Russia Targeting, Breaching Western Organizations Aiding Ukraine: CISA Joint Advisory
Western logistics and technology companies engaged in the transportation, coordination, and delivery of foreign assistance to Ukraine are being targeted by a Russian state-sponsored cyber unit, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) said in a May 21
The campaign, which began in 2022, is being carried out by a military unit within the Russian General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU) called Unit 26165, which is known in the cybersecurity community under various names such as APT28, Fancy Bear, Forest Blizzard, and BlueDelta.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
Iran has a lot of options to hurt Western interests — but all carry a blowback, EIU economist says
Iran has a lot of options to hurt Western interests, but all options carry negative cost for the Iranian regime, says Cailin Birch, global economist at the Economist Intelligence Unit.
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
China's support for Tehran grows more restrained as U.S. enters war between Israel and Iran
As the U.S. rained bombs and missiles on Iran's nuclear sites on Saturday — entering the war between Israel and Iran — Beijing appears to be standing firm in its support of its long-standing ally in Tehran. However, its support will be tempered by its limited heft as a peace broker in the region, and potential upside if oil chokepoints squeeze the U.S. more than they hurt Beijing. Beijing has drawn closer to Iran in recent years, with the two countries cooperating regularly on military exercises and signing a 25-year strategic partnership in economic, military and security cooperation in 2021. Iran's population of nearly 91 million, far more than Israel's 9.8 million people, coupled with its abundant crude oil reserves, made it a natural partner in China's Belt and Road initiative, which the Global Times, a Beijing government mouthpiece, described as a way to "counter U.S. hegemony." China's primary economic interest lies in its access to Iranian oil and the Strait of Hormuz, which is one of the most important trade routes for global crude oil flows. Some 20 million barrels per day of crude oil, or a fifth of global consumption, flowed through the strait in 2024, according to the Energy Information Administration. Half of Beijing's oil imports moved through the key route — using a system of workarounds to bypass Western banks, shipping services and yuan-denominated transactions to avoid triggering sanctions. China will likely keep its "hands off Iran in any case," said Neo Wang, lead China economist and strategist at Evercore ISI, due to its limited influence over Israel and its strategic calculus on Washington's intervention. Beijing is embroiled in a trade war with the U.S. and may find value in any chaos in the Middle East, which "would become a bigger distraction to Washington," Wang added. China pledged to support Iran in "safeguarding its national sovereignty" shortly after it was attacked by Israel on June 12, which Beijing condemned as a "violation of Iran's sovereignty, security and territorial integrity." But despite that initial show of support for Iran, Beijing's rhetoric has shifted to become more measured, short of denouncing Israel's military actions but focused on brokering dialogue and a ceasefire. Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi told his Israeli counterpart in a phone call that Israel's strikes were "unacceptable," but refrained from remarks of "condemning" them in the call. In another sign of Beijing dialing back its rhetoric on Iran, the Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson said Monday that it is in the international community's shared interest to maintain stability in the Persian Gulf and surrounding waterways. Beijing has largely avoided "direct condemnation of Israel while remaining diplomatically aligned with Iran," political risk consultancy firm Eurasia Group analysts said, as it seeks to "contain the tensions and prevent spillover of the conflict to the wider region — which could affect its economic and strategic interests." U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Sunday called for China to dissuade Iran from closing the Strait of Hormuz. While many expect Beijing to do just that, some suggested a blockade of the chokepoint could be favorable for China, as it stands better prepared to absorb the blow than the U.S. and European Union, and that China could easily turn to other alternative oil sources. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, China's primary oil sources are Russia, Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, Iraq and Oman, although a sizable portion of Malaysia's exports are actually relabeled or transferred from Iran. Robin Brooks, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, said "China will be happy to see a big spike in oil prices if that destabilizes the U.S. and Europe." Echoing that view, Andrew Bishop, global head of policy research at Signum Global Advisors, said: "China may not be that irate at paying more for oil from other sources, if it means the U.S. suffers even more." Iran's parliament Sunday backed the decision to close the strait, pending the final approval by its national security council. That sent the oil futures over 2% higher in early Asia hours. U.S. WTI crude rose more than 2% to $75.22 per barrel, while global benchmark Brent was up nearly 2% at $78.53 per barrel. While China's U.N. Ambassador Fu Cong had harsh words for the U.S. at a U.N. Security Council meeting on Sunday, Fu also singled out Israel and called for an immediate ceasefire and an end to the hostilities. Although China appears to favor stability in the Middle East, it may benefit from U.S. involvement in the conflict. The U.S. strikes on Iran "handed China an important talking point: It's America, not China, that threatens the global order and peace," said Shehzad Qazi, managing director of China Beige Book. China may have hopes of acting as a peacemaker, building on its mediation of a peace deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia in 2023. Beijing hailed the reconciliation as a win for Chinese diplomacy and a sign that Beijing has emerged as a major power broker in the Middle East. But Israel would likely be skeptical of China's neutrality as a mediator because of its alignment with Iran and engagement with Hamas, an ally of Iran that attacked Israel in October 2023, and the possibility of angering the U.S., analysts said. "China has neither offered to mediate the conflict nor offered Iran any material support. Xi wants to, and will, have his cake and eat it too," said Qazi.
San Francisco Chronicle
2 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
NATO leaders are set to agree a historic defense spending pledge, but the hike won't apply to all
THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — NATO leaders are expected to agree this week that member countries should spend 5% of their gross domestic product on defense, except the new and much vaunted investment pledge will not apply to all of them. Spain has reached a deal with NATO to be excluded from the 5% of GDP spending target, while President Donald Trump said the figure shouldn't apply to the United States, only its allies. In announcing Spain's decision Sunday, Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez said the spending pledge language in NATO's final summit communique — a one-page text of perhaps half a dozen paragraphs — would no longer refer to 'all allies.' It raises questions about what demands could be insisted on from other members of the alliance like Belgium, Canada, France and Italy that also would struggle to hike security spending by billions of dollars. On Friday, Trump insisted the U.S. has carried its allies for years and now they must step up. 'I don't think we should, but I think they should,' he said. 'NATO is going to have to deal with Spain.' Trump also branded Canada 'a low payer.' NATO's new spending goals The 5% goal is made up of two parts. The allies would agree to hike pure defense spending to 3.5% of GDP, up from the current target of at least 2%, which 22 of the 32 countries have achieved. Money spent to arm Ukraine also would count. A further 1.5% would include upgrading roads, bridges, ports and airfields so armies can better deploy, establishing measures to counter cyber and hybrid attacks and preparing societies for future conflict. The second spending basket is easy for most nations, including Spain. Much can be included. But the 3.5% on core spending is a massive challenge. Last year, Spain spent 1.28% of GDP on its military budget, according to NATO estimates, making it the alliance's lowest spender. Sánchez said Spain would be able to respect its commitments to NATO by spending 2.1% of GDP on defense needs. Spain also is among Europe's smallest suppliers of arms and ammunition to Ukraine, according to the Kiel Institute, which tracks such support. It's estimated to have sent about 800,000 euros ($920,000) worth of military aid since Russia invaded in 2022. Beyond Spain's economic challenges, Sánchez has other problems. He relies on small parties to govern and corruption scandals have ensnared his inner circle and family members. He is under growing pressure to call an early election. Why the spending increase is needed There are solid reasons for ramping up spending. The Europeans believe Russia's war on Ukraine poses an existential threat to them. Moscow has been blamed for a major rise in sabotage, cyberattacks and GPS jamming incidents. European leaders are girding their citizens for the possibility of more. The alliance's plans for defending Europe and North America against a Russian attack require investments of at least 3%, NATO experts have said. All 32 allies have endorsed these. Each country has been assigned 'capability targets' to play its part. Spanish Foreign Minister José Albares said Monday that 'the debate must be not a raw percentage but around capabilities.' He said Spain 'can reach the capabilities that have been fixed by the organization with 2.1%.' Countries much closer to Russia, Belarus and Ukraine all have agreed to reach the target, as well as nearby Germany, Norway, Sweden and the Netherlands, which is hosting the two-day summit starting Tuesday. The Netherlands estimates NATO's defense plans would force it to dedicate at least 3.5% to core defense spending. That means finding an additional 16 billion to 19 billion euros ($18 billion to $22 billion). Setting a deadline It's not enough to agree to spend more money. Many allies haven't yet hit an earlier 2% target that they agreed in 2014 after Russia annexed Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula. So an incentive is required. The date of 2032 has been floated as a deadline. That is far shorter than previous NATO targets, but military planners estimate Russian forces could be capable of launching an attack on an ally within five to 10 years. The U.S. insists it cannot be an open-ended pledge and a decade is too long. Still, Italy says it wants 10 years to hit the 5% target. The possibility of stretching that period to 2035 also has been on the table for debate among NATO envoys. An official review of progress could also be conducted in 2029, NATO diplomats have said. ___ Suman Naishadham in Madrid contributed to this report.
