US' Golden Dome missile shield: Pete Hegseth rebuts China's ‘space militarization' accusations
US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth firmly denied China's assertions that the Golden Dome missile defense project would militarize space. Speaking to Fox News Digital while leaving Fort Bragg, North Carolina, Hegseth said, 'All we care about is protecting the homeland.'
Hegseth emphasised that the Golden Dome project is aimed at safeguarding the US against emerging missile threats rather than escalating conflict.
Chinese Foreign Minister Mao Ning criticised the project this week, accusing it of having a 'strong offensive nature' that violates the Outer Space Treaty's principles of peaceful use. Mao warned, 'The project will heighten the risk of turning space into a war zone and creating a space arms race and shake the international security and arms control system.' China urged Washington to abandon the initiative to prevent destabilising global security.
Russia's response was more measured. Sergei Ryabkov, Russia's deputy foreign minister, acknowledged 'serious concern' but dismissed the need for panic. A Kremlin spokesperson noted that Golden Dome could 'force talks between Moscow and Washington about nuclear arms control in the foreseeable future,' hinting at diplomatic engagement over the new system.
President Donald Trump, along with Hegseth, unveiled the ambitious Golden Dome plan, estimating it will cost $175 billion and take three years to complete. The system intends to counter advanced missile threats from China, Russia, North Korea, Iran, and non-state actors.
Trump described Golden Dome as a 'generational investment' critical to his 'America First' defense policy. The multilayered shield will include ground- and space-based interceptors capable of destroying missiles during all four stages of an attack — from launch detection to terminal interception.
'This is about protecting American lives,' Trump stated, noting the system's expected completion by the end of his term in 2029.
Key contractors likely to contribute include SpaceX, Palantir, Anduril, L3Harris, Lockheed Martin, and RTX Corp. SpaceX's involvement is notable given CEO Elon Musk's close ties to Trump.
However, funding remains uncertain. Republican lawmakers have proposed an initial $25 billion investment within a broader $150 billion defense package. Yet, this is tied to a reconciliation bill facing significant opposition in Congress.
Golden Dome revives elements of Ronald Reagan's Cold War-era Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), famously dubbed 'Star Wars.' While SDI never materialised due to technological and treaty challenges, Golden Dome seeks to address new missile threats with advanced technology.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney confirmed discussions with the US about joining Golden Dome, highlighting Canada's interest in missile defense. 'Is it a good idea for Canada? Yes, it is good to have protections in place for Canadians,' Carney said.
He added that Canada faces potential missile threats 'in the not-too-distant future' and stressed that cooperation with the US will be evaluated carefully. 'We cooperate if necessary but not necessarily cooperate,' Carney noted, reflecting a cautious approach to the traditionally close Canada-US defense partnership.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
19 minutes ago
- Mint
Iran-Israel War: US strikes against Iran not aimed at regime change: Pentagon chief
Iran-Israel War: US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said on Sunday that the country's military strikes on Iran's nuclear sites were not meant for regime change plans. The US has sent private messages to Tehran before the strikes, encouraging them to negotiate, Hegseth said. Hegseth also warned Iran against retaliation against the United States, and said US forces were postured to defend themselves, and take action if needed. "This mission was not and has not been about regime change," Hegseth told reporters at the Pentagon. The president authorised a precision operation to neutralise the threats to our national interests posed by the Iranian nuclear program, he said. The United States military struck three sites in Iran on Sunday, marking its official entry into the Israel-Iran war that started about a week ago. President Donald Trump was the first to disclose the strikes. Speaking from the White House after the strikes, President Trump dubbed Iran "the bully of the Middle East" and warned that the Islamic Republic 'must now make peace.' In what has now been called Operation 'Midnight Hammer', the US strikes included 14 bunker-buster bombs, more than two dozen Tomahawk missiles and over 125 military aircraft. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff US General Dan Cane said at the briefing that initial battle damage assessments indicated that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction, but he declined to speculate whether any Iranian nuclear capabilities might still be intact. The operation pushes the Middle East to the brink of a major new conflagration in a region already aflame for more than 20 months with wars in Gaza and Lebanon and a toppled regime under President Bashar al-Asad in Syria. Soon after the US strikes, Tehran responded with a volley of missiles at Israel that wounded scores of people and destroyed buildings in its commercial hub Tel Aviv. Iran's Supreme National Security Council is weighing a decision to close the Strait of Hormuz, a vital global energy chokepoint, in response to US military strikes. The move, if approved, would escalate tensions in the region and risk disrupting nearly 20 per cent of the world's oil and gas shipments. The Strait of Hormuz is a strait between the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman. It provides the only sea passage from the Persian Gulf to the open ocean and is one of the world's most strategically important choke points. The Strait serves as the primary export route for Gulf producers such as Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Iraq, and Kuwait. Caine said at the Pentagon briefing that the US military had increased protection of troops in the region, including in Iraq and Syria. This mission was not and has not been about regime change.
Mint
20 minutes ago
- Mint
"Severe damage and extreme destruction" of three nuclear sites in Iran: US defence secy Hegseth
US defence secretary Pete Hegseth and chairman of the joint chiefs of staff air force general Dan Caine on Sunday said the three Iranian nuclear sites in Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan had been severely damaged and facing extreme destruction citing initial battle damage assessment reports and that the final battle damage assessment was in progress. "We devastated the Iranian nuclear programme," said Hegseth. 'It is worth noting the operation did not target Iranian troops or Iranian people.' Hegseth maintained that the operation, named 'Midnight Hammer', was not for regime change in Iran and was focused on destroying the west Asian nation's nuclear capabilities. "This mission was not, has not been for regime change. The president authorized a precision operation to neutralize the threats to our national interests posed by the Iranian nuclear programme," Hegseth said. He also said public and private messages were being delivered to Iranians after the attack seeking negotiations for peace. Hegseth reiterated President Trump's statement that the objective of this operation was to prevent Iran from developing nuclear arms in order to promote peace. Hegseth said US President Donald Trump had repeatedly asked Iran to halt its nuclear programme for peace, but all such attempts were stonewalled. In response to a question about whether the US is prepared for a full-protracted war, Hegseth clarified that the scope of this operation was intentionally limited and that anything is possible in a conflict. Asked about whether Israeli forces had contributed to the operation, Hegseth said the mission was partly to defend Israel, but Tel Aviv was not a part of the operation and that it was a solely US-led operation. On a query about Iran garnering support from China and North Korea, Hegseth said the previous administration's policies had driven these nations together, which could be a challenge, but maintained that the operation was to promote peace by stopping Iran's nuclear programme. Asked about previous reports stating that Iran's nuclear facilities were not a threat, he said Trump used credible information to take the call that the Iranian nuclear programme was a threat. Operation Midnight Hammer involved eight B-2 stealth bomber aircraft taking off from Missouri in the US, according to Caine. One of these jets flew west for misdirection, while the others flew east for 18 hours towards Iranian airspace, Caine said. This was the biggest B-2 bomber attack carried out by the US and the longest B-2 bomber flight after operations in the wake of 9/11, Hegseth said. Caine said the operation used B-2 stealth bombers, several fourth- and fifth-generation fighter aircraft and one armed submarine to attack the three nuclear facilities. For the first time, the US used Massive Ordnance Penetrators (MOP), designated as GBU-57. As many as 14 of these 30,000-pound bombs were used to target nuclear facilities at Fordow and Natanz, Caine said. Over two dozen tomahawk missiles were also fired from a submarine at the facility as Isfahan, Caine said, adding that the attack took place at approximately 2-2:10 am Iranian time. Caine said Iranian jets did not scramble and that Iranian surface-to-air missiles did not retaliate. The US attacked Iran's nuclear facilities after Israel launched an offensive against Iran on 13 June, also targeting Iran's nuclear facilities. Iran responded with military action, attacking an Israeli hospital shortly after head-of-state Benjamin Netanyahu visited it. Iran's foreign ministry condemned the US attack in a post on X, calling it "a grave and unprecedented violation of the fundamental principles of the Charter of the United Nations and the international law". Alleging that the US violated the UN Charter with its attack, Iran's foreign ministry stressed its right to defend Iran's territory and protect its people using "all force and means". Iran also urged the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) to convene an emergency session to condemn the US for its attack. "We call on the IAEA Board of Governors to immediately convene and carry out its legal responsibility in response to this dangerous US attack on Iran's peaceful nuclear facilities, all of which have been under the Agency's full safeguards and monitoring," the Iranian foreign ministry's statement added. On the night of 21-22 June, the US attacked three nuclear facilities in Iran. US President Donald Trump late on 21 June (US time) addressed the nation and said, "Our objective was the destruction of Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity and a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world's number one state sponsor of terror. Tonight, I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success. Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated." Trump also thanked and congratulated Israeli prime minister Netanyahu in his address. "We worked as a team like perhaps no team has ever worked before and we've gone a long way to erasing this horrible threat to Israel," he said. Netanyahu, in a video address on Sunday, congratulated Trump on the operation. "Your bold decision to target Iran's nuclear facilities with the awesome and righteous might of the United States will change history," said Netanyahu in his address after the operation. Indian prime minister Narendra Modi spoke with the president of Iran, Masoud Pezeshkian, to discuss the current situation. "Expressed deep concern at the recent escalations. Reiterated our call for immediate de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy as the way forward and for early restoration of regional peace, security and stability," said Modi in a post on X. India has undertaken Operation Sindhu to evacuate Indian students from conflict-ridden places in West Asia. As many as 311 Indian nations arrived in New Delhi from Masshad in Iran on 22 June, external affairs ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal announced in a post on X.
New Indian Express
22 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
US strikes on Iran mark a dangerous turning point for the region and the world: Here's why
NEW DELHI: The American airstrikes targeting Natanz, Isfahan, and the fortified Fordow facility in Iran represent a dramatic escalation in the region's tensions. This could reshape the geopolitical landscape of West Asia, with wide-ranging consequences for diplomacy, regional stability, global oil markets, and India's energy security. What Are Iran's Options Now? Iran has several possible responses, each fraught with risk: Diplomatic De-escalation Iran could return to negotiations, potentially under the framework of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which the Trump administration previously abandoned. However, this route faces resistance from Iran's hardliners, who view the U.S. strikes as a humiliation and a betrayal of diplomacy. Tehran could also withdraw from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Closure of the Strait of Hormuz Iran's most potent non-military leverage is the Strait of Hormuz—a narrow maritime chokepoint through which over 20 million barrels of oil and a large volume of liquefied natural gas (LNG) pass daily. Iranian parliament has backed the proposal to close the strait while the final decision is yet to be made by Iran's top security body. The closure of Hormuz could trigger an oil price surge and widespread economic ripple effects. But this move would also harm Iran. Its own oil exports pass through Hormuz, and a closure would likely provoke military responses from Gulf Arab states and lead to further Western sanctions. Still, the threat alone could cause panic in energy markets. Military Counterstrike A more dangerous path is retaliation. Iran's military and political leadership have warned of striking U.S. military bases and naval assets in the region. Hossein Shariatmadari, editor of the hardline Kayhan newspaper, stated ominously: 'It is now our turn.' Iran possesses short-range ballistic missiles, drones, and naval assets that could be used in asymmetric attacks. The U.S., anticipating a reaction, has dispersed its forces and bolstered regional air defenses.
