Green grocer and ex-SAS commander hoping to kick Sadiq Khan out of office
After nearly a decade in power, Sir Sadiq Khan's rule as Mayor of London is coming under increasing scrutiny.
With YouGov polling showing that crime, housing and health are seen to be getting worse in the capital, inventive politicians are now taking the fight to Sir Sadiq with viral video campaigns.
The most high-profile example of this was Robert Jenrick's video of fare-dodging on the Tube, which showed the shadow justice secretary confronting rule-breakers.
But while Mr Jenrick's team have ruled him out of any Tory mayoral race, other 'law and order' challengers to Sir Sadiq are also emerging on social media.
They include a viral greengrocer, a former Royal Marines commando and a heavyweight boxing champion.
Born in Romford, a traditional Tory voting part of outer London, Thomas Skinner began working as a market trader in East London at the age of 16 and later appeared as a candidate on The Apprentice, Sir Alan Sugar's business-based reality TV show.
In his early career he was found guilty of handling £40,000 worth of stolen goods while working as a market trader.
He has said of the spent conviction: 'I've made mistakes, in fact more than most, who hasn't made one?'
Mr Skinner has since gathered a large following on social media for his jolly videos in which he discusses, in his thick Essex accent, the joys of having a 'cheeky pint' following a day of 'hard graft'.
Yet in recent months, he has increasingly focussed on political issues, declaring 'I love Trump' and claiming 'London has fallen' under Sir Sadiq's mayoralty. He has also been involved in knife crime campaigning.
'London has fallen'
Last week in a post that prompted speculation about his ambitions for public office, Mr Skinner railed against the decline of law and order in the capital and a loss of 'community'.
'London has fallen. But I'm not giving up on it,' he wrote, claiming that 'people are scared', 'it ain't safe out there anymore' and ' London don't feel like London no more '.
'We need leadership that understands the streets, the markets, the working class. People like me,' he wrote, opening the door to a potential mayoral run.
It is understood Mr Skinner currently has no firm plans to run for office and is not affiliated with any political party.
But Mr Skinner, who maintains 'I'm not a politician', nevertheless says he has been approached by three political parties in recent weeks.
The Telegraph also understands that since he made the post, Mr Skinner has been contacted by members of the Prime Minister 's team.
The call was intended to discuss the Government's plans for more skilled apprenticeships for those who, like Mr Skinner, left school at 16.
But the attempt to reach out to a popular and rising voice of opposition could be taken as another Labour attempt to head off the threat from Reform.
Reform sources say the party will likely fight the next London mayoral election with a focus on law and order, taking inspiration from the political battles over spiralling crime in 1980s New York City.
Another figure spoken of as a Reform London mayor is Ant Middleton, the former Royal Marines Commando who made his name on military-based reality TV show SAS: Who Dares Wins.
Mr Middleton has said 'it's inevitable that I'm going to be the next Mayor of London' and has already set out a raft of possible policies for the capital.
These include introducing a 'Military Guard Unit' on the streets of London to 'be a reactive and deterrent force on the ground'.
He suggested such a unit would only accept 'British applicants' and its task would be 'to uphold the values, principles and standards of what our great nation represents'.
Mr Middleton endorsed Reform at its conference in September following the general election. He has since grown close to the party's leadership and even visited Washington DC with Nigel Farage for the second inauguration of Donald Trump.
In March the UK Insolvency Service banned Mr Middleton from being a company director over unpaid taxes.
Derek Chisora, the Zimbabwe-born heavyweight boxer, is spoken of as another possible mayoral candidate for the party.
It is understood that Mr Chisora, a longstanding supporter of Reform UK and its predecessor the Brexit party, has been inspired by the success of fellow boxer Luke Campbell who won the Hull mayoral election for Reform in May.
In January Mr Middleton and Mr Chisora both attended a slick fundraiser for the party at the Mayfair private members' club Oswalds.
In previous elections Sir Sadiq benefitted from a ranked-preference voting system in which ballots cast for other Left-wing candidates would eventually end up in his pile.
However mayoral elections are now largely fought according to first-past-the-post.
It was the first-past-the-post system that nearly crowned Arron Banks, the billionaire Reform supporter, as mayor of the West of England in May.
Despite the Left-wing bent of Bristol, the biggest city in the area, votes were scattered between Labour, Greens and Liberal Democrats with Mr Banks achieving an impressive second place and being just 6,000 votes away from taking power.
In the capital, Reform is now projected to replace the Tories as the major political force in outer London if current polling numbers are reflected in the next parliamentary and Assembly elections in Greater London.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
PETER HITCHENS: MPs have voted to destroy even more unborn babies - and to begin the abortion of the old
Are we ruled by some sort of death cult? In just one week, our Parliament has voted for the even more ruthless destruction of unborn babies, and to begin the abortion of the inconvenient old and ill. You may be quite sure that the abortion of the old, once it gets into full swing, will solve a lot of problems for the middle-aged, afraid of nursing home fees and of losing their inheritances. Does anyone really doubt this?
The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
Hope for end to ‘cruel experiment' of indefinite jail terms that have seen phone thieves trapped for up to 20 years
Desperate prisoners who have been trapped in jail for up to 20 years for minor offences such as stealing a mobile phone could finally get a release date under landmark new proposals. Britain's leading justice experts have issued a string of recommendations to finally end the 'cruel experiment' of imprisonment for public protection (IPP) jail terms, which have left inmates languishing in prison for up to 22 times longer than their original sentence. A panel led by Lord John Thomas, who was once Britain's most senior judge, convened by the Howard League for Penal Reform, will urge the government on Monday to take 'long overdue' action to restore hope to 2,614 inmates still trapped under the outlawed jail terms, which have been described as a 'monstrous blot' on our justice system. IPP jail terms were abolished in 2012, but not retrospectively, leaving those already jailed incarcerated indefinitely. Victims of the scandal, whose tragic cases have been highlighted by The Independent, include Leroy Douglas, who has served almost 20 years for stealing a mobile phone; Thomas White, 42, who set himself alight in his cell and has served 13 years for stealing a phone; and Abdullahi Suleman, 41, who is still inside 19 years after he was jailed for a laptop robbery. Successive governments have refused justice committee recommendations to resentence them, despite recognising the jail term was a mistake. At least 94 IPP prisoners have taken their lives in custody as they lost hope of being freed, with a further 37 self-inflicted deaths among those released but left living in fear of being hauled back to jail indefinitely for minor breaches of strict licence conditions. On Monday, the expert panel will set out six recommendations to the Ministry of Justice to finally give those languishing in prison a release date and end the cycle of recall. Lord Thomas told The Independent: 'We must not go on perpetuating this injustice.' The proposals would see: Every IPP prisoner given a release date at their next review by the Parole Board within a two-year window, with plans to prepare them to be safely freed Decisions to recall IPP prisoners only made as a last resort, with independent scrutiny by a district judge or senior parole board member Mental health aftercare support for every released IPP prisoner, in recognition of the harms caused by the sentence The government has said ministers will 'carefully consider' the recommendations. In the 25-page report, due to be presented at an event in parliament, Lord Thomas warns: 'It is long overdue for those whose lives continue to be blighted by this sentence to be released from its clutches. 'There are only two options given the government's rejection of resentencing: (1) do nothing new and let those subject to IPPs continue with the real risk that many will languish in prison until they die; or (2) adopt our proposals. 'Our proposals provide a route to ending this grave injustice while protecting the public.' The member of the House of Lords, who served as lord chief justice from 2013 to 2017, believes the 'practical solutions' could be the last chance to help those on the jail term, which has been condemned as 'psychological torture' by the UN. Despite agreeing that the sentences are a 'terrible stain', Labour's prisons minister James Timpson has repeatedly said the government will not resentence IPP prisoners because it would result in serious offenders being released automatically without licensed supervision. Instead, the government has urged prisoners to work towards release by the Parole Board through the refreshed IPP Action Plan. However, Lord Thomas believes the measure is 'not enough' and it will leave some desperate inmates stuck in prison for the rest of their lives. He said it is 'absolutely clear' that without action, many will resign themselves to lifelong institutionalisation or take their own lives. Urging the state to take responsibility for its own mistakes, he insisted 'enough is enough', noting that if these prisoners had committed their crime a day after the sentence was abolished, they would have long been freed. 'It is time to address this problem in the way we have set out, which produces justice and minimises risk as much as possible,' added the judge, who last year backed The Independent's campaign to review IPP sentences. Andrea Coomber KC, chief executive of the Howard League, described the jail term as a 'cruel experiment' that has been perpetrated upon these prisoners by accident. Even the architect of the flawed 99-year sentence, Labour's former home secretary David Blunkett, has described it as the 'biggest regret' of his career. 'I spend a lot of time visiting people in prisons, I have met people who aren't engaged in IPP forums, who have given up hope,' Ms Coomber told The Independent. 'They have settled into the idea that they are going to die in prison. That is a monstrous blot on our justice system that people would feel that justice has let them down that much.' By ensuring they would get a release date, those prisoners would re-engage with the Parole Board and the steps for their rehabilitation, she added. 'Fundamentally, it will be a way to restore hope to people who have lost all hope, while protecting the public,' she said. It will also have the 'happy side effect' of freeing up a lot of prison places as the government grapples with an overcrowding crisis, she added. In April, The Independent revealed that incarcerating IPP inmates cost taxpayers £145m in 2024, on top of an estimated £1.6bn spent since the sentence was abolished. Any cost to implementing the changes would be 'more than covered' by the savings of releasing them, the report said. Other proposals from the panel, which also comprised a retired High Court judge and vice-chair of the Parole Board, leading forensic psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, legal experts and a former IPP prisoner, would see those handed indeterminate sentences when they were children (known as DPP jail terms) given a release date within one year of their parole review. They have also called for an enhanced process for people to appeal their IPP sentence, the right for annual licence termination reviews in the community and the ability for IPP jail terms to become 'spent' after an appropriate period. Currently, those who serve an IPP sentence must disclose information about their conviction for life, which can be 'hugely stigmatising' as they try to rebuild their lives and find work, Ms Coomber said. Campaigner Shirley DeBono, whose son Shaun Lloyd has spent 14 years behind bars after multiple recalls for stealing a mobile phone in 2005, welcomed the proposed measures. 'I think it's a great idea. I urge Shabana Mahmood [justice secretary] and James Timpson to take the proposals on,' said the mother, who co-founded the IPP Committee in Action. A spokesperson for the United Group for Reform of IPP (Ungripp) said that while it will always push for a full resentencing process, it supports the measures. 'We hope that the government will seriously consider these alternatives and give back some hope to those who are in prison either on recall or who have never been released,' they added. A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: 'It is right that IPP sentences were abolished, and we will carefully consider the recommendations in this report. 'We are determined to make progress towards safe and sustainable releases for those in prison, but not in any way that undermines public protection.'
Times
31 minutes ago
- Times
Cost of damage by Palestine Action could hit £55m
Activists from Palestine Action are feared to have cost the government and firms making equipment for the British military as much as £55 million. In a five-year campaign Palestine Action has conducted 356 attacks on sites across the UK, culminating in a raid on RAF Brize Norton last week in which two Voyager aircraft were damaged. The attacks have cost the defence industry at least £30 million, according to evidence submitted to the government by several firms that have been affected. But it is also feared that one engine of a plane attacked at Brize Norton is damaged beyond repair and could cost £25 million to replace. While the extent of the damage is still being investigated, it is feared that red paint sprayed in to the turbine of the engine may mean it cannot be safely used again. Other costs are believed to cover repairs to warehouses, research facilities and factories, lost working time from the disruption, and the extra security the firms have been forced to invest in to ward off criminal activity by Palestine Action. The firms have also warned the Ministry of Defence that the group's activities have now extended to smaller firms in their supply chains, which will struggle to afford extra security and repairs. Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, is set to proscribe Palestine Action on Monday, but an influential group of peers wants the law toughened to make it easier for the police to stop all kinds of 'organisations which cause destruction'. There have been growing concerns about the ability of the police to combat extreme protest groups such as Palestine Action. Lord Walney, the government's former extremism adviser, will table an amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill, which is currently making its way through the House of Lords, to give the police more powers to stop the activities of groups such as Extinction Rebellion and Youth Demand. An investigation by The Sunday Times in March revealed how activists had switched between protest groups which were also sharing tactics. If implemented the new law would restrict a group's ability to fundraise and its right to assembly in the UK. It could stop them posting on social media and live-streaming actions that they take. An extreme protest group would be defined as an organisation which routinely uses criminal tactics to try to achieve its aims. Although Palestine Action will be proscribed under existing terror laws, Walney's peers believe a new legal mechanism is required to tackle extreme political, environmental and animal rights groups 'who fall just below the threshold of being terrorist organisations'. His 'criminal protest proscription' amendment would represent a major overhaul in how such groups are policed in the UK. Walney plans to table the amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill, which has reached the House of Lords, in coming weeks. 'The police need new powers to be able to tackle and disrupt extreme protest groups like Palestine Action, who have been allowed to cause mayhem and destruction for the past five years,' Walney said. 'Many of these groups fall just below the threshold required to be considered a terrorist organisation. We need a new mechanism to help police disrupt these extreme protests which are causing real harm to hundreds of businesses across the country.' • Melanie Phillips: Palestine Action is a terrorist group, so ban it His proposal is expected to have support from up to 42 peers who have this weekend signed a letter sent to Cooper asking for a meeting to discuss how to 'prevent or disrupt further attacks'. The letter, signed by peers including Baroness Ramsay of Cartvale, a former assistant head of MI6; Baroness Berger, a prominent Jewish peer; Lord Evans of Sealand, a former Labour general secretary; and Lord Cryer, the former chairman of the parliamentary Labour party, says that Palestine Action has been allowed to carry out a 'sustained aggressive broad campaign that undermines the rule of law and Britain's national security'. Research by The Sunday Times reveals there have been 356 direct actions on British-based defence and engineering firms, banks, insurance companies, estate agents and property companies, accountancy firms, universities and local government buildings owing to alleged links to Israel. Some 118 Palestine Action activists were convicted of criminal offences between 2020 and 2024 for attacks on British-based companies linked to Israel, with 33 found not guilty of offences at trial. There are 17 trials continuing relating to direct action protests by Palestine Action. John Healey, the defence secretary, said he was 'really disturbed' by the breach of RAF Brize Norton and has ordered an investigation and wider security review. Counterterrorism police officers are investigating the incident, with Thames Valley police and the Ministry of Defence police. A Palestine Action spokesman said: 'Despite publicly condemning the Israeli government, Britain continues to send military cargo, fly spyplanes over Gaza and refuel US and Israeli fighter jets.'
