logo
‘My brother would still be alive': Sister of teen killed in 100mph crash calls for new restrictions for young drivers

‘My brother would still be alive': Sister of teen killed in 100mph crash calls for new restrictions for young drivers

Independent05-03-2025

'They never stood a chance,' said Mia Pullen, recalling the night her younger brother Elliot was one of three teens killed in a car crash.
In the court trial that followed it emerged the driver, 19-year-old Thomas Johnson, had inhaled laughing gas at the wheel and was travelling at more than 100mph on a 30mph road.
Elliot, 17, and Daniel Hancock and Ethan Goddard, both 18, were pronounced dead at the scene.
Ms Pullen told The Independent: 'The boys were not close friends and were out for a seemingly pointless drive when Thomas lost control of his car.'
She is one of 71 signatories to a letter to Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer urging him to introduce reforms targeting dangerous youth driving as part of a road safety strategy being drafted by ministers. Each signatory lost a brother or sister in a collision involving a young driver.
The letter, shared with The Independent, calls for Graduated Driver Licensing (GDL), which would introduce a transition period between learner and fully-qualified driver for young drivers.
Motorists aged 17 to 24 account for 18 per cent of all fatal or serious car crashes in Britain despite only accounting for 6 per cent of all miles driven. Crashes involving young drivers killed or seriously injured 4,959 people in 2023, the latest year for which data is available.
Young men, who account for two-thirds of the total for their age group, are four times as likely to be killed or seriously injured compared with over-25s.
Campaigners hope new measures would resemble those in the US, Australia and New Zealand, where newly-qualified young drivers are not allowed to carry similar-age passengers or drive late at night.
A study in the US looked at involvement in fatal crashes for different age groups between 1996, when states began adopting GDL policies, and 2016. In that time, the rate fell for 17-year-olds by 61 per cent, and for 18-year-olds by 54 per cent. The number for 30 to 59-year-olds also dropped but only by 29 per cent.
Ms Pullen said GDL rules would have stopped her brother from going for the ride that killed him and the others.
'I signed the sibling letter on GDLs because I cannot fathom how the government believes they are not a necessary part of learning to drive as a teenager or young adult,' she said.
'GDLs would've saved them and would have prevented Thomas [Johnson] from having to spend his days in prison, living with what he has done.'
The Department for Transport has ruled out including GDL in the road safety strategy, despite roads minister Lilian Greenwood having last year supported a bill calling for its introduction.
Ms Greenwood told a Westminster Hall debate last month that youth driver safety will be part of the strategy but the government was 'exploring options to tackle the root causes of the issue without unfairly penalising young drivers'.
'Where is the fairness for our dead siblings?', asked the letter, which was written in response to the minister's dismissal of GDL after The Independent revealed her change of course.
Clara Greenwood also signed the letter. She was six when her sister Alice, 12, was killed in a crash caused by an 18-year-old driver, Andrew Sellers, who was driving at a high speed in a convoy of five cars all driven by teenagers. The crash also left Ms Greenwood and her mother seriously injured.
Sellers and his passenger died but four other teenagers in the convoy were jailed for causing death by dangerous driving.
'Alice had barely started high school when she was killed, her whole life was ahead of her.
'The teenagers in the other cars were all under 19 years old, and an 18-year-old and his 16-year-old passenger also lost their life: their lives were also ahead of them.
'GDLs would have saved both my sister and the other two young men, and would have prevented all the hurt that their deaths caused my family and their family.'
Road safety campaign groups have promoted GDL in Britain for years. In the past year, The AA and the National Fire Chiefs Council all backing it.
A DfT spokesperson said: 'Every death on our roads is a tragedy and our thoughts remain with the families of everyone who has lost a loved one in this way.
'Whilst we are not considering Graduated Driving Licences, we absolutely recognise that young people are disproportionately victims of tragic incidents on our roads, and we are exploring options to tackle the root causes of this without unfairly penalising young drivers.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Condition of rural Gloucestershire roads to be checked by AI
Condition of rural Gloucestershire roads to be checked by AI

BBC News

time11 hours ago

  • BBC News

Condition of rural Gloucestershire roads to be checked by AI

Artificial intelligence (AI) is set to be used to survey the conditions of rural County Council has been working with the Department for Transport( DfT) to implement the AI-based camera assessment on the road networks. It comes as councillors raised concerns over a lack of data from the last two years on unclassified routes in the county, the Local Democracy Reporting Service scheme is currently under development, according to the council. Speaking at a cabinet meeting on June 18, Minchinhampton councillor Chloe Turner said the data is "crucial" for motorists using rural roads. Conditions on larger unclassified roads were previously assessed with a specialised scanner vehicle every three years."Since the last assessment period in 2023 when DfT removed both the reporting requirement and standard by which to measure unclassified roads, all authorities have been working with DfT to implement an AI based camera assessment of their networks," Mr Harris said in a written response to Ms Turner. "This remains under development, but is likely to be the agreed method to be implemented in 2026," he added.

Hildenborough cyclist says she does not feel safe riding in Kent
Hildenborough cyclist says she does not feel safe riding in Kent

BBC News

time3 days ago

  • BBC News

Hildenborough cyclist says she does not feel safe riding in Kent

A cyclist from Kent says she does not feel safe riding on the county's roads as a charity says a record number of people are reporting to police being overtaken too safety charity IAM RoadSmart says the numbers of cyclists who submitted video footage of poor driving to police also doubled from 7,249 in 2021 to 15,779 in 2024More than half of motorists admit they do not know how much space to leave when overtaking, the charity Alice Thomas, from Hildenborough, said: "I don't feel safe cycling in Kent, I lived in London for 10 years and I felt safer cycling there than I do here - drivers get so annoyed and overtake very closely." IAM RoadSmart says data shows the number of reports leading to the serving of a notice of intended prosecution rose from 38% in 2021 to 54% in a third of people say they do not cycle because they think it is too dangerous, the charity to the Department for Transport, 87 pedal cyclists were killed in Great Britain in 2023, while 3,942 were reported to be seriously injured and 10,970 slightly injured. Ms Thomas told BBC Radio Kent: "I always see arguments between cyclists and drivers online, comment sections, radio phone-ins, but other countries aren't like that, they all work together, it feels like a real conflict here." 'Cyclists are human beings' The Highway Code, which was updated in 2022, recommends that drivers gave cyclists at least 1.5m (5ft) of space - about the width of a compact car - when overtaking at speeds of up to 30mph (48kmh).Ms Thomas says: "There's a big narrative between cyclists and drivers hating each other, which is crazy because the majority of cyclists are drivers as well."So it's not one or the other, cyclists are human beings. "I'm a mother of two young boys and I always just think, I want to be able to go home safely to my sons."

Dartford Charge will go up for drivers - here's how much it rises
Dartford Charge will go up for drivers - here's how much it rises

Metro

time4 days ago

  • Metro

Dartford Charge will go up for drivers - here's how much it rises

The Dartford Crossing charge is set to increase later on this year to help ease congestion, the Department for Transport has announced. The fee, which is paid by motorists driving on the A282 road between Dartford in Kent in the south and Thurrock in Essex in the north, is used to maintain upkeep of the bridge. From September 1, the Dartford Crossing charge will increase from £2.50 to £3.50 for cars, minibuses and motorhomes, while coaches, buses and vans will be charged £4.20 instead of the previous price of £3. The Dartford Crossing charge for lorries and large vehicles with more than two axles will increase from £6 to £8.40. Motorbikes and mopeds can continue to cross for free. The route is the UK's busiest crossing as it sees an average of 150,000 vehicles a day, but it was built for 135,000, National Highways said. On some days, traffic reaches 180,000, and the crossing is no stranger to traffic gridlock and severe delays. Drivers using the crossing, which is made up of the Queen Elizabeth II bridge southbound and two tunnels northbound, have to pay the Dart Charge every time they use it. The Dart Charge has faced criticism from motorists who have been wrongly fined for crossings they never made, including a doctor who was fined 34 times after the ANPR cameras mistook another number plate as hers. Residents have been able to cross as many times as they want for £20 a year, but that will also increase this autumn to £25. Announcing the Dartford Crossing charge increase, junior transport minister, Lilian Greenwood, said the traffic levels are 'well in excess of the crossing's design capacity, causing delays for drivers using the crossing, congestion and journey disruption to drivers on the M25 and a range of knock-on impacts for local communities.' The crossing charges have increased steadily since the four-lane bridge opened in 1991, shortly after the M25 opened. The tunnels, which opened in 1963 and 1980 respectively, originally cost two shillings and sixpence to use. It is thought the charges were intended to be phased out when the construction costs were covered, but the charges have become a permanent fixture. More Trending People in the area have told Metro that when an incident blocks traffic at Dartford, the nearby local roads become mayhem with diverted vehicles navigating narrow roads. One resident said it is not uncommon to see huge lorries clogging up the village roads when Dartford traffic is diverted. In a bid to take pressure off the Dartford, National Highways wants to build a second crossing nearby, the Lower Thames Crossing. The £10 billion Lower Thames Crossing was awarded £590 million in government funding after the project was approved by planners. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: HS2 is delayed again – here's how much it is over budget MORE: Another e-bike brand is set to launch in London this summer MORE: Traffic delays on M25 after multi-vehicle crash

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store