Australian Billionaires Forrest And Rinehart Turn Iron Ore Into Gold
No-one has ever been able to turn lead into gold, as medieval alchemists promised, but two Australian billionaires have found a way to turn iron ore into gold.
Gina Rinehart and Andrew Forrest with fortunes estimated by Forbes at $30.1 billion and $14.8 billion respectively have added gold to their better-known interest in mining iron ore.
Going for gold, iron ore billionaire Andrew Forrest. Photo William West/AFP via Getty Images) AFP via Getty Images
In Rinehart's case the addition of gold is almost accidental with a small lithium exploration company in which she has a 10% interest carving out a gold business with the aim being to catch the record gold price of more than $3380 an ounce.
Delta Lithium, which has been hit by an 80% collapse in the price of the battery metal, is now working on the creation of Ballard Mining which aims to redevelop the Mt Ida goldmine in Western Australia.
The historic mine is located close to Lake Ballard which is home to 51 steel statues made by British artist Antony Gormley and installed in 2003 for a temporary exhibition but have remained as a tourist attraction.
One of the 51 steel figures by Antony Gormley on Lake Ballard, a salt lake, installed in 2003 as a ... More temporary exhibition that stayed, drawing acclaim from visitors and affection from locals, The figures extend around an ironstone mound on the edge of the lake in Western Australia. (Photo by: Auscape/Universal Images Group via Getty Images) Universal Images Group via Getty Images
The addition of the gold asset to a struggling lithium business has revitalised the Delta share price which has risen by 18% over the past month but remains well below its peak during the lithium boom of two years ago.
Forrest is more focused, playing a key role in creating a world class goldmining company based on the big Telfer mine in Western Australia.
Greatland Gold, currently listed on the London Stock Exchange, but planning to relocate to Australia, been a spectacular performer over the past 12-month with its shares rising by 150% to 14.6 pence.
Forrest and his separated wife Nicola, through their company, Wyloo, have an 8.45% interest in Greatland but have indirect interests which could see their stake rise to 21% of Greatland which has a current stock market value of $2.5 billion.
In theory, that means the Forrest duo will have turned a modest initial investment in Greatland into a stake worth more than $500 million.
The complex evolution of Greatland from obscurity into an emerging gold leader has involved a series of deals, capital raisings, and the appointment of leading businesspeople to the company's board.
Greatland Gold director Elizabeth Gaines (Photo by) Getty Images
Greatland's chairman, Mark Barnaba, is a long-time director of Fortescue, the iron ore business controlled by the Forrests. Other directors are Elizabeth Gaines, a former chief executive of Fortescue and Jimmy Wilson, a former head of the iron ore division of the world's biggest mining company BHP.
The key assets in Greatland are the Telfer ore processing plant, unmined areas of the primary orebody and nearby ore deposits being developed to feed the Telfer plant.
Gold, for Rinehart and Forrest, is secondary to their iron ore assets but with the gold price rising and the iron ore price falling it's likely that gold will become of increasing interest.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Could Central Banks Embrace Bitcoin as a Reserve Asset?
Central banks prefer to hold stable assets on their balance sheets. Bitcoin has some of the features they like. It isn't a preferred holding just yet, but it might become one, and perhaps soon. 10 stocks we like better than Bitcoin › Central bankers spend their careers worrying about risks that most investors ignore. In 2024, they bought a record 1,045 tons of gold as insurance against globally swelling sovereign debt loads and growing geopolitical fractures. Those same issues might even be leading a few outliers to consider another hedge asset: Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC). What sounded foolish a decade ago now ticks three boxes every reserve manager studies -- specifically, the asset's limited supply, its round-the-clock liquidity, and its (partial) insulation from certain geopolitical risks. If gold hoards are a vote of no-confidence in fiat currencies, central banks holding a sliver of Bitcoin would be a vote of no-confidence in the entire monetary status quo. Let's see why they're more likely to be casting that vote right now than ever before. Let's start with Bitcoin's scarcity. There can only ever be 21 million Bitcoin, per its protocol (about 19.9 million now are in circulation). It gets harder to mine Bitcoin on a regular basis thanks to its halving mechanics. So there will probably not ever be a large influx of freshly mined coin dumped on the market, indicating that it will likely retain a semblance of price stability in the long term. Other reserve assets, like gold or silver, are not necessarily constrained as precisely. It's true that precious metals can't be printed like fiat currencies can be, but new deposits can be discovered if there's an incentive to look for them, refining methods can be improved, substitutes can be used, or recycling efforts can be undertaken. All those possibilities make it harder to know with confidence that the supply of and demand for those metals will remain relatively constrained in the long run, even if there will probably not be any big surprises in the short term. Another factor is that the coins do not carry any counterparty risk in the same way as other reserve assets, like U.S. Treasury bills or other sovereign bonds. There are no cash flows associated with holding Bitcoin, nor is there any central issuing authority. So it isn't possible for anyone to default on cash flows and tank the price of the asset. Nor is it possible for any issuer to debase their currency to reduce the value that they owe to holders. In the same vein, the network is politically neutral, at least for now. The miners that make up the network are distributed around the globe. Furthermore, there's a strong taboo against allowing any single miner or cartel of miners to accumulate enough mining power to control the network on their own, and substantial technical barriers to prevent such an outcome from happening in the first place. Again, there is no issuer that can devalue Bitcoin to fund their deficit spending, and no single military can blockade its ledgers, nor seize control of it. For smaller economies nursing dollar-denominated debts, that neutrality is attractive insurance. That's why it's becoming a more attractive asset for central bankers. There are already a handful of countries accumulating Bitcoin for the above reasons. El Salvador now holds 6,170 bitcoins worth about $650 million after fresh purchases in May. Governments altogether control 463,741 coins, or roughly 2.3% of the supply, via intentional accumulation or law enforcement seizures. The U.S. tops that list with 207,189 coins, though the country's Federal Reserve is not officially on board with accumulating it. Ukraine's parliament just introduced a bill instructing its central bank to hold Bitcoin alongside gold once post-war reconstruction begins. In January, the Czech National Bank governor floated putting up to 5% of its 146 billion euros ($168 billion) of reserves into Bitcoin to diversify away from dollars and euros. Even if these countries never actually follow through on these plans, the public debate itself legitimizes the asset as something that's stable enough for sovereigns to hold intentionally. As bullish as it is for the coin's holders that governments and central banks are looking for exposure to Bitcoin, the idea of it being a commonly held reserve asset is still controversial, even if it's no longer fringe. Bitcoin is still fairly volatile compared to an asset like gold. As a result, key central banks don't want to touch it. The Swiss National Bank dismissed Bitcoin in April, citing stability concerns. Nonetheless, if even a handful of central banks eventually follow El Salvador's lead, the structural demand could absorb a lot of the coin's floating supply each year. That isn't enough to spike prices overnight, but it could create a steady amount of buying pressure that compounds Bitcoin's long-run scarcity narrative significantly. Investors betting on the asset today are therefore front-running a potential sovereign buyer of last resort, which is to say they're getting exposure to a similar upside that gold already enjoys. For now, Bitcoin remains a speculative reserve candidate, not a mainstream holding. Yet the very discussion marks a shift in monetary imagination that's just starting to pick up speed. Central banks won't replace their gold bars with cold wallets tomorrow, but the door is now open, and that's a smart reason to consider buying the asset today. Before you buy stock in Bitcoin, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Bitcoin wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $659,171!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $891,722!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 995% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Alex Carchidi has positions in Bitcoin. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Bitcoin. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Could Central Banks Embrace Bitcoin as a Reserve Asset? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Ur‑Energy (URG) Gains Amid Bullish Outlook on Uranium
The share price of Ur‑Energy Inc. (NYSEAMERICAN:URG) surged by 17.71% between June 11 and June 18, 2025, putting it among the Energy Stocks that Gained the Most This Week. Aerial view of the vast landscape of Great Divide Basin, Wyoming. Ur‑Energy Inc. (NYSEAMERICAN:URG) is engaged in uranium mining, recovery, and processing activities, including the acquisition, exploration, development, and operation of uranium mineral properties in the United States. Ur‑Energy Inc. (NYSEAMERICAN:URG) received a massive boost following a more than 7% surge in the global price of uranium over the last week. The surge comes as a result of an announcement by the Sprott Physical Uranium Trust that it would acquire around $200 million worth of the nuclear fuel in its physical form, twice the amount it initially signaled in its agreement with Canaccord Genuity. The stock has also benefited from an upcoming nuclear renaissance in the United States, following an executive order by President Trump to support domestic uranium mining and enrichment capacity, cut regulations, and accelerate licenses for reactors. Following the recent rally, the share price of Ur‑Energy Inc. (NYSEAMERICAN:URG) has jumped by more than 61% over the last month. While we acknowledge the potential of URG as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 10 Best Nuclear Energy Stocks to Buy Right Now and Disclosure: None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Greenland Resources secures 30-year exploitation licence for Malmbjerg project in Greenland
Greenland Resources has been granted a 30-year exploitation licence for molybdenum and magnesium at the Malmbjerg project in Greenland. The licence stipulates that mining activities must commence by 31 December 2028 and allows for a potential licence extension of up to 50 years. The company is also focusing on addressing additional requirements that can be met following the issuance of the exploitation licence. Greenland Resources has committed to an environmentally conscious mine and process plant design, aiming to reduce CO₂ emissions and water usage. The Malmbjerg project is a pure molybdenum open-pit venture in east-central Greenland near the coast, north-west of Iceland and close to Mestersvig airport. The project is expected to generate more than $800m (DKr5.18m) in corporate taxes for the Greenland Government over its lifetime. The mineral reserves are estimated at 245 million tonnes (mt) with 571 million pounds (mlb) of molybdenum metal, ideal for European high-performance steel products due to its low impurity levels. Greenland Resources executive chairman of the board Ruben Shiffman said: 'We sincerely thank the Government of Greenland. Our team has a good track record from previous mining projects on sustainable mining and providing wealth and prosperity to communities. 'Malmbjerg has the potential to generate close to $1bn in taxes during the 20-year life of the mine, can create critical infrastructure on the east coast and provide people with new life skills. The project comes at a time of deglobalisation and significant growth in defence expenditures. It will be able to supply around 25% of all EU molybdenum needs and 100% of defence applications.' A definitive feasibility study for the project was completed by Tetra Tech in February 2022. The project's feasibility study highlights include a 20-year mine life with an average annual production of 32.8mlb of molybdenum metal in the first ten years, and an average life-of-mine production of 24.1mlb. In February, Greenland Resources secured a ten-year offtake agreement with Outokumpu valued at approximately $160m (€138.94m) to supply 8mlb of molybdenum annually. This partnership supports Greenland Resources' long-term strategy and facilitates capex financing, with Outokumpu assisting in the arrangements. "Greenland Resources secures 30-year exploitation licence for Malmbjerg project in Greenland" was originally created and published by Mining Technology, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
