AMD's Lisa Su on Experimenting with AI
HBR editor at large Adi Ignatius speaks with Lisa Su, CEO of leading semiconductor company AMD, about the company's evolution toward high-performance and adaptive computing, the future of AI use in different sectors, and the importance of responsible risk-taking. She advocates for fast experimentation and implementation while ensuring safety through initiatives like AMD's Responsible AI Council, active learning within the organization and among industry peers, and the hiring of diverse talent to drive innovation. Time Magazine recently named Su their 'CEO of the Year.'
Key episode topics include: artificial intelligence, computing, machine learning, technology, decision-making, implementation, experimentation, ChatGPT, OpenAI, strategy
HBR On Strategy curates the best conversations and case studies with the world's top business and management experts, to help you unlock new ways of doing business. New episodes every week.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Why is AI halllucinating more frequently, and how can we stop it?
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. The more advanced artificial intelligence (AI) gets, the more it "hallucinates" and provides incorrect and inaccurate information. Research conducted by OpenAI found that its latest and most powerful reasoning models, o3 and o4-mini, hallucinated 33% and 48% of the time, respectively, when tested by OpenAI's PersonQA benchmark. That's more than double the rate of the older o1 model. While o3 delivers more accurate information than its predecessor, it appears to come at the cost of more inaccurate hallucinations. This raises a concern over the accuracy and reliability of large language models (LLMs) such as AI chatbots, said Eleanor Watson, an Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) member and AI ethics engineer at Singularity University. "When a system outputs fabricated information — such as invented facts, citations or events — with the same fluency and coherence it uses for accurate content, it risks misleading users in subtle and consequential ways," Watson told Live Science. Related: Cutting-edge AI models from OpenAI and DeepSeek undergo 'complete collapse' when problems get too difficult, study reveals The issue of hallucination highlights the need to carefully assess and supervise the information AI systems produce when using LLMs and reasoning models, experts say. The crux of a reasoning model is that it can handle complex tasks by essentially breaking them down into individual components and coming up with solutions to tackle them. Rather than seeking to kick out answers based on statistical probability, reasoning models come up with strategies to solve a problem, much like how humans think. In order to develop creative, and potentially novel, solutions to problems, AI needs to hallucinate —otherwise it's limited by rigid data its LLM ingests. "It's important to note that hallucination is a feature, not a bug, of AI," Sohrob Kazerounian, an AI researcher at Vectra AI, told Live Science. "To paraphrase a colleague of mine, 'Everything an LLM outputs is a hallucination. It's just that some of those hallucinations are true.' If an AI only generated verbatim outputs that it had seen during training, all of AI would reduce to a massive search problem." "You would only be able to generate computer code that had been written before, find proteins and molecules whose properties had already been studied and described, and answer homework questions that had already previously been asked before. You would not, however, be able to ask the LLM to write the lyrics for a concept album focused on the AI singularity, blending the lyrical stylings of Snoop Dogg and Bob Dylan." In effect, LLMs and the AI systems they power need to hallucinate in order to create, rather than simply serve up existing information. It is similar, conceptually, to the way that humans dream or imagine scenarios when conjuring new ideas. However, AI hallucinations present a problem when it comes to delivering accurate and correct information, especially if users take the information at face value without any checks or oversight. "This is especially problematic in domains where decisions depend on factual precision, like medicine, law or finance," Watson said. "While more advanced models may reduce the frequency of obvious factual mistakes, the issue persists in more subtle forms. Over time, confabulation erodes the perception of AI systems as trustworthy instruments and can produce material harms when unverified content is acted upon." And this problem looks to be exacerbated as AI advances. "As model capabilities improve, errors often become less overt but more difficult to detect," Watson noted. "Fabricated content is increasingly embedded within plausible narratives and coherent reasoning chains. This introduces a particular risk: users may be unaware that errors are present and may treat outputs as definitive when they are not. The problem shifts from filtering out crude errors to identifying subtle distortions that may only reveal themselves under close scrutiny." Kazerounian backed this viewpoint up. "Despite the general belief that the problem of AI hallucination can and will get better over time, it appears that the most recent generation of advanced reasoning models may have actually begun to hallucinate more than their simpler counterparts — and there are no agreed-upon explanations for why this is," he said. The situation is further complicated because it can be very difficult to ascertain how LLMs come up with their answers; a parallel could be drawn here with how we still don't really know, comprehensively, how a human brain works. In a recent essay, Dario Amodei, the CEO of AI company Anthropic, highlighted a lack of understanding in how AIs come up with answers and information. "When a generative AI system does something, like summarize a financial document, we have no idea, at a specific or precise level, why it makes the choices it does — why it chooses certain words over others, or why it occasionally makes a mistake despite usually being accurate," he wrote. The problems caused by AI hallucinating inaccurate information are already very real, Kazerounian noted. "There is no universal, verifiable, way to get an LLM to correctly answer questions being asked about some corpus of data it has access to," he said. "The examples of non-existent hallucinated references, customer-facing chatbots making up company policy, and so on, are now all too common." Both Kazerounian and Watson told Live Science that, ultimately, AI hallucinations may be difficult to eliminate. But there could be ways to mitigate the issue. Watson suggested that "retrieval-augmented generation," which grounds a model's outputs in curated external knowledge sources, could help ensure that AI-produced information is anchored by verifiable data. "Another approach involves introducing structure into the model's reasoning. By prompting it to check its own outputs, compare different perspectives, or follow logical steps, scaffolded reasoning frameworks reduce the risk of unconstrained speculation and improve consistency," Watson, noting this could be aided by training to shape a model to prioritize accuracy, and reinforcement training from human or AI evaluators to encourage an LLM to deliver more disciplined, grounded responses. RELATED STORIES —AI benchmarking platform is helping top companies rig their model performances, study claims —AI can handle tasks twice as complex every few months. What does this exponential growth mean for how we use it? —What is the Turing test? How the rise of generative AI may have broken the famous imitation game "Finally, systems can be designed to recognise their own uncertainty. Rather than defaulting to confident answers, models can be taught to flag when they're unsure or to defer to human judgement when appropriate," Watson added. "While these strategies don't eliminate the risk of confabulation entirely, they offer a practical path forward to make AI outputs more reliable." Given that AI hallucination may be nearly impossible to eliminate, especially in advanced models, Kazerounian concluded that ultimately the information that LLMs produce will need to be treated with the "same skepticism we reserve for human counterparts."
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
AMD Is Gunning for Nvidia's AI Chip Throne. Should You Buy AMD Stock Now?
For the longest time, Nvidia (NVDA) has enjoyed an open runway in the data center and artificial intelligence GPU market. But on June 12, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) made it clear that it was no longer content staying in the shadows. In a detailed reveal, the company introduced its upcoming Instinct MI400 series, a new breed of AI chips set to launch next year. 3 Highly-Rated Dividend Stocks You've Probably Never Heard Of (But Should) AMD Just Landed a New Microsoft Partnership. Should You Buy AMD Stock Here? The Crypto Rally Is 'Just Getting Started' According to Analysts. Buy Coinbase Stock Here. Get exclusive insights with the FREE Barchart Brief newsletter. Subscribe now for quick, incisive midday market analysis you won't find anywhere else. These chips form the core of a larger vision called Helios, a full server rack capable of connecting thousands of chips into one powerful 'rack-scale' system. That architecture puts AMD head-to-head with Nvidia's Blackwell platform, which links together 72 GPUs in a single configuration. AMD also drew a line in the sand on inference performance. Its new chips come with more high-speed memory, making it possible to run massive AI models on a single GPU. As anticipation builds, let us see how high this can take the AMD stock. Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), based in Santa Clara, California, has carved out a formidable presence in the high-performance computing landscape with a market cap of $205.6 billion. AMD delivers one of the industry's most comprehensive portfolios of advanced processor technologies. In the last three months alone, AMD's stock has gained 22.5%, significantly outpacing the broader S&P 500 Index ($SPX), which rose by 5.4% in the same period. Currently, AMD trades at 40.2 times forward earnings and 8 times its sales. Both metrics sit below the five-year historical average. This signals a potential window for investors looking for exposure to the next wave of computing innovation. On May 6, Advanced Micro Devices stepped into the earnings spotlight and delivered a performance that raced ahead of Wall Street expectations. In its Q1 2025 results, the company posted revenue of $7.4 billion, marking a 35.9% increase from the same quarter last year and sailing past Wall Street's forecast of $7.1 billion. The showstopper in this story was AMD's data center segment, which pulled in $3.7 billion, registering a 57.2% year-over-year surge. The client and gaming segment brought in $2.9 billion. While the gaming unit struggled under pressure, sliding 29.8% to $647 million, the client business rose sharply, climbing 67.7% to reach $2.3 billion. The divergence between segments did not go unnoticed, yet the weight of the gains was strong enough to lift AMD's overall gross margin to 50%, up from 47% a year earlier. A stronger product mix and swelling demand for data center chips provided a firm foundation for this margin expansion. On the profit front, the company kept up its winning streak. Non-GAAP net income jumped 54.6% to touch $1.6 billion. Adjusted EPS also moved 54.8% higher, landing at $0.96 and ahead of analyst expectations of $0.93. In addition, AMD generated $939 million in cash from operations, while free cash flow for the quarter stood at $727 million. Peering into the second quarter of 2025, management expects revenue to hover around $7.4 billion, plus or minus $300 million. This includes a projected $700 million revenue reduction stemming from a new export license affecting MI308 shipments to China. Still, the midpoint implies 27% growth over the previous year. Analysts, however, expect some softness in profitability for the Q2 2025, projecting a 30% decline in EPS to $0.35. Yet the broader picture remains encouraging. For the full fiscal year 2025, the bottom line is expected to climb 20.6% from the previous year to $3.16. Looking further ahead, fiscal year 2026 is forecast to deliver even stronger growth, with EPS projected to rise 54% to reach $4.87. AMD holds its ground with quiet conviction, earning a 'Moderate Buy' consensus that reflects solid confidence from the analyst community. Among the 42 analysts tracking the stock, 28 issue a 'Strong Buy,' one backs a 'Moderate Buy,' and 13 advise to 'Hold.' The average price target of $133.32 represents potential upside of 5.5%. The Street-high price target of $200 implies shares could gain nearly 60% from here. On the date of publication, Aanchal Sugandh did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Advanced Micro Devices (NasdaqGS:AMD) Earnings Rise To US$7 Billion In Recent Quarter
This quarter, Advanced Micro Devices experienced a significant 20% increase in share price. This uptick aligns with major announcements, like its collaboration with Oracle to integrate MI355X GPUs into Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, offering improved price-performance for AI workloads. Partnerships with Infobell and mimik further highlight AMD's focus on AI innovation and cloud applications. The company's earnings announcement in May, with sales rising to $7.438 billion and net income markedly improving, also strengthened investor confidence. These developments would have added weight to the company's share price move, despite the broader market remaining flat over the last week. Buy, Hold or Sell Advanced Micro Devices? View our complete analysis and fair value estimate and you decide. Find companies with promising cash flow potential yet trading below their fair value. The recent surge in Advanced Micro Devices' share price, bolstered by strategic partnerships in AI and cloud computing, signifies potential growth in these lucrative markets. This aligns with analysts' expectations of accelerating revenue and earnings growth driven by increased demand for high-performance computing. Notably, the collaboration with Oracle for GPU integration into Oracle Cloud Infrastructure promises enhanced AI workload capabilities, potentially boosting AMD's revenue and solidifying its market position. These developments reflect positively on AMD's narrative, given the focus on diversification and resilience. Over the past five years, AMD's total shareholder return reached 155.97%. However, in the past year alone, AMD lagged behind the US Semiconductor industry, which saw a 7.3% gain. This disparity highlights the challenges AMD faces within a competitive landscape, marked by rivals like NVIDIA and evolving supply chain risks. Despite this, AMD's substantial long-term growth outlines a strong trajectory enhanced by its AI and cloud initiatives. In terms of valuation, the current share price of US$98.62 is close to the consensus price target of US$130.47 but above the more bearish target of US$76.70. This suggests mixed analyst sentiment regarding AMD's future prospects. The company's recent partnerships and innovations may positively impact revenue and earnings forecasts. Still, these must counteract regulatory barriers and heightened competition. Investors should consider AMD's position and its ability to maintain momentum amid evolving industry dynamics. Review our growth performance report to gain insights into Advanced Micro Devices' future. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include NasdaqGS:AMD. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Sign in to access your portfolio
