Japan appears to show some support for U.S. strikes on Iran nuke sites
KYODO NEWS - 18 minutes ago - 14:01 | All, Japan, World
The Japanese government on Monday appeared to show some support for U.S. strikes on Iran's key nuclear sites over the weekend, saying that they signaled Washington's resolve to block Tehran from racing toward possession of nuclear weapons.
Noting that the "the most important thing" is to de-escalate the situation over Iran's nuclear activities, Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya said in a statement, "Japan understands that the U.S. action demonstrates its determination to de-escalate the situation while preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons."
He also acknowledged that the United States has been "seriously pursuing dialogue" amid difficult circumstances surrounding the Iranian nuclear issue.
Japan continues to "strongly hope that the path to dialogue will be reopened" between the United States and Iran, while vowing "all necessary diplomatic efforts in cooperation with the international community" toward peace and stability in the Middle East, the foreign minister added.
The United States conducted airstrikes on three key Iranian nuclear facilities early Sunday, joining its ally Israel's conflict with Iran that began after Israeli forces attacked nuclear and military targets in its regional archrival on June 13.
Japan has traditionally maintained amicable ties with Iran even as its security alliance with the United States has remained strong. Stability in the Middle East is important for resource-scarce Japan, given its heavy dependence on the region for crude oil.
Speaking to reporters on Sunday, Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba refrained from expressing immediate support for the U.S. military action, while underscoring the importance of de-escalating the situation and maintaining Japan's position that Iranian possession of nuclear weapons should never be allowed.
Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi did not say whether the statement by the foreign minister was a clear show of backing for the U.S. attack, only reiterating the words from the statement when for clarification by a reporter during a press conference Monday.
Related coverage:
Most Japanese worried about Mideast war's impact on daily lives: poll
Japan vigilant amid Iran conflict, mum on support for U.S. attacks
U.S. enters war with Iran, Trump says key nuclear sites wiped out
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yomiuri Shimbun
42 minutes ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Japan PM Ishiba to Skip NATO Summit
TOKYO (Jiji Press) — Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba has canceled his visit to the Netherlands for the NATO summit, the Japanese government announced Monday. While the government press release said that the cancellation of the three-day trip from Tuesday was due to 'various circumstances,' informed sources said that the decision reflected the tense situation in the Middle East. The prime minister is expected to focus on ensuring the safety of Japanese nationals in Iran and Israel, and also on maintaining stable energy supplies. South Korean President Lee Jae-myung had already decided not to attend the summit. Like Japan, South Korea is an Indo-Pacific partner of NATO. Earlier on Monday, Ishiba told reporters in the city of Itoman in the southernmost Japan prefecture of Okinawa, 'As my main objective (of the trip) is to attend a meeting involving South Korea, Japan, Australia and New Zealand, I'd like to reach a decision after taking the attendance status of such nations into consideration.' Ishiba was set to hold talks with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte and others as part of Japan's engagement as a NATO partner nation. Japan's prime minister has attended the NATO summit since 2022, when Russia launched its invasion on Ukraine.
Asahi Shimbun
an hour ago
- Asahi Shimbun
Sanseito wins 1st Tokyo assembly seats; Ishimaru's party shut out
Sanseito leader Sohei Kamiya speaks at the party's headquarters in Tokyo's Minato Ward on June 22. (Akari Sugiyama) Rising party Sanseito secured its first seats in the Tokyo metropolitan assembly on June 22 while newcomer Saisei no Michi (The Path to Rebirth) failed miserably after much fanfare. Sanseito candidate Masanori Mochizuki, 35, won an assembly seat in Setagaya Ward, while party colleague Sanae Ezaki, 39, was successful in Nerima Ward. The conservative party promotes 'Japanese First' policies that have been compared with the 'America First' thinking of U.S. President Donald Trump. The party fielded four candidates in the Tokyo assembly election, including Mochizuki. 'Thanks to the efforts of our candidates, the party's leadership election, the release of our draft constitution, and other ongoing activities, we've been able to increase people's awareness of our party online,' Sanseito leader Sohei Kamiya said on the evening of June 22. When he was projected to win a seat, Mochizuki said: 'This is the result of the party's steady efforts. But it's just a milestone. Our party members will unite to work harder for the Upper House election next month.' In the assembly election campaign, Sanseito advocated a 50-percent reduction in the metropolitan government's residential tax, public ownership of essential infrastructure, such as crematoriums and subways, and the distribution of 'rice coupons' to households with children and those facing financial hardship. Sanseito has been gaining support across the country largely through YouTube videos and social media. It also built on the momentum it gained from recent city assembly elections on June 15. First-time candidates from Sanseito won the most votes in the elections in Amagasaki, Hyogo Prefecture, Nishio, Aichi Prefecture, and Awara, Fukui Prefecture. ZERO FOR 42 For the Path to Rebirth, the outcome of the election could not have been worse. The party fielded 42 candidates across 35 electoral districts, but none of them gained a seat. The regional political party was established in January by Shinji Ishimaru, who attracted national attention by placing second in the Tokyo gubernatorial election last year with around 1.66 million votes. But the new party had a relatively short preparation period to decide on candidates and devise strategy for the assembly election. Despite the shutout of his party, Ishimaru said it has accomplished one of its missions. 'As the party leader, I don't cling to results like that,' he said at a news conference on the night of June 22. 'Our goal was to field candidates in the Tokyo metropolitan assembly election, which we have already achieved.' He had called for broad public participation in politics, and his candidate recruitment effort attracted 1,128 applicants. The chosen candidates included employees from major companies and some executives. The Path to Rebirth matched the Liberal Democratic Party for the most candidates fielded in the election. Ishimaru's party presented no concrete policy platform, except for limiting its successful candidates' time in the assembly to 'two terms or eight years.' The party's candidates were allowed to shape their own campaign messages. Ishimaru joined the candidates on the streets, appealing to voters by saying: 'The current Tokyo government lacks a functioning dual-representation system. The Path to Rebirth offers a better alternative for the assembly.' However, Ishimaru himself did not run in the election. Official endorsements for the party's candidates were only finalized about two months before the election campaign started, giving them limited time to build name recognition in their districts. One party candidate said, 'People generally know who Ishimaru is, but voters asked me, 'What is the Path to Rebirth?'
The Mainichi
an hour ago
- The Mainichi
Editorial: US attack on Iran facilities a high-handed use of force going against reason
The administration of U.S. President Donald Trump has launched attacks on three nuclear facilities in Iran, saying its goal is to destroy Iran's nuclear development capabilities and prevent a nuclear threat. Intervention by the U.S. military could lead to the spread of war in the Middle East, deepening global chaos. It is imperative to put an end to the conflict as soon as possible. Several large "bunker buster" bombs designed to penetrate deep in the ground before exploding were used to strike the underground Fordo nuclear facility in central Iran. In an announcement, Trump said the strikes "completely and totally obliterated" Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities, and threatened continued attacks unless Iran makes peace with Israel. He also hinted at the possibility of a regime change in Iran. Two days before the strikes, Trump had said he would decide whether or not to attack Iran within two weeks, leaving room for negotiations with the country, but went ahead with military action without waiting for direct talks. Israel had requested the U.S. military's attack on Iran's nuclear facilities. In a video message, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu praised Trump's "bold decision" to target the facilities, and stated that in its action, "America has been truly unsurpassed." Fostering further confusion The strikes drew a backlash from Iran, which criticized them as "outrageous." Iran downplayed the damage as being limited, and revealed its intention to continue nuclear development. Admittedly, while Iran claims that its nuclear development is for "peaceful use," it has taken actions raising suspicions of nuclear weapons development. It is said to be producing highly enriched uranium close to weapons-grade levels. The facility at Fordo is built deep underground, protected by bedrock, and is believed to house highly enriched uranium. However, this does not justify the U.S. attacks. Under international law, the use of force against another country is only permitted in cases of self-defense or if there is a United Nations Security Council resolution. The exercise of self-defense is premised on either retaliating after being attacked or facing an imminent threat, but neither applies here. In the first place, Israel's preemptive strike against Iran violates international law. The U.S. military's attack is tantamount to complicity in this illegal act. Trump has stressed that Iran's nuclear development poses a serious threat to international society. If that's indeed the case, then the logical thing for him to do would be to go to the United Nations Security Council and present evidence of it. Trump's actions, completely disregarding rules and procedures to attack another country's territory at will, go against reason and cannot be overlooked. Attacks on nuclear facilities carry the risk of radioactive leaks and are ethically unacceptable. Previously during the Iraq War, which was initiated under the pretext of removing weapons of mass destruction, the Saddam Hussein regime was toppled, yet no evidence of such weapons was found. Even within the ruling Republican Party, there have arisen claims that not consulting Congress on the use of force is unconstitutional. It is only natural that U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres stated he was "gravely alarmed" by the use of force by the United States against Iran and warned that it poses a "direct threat to international peace and security." The concern is that the entire Middle East could be plunged into war, severely impacting the world. Diplomacy as a means of resolution Iran has indicated it could retaliate with strikes against U.S. military bases in the Middle East. There is a risk that pro-Iranian armed groups rooted across the Middle East could join the conflict. If that happens, Western nations and Israel's confrontation with Arab and Islamic countries will intensify. Russia and China are likely to harden their stance against the West. Iran has suggested that it could close the Strait of Hormuz leading to the Persian Gulf, a vital artery for oil transportation. The surge in oil prices would severely impact a world already suffering from inflation. The wars in Europe and the Middle East are likely to increase distrust among emerging and developing countries collectively known as the Global South, which are already bearing the economic brunt of the conflicts. Japan's position is also under scrutiny. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba condemned Israel's attack on Iran as "absolutely unacceptable," but regarding the U.S. attack, only stated that "early stabilization is of utmost importance." In Asia, North Korea is manufacturing nuclear warheads and deploying numerous ballistic missiles capable of carrying them. The threat level is more severe than that of Iran. The U.S. previously considered attacking North Korean nuclear facilities but refrained from doing so due to the risk of Asia plunging into chaos. As an ally, Japan must not overlook the United States' unilateral use of military force. It should collaborate with Europe to encourage restraint. Solutions by force create future sources of trouble, leading to repeated tragedies. Only a diplomatic resolution can fundamentally address the root issues.
