Police Association president criticises leaking info related to Jevon McSkimming investigation

Police Association president Chris Cahill
Photo:
RNZ / Angus Dreaver
The Police Association President has criticised the
leaking of information
in relation to the ongoing inquiries into the former deputy commissioner of police.
Jevon McSkimming resigned as the country's second most powerful cop last month amid a four-month investigation by the Independent Police Conduct Authority and police.
His resignation came after Police Minister Mark Mitchell said he was recently informed of allegations of a "very serious nature", separate to the investigation that led to him being suspended.
RNZ earlier revealed
pornography found on McSkimming's work computer
is being investigated as alleged objectionable material.
He declined to comment on the allegations through his lawyer.
A High Court judge earlier reserved her decision on whether the media should be allowed to report the nature of the allegedly objectionable material found.
Police Association president Chris Cahill addressed leaking in his latest column in the Police News magazine.
Cahill wrote that raising concerns about "serious wrongdoing" in the workplace was safeguarded under the Protected Disclosures Act.
"This recognises the importance of good faith disclosures about wrongdoing, and encourages transparency, accountability and prevention of corruption."
However, leaking details of an ongoing investigation was not whistleblowing, he said.
"Over the nine years I have been in my role, I have watched a steady escalation in the number of leaks to media and the accompanying erosion they have caused to police's reputation.
"The latest high-profile leak has me literally shaking my head.
"Ignoring the media frenzy it has created, we must ask what it says about the professionalism of those in police. What protection can victims, witnesses and even suspects expect when such inappropriate disclosures come with all manner of innuendo and potentially pseudo allegations?"
Cahill said that during his decades in police he had been involved in many "sensitive investigations".
"I know the damage leaked material could have caused. I would have had no qualms about investigating the breach itself, and I expect this to happen in this current case.
"Underlying this situation that is saturating the news, we must still abide by the right to natural justice, irrespective of whether we sympathise or empathise with an alleged offender or not."
He said there was also a trend of leaking information on internal employment investigations.
"This is not whistleblowing. It is the practice of the selfish saboteur, often driven by personal gain at the expense of others.
"I know of bullying allegations being made to settle grievances and then leaked to media, who lap up the reports irrespective of their credibility."
He acknowledged some people who leaked may have had a "legitimate grievance".
"But laundering it through the media is no more acceptable than the behaviour behind the grievance itself.
"These scenarios reflect poorly on the professionalism of both the media and police institutions.
"Police criminal investigations - whether internal or external - should be kept as tight as a drum to protect the rights of victims, witnesses and the accused.
"All Kiwis have a right to expect that this standard is preserved. Within Police, it is at the heart of its professional, integrity and empathy values."
Former Deputy Commissioner Jevon McSkimming.
Photo:
Getty Images
In response to questions from RNZ, Cahill confirmed his column was spurred by the investigation into McSkimming which he said was "just an example of a wider issue of leaking".
"The leaking of active investigation information paints police in a very unprofessional light. Victims, witnesses and suspects all have the right to expect their statements etc will be treated with privacy and only made public as is appropriate during the justice process.
"When it comes to suspects, the very idea of innocent until proven guilty and the access to a fair trial are cornerstones of the justice system. The leaking of information can undermine this."
He said if no offending was identified by an investigation, the damage to an individual's reputation could be permanent, "especially in today's world of the social media and online content sharing".
"When an investigation is still in progress, I do not believe the public interest overrides the need for these privacy protections."
Asked if he had expressed his concerns to police, Cahill declined to comment.
In the same edition of Police News it was announced that Cahill would not be seeking re-election to his role.
"I believe it is positive for an organisation to have change in leadership and while nine years has gone very quickly, it is time for someone else to bring their style and energy to the role.
"I am comfortable the association is in a strong position with a positive leadership team at both board and operational levels to support the new president and continue to build on the legacy of past members."
He intended to take a break before deciding on what was next for him after October, but added "I will not be looking at national politics".
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

RNZ News

an hour ago

• RNZ News

Northland faces unsustainable court delays as homicide cases surge

By Shannon Pitman, multimedia journalist, Whangārei of Whangarei High and District Court. Photo: RNZ / Nate McKinnon There's a well-known saying that justice delayed is justice denied. And in Northland, where the region is facing a growing number of homicides, the wheels of justice are getting increasingly slow. With trials now being set down for as far out as October 2027, the battle for limited resources and judicial time in the High Court at Whangārei is no longer just inconvenient - it is unsustainable. And, it's not a new problem. "I find this date to be unacceptably distant," Justice Timothy Brewer declared two years ago when the earliest available date for a murder trial was in 2026. "A trial of charges such as these should not be scheduled for trial further out than 12 to 15 months," he said at that hearing in 2024 before directing the court to find something earlier. Unfortunately, not a lot has changed since then. As cases pile up the question is no longer if something must change - but when, and at what cost. Defendants are spending long periods of time, often in custody, waiting for their cases to get to trial, while victims and their families struggle to move forward while the case is still before the court. Both sides are facing the reality of waiting years for justice to catch up in Northland. And, it's unlikely to get any better unless resourcing improves because the kinds of serious crimes that end up in the High Court have got worse this year. Northland recorded eight homicides last year, but the region has already exceeded that number, with nine homicides in the first six months of this year alone. According to data released by police under the Official Information Act, Northland had recorded the highest number of homicides up until 1 May, with Waikato next behind the region on five. Auckland had only two people charged with homicides for the same period, while Counties Manukau had three. In Northland, arrests have been made in all of the homicides - but that means there's nine new cases - and potential trials - that need to be worked into the High Court schedule. Several have already been locked in for 2027. Part of the problem is the fact Northland has just one courtroom - Courtroom Five at the Whangārei District Court - that is designated for High Court matters. But, there's no dedicated High Court judge and they are instead brought in from Auckland as required. So far in 2025, the High Court at Whangārei has had two murder trials scheduled, both relating to homicides that occurred in 2023, but neither ended up needing the full amount of time that was allocated. In the case of the Manuel brothers, scheduled for the first week of February, Samson Manuel pleaded guilty to the murder of Shayden Perkinson, on the morning their three-week trial was due to start, while his brother Bronson pleaded to a lesser charge. The High Court then remained largely empty for four weeks until the next trial commenced in March, involving Denise and Quinntinn Davis and their nephew Joshua Tana, who are all accused of murdering Euan Mackey in March 2024. They initially had a trial date allocated for April 2026, however, Justice Timothy Brewer directed the court to find an earlier date, saying the delay was unacceptable. Their trial was then brought forward and began on 15 March but was aborted in its second week. A new trial for Denise Davis, Quinntinn Davis and Tana has now been scheduled for April 2027, leaving defendants in custody and victims facing the prolonged wait to testify again. In total, the case could take three years and one month to reach trial. A trial falling over doesn't mean other matters scheduled for later on can always easily come forward. Justice Simon Moore, who retired from the High Court in 2024, told NZME one of his roles had been rostering judges and that was done 12 months in advance. Justice Moore said Whangārei sits on the Auckland circuit, meaning it relies on judges from Auckland.. When trials "fall over", the schedule can be left with holes that are only able to be filled by shorter hearings. "How do you fill a hole like that? You can't suddenly say to the parties 'we have got a judge here, got a court here, you need to come and we will start this four-week trial tomorrow'. The logistics of doing that are incredibly difficult." Justice Moore believes regional courthouses have not kept up with population growth and the complex nature of homicide cases was putting pressure on time constraints. "These regional courts are set up to deal with populations of the '50s and '60s where it just wasn't an issue. You could run a single court like that perfectly efficiently and it wasn't a problem. He said a standard homicide is usually three to four weeks long, with difficult and more complex cases running much longer than that. "You have a trial like that locked into Whangārei High Court and it pleads out, you are scurrying around looking for a stocking filler," Justice Moore said. "It's not the sort of problem we have in Auckland, Hamilton or Tauranga because we're able to draw people in. Whangārei is a bit more difficult." Justice Moore said work was being done to give trials in Northland a firm trial date as well as an earlier back-up trial date to fill in should something fall over. "But the average trial is four weeks long and you just can't stack them up, the High Court is just a different beast to manage." One option being offered for Northland-based trials is a relocation to Auckland. However, defence lawyer Sumudu Thode said a change of location is unfair to all, with legal aid ultimately footing the bill. "We've got no other remedy than waiting for two years. It's not fair to put all of them to that inconvenience. They're also not being tried by members of their community, they're being tried by members of an Auckland community," Thode said. Thode raised another concern. In one of her cases, Thode's client - facing his third strike warning - was charged with a firearms offence, which, due to legal requirements of the three-strikes law, must be heard in the High Court. He was in custody for two years awaiting a jury trial, which resulted in a hung verdict. He then was placed back into custody and granted bail after two years and 10 months and it was another six months until his retrial got off the ground. "These are non life-imprisonment offences. This is not a Covid issue, this is not because there has been a ton of murders, these are issues that have been happening for a while," Thode said. Thode said in her experience, when earlier dates are offered, all parties generally prioritise High Court cases to ensure they can go ahead. "The victims, the whānau, they want these to continue, police officers are generally available or make themselves available." A sexual violence victim who had to give evidence in the High Court at Whangārei for a second time after the defendant was granted a retrial told NZME the long wait sent her life into turmoil. The case began its court journey in 2019, and she said, after testifying in 2022, she felt relieved to finally share her story. But when the defendant appealed his conviction and a retrial was granted three years later, everything unravelled. "No one told me this could happen and it was a huge shock. I had a full breakdown." To prepare to give evidence for the second time in three years, she had to pause therapy, ensuring painful memories remained intact for court. She said an earlier retrial date could have made things easier but instead they were told there were no gaps in the calendar for another two years. "If it had happened sooner, I could have moved on. Instead, it affected my family, my job, and my mental health." Adding to her stress was the knowledge that her perpetrator was out on bail, while the court case - now stretching into its sixth year - drags on. "It's not just victims or witnesses who feel the anxiety - it's their families, workplaces, and livelihoods. I wouldn't wish it on anyone," she said. A spokesperson for the office of the Chief Justice said Whangārei's reliance on a single courtroom was impacting the ability to schedule trials promptly. The spokesperson said Chief Justice Helen Winkelmann has raised the delays in Whangārei with the Minister of Justice on previous occasions and briefed the Attorney-General Dame Judith Collins back in 2019. In the brief, Chief Justice Winkelmann specifically noted Whangārei and Rotorua were facing wait times nearly 12 months longer than those in main centres, solely because of the lack of courtroom availability. Chief High Court Justice Sally Fitzgerald also said in a statement issued to NZME that the wait times are problematic. "It is concerning that people in Northland are sometimes waiting considerably longer than court participants in other areas to have these serious matters resolved in court. "We know that court delays are very difficult for the people concerned - for the victims and their families, for the defendant and their families," Fitzgerald said. The office of the Chief Justice said when the previous murder trials were resolved in Whangārei earlier this year, the court was utilised. "During the remaining available weeks, action was taken to ensure that other, shorter matters continued to be heard, and included an Associate Judge and an Auckland-based Judge sitting in Whangārei during that time," the spokesperson said. The spokesperson said that with adequate notice, trials scheduled for 2027 may be able to be brought forward if earlier trials resolve. Minister for Justice Paul Goldsmith told NZME that waiting years for a trial to start is far too long and announced in Budget 2025 that $246 million will be invested over four years to improve court timeliness. "Justice delayed is justice denied. Waiting months or years for a case to be resolved only adds to the frustration and trauma for victims and, indeed, all court participants," Goldsmith says. "This funding will support the ongoing operation of specialist courts, tribunals, the District Court, senior courts, the Coroners Court, and the legal aid system." Homicide cases for 2025 currently before the court Jan 29: Brooklyn Jenkins, 20, charged with the murder of his brother, Kyle Jenkins, had his trial scheduled for March 2026. Feb 24: Aitua Puriri was charged with the manslaughter of his 3-year-old nephew, Reign Puriri in Whangārei, and had his trial set for July 2027. Feb 27: Duwaine Johnstone was charged with the murder of mother of three, Yvonne Chapman, in Whangārei, and had a trial allocated for February 2027. Mar 15: A man, whose name is suppressed, was charged with the murder of 62-year-old Toby Mike Adams in Whangārei, and had his trial date set for July 5, 2027. Mar 15: A man, whose name is suppressed, was charged with the murder of Estene Rapatini in Kaikohe, and had his trial scheduled for August 2027. Apr 12: Lewis Edmonds was charged with the murder of Archibald McKenzie in Kerikeri, and had his trial scheduled for October 2027. May 9: A 26-year-old, whose name is suppressed, was charged with the murder of Geoffrey Ware in Parakāo and had his trial scheduled for early July 2027. May 21: Drummond Leaf was charged with the murder of 3-year-old Catalya Remana Tangimetua Pepene and has a trial date scheduled for February 2027. May 21: A man whose name is suppressed has appeared in court charged with the murder of Daniel Hepehi in Horeke. - This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald .

RNZ News

2 hours ago

• RNZ News

Destiny Church protesters set flags on fire in Auckland rally

Protesters at a Destiny Church rally in Auckland, 21 June 2025. Photo: RNZ Fire and Emergency crews have been called to a Destiny Church march in downtown Auckland after flags were set on fire. Hundreds have marched from Aotea Square down Queen Street in what the church billed as a rally "in defence of faith, flag and family". At one point flags - which an RNZ reporter said appeared to include rainbow flags and flags representing mainstream media - were set alight. Rally goers then put the flames out with water and arriving fire crews then left without taking action. During the march, people chanted "no immigration without assimilation". Destiny Church said the march was to take "a bold public stand for Christian values, Kiwi identity and the future of this nation". Church leader Brian Tamaki claimed "uncontrolled immigration" in the United Kingdom had led to spikes in crime and a collapse in British identity. Tamaki said the church was building a "Commonwealth crusade" to "reclaim Christina nations". Protesters and counter-protesters at a Destiny Church rally in Auckland, 21 June 2025. Photo: RNZ The Destiny marchers were met by about 20 counterprotestors waving tino rangatiratanga and Palestine flags. A large number of Police were also in attendance. Ahead of the march, Tamaki said church leaders had sent an open letter to Prime Minister Christopher Luxon calling for a reversal on a position that the country has no official religion. He said a demand included enforcing a "no immigration without assimilation" policy. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Newsroom

2 hours ago

• Newsroom

PM appeals to China's ego in the pursuit of peace and order

Analysis: The Prime Minister has singled out the Pacific, the Taiwan Strait and the South China Sea as tension points during his meetings with his Chinese counterpart in Beijing. And when pushed, he all-but confirmed he also raised China's live-firing exercises in the Tasman Sea in February – something he's previously said 'alarmed' New Zealanders. But in contrast to what NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte says, Luxon pushed back against the idea of a 'China threat', saying he did not believe China was creating a fearsome foursome with Iran, Russia and North Korea. 'We haven't seen any evidence of a wholesale force from those four countries coming together against the West in that way. And so that might be a difference of opinion, but that's very much how we put it.' In Beijing on Friday, Luxon engaged in a series of leader meetings at the historic Great Hall of the People, including with President Xi Jinping, as well as his Chinese counterpart Premier Li Qiang. He came away from those meetings saying the China-New Zealand relationship was in 'good heart'. Ahead of his meeting with Li, Luxon received an official welcome, with the full military pomp and ceremony – just hours ahead of flying to Europe to spend time with New Zealand's security partners at the NATO summit. In the Luxon-Xi meeting, neither side skirted around the edges, directly addressing the fact that the relationship had been a rocky one. 'More than 50 years since the establishment of diplomatic ties to China, New Zealand relationship has experienced many ups and downs, but we have always respected each other and worked together,' Xi said in his opening remarks ahead of his closed-door meeting with Luxon. The Prime Minister responded in the same way, with a directness that was respectful and predictable – exactly the type of communication the New Zealand side said it was striving for in its relationship with China. The Chinese and New Zealand teams at the formal leaders' meeting. Photo: Pool In what seemed to be an attempt at positive manifestation, Luxon appealed to China's view of itself as a predictable, constructive player at a time of global turmoil. 'We are meeting at a time of increasing global uncertainty and strain, and the world looks to China as a major global power to play a constructive role in addressing many of the challenges that are facing us all,' Luxon said. In this context, ongoing discussions with China were 'more important than ever before – and we value it highly'. 'Stability in our region and our deep and abiding support for the rules-based system are fundamental to New Zealand's interests … our long-standing connections and cooperation supports us to continue our positive, constructive, open and comprehensive discussions, as partners should do.' While Luxon did not mention the US, China already sees itself as the antithesis to Donald Trump's chaos. Playing to that ego in the hope of maintaining peace in the region (and the globe) couldn't hurt. 'As a small country, you have to acknowledge we're not a medium power, not a large power, right? So I have to find ways to influence what I believe in and what we believe in in New Zealand – which is a set of values – and actually put voice to those values and articulate them well,' Luxon said following the bilateral. In return, Li said that Xi had 'chartered the direction for the next phase' of the relationship, while also saying that New Zealand should place greater emphasis on cooperation. 'In these turbulent times, the fundamental interests of both countries call for the relationship to be defined and underpinned by cooperation, rather than anything else,' Chinese Ambassador to New Zealand Wang Xiaolong said. The meetings took place against the back-drop of heightened tensions in the Indo-Pacific Region. Following China's live-firing combat exercises in the Tasman in February, China has said it planned for the normalisation of deployment of the naval forces of the People's Liberation Army into the South Pacific. Meanwhile, the day before the meetings, AFP reported that a tranche of classified government briefing notes showed deep concern within the New Zealand government in the wake of the surprise intercontinental ballistic missile launch off the coast of Tahiti last year, which China shrugged off as 'routine.' In briefing documents provided to Foreign Minister Winston Peters, officials called the missile launch a 'significant and concerning development'. On the flip side, China has consistently hit back at New Zealand's indication of joining Aukus Pillar II, warning against joining 'small circles', and stoking a regional arms race. This was another topic Luxon wouldn't be drawn on following his day of meetings. China has also pushed back at New Zealand's retaliatory action against the Cook Islands after Prime Minister Mark Brown signed a strategic deal with Beijing, without consulting New Zealand. Luxon refused to confirm whether the Cook Islands issue was raised in his meetings with Xi and Li, but said he raised the importance of respecting the Pacific Islands Forum as the way to advance development in the Pacific. It seemed to be a tight-lipped Luxon way of acknowledging the under-lying issue with China's role in the Cook Islands saga, without disclosing the specifics of what was said in the room. During a 25-minute press conference at the conclusion of Luxon's three-day trip that had covered Shanghai and Beijing, the Prime Minister went out of his way to not divulge any further information about the diplomatic discussions, beyond what was included in his press release and a joint statement. 'We need to respect that they are private diplomatic conversations,' he said. 'What I can reassure you is that I raise issues of common interest; I raise issues of difference. We had a very fulsome conversation. We discussed everything we needed to discuss.' While it was expected for some topics to remain in the room, Luxon joined the tradition of New Zealand prime ministers to be particularly evasive following discussions with China's leaders. But he reassured Kiwis and security partners that – 'as you would expect in a mature relationship' – New Zealand canvassed the range of topics 'very openly, very candidly'. Despite the direct acknowledgement of the shared differences, there was more positive than negative in the remarks between the two countries. It seemed China still regarded New Zealand as 'the best in the west' and understood the importance of keeping New Zealand onside at a time of increasing global uncertainty. This marked Luxon's second meeting with Xi. In November, the president asked for a bilateral on the sidelines of the Apec summit in Peru. Xi referenced this first face-to-face, saying the two had a 'good discussion' last year, saying he was 'very impressed' with Luxon and appreciated his 'positive attitude'. Both sides played up the positives of the trading relationship, with Luxon noting the $39 billion in two-way trade and opportunities for further collaboration. But one trade area that remained a sticking point was China's bid to join the CPTPP. China has been angling to join the trade grouping since 2021, and ahead of this visit government officials made a point of saying they believed they had taken steps to meet all the Auckland Principles required for ascension into the partnership. Despite repeated questioning Luxon refused to say whether New Zealand supported China's bid to join the CPTPP, relying on the final 'principle' that required consensus from all 12 countries. But a joint statement issued by the two countries said New Zealand had 'noted' China's application. Chinese Premier Li Qiang with Christopher Luxon as he inspects an honour guard. Photo: Pool The Xi meeting, which was scheduled for 40 minutes, lasted about an hour. It came after a bilateral with Zhao Leji, the chairman of the country's top legislative body – akin to the Speaker of the House – and before a detailed bilateral with Luxon's counterpart Premier Li Qiang. Following the final meeting, Li and Luxon had a banquet dinner with the full delegation of officials and business leaders. For these crucial first meetings, the Prime Minister brought along Wellington's full diplomatic might. Ambassador to China Jonathan Austin, Foreign Secretary Bede Corry and division head Wendy Matthews all joined Luxon in the room. And for good measure, he took in former senior diplomat and head of DPMC Ben King, Customs chief executive Christine Stevenson, as well as foreign affairs advisers from both DPMC and PMO. While it was unlikely either side was surprised by the topics raised, the experienced officials in the room would have been listening carefully to the specific language used and how things were said. It was the nuance in China's statements and responses that would communicate the CCP's strength of feeling on specific issues. From Beijing, Luxon left his business delegation and the Airforce 757 and jumped on a commercial jet to Brussels late Friday night. The juxtaposition of the Beijing visit abutted against the Prime Minister's trip to NATO provided a fitting illustration of New Zealand's competing priorities, which Luxon said were inextricably linked.