How Labour's spending review was shaped by Reform UK

Keir Starmer told his cabinet today that the spending review marked the start of a 'new phase' which delivers Labour's much-promised change. Which can be roughly translated as: we hope the public forget our mistakes in our first year and give us a fresh look. For some voters, that will prove a big ask.
Despite Starmer's plea, Rachel Reeves's spending review felt more like one that would be made towards the end of a five-year parliament – not four years out from the next election.
The chancellor insisted her choices were 'Labour choices.' But as I watched her deliver her statement, I couldn't help thinking that much of it was aimed at seeing off the rising threat to Labour from Reform UK.
Political knockabout on big Commons occasions is nothing new – Reeves also directed her fire at the Conservatives – but her several attacks on a party with just five MPs showed who is really setting the political agenda.
Reeves deployed Liz Truss's disastrous mini-Budget as not only an example of Tory 'chaos' but to recall that Farage praised it at the time, warning that Reform 'would do the same thing all over again' through its unfunded tax cuts and spending rises. Reform is 'simply not serious,' she declared. For good measure, she reminded us of Farage's interest in funding the NHS through an insurance-based system.
Many of the chancellor's measures also had Reform in mind, notably a welcome change in Treasury value-for-money rules (the green book). This will allow the approval of more capital projects in the north and Midlands, where Reform is a threat to many Labour seats and where Labour strategists are convinced the next election will be won or lost. It's back to "levelling up" – even though Reeves banned the phrase after Boris Johnson's broken promise of it.
The change means London and the South East will lose out, prompting a row between the government and the city's Labour mayor, Sadiq Khan. Reeves won't lose sleep over that, as it will amplify her message in the red wall.
Indeed, some Labour MPs quip that Reeves, MP for Leeds West and Pudsey, wants to be seen as 'queen of the north.' But Andy Burnham, the mayor of Greater Manchester, is already seen as the region's king and has no intention of giving up his crown. Among Labour members, Burnham is the favoured successor to Keir Starmer, and Reeves is no longer at the races. Angela Rayner, who is in second place, would also aspire to be the northern queen.
While voters in the red wall will welcome the chancellor's £15.6bn investment in local transport schemes outside London and the South East, these will take years to come to fruition. Her long list of announcements gave the misleading impression of a 'spend, spend, spend' chancellor when her review will mean an immediate squeeze on day-to-day spending outside health and defence. That will feel like austerity to voters – and will not be welcomed in the red wall – even if, on paper, it is not as severe as the cuts begun by George Osborne in 2010.
Will Labour's full-frontal attack on Farage work? I think Labour has a lot more work to do to combat 'the Farage factor.' According to More in Common, the public now trusts Reform as much as Labour to provide support for vulnerable people, and on the economy. Reform has a narrow leader over the Tories on tax: 19 per cent trust Reform most to keep taxes low, compared to 18 per cent for the Tories.
However, 46 per cent of people say Reform would be a risk to the economy, while 29 per cent disagree. Interestingly, comparing Farage's recent policy announcements to the Truss mini-Budget erodes net support for his policies by 20 points. That is why Reeves deployed this ammunition and why we will hear it thousands of times before the next election.
The bad news for Starmer: the public has so lost faith in mainstream parties that they feel they have nothing to lose by taking a punt on Farage. Luke Tryl, UK director of More in Common, said: 'It's clear that Reform's gains are driven by a declining trust in other parties' economic competence and a willingness to 'roll the dice' rather than a widespread trust in Reform.' So Labour, and the Tories, could damage Reform by regaining economic trust. It won't be easy for either of them.
Starmer won't win a second term solely by attacking Farage. A winning coalition will be recreated only if Labour improves living standards and public services. Despite Reeves's big-sounding numbers – and her claim of a £300bn spending boost – the plans she announced today will not guarantee such progress unless she also boosts economic growth.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Daily Record

2 hours ago

• Daily Record

Online attacks on MSPs cross the line of decent debate as hate almost triples

Even if we disagree fundamentally with some of our MSPs' political positions, they deserve to be safe at work, Record View says. The number of abusive social media posts directed towards MSPs has almost tripled in the past year. According to research, MSPs have been on the receiving end of 23,500 abusive posts – an increase from 8000 the 12 months before. ‌ No matter your views on the performance of our politicans, this is unacceptable. ‌ While robust debate should always be welcomed – and our MSPs should expect a fair amount of anger from constituents – this onslaught of online hate must end. Even if we disagree fundamentally with some of our MSPs ' political positions, they deserve to be safe at work. But it makes it almost impossible for them to engage with voters when they are on the receiving end of so much online abuse. Some will argue MSPs should just get on with it and these hateful messages are nothing more than keyboard warriors letting off steam. But we all know nasty bile poured out online can seep into the real world. ‌ We saw the worst of this in 2016, when Labour MP Jo Cox was murdered just a week before the Brexit referendum. If we want politics to make our lives better and spark real change, then we need to engage with ideas and real debate. ‌ We should disagree with our politicians. We should argue with them. We can think outside the box and put forward radical ideas. But the minute we start to abuse, threaten and hate those we disagree with, a line has been crossed. There is no excuse for it and those who engage in such tactics deserve nothing but disdain. ‌ Stay sun-sible Scots will be baking in the hottest day of the year so far today – with the temperature in Jedburgh set to top Tenerife. With the mercury soaring as high as 29C, many of us will be heading for beaches and parks to enjoy the great outdoors and a few drinks. With that in mind, many pubs are ordering in extra beer barrels to keep up with demand. ‌ But although the sun has been a rare visitor so far this summer, it would be wise to keep everything in moderation. Sunbathing, like alcohol, is best enjoyed with a sensible head on. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. ‌ Health chiefs in Glasgow have warned sun-worshippers to keep hydrated and make sure to cover up if out in the heat for long spells. The warm and dry weather will also increase the risk of wildfires, so people are being urged to take care with open fires and disposable barbecues. Whatever you get up to this fine weekend, be safe and don't forget the sunscreen.

Sky News

2 hours ago

• Sky News

'Don't kill the ill' vs 'What a relief': Two terminally ill people on the assisted dying vote

Over the past year, Sky News has been following the journeys of two people who are terminally ill and on opposite sides of the assisted dying debate. Philip, a Christian pastor, views it as suicide and says supporters of the bill need more faith. Clare, a former counsellor, thinks it should be a personal choice, which for her could offer a good death. Philip died two days before Friday's historic vote, which saw MPs vote in favour of assisted dying. "Kill the bill, don't kill the ill," he told Sky News days before he died. Philip said better palliative care can make all the difference. "I still believe it's because of money. It would save millions and millions if they bump off people like me and Clare and others." Philip was resting in a bed in his living room when we spoke to him. Doctors had told him he had just days left. He was struggling to eat and experiencing hallucinations. "Just now, I went to kiss [my wife] Pauline and she's not there." He pointed to a corner of a biscuit he'd been eating over the last three days that's "not even as big as my thumb". "That's the maximum amount of food I can eat because I'm blocked with cancer." "Logically, I should be screaming and ranting and shouting. But I've been organising things like the funeral," he said, explaining that his belief in Jesus means he's at peace with death, however it comes. At times he cries and very often, he winces in pain. Asked what it would mean if the vote was passed, Philip said it would be "a terrible step downwards". Assisted dying would desensitise the British public to death, he explained. "I personally am totally against it, because you're missing out on what God's planned for you. "Because even now, he knows what's going to happen in me, he knows what's going to happen in the other people." He added: "You'll miss the support of people who love you. Because there are people who love you. If you just reach out to them." Philip died on Wednesday morning, two days before the bill's third reading and ascension to the House of Lords. Clare is sitting in her friend's garden in Cirencester, Gloucestershire, surrounded by nature and absorbing the news that the vote has passed. She tells Sky News: "Oh what a relief! Thank goodness. Thank you to all those people who were brave." Clare has breast cancer which has spread to her bones. Her doctors say her lungs have hardened, making it more difficult for her to breathe. "I'm breathless all the time especially if I'm talking. I can't walk very far without being breathless. Now my heart has to work very, very hard to keep my oxygen levels up." Clare has supported the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill from its inception and calls it a "difficult subject". "People are very fearful," she says, before acknowledging that concerns remain for vulnerable people at risk of coercion. "Lots of people have been in controlling relationships, and I really understand how that works. "I've got daughters and I can understand situations where people are thinking, 'oh, I don't want to be a burden on somebody else' and all of that. But I think it's [worth] remembering that this is one choice out of many." Clare is aware it is unlikely the law will change before she dies. "It won't for [be there] me and it hasn't come in time for lots of people, has it?" she says. "All the people that have gone before that would've liked this choice to avoid suffering and indignity." Clare turns 60 this year and is marking her birthday with 60 memorable days. "I'm enjoying life," she says with a big smile. "I don't want to die, but we all have to go."

Telegraph

3 hours ago

• Telegraph

The whole free world has an interest in derailing Iran's nuclear schemes

SIR – Allister Heath is correct in his condemnation of Sir Keir Starmer and Labour for their failings over Israel and Iran ('Trump and Netanyahu are saving the decadent West from its demons', Comment, June 19). I have been impressed by the Israelis' operations against Iran so far, and hope they will be supported to finish the job. Those who value Western freedom should be backing them, and Britain should be standing shoulder-to-shoulder with its allies. Yet Sir Keir, David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary, and Lord Hermer, the Attorney General ('Hermer: War on Iran may be illegal', report, June 19), have proved an embarrassment. It is also worth remembering that the weakness of multiple European and American leaders allowed Iran to reach the point it is at now. Huw Bell Wetherby, West Yorkshire SIR – Has there ever been an occasion when Lord Hermer's interventions and advice have reflected what most of us consider to be the national interest? Bob Hart Newark, Nottinghamshire SIR – With our Government in the hands of international lawyers, our enemies may rest assured that we are more likely to prosecute our own soldiers than a war against them. Michael Staples Seaford, East Sussex SIR – Charles Moore (Comment, June 17) is absolutely right that we owe real debts to Ukraine and Israel. Ukraine deserves full-hearted support against the tyranny of Vladimir Putin, which menaces all of Europe. Israel has been on the front line fighting Islamist tyranny for almost 50 years. Western calls for 'de-escalation' in Israel's astonishing and understandable offensive against that tyranny are misplaced. Never forget that the Ayatollahs of Iran have spent almost five decades trying to murder the Jewish people of Israel. By contrast, the Israelis seek only to destroy Iran's genocidal regime, and hope then to live in peace with the Iranian people, as they did until the Islamists overthrew the Shah in 1979. William Shawcross London W2 SIR – After the G7, which Donald Trump left early, Britain and its European allies must realise they can no longer be sure of American support in the defence of Ukraine or their own borders. We've seen the vulnerability of Ukraine, Israel and Iran to attacks from the air, and have nothing like their air-defence capabilities. Arbitrary percentages of GDP, which include all manner of non-defence-related expenditure, are blatantly insufficient. Now is the time to cut the rhetoric and prepare adequately for the threats we know are out there. Gp Capt Ron Powell (retd) Barry, Glamorgan