Scotland ‘at risk of two-tier justice' over grooming inquiry
First Minister John Swinney yesterday told journalists that the independent Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry is undertaking an extensive review of child protection policy and has the powers necessary to investigate grooming.
READ MORE
Demands for a closer look at grooming gangs in Scotland follow the publication of damning report by Baroness Louise Casey, exposing decades of institutional failure to protect vulnerable children—particularly girls—from organised abuse.
The report described such crimes as 'one of the most heinous in our society' and accused authorities of turning a blind eye, failing to act on warnings, and treating victims as if they were responsible for their own exploitation.
It highlighted how children—often in care or already at risk—were coerced, raped and trafficked by multiple men, and later ignored or disbelieved by the very systems meant to protect them.
A central finding was the state's refusal to properly examine the role of ethnicity in offending patterns.
Despite numerous convictions involving groups of Asian men, often of Pakistani heritage, many agencies avoided collecting or analysing this data for fear of appearing racist or stoking community tensions. Ethnicity is currently recorded in only 37% of suspect cases.
Baroness Casey said this lack of transparency had harmed victims, undermined public trust and fuelled extremism.
The review found that grooming gangs often operated in loosely connected social networks, targeting vulnerable girls with flattery, gifts, alcohol and drugs before passing them between abusers.
Despite countless reviews and promises of reform since the high-profile scandals in Rotherham and Rochdale, Baroness Casey said little had changed in how institutions respond.
At the start of the year, the UK Government repeatedly dismissed calls for a national inquiry, arguing that the issue had already been examined in a seven-year investigation led by Professor Alexis Jay.
Instead, they commissioned Baroness Casey to conduct a review of the grooming gang evidence.
Her searing report—and call for a full statutory inquiry into grooming gangs—prompted the Prime Minister to change position.
On Tuesday, Shadow Scottish Secretary Andrew Bowie wrote to the Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, welcoming the probe and urging her to expand the UK inquiry's remit to cover Scotland.
'To exclude Scotland risks creating a two-tier system of justice,' he warned. 'Victims of grooming gangs in Scotland must not and cannot be overlooked.'
He said there was 'clear evidence that victims have been trafficked into Scotland as part of organised exploitation networks'.
Mr Bowie pointed to a 2016 grooming gang operating in Glasgow, where at least 44 victims were forced into prostitution and abused mentally, physically and financially. A Romanian gang was found responsible for the rape and sexual abuse of women in Dundee.
The inquiry, he said, could follow the model of the Covid Inquiry, with co-operation between governments and parallel hearings where necessary.
'It is essential that the voices of Scottish victims are heard and appropriate lessons learned,' he said. 'The Home Secretary must work with the Scottish Government to agree the scope of the inquiry.'
READ MORE
Meanwhile, Ms Reid, the MP for East Kilbride and Strathaven, said there was little information on the scale of the problem in Scotland.
She told the Daily Record: 'Young women and girls are being exploited by organised grooming gangs in Scotland. Strathclyde University's Professor Alexis Jay, the UK's leading expert on sexual exploitation, made this clear to MPs earlier in the year.
'We have even less understanding about the scale of this problem in Scotland. That is simply unacceptable. It is vital Scotland is fully engaged with any statutory inquiry.'
She added: 'If the Scottish Government does not intend to hold its own dedicated inquiry, we need clear reasons why—not the vague responses we have had so far. This issue is too serious and urgent to leave unanswered.'
Announcing the inquiry in the Commons on Monday, Ms Cooper gave an 'unequivocal apology' to victims and said it was time to 'expose this depravity to the light'. The inquiry will be able to order local deep dives, investigate past failings and examine whether existing systems are still letting down young people at risk.
The First Minister was asked on Monday—ahead of the publication of Baroness Casey's review—about Sir Keir Starmer's decision to hold an inquiry, and whether there was a need to do something similar in Scotland.
He said: 'The Prime Minister has obviously taken his own decision in relation to grooming gangs.
'We established the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry some years ago. It has extensive scope and the ability to explore many—and all—of these issues.
'There will, of course, be other processes of inquiry undertaken when that is appropriate.
'I would give every consideration to an issue of this type if I felt it was necessary to be undertaken—and we will do that in the fullness of time.'
Responding to Ms Reid's comments in the Daily Record, a Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'The independent Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry is undertaking an extensive review of child protection policy in Scotland and will report with recommendations.
'We have also established a national multi-agency Child Sexual Abuse and Exploitation Strategic Group. All healthcare and education professionals already have a duty to report child abuse. The case for mandatory reporting more widely remains under active consideration.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
27 minutes ago
- NBC News
Pakistan to nominate Trump for Nobel Peace Prize
Pakistan said on Saturday it would recommend U.S. President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize, an accolade that he has said he craves, for his work in helping to resolve the recent conflict between India and Pakistan. Some analysts in Pakistan said the move might persuade Trump to think again about potentially joining Israel in striking Iran's nuclear facilities. Pakistan has condemned Israel's action as a violation of international law and a threat to regional stability. In May, a surprise announcement by Trump of a ceasefire brought an abrupt end to a four-day conflict between nuclear-armed foes India and Pakistan. Trump has since repeatedly said that he averted a nuclear war, saved millions of lives, and grumbled that he got no credit for it. Pakistan agrees that U.S. diplomatic intervention ended the fighting, but India says it was a bilateral agreement between the two militaries. 'President Trump demonstrated great strategic foresight and stellar statesmanship through robust diplomatic engagement with both Islamabad and New Delhi, which de-escalated a rapidly deteriorating situation,' Pakistan said. 'This intervention stands as a testament to his role as a genuine peacemaker.' Governments can nominate people for the Nobel Peace Prize. There was no immediate response from Washington. A spokesperson for the Indian government did not respond to a request for comment. Trump has repeatedly said that he's willing to mediate between India and Pakistan over the disputed Kashmir region, their main source of enmity. Islamabad, which has long called for international attention to Kashmir, is delighted. But his stance has upended U.S. policy in South Asia, which had favored India as a counterweight to China, and put in question previously close relations between Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. In a social media post, opens new tab on Friday, Trump gave a long list of conflicts he said he had resolved, including India and Pakistan and the Abraham accords in his first term between Israel and some Muslim-majority countries. He added: 'I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do.' Pakistan's move to nominate Trump came in the same week its army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, met the U.S. leader for lunch. It was the first time that a Pakistani military leader had been invited to the White House when a civilian government was in place in Islamabad. Trump's planned meeting with Modi at the G7 summit in Canada last week did not take place after the U.S. president left early, but the two later spoke by phone, in which Modi said 'India does not and will never accept mediation' in its dispute with Pakistan, according to the Indian government. Mushahid Hussain, a former chair of the Senate Defence Committee in Pakistan's parliament, suggested nominating Trump for the peace prize was justified.' Trump is good for Pakistan,' he said. 'If this panders to Trump's ego, so be it. All the European leaders have been sucking up to him big time.' But the move was not universally applauded in Pakistan, where Trump's support for Israel's war in Gaza has inflamed passions. 'Israel's sugar daddy in Gaza and cheerleader of its attacks on Iran isn't a candidate for any prize,' said Talat Hussain, a prominent Pakistani television political talk show host, in a post on X. 'And what if he starts to kiss Modi on both cheeks again after a few months?'
Metro
41 minutes ago
- Metro
Urgent hunt for boy, 10, who vanished nearly 24 hours ago
An urgent hunt has been launched for a 10-year-old boy who vanished in Edinburg. Haiden Crawford was last spotted around midday on Friday in the area of Glenalmond Place in the Scottish capital. Police say he may have boarded a bus and travelled around Edinburgh. He is described as around 4ft 10ins, of average build with short orange coloured hair. Police have urged anyone with information about the boy's whereabouts to come forward as they are 'concerned for Haiden's welfare'. Inspector Quentin Russell appealed to members of the public to help and stressed that it is 'vital' to make sure he is 'safe and well'. More Trending He said: 'Concerns are growing for Haiden's welfare and it is vital that we find him to make sure he is safe and well. 'He may have taken a bus and travelled around the city. 'We are asking anyone who has seen Haiden or knows where he might be to get in touch with us immediately.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Aldi's supermarket sweep is back — giving customers the chance to nab free shopping MORE: Scottish council apologises after school was accused of sectarianism for flying Union Flag MORE: 'I won the National Lottery – this is what I now do day to day'
North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Rantzen warns peers not to hamper progress of assisted dying law
The Terminally Ill Adults (End Of Life) Bill cleared the Commons with a majority of 23 votes on Friday, but opponents have vowed to continue their resistance in the unelected chamber. The legislation could face a difficult passage through the Lords, with critics poised to table amendments to add further restrictions and safeguards to the Bill. Dame Esther told BBC Radio 4's Today: 'I don't need to teach the House of Lords how to do their job. They know it very well, and they know that laws are produced by the elected chamber. 'Their job is to scrutinise, to ask questions, but not to oppose. 'So yes, people who are adamantly opposed to this bill, and they have a perfect right to oppose it, will try and stop it going through the Lords, but the Lords themselves, their duty is to make sure that law is actually created by the elected chamber, which is the House of Commons who have voted this through.' Dame Esther, who turns 85 on Sunday and has terminal cancer, acknowledged the legislation would probably not become law in time for her to use it and she would have to 'buzz of to Zurich' to use the Dignitas clinic. Paralympian and crossbench peer Baroness Tanni Grey-Thompson told BBC Breakfast: 'We're getting ready for it to come to the Lord's and from my personal point of view, about amending it to make it stronger. 'We've been told it's the strongest Bill in the world, but to be honest, it's not very high bar for other legislation. 'So I do think there are a lot more safeguards that could be put in.' Conservative peer and disability rights campaigner Lord Shinkwin said the narrow Commons majority underlined the need for peers to take a close look at the legislation. He told Today 'I think the House of Lords has a duty to expose and to subject this Bill to forensic scrutiny' but 'I don't think it's a question of blocking it so much as performing our duty as a revising chamber'. He added: 'The margin yesterday was so close that many MPs would appreciate the opportunity to look at this again in respect of safeguards as they relate to those who feel vulnerable, whether that's disabled people or older people.' Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, who steered the Bill through the Commons, told the PA news agency she hoped peers would not seek to derail the legislation, which could run out of parliamentary time if it is held up in the Lords. She said: 'I would be upset to think that anybody was playing games with such an important and such an emotional issue.' A group of 27 Labour MPs who voted against the legislation said: 'We were elected to represent both of those groups and are still deeply concerned about the risks in this Bill of coercion of the old and discrimination against the disabled, people with anorexia and black, Asian and minority ethnic people, who we know do not receive equitable health care. 'As the Bill moves to the House of Lords it must receive the scrutiny that it needs. Not about the principles of assisted dying but its application in this deeply flawed Bill.' Meanwhile, one of the leading opponents of the Bill, Conservative Danny Kruger, said 'these are apocalyptic times'. In a series of tweets on Friday night, the East Wiltshire MP – who is at odds with his mother, Great British Bake Off judge Dame Prue Leith in her support for legalisation – accused assisted dying campaigners of being 'militant anti-Christians' who had failed to 'engage with the detail of the Bill'.
