Police Applicants Who Failed Physical Test Still Admitted For Training
Police are investigating after three applicants who failed physical testing were still admitted for training.
In a statement, assistant commissioner Tusha Penny said it was a clear breach of recruitment policy.
"Police recently became aware of three instances where applicants were approved to begin training at the Royal New Zealand Police College (RNZPC) without having met the full requirements for the Physical Appraisal Test (PAT).
"Our process does not allow for exemptions to the PAT, and this is a clear breach of the recruitment policy. Recruitment leaders have been reminded by email that there are no circumstances where discretion can be provided for applicants who do not pass the PAT."
She said police had begun an audit into whether further breaches of the recruitment process had occurred, covering a six-month period.
The investigation would check whether the application process for recruits to the police college had deviated from the required standards, and the findings would be reported publicly.
Pressure is growing as the November deadline for the government's promise to recruit 500 additional frontline officers nears, but Penny said Commissioner Richard Chambers had been "very clear publicly and internally that recruitment standards will not be compromised".
"We have previously acknowledged the target of 500 additional officers by 27 November 2025 is ambitious, but we know this is a great opportunity and we are working hard to achieve the target," she said.
"Police is looking into these matters and conducting an audit to establish if there have been any further breaches of the recruitment process."
Police bosses in December told ministers it would be "very very challenging" to meet the two-year target, noting at the time total office numbers had decreased by more than 50.
Police confirmed to RNZ that as of 21 April they were still 475 officers short of the target, noting that did not include the 334 recruits still at Police College.
'All recruits should be good to go'
Police Association vice president Paul Ormerod said it was pleasing to hear the Commissioner had ordered an audit.
"We wouldn't want to see any softening continuing in being a recruit for college, and any failures of college need to be addressed at college and not put on to districts. All recruits should be good to go when released to district.
"Hopefully this is the case, but we are seeing some fall through the cracks that need extra guidance after they have finished Police College."
He said they particularly did not want to see further softening of other police college requirements, like psychometric testing "and that stand down period - if they get that psychometric testing wrong, they have a six month stand down - so that's another aspect of recruiting procedures that we'd like ensure is continued".
He said as of last month officer numbers were only up by six compared to the 2023 benchmark, and the government should focus on improving pay and conditions if it wanted to meet its target.
"We'd be naive to think that there isn't some kind of political interference. What I'd like to see personally, instead of so much effort put into new staff, pay officers more, improve the conditions that they already have, and retain the staff that we have. That'll go a long way ... if we don't have so many leaving.
"I'm sure the Commissioner has had a number of talks with the minister in regarding how they're going to achieve it, but police and government need to invest in their current staff and retain the valuable knowledge that they have instead of recruiting and training for the Australian police forces."
Ministers respond
Associate Minister Casey Costello, who has the delegated responsibility for the target, said decisions on recruitment and training were an operational matter for the organisation.
"How police recruit and train new constables is an operational issue. Ministers have no involvement in this," she said. "What the government has done is made a commitment to recruit an extra 500 frontline officers and we have backed police to do this with $225 million in extra funding.
"As ex-police officers, Minister Mitchell and I are well aware of the very high standards of NZ Police and it's very important that those are maintained."
Police Minister Mark Mitchell told Midday Report police had taken "immediate steps" to remedy the problem, and he backed the Commissioner's support for maintaining training standards.
He said the decision-making would have been "very operational, it'll be out at district levels," and ruled out there having been any political pressure involved, challenging Labour to come up with evidence of that.
"As a past police officer, I understand and I guard that operational independence strongly, and neither myself or my Associate Minister Casey Costello would ever be involved with instructing police on how to carry out recruitment, what the standards should be, or how they should be going about that.
"That is purely operational for police. We have been very clear as an incoming government and as part of our coalition agreement with New Zealand First that we will fund 500 more police officers, and we've set a target for the police in which to do that. That is as far as we can go as a government."
In an earlier statement, he also said meeting that commitment was an operational matter for police.
"There has been no political interference with police and its recruiting programme. The coalition government set the police a recruitment target and the funding to increase police numbers by 500. The delivery of that is an operational matter for police," he said.
He said he and Costello had been clear "that standards were not to be dropped".
"Under the previous Labour government police recruiting standards were relaxed for example by dropping the required swim standard and dropping standards around low-level offending.
"In contrast, Minister Costello and I have unequivocally supported the Police Commissioner's public commitment to the maintenance of standards and expect the police to maintain these standards."
He made that accusation again "when the police dropped the swimming standard" again.
"Now, I'm not saying that wasn't the right thing to do but I'm highlighting the fact that the dropping of those standards happened under a previous government.
"Under this government not only have we returned the recruit courses from 16 to 20 weeks, we've been very clear that we do not want standards dropped, there will not be any compromise on that."
He pushed back when host Charlotte Cook pointed out the government had allowed applicants on their restricted licence to join the Police College on the understanding they would have their full licence by the time they got there.
"Again, those are operational decisions for the police, and that's why those decisions were taken. It's not for us to interfere or meddle in those," he said.
Minister 'trying to excuse his own behaviour' - Labour
Labour's police spokesperson Ginny Andersen said the decision to override recruiting policy would typically be made by someone in the police executive and despite the minister's claims of no interference, questions still needed to be answered.
"We need to understand why, then, did police - and who in police - made the decision for the rules to be bent in order to allow recruits through that hadn't qualified properly. It seems highly unlikely that police would do this of their own accord," she said.
"It not only compromises public safety, but it also compromises the safety of those officers on the front line right now who rely on recruits being able to have all the skills necessary to be a police officer."
She said the lowering of swimming requirements when Labour was in government was as a result of a review by police into what training was needed - an operational decision.
"Changes to standards for police recruits do happen over time, and that's in order to better reflect what is needed of an officer on the frontline, but what has happened here is recruits have entered training having not met the current requirements and police are worried enough to do an audit of that.
"It seems like he's trying to excuse his own behavior ... it does seem odd that he's bringing things up from years ago when the pressing issue right now is that police recruits have been able to proceed through training without without completing required physical assessment tests."
The minister should be held responsible for what was a political promise, she said.
"It is completely unfair for New Zealand police to be held accountable for a political promise that they have always said was unattainable by the 27th of November this year.
"The political deal making done by this government is now calling into question the reputation of New Zealand police, and that is not fair on the hard working and excellent police service we have.
She said the six-month investigation should be expanded to cover the whole two years police had been recruiting to try to meet the target.
"I think it would be better for the public's confidence for the whole period to be reviewed, six months doesn't cover the entire time that police have been trying to get the 500 extra and as we've seen that political pressure build on the government, there clearly has been something happened for standards to change."
However, Ormerod said the time period would cover all those still at Police College, and "everyone else should have passed and is out on the street and in district, so I think the timing is fair".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
4 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Commissioner supports exemptions for two police recruits
By Sam Sherwood of RNZ The Police Commissioner says he fully supports the Assistant Commissioner's decision to sign off on exemptions from recruitment standards for two recruits. It comes after revelations Assistant Commissioner Jill Rogers personally signed off at least two exemptions from recruitment standards. On Wednesday, a police spokesperson confirmed in a statement that Rogers gave at least two approvals in the past year, and records were being checked to see if there were more. "As is already accepted, there had been a practice of discretion applied to some applicants to Police College in relation to the Physical Appraisal Test (PAT)," the statement said. "Assistant Commissioner Jill Rogers can recall two occasions in the last year where she gave approval to be applied to two applicants. There was no directive, instruction, or request issued in relation to this. We are searching available documentation to confirm this number. "As with other recruits, those two candidates went on to pass all the tests required to graduate as constables." The statement said Police Commissioner Richard Chambers had made it clear no more discretion was to be applied. This was following the result of an audit showing the use of discretion had become "too widespread for my liking", and it had developed "over a period of years that pre-dated my time as Commissioner". Chambers and Rogers spoke to media at Parliament on Thursday. Chambers said there had been occasions over the years where discretion had been given. "That's the fair and reasonable thing to do for staff who have their own personal circumstances as to why they might need a little extra support, but I've been clear going forward, there'll be no discretion." Rogers did not want to give any of the personal circumstances about the two recruits, but said she "deemed the circumstances of their recruitment process required an exemption and allowed that". "There are extenuating circumstances in a number of these cases, and so I don't want to talk about the personal circumstances. What I will say is the recruit pipeline to enter our initial training phase is a 12-step process. Once they get through that, they enter into the Police College, where they're required to pass all aspects of the training before they graduate as constables, so there's still a robust process for them to go for before they graduate." Chambers said he had spoken with Rogers about the circumstances of the two recruits and "100% support her decision". "Because when you take into account human beings choosing a career in the police that you know they aspire to be part of our organisation, there may be reasons. Sometimes we have to give some flexibility to their personal circumstances. Now that I understand those, which has been since Monday, I totally support the decision." Chambers said he was focused on "moving forward". "That's where I need to put my time and effort, and that's where I've asked my staff to put their time and effort to so that we can be very confident, which I am, that the quality of police officer for our country remains very, very high." Trust and confidence in police was "critical", Chambers said. "I've made a number of statements publicly about a number of things, actually, that sets an expectation and a standard that I know that it's not just me as a commissioner that can be proud of, it's my full executive and it's 15,000 colleagues across the country. "We're not always going to get it right, and I've said that before. You know, we're human beings at the end of the day, and but when, when things don't quite go to plan, you know, we've got to own it, learn from it, and move on, but the focus is moving forward and continuing to be the best that we can be." Politicians clash over police recruitment targets The government committed in its coalition agreements to recruiting 500 more police officers by November - but seems unlikely to meet that deadline. Labour's Police spokesperson Ginny Andersen said the revelations Rogers was involved raised serious questions about whether political pressure had been applied to the Police College to deliver on that promise. "It's pretty clear that people at the Police College themselves don't make these types of decisions, there's a hierarchy in police. "There's been a clear pattern here of recruits not meeting standards and when the government has promised 500 more police it's pretty clear that pressure has been applied to the college and that's not right. "They've delivered around 30 of 500, and they have until November. It's pretty clear they've failed," Andersen said. In a statement, Mitchell's office said a draft report showed "that for the delivery of the 1800 new police target, a discretionary pass was introduced where the literacy assessment standards were not met, which has since become common practice". "This does raise questions about political pressure." Labour, in 2017, committed to recruit an extra 1800 police officers, marking that milestone in June 2023. RNZ has requested a copy of the draft report the minister's statement refers to. "We have made very clear on discovering this practice that it does not meet our expectations and Police have responded quickly with the Commissioner directing that the practice be ended," his office said. "Labour should be upfront with New Zealanders about the mess they created in order to deliver their well overdue and incomplete 1800 new police target, instead of trying to blame this government that had to come in and clean it up." Further comment has been sought from Andersen responding to Mitchell's statements. She said the review made it clear "recruits failed physical tests and got through anyway". "This happened in the past year, under their watch. Mark Mitchell needs to take accountability for his failure to deliver 500 more police." The audit covers 1022 recruits between January 2024 and April 2025. Preliminary findings showed a significant number of applicants were allowed into the college, despite failing preliminary tests.
1News
5 days ago
- 1News
'No direction' to lower standards for police recruits
The Police Commissioner says there was "no direction or order" to drop standards in order to fulfil a coalition promise and recruit 500 more police officers. Richard Chambers said, once he knew "discretion" had been applied, he made it clear that graduating police officers must still meet standards. Both Chambers and Police Minister Mark Mitchell fronted a scrutiny hearing today – a chance for MPs to grill ministers on this year's Budget decisions. Findings from an audit into recruitment standards at the Royal New Zealand Police College found a significant number of applicants were allowed into the college, despite failing preliminary tests. The Police College sometimes gives discretion to recruits who fall short of certain standards, although they must still pass the tests before graduating, but the audit found this had become increasingly common. ADVERTISEMENT The findings prompted Police Commissioner Richard Chambers to instruct the college not to accept anyone who hasn't met all mandatory recruitment standards. Critics say the Govt is behind on its target of 500 new officers as gang numbers and illicit drugs continue to surge. (Source: 1News) Just last month, a review found more than 300 police officers were not assessed on their swimming abilities before graduating, leading to the audit. Those recent recruits had undergone assessments retrospectively, and it was announced that police would review the swimming training policy. Another issue was a failure by some to meet the literacy standard required before entering Police College. Labour police spokesperson Ginny Andersen asked Mitchell in the hearing: "Who gave the order to drop standards at the Police College in order to try deliver the 500 [new police] quicker?" Mitchell described it as an operational matter, but as minister, his view was that there were no specific orders "ever" to drop standards. He blamed the previous government and had previously said: "There is no doubt in my mind that the priorities set by the previous government around recruiting contributed to this." ADVERTISEMENT He said there may have been a change in the approach taken, but under this government, "we've been very clear what our expectations are, and that is that there will be no reduction or change in standards". Police Commissioner Richard Chambers (Source: 1News) Mitchell added that, when it came to recruiting, the Commissioner and his statements had been "unambiguous" about his expectations. Chambers added the minister was correct - "there was no direction or order" - but once he was made aware that "discretion" had been applied on different standards and expectations, he made it clear those standards needed to be met. "I've been very clear about under my commissionership, we have standards that we will meet and, if some people need to do some extra work before they join New Zealand Police, then that's up to them to do." Going forward, he said he was very clear "we do have expectations of standards". Mitchell emphasised the recruits who failed preliminary tests did so before attending police college and, under the commissioner's direction, that would no longer happen. ADVERTISEMENT "Now there is no discretion around those standards," he said. "They'll meet the standard before they go to the college, but once they're at the college, they have to meet the standard before they graduate."
Scoop
5 days ago
- Scoop
Mitchell Contradicted On Lower Police Standards
It's been revealed that Police leadership gave approval for at least two recruits who failed fitness standards to enter Police College. This raises questions about political pressure being applied to the Police College to lower standards. 'Yesterday Mark Mitchell and Richard Chambers emphatically denied any directive to lower standards had been given. However, there are reports that Associate Commissioner Jill Rogers approved at least two recruits who had failed fitness standards to enter Police College,' Labour Police spokesperson Ginny Andersen said. 'This raises serious questions about political pressure being applied to the Police College to fix the Government's failing promise of 500 more police on the beat. 'It also calls into question whether Mark Mitchell was honest with New Zealanders during yesterday's committee hearing. 'He needs to front up and answer whether he was aware that recruits who had failed standards were being allowed to advance. 'When the Government promised 500 more police, the pressure that followed may have contributed to inconsistent and unclear processes. That seriously risks undermining public confidence and the integrity of the Police. 'We need a Police Minister we can trust and who is focused on truly breaking the cycle of crime,' Ginny Andersen said.
