AP) It was unclear what Mr Trump had in mind when he called for a special prosecutor, but in the event Attorney General Pam Bondi heeds his call, she may face pressure to appoint someone who has already been confirmed by the Senate. A Justice Department spokesman declined to comment on Friday. The Justice Department has appointed a succession of special counsels in recent years — sometimes, though not always, plucked from outside the agency — to lead investigations into politically sensitive matters, including into conduct by Mr Biden and by Mr Trump. Last year, Mr Trump's personal lawyers launched an aggressive, and successful, challenge to the appointment of Jack Smith, the special counsel assigned to investigate his efforts to undo the 2020 presidential election and his retention of classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida. A Trump-appointed judge agreed, ruling that then-Attorney General Merrick Garland had exceeded his bounds by appointing a prosecutor without Senate approval and confirmation, and dismissed the case. That legal team included Todd Blanche, who is now deputy attorney general, as well as Emil Bove, who is Mr Blanche's top deputy but was recently nominated to serve as a judge on a federal appeals court.