logo
Migration past crisis but still a big issue, says agency chief

Migration past crisis but still a big issue, says agency chief

Euronews05-06-2025

Europe is past the worst of its peak migration flows but cannot afford to calm its efforts to deal with the issue, the head of the International Centre for Migration Policy Development (ICMPD) has told Euronews in an interview.
The ICMPD is an international organisation that supports governments and institutions in developing and implementing long-term strategies to manage and govern migration.
"We're not in an exceptional situation anymore,' said Michael Spindelegger, reflecting on the peak migration flows of 2015–2016 in the Vienna office of the agency, adding: 'But with nearly one million asylum applications again last year, we can't afford to calm down.'
Despite a big drop in irregular migration to the EU this year, migration remains a thorny political issue in many countries.
Michael Spindelegger, a former MEP from Austria, has been in charge of the ICMPD for almost a decade, told Euronews the EU is still in need of a 'balanced and creative' approach to migration policy.
Spindelegger expressed support for emerging migration models, such as Italy's controversial plan to process asylum seekers in Albania—an initiative he described as 'innovative' and legally distinct from the UK's Rwanda scheme.
'The key difference is Italy remains responsible. It's their authorities running the process,' he said. 'If this works, it could be a model for other European countries.'
Asked about proposals from countries like Denmark that have seen the country come up against the European Convention on Human Rights, Spindelegger was open.
'Everyone is invited to explore intelligent, modern ways of handling migration,' he said.
To curb irregular migration, Denmark has deployed a mixture of policies from paying migrants to return to their home countries to the so-called "ghetto law" that aims to limit the concentration of ethnic minorities in certain neighbourhoods.
Denmark and Italy published an open letter -backed by a handful of other EU nations - criticising the European Court of Human Rights for going "too far" in interpreting the law on migration matters.
The recently ratified EU Migration and Asylum Pact—years in the making—has sparked division among member states, with Hungary, Poland, and the Netherlands voicing strong opposition.
Still, Spindelegger called the pact a 'big step forward', dismissing claims that it's falling apart.
'There is always opposition in Europe. The fact that we reached a breakthrough after so many years of deadlock is a success in itself,' he noted.
He emphasised that national initiatives like Italy's do not conflict with the pact, which is primarily about streamlining asylum procedures and strengthening border controls.
On the contentious issue of returning migrants to countries deemed 'safe', Spindelegger highlighted the complexity of the debate—particularly in relation to Syria.
'It depends very much on developments on the ground,' he said. 'In parts of Syria, especially along the Mediterranean coast, conditions might be improving, but we need real guarantees for minority protection.'
He urged EU states to engage directly with Syrian authorities before any broader policy shifts, warning against premature decisions.
EU ministers will meet in Luxembourg next week for talks on migration and asylum.
Syria's new government has agreed to give UN inspectors access to suspected former nuclear sites immediately, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has said.
Rafael Grossi confirmed the development after talks with Syria's interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa and other officials in Damascus.
The UN agency's aim is "to bring total clarity over certain activities that took place in the past that were, in the judgement of the agency, probably related to nuclear weapons", Grossi said.
He described the new Syrian government as "committed to opening up to the world, to international cooperation", and expressed hope that the inspection process could be completed within months.
In 2024, an IAEA team visited some sites of interest while former President Bashar al-Assad was still in power.
Since al-Assad's fall in December, the IAEA has been seeking to restore access to sites associated with Syria's nuclear programme.
Under the former dictator's rule, Syria is believed to have operated an extensive clandestine nuclear programme, which included an undeclared nuclear reactor built by North Korea in the eastern province of Deir el-Zour.
The IAEA described the reactor as being "not configured to produce electricity," raising the concern that Damascus sought to construct a nuclear bomb there by producing weapons-grade plutonium.
The reactor site only became public knowledge after Israel destroyed the facility in airstrikes in 2007.
Syria later levelled the site and never responded fully to the IAEA's questions about it.
Grossi said inspectors plan to return to the reactor in Deir el-Zour as well as to three other sites.
A miniature neutron source reactor in Damascus and a facility in Homs that can process yellow-cake uranium are among the sites under IAEA safeguards.
While there are no indications that there have been releases of radiation from the sites, Grossi said the watchdog is concerned that "enriched uranium can be lying somewhere and could be reused, could be smuggled, could be trafficked".
He said al-Sharaa, who has courted Western governments since taking power, had shown a "very positive disposition to talk to us and to allow us to carry out the activities we need to".
Apart from resuming inspections, Grossi said the IAEA is prepared to transfer equipment for nuclear medicine and to help rebuild the radiotherapy, nuclear medicine and oncology infrastructure in a health system severely weakened by nearly 14 years of civil war.
"And the president has expressed to me he's interested in exploring, in the future, nuclear energy as well," Grossi said.
A number of other countries in the region, including Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt and Jordan, are pursuing nuclear energy in some form.
Grossi said Syria would most likely be looking into small modular reactors, which are cheaper and easier to deploy than traditional large ones.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hundreds take to the street in the Hague to demonstrate against NATO
Hundreds take to the street in the Hague to demonstrate against NATO

Euronews

time2 hours ago

  • Euronews

Hundreds take to the street in the Hague to demonstrate against NATO

Hundreds of people gathered on Sunday to protest against NATO, rising military spending, and the risk of war with Iran. The protest comes two days before a summit of the alliance in The Hague, where leaders are expected to discuss increasing defence budgets. 'Let's invest in peace and sustainable energy,' Belgian politician Joe d'Haese said addressing a crowd in a park near the summit location. Although the protest focused on NATO and the war in Gaza, many Iranians joined in response to Sunday's attacks carried out by the United States on three key Iranian nuclear sites. Demonstrators were seen holding signs reading 'No Iran War,' and "Hands off Iran." 'We are opposed to war. People want to live a peaceful life,' said 74-year-old Hossein Hamadani, an Iranian living in the Netherlands. "Things are not good. So why do we spend money on war?' he added. Arno van der Veen, spokesperson for the Counter Summit Coalition for Peace and Justice, which organised the protest, said the role of NATO has become problematic now that the US decided to join Israel in the war in Iran. "If there is a retaliation from Iran now, which would be just and legitimate under international law, then we, as the Netherlands, would also be at war with Iran," he told Euronews. "The next step is a nuclear war. And that is what we are incredibly worried about, and why we can see that the moment you buy more weapons, the chances increase that you will also use them. And that is life-threatening," he warned. Anti-NATO activists are often criticised for having a supposedly pro-Russian stance. Van der Veen emphasised, however, that his organisation stands against Russian imperialism, while also opposing US imperialism. "They are both now trying to divide the natural resources in the ground in Ukraine," he said. "The population of Ukraine is the victim of this war, and also the population of Russia, because they are all sent into the army." The Netherlands is hosting the annual NATO summit, starting Tuesday, with world leaders meeting on Wednesday. Leaders plan to agree on higher defence spending, as pushed by US President Donald Trump. Talks were nearly complete last week, until Spain's Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez told NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte that asking Spain to spend 5% of its GDP on defence was 'unreasonable and counterproductive.' Since Russia invaded Ukraine over three years ago, NATO countries have increased defence spending. But nearly a third still do not meet the current 2% target. The summit is under tight security, with the largest safety operation ever in the Netherlands, called 'Orange Shield.' It involves thousands of police and military officers, drones, no-fly zones, and cybersecurity teams.

Exclusive: Israel blasts EU report claiming Gaza human rights breaches
Exclusive: Israel blasts EU report claiming Gaza human rights breaches

Euronews

time3 hours ago

  • Euronews

Exclusive: Israel blasts EU report claiming Gaza human rights breaches

Israel has blasted the EU-Israel Association Agreement (EUSR) review, saying 'this report and its conclusions should not be taken seriously or used as a basis for any future actions or conversations', in a letter from the country's foreign ministry to the EU seen by Euronews on Sunday. 'Decency would dictate addressing the report's shortcomings and dismissing it in its entirety,' the letter, sent to the Commission and External Action Service, concludes. The EU-Israel Association Agreement review released on Friday said that Israel's actions in the Gaza Strip indicate a breach of the human rights provisions contained in its Association Agreement with the European Union. The issue is set to be considered by foreign ministers meeting on Monday. Citing a collection of findings by independent international organisations, the highly anticipated review from the bloc's diplomatic service said it found "indications" that Israel breached its human rights obligations with actions in Gaza. The breach stems from Israel's offensive on Gaza and the stringent conditions applied to the deliveries of humanitarian aid, which have stoked fears of widespread famine among Palestinians living in the densely populated enclave. In the letter seen by Euronews, the Israeli foreign ministry expressed its 'astonishment' that the report disregarded 'our detailed response to the questions submitted to us'. The letter starts with a presentation of what it calls 'the strategic reality Israel is facing', detailing how it is 'fighting a war on seven fronts.' 'It is against this backdrop – Israel's combat with a host of brutal enemies - that the EUSR was tasked with doing a 'rush job', compiling a biased and extremely one-sided summary of many anti-Israeli voices and documents into a so-called 'honest report' for the Member States of the EU,' the letter states. The Israeli foreign ministry letter focuses on what it calls 'two failures' of the EUSR report, claiming that it 'fails to take into account the context' and 'crucial facts' the October 7 attacks followed by 'the ongoing attempt by Iran and its proxies to bring about the annihilation of the Jewish state'. 'A report that opens with an admission that it lacks the ability to verify its own statements, or even the mandate to address the numerous terror attacks by Palestinians against Israel, cannot be taken seriously,' the letter says. The letter claims that the EUSR report 'fails morally' by neglecting to address any damage inflicted on Israeli civilians' by Hamas' control of the Gaza strip and its actions against Israelis, including what it calls 'the proven complicity of UN bodies such as UNRWA.' 'The report aims to deny Israel's right to defend itself against terrorism. It does not cite any of the many positive actions undertaken by Israel in the humanitarian field and neglects to mention the continuous refusal by Hamas of a US-brokered hostage deal (the 'Witkoff Proposal') which Israel has agreed to,' the letter says. Secondly, the Israeli foreign ministry letter claims that the EUSR report also 'fails methodologically'. No opportunity to defend itself, Israel claims 'Israel was not given an opportunity to defend itself against the extreme accusations mounted on it. Regretfully, even a person facing dismissal from a job, receives more leeway to state his or her case, than the complete disregard the EUSR has shown toward the objective facts and evidence of the State of Israel," the letter claims. The EUSR did not adhere to due process, it alleges, choosing not to engage Israel in dialogue over the report. The EUSR also did not allow Israeli information to be included in the report; and in fact, even when Israel thoroughly detailed its position in communication– offering detailed answers on several topics - the information presented was neither added nor addressed in the report,' the letter states. The letter insists on 'Israel's Compliance with International Law', and claims that 'a simple dialogue with Israeli authorities could have made these facts clear. Israel is a democratic state abiding by IHL and international law, while fighting to survive in a region void of democracy and full of terrorism and radicalism. Its actions should be judged fairly and honestly, a process at which the report in question has failed.' 'Throughout the war against Hamas, Israel has facilitated the transfer of large quantities of humanitarian aid into Gaza, even under fire,' the letter says in response to the EUSR report, which speaks about the blockade of humanitarian assistance, military strikes against hospitals, the forced displacement of the Palestinian population, mass arrests, arbitrary detentions, the expansion of settlements, which are illegal under international law, in the Occupied Territories, and the violence committed by settlers. According to the EUSR report, the violations are described as numerous and serious. The internal review exercise was launched last month at the request of 17 countries, led by the Netherlands, to determine whether Israel was still complying with Article 2 of the Association Agreement, which states bilateral relations "shall be based on respect for human rights and democratic principles, which guides their internal and international policy and constitutes an essential element of this agreement". The Israeli foreign ministry response concludes that the EUSR report 'is absurd and reflects an unprecedented process directed at a democratic state in the midst of war,' and that it 'completely ignores the circumstances, as well as the substantive comments and responses provided by Israel.' The stern response by Israel's foreign ministry appears to echo the statements made by Israel's ambassador to the EU and NATO Haim Regev, on Thursday 19 June. In an interview with Euronews, ambassador Regev was clear and firm about his government's current interactions with the European Union on the crisis with Iran and about Israel's actions in Gaza, saying 'we hear different tones, but at the end of the road we see and we feel the support.' The Israeli government has 'a continuous and intensive interaction' with the top EU institutions in Brussels, but 'of course it is complicated when it comes to have one position in the Union composed of 27 member states,' the Israeli diplomat said. 'There is a war right now and Israel is actually leading this war against Iran, that this is the war also for the benefit, for the long run of Europe. So this is not the time right now to examine or to push things or to try to put obstacles in the Israel-EU relations," Regev concluded. The Commission and External Action Service have been approached for comment.

Macron urges Iran's president to 'exercise utmost restraint'
Macron urges Iran's president to 'exercise utmost restraint'

LeMonde

time6 hours ago

  • LeMonde

Macron urges Iran's president to 'exercise utmost restraint'

President Emmanuel Macron on Sunday, June 22, urged Tehran to de-escalate and "exercise the utmost restraint" after US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities in a call with his Iranian counterpart Masoud Pezeshkian. "I called for de-escalation and for Iran to exercise the utmost restraint in this dangerous context to allow a return to the diplomatic path," Macron posted on X. He said he also told Iran to "renounce nuclear weapons," warning of "the risk of the worst for the entire region." It is "the only path that leads to peace and security for all," Macron said. On Sunday, Macron also spoke with the leaders of Saudi Arabia, Oman, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar. Together with European partners, France has advocated a diplomatic solution to end the conflict between Israel and Iran. Macron had said Saturday that France and its European partners planned to step up talks with Iran. Earlier Sunday, French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot expressed "concern" over the US air strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities and urged "restraint." Macron will convene a meeting of France's defence and national security council on Sunday evening, the presidency said. On Friday, British, French, German and EU diplomats held talks in Geneva with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, a week after Israel started its bombardment of Iranian sites. They urged Iran to revive diplomatic efforts with the United States to find a solution in the standoff over its nuclear programme.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store