From Iran to Pakistan and Ukraine: MAID and the dangerous democracy of war
The images streaming from conflict zones in 2025 tell a chilling story of warfare's rapid evolution. Israeli fighter jets targeting Iranian nuclear facilities while swarms of drones darken the skies over Tel Aviv. Indian precision strikes eliminating Pakistani terrorist camps without a single civilian casualty. Ukrainian drones penetrating deep into Russian territory, launched from operators sitting safely hundreds of miles away. Welcome to the MAID era — Missiles, Artificial Intelligence and Drones — where warfare has become more precise and dangerous than ever before.
This technological trinity represents the most significant shift in military doctrine since the advent of nuclear weapons. Yet, unlike the Cold War's nuclear standoff, which created a terrifying but stable balance of mutually assured destruction, the MAID revolution is democratising violence in ways that should alarm anyone concerned about global stability.
Low cost, high-impact warfare
Consider the stark mathematics: A modern F-35 fighter jet costs over $100 million and requires a highly trained pilot whose loss represents years of investment. A military drone capable of devastating precision strikes costs less than $50,000 and can be operated by someone with minimal training from thousands of miles away. This cost differential isn't just changing military procurement — it's fundamentally altering the strategic calculations that have historically prevented conflicts.
The India-Pakistan drone warfare in May illustrates this transformation perfectly. Both nuclear-armed neighbours could demonstrate military resolve, achieve visible battlefield effects, and satisfy domestic political pressures without risking expensive aircraft or elite pilots. The conflict remained contained not because of strategic wisdom, but possibly because drone warfare allowed both sides to save face while minimising escalation risks. This is warfare as political theatre, enabled by technology that makes military action cheaper and seemingly less consequential.
Computer-scale speed, human consequences
More troubling is the role of AI in accelerating conflict beyond human decision-making timelines. When machine learning algorithms can identify, track and engage targets with minimal human oversight, we edge closer to a world where wars might be fought at computer speeds with human-scale consequences. Ukraine's pioneering work in drone swarm technologies — coordinating hundreds of autonomous units simultaneously — offers a glimpse of conflicts that could spiral beyond human control within minutes rather than hours or days.
The current Israel-Iran exchange, now in its first week with mounting casualties, demonstrates how quickly MAID-enabled conflicts can escalate despite initial attempts at limitation. What began as targeted strikes on military infrastructure has expanded to include civilian energy facilities and media centres when warfare becomes this precise and distant, the psychological barriers that historically constrained military action begin to erode.
MAID ethics and guardrails
Perhaps, most concerning is how the MAID revolution has outpaced our legal and ethical frameworks for warfare. International humanitarian law was crafted for conflicts involving uniformed soldiers using identifiable weapons platforms. How do we assign responsibility when an AI algorithm makes targeting decisions? What constitutes proportionality when swarms of autonomous drones can overwhelm any defence system? Who is accountable when a remote operator launches a precision strike from another continent?
Recent US military exercises involving counter-drone operations revealed the complexity of legal authorities even for homeland defence scenarios. If we struggle to determine rules of engagement for defending our own territory against drone incursions, how can we expect coherent international frameworks for offensive operations?
The MAID ecosystem's most destabilising effect may be its democratisation of military capabilities. Small nations and non-state actors can now pose credible threats to major powers using relatively inexpensive technology. This levels the playing field in ways that traditional military doctrine never anticipated, potentially emboldening actors who previously would have been deterred by overwhelming conventional superiority.
Iran's threats to target the US military base at Diego Garcia with long-range ballistic missiles and drones exemplify this shift. A regional power can now credibly threaten American strategic assets thousands of miles away using technology that was unimaginable just a decade ago. This reach, combined with the reduced political costs of MAID warfare, fundamentally alters deterrence calculations.
The conflicts of 2025 have demonstrated that mastery of MAID technologies increasingly determines military effectiveness. Ukraine's transition from individual drone operations to sophisticated swarm coordination shows how quickly military innovation advances under pressure. India's planned $470 million investment in UAV capabilities — triple pre-conflict levels — signals how rapidly nations are adapting to this new reality.
Yet, this technological arms race proceeds without corresponding developments in international governance, legal frameworks, or strategic stability mechanisms. We're stumbling toward a future where conflicts may unfold at machine speed with consequences that remain devastatingly human.
The international community faces an urgent choice. We can either develop new frameworks for managing MAID-enabled conflicts before they spiral beyond control, or we can continue reacting to each escalation as it occurs. The former requires unprecedented international cooperation and legal innovation. The latter virtually guarantees that the precision and distance of modern warfare will make conflicts more frequent, not less devastating. And there are no guard rails because the UN has almost ceased to function with its members almost disregarding it.
The MAID revolution isn't coming — it's here. The question isn't whether this technology will reshape global power dynamics, but whether we'll develop the wisdom to control tools that make warfare simultaneously more precise and more perilous than ever before.
The writer, a defence and cyber security analyst, is former country head of General Dynamics
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
39 minutes ago
- The Print
Govt meets stakeholders to assess impact of Iran-Israel conflict on trade; monitoring situation
The participants informed that the situation in the Strait of Hormuz is currently stable and a ship reporting system is in place to monitor any incidents. New Delhi, Jun 20 (PTI) The commerce ministry on Friday held consultations with key stakeholders, including shipping lines, exporters, container firms, and other departments, to assess the impact of the Iran-Israel conflict on India's overseas trade, an official said. The freight and insurance rates are also being closely monitored, the official said. The commerce secretary emphasised the need to assess the evolving situation and its impact on Indian trade, the official said. He highlighted the importance of exploring all possible alternatives in response to the situation. Exporters have stated that the war, if escalated further, would impact world trade and push both air and sea freight rates. They have expressed apprehensions that the conflict may impact the movement of merchant ships from the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea. Nearly two-thirds of India's crude oil and half of its LNG imports pass through the Strait of Hormuz, which Iran has now threatened to close. This narrow waterway, only 21 miles wide at its narrowest point, handles nearly a fifth of global oil trade and is indispensable to India, which depends on imports for over 80 per cent of its energy needs. According to think tank GTRI, any closure or military disruption in the Strait of Hormuz would sharply increase oil prices, shipping costs, and insurance premiums, triggering inflation, pressuring the rupee, and complicating India's fiscal management. The present conflict that began with an attack on Israel on October 7, 2023 had brought cargo movement through Red Sea routes to a halt due to attacks by Houthi rebels on commercial shipping. Last year, the situation around the Bab-el-Mandeb Strait, a crucial shipping route connecting the Red Sea and the Mediterranean Sea to the Indian Ocean, escalated due to attacks by Yemen-based Houthi militants. Around 80 per cent of India's merchandise trade with Europe passes through the Red Sea, and substantial trade with the US also takes this route. Both these geographies account for 34 per cent of the country's total exports. The Red Sea Strait is vital for 30 per cent of global container traffic and 12 per cent of world trade. India's exports to Israel have fallen sharply to USD 2.1 billion in 2024-25 from USD 4.5 billion in 2023-24. Imports from Israel came down to USD 1.6 billion in the last fiscal from USD 2.0 billion in 2023-24. Similarly, exports to Iran, amounting to USD 1.4 billion, which were at the same level in 2024-25 as well as in 2023-24, could also suffer. India's imports from Iran were at USD 441 million in FY25 as against USD 625 million in the previous year. The conflict adds to the pressure that the world trade was under after the US President Donald Trump announced high tariffs. Based on the tariff war impact, the World Trade Organisation (WTO) has already said that global trade will contract 0.2 per cent in 2025 as against the earlier projection of 2.7 per cent expansion. India's overall exports had grown 6 per cent on year to USD 825 billion in 2024-25. PTI RR HVA This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
India.com
40 minutes ago
- India.com
Stolen nuclear bomb's blueprints, smuggled parts: Here's how Pakistani scientist AQ Khan supported Iran's nuclear dreams
Stolen nuclear bomb's blueprints, smuggled parts: Here's how Pakistani scientist AQ Khan supported Iran's nuclear dreams The prime reason behind the Iran-Israel conflict is Tehran's nuclear program. It is the reason why Israel launched deadly airstrikes and missile barrages. Interestingly, the nuclear program, which is at the heart of the ongoing war, was not built by Iran. The Middle Eastern country acquired crucial information, technology, and expertise from another country, effectively buying it into existence. It all started before the world grew concerned about Tehran's uranium enrichment at Natanz. The country had already found a shortcut – thanks to a Pakistani nuclear scientist named Abdul Qadeer Khan, who is a hero in Pakistan but infamous worldwide for running a dangerous black-market nuclear network. Khan sold centrifuge designs, crucial parts and blueprints of the nuclear bomb to Iran which he stole from Europe. He sent Pakistani-made components to Iran through secret routes in Malaysia and Dubai. It is a fact that Iran's nuclear program grew from Khan's underground network. Abdul Qadeer Khan was a Pakistani metallurgist who stole nuclear bomb's blueprints from Europe and built Pakistan's atomic bomb. He later shared the knowledge, creating the world's most dangerous black market for nuclear technology — one that gave Iran much more than just ambition.
New Indian Express
40 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
India's basmati export takes another hit after Trump tariffs as Israel-Iran war intensifies
CHANDIGARH: Already grappling with US President Donald Trump's 26 per cent tariff, the ongoing Israel-Iran war has triggered a fresh crisis in the Indian basmati rice export market. Indian basmati exporters find themselves caught in a web of woes, with stuck consignments, delayed payments, plummeting prices, and fears of a domestic glut. Iran is the second-highest importer of Indian basmati after Saudi Arabia, with the sela (parboiled) variety particularly cherished in Iranian kitchens. In the 2023–24 fiscal year, a total of 59.42 lakh metric tonnes (LMT) of basmati rice was exported from the country. Of these exports, basmati rice was mainly sent to five countries: 7 LMT to Iran, 11 LMT to Saudi Arabia, 8 LMT to Iraq, 3 LMT to Yemen, and 3 LMT to the US, with the remainder going to other countries. This development is likely to severely affect Punjab, the highest producer of basmati rice in the country, accounting for 40 per cent of production, followed by Haryana and other states.
