STEPHEN DAISLEY: Findlay cut through the FM's hubris like a bushman with a machete

Off-peak rail travel and 100,000 extra GP appointments. Those were the two headlines from the SNP 's latest programme for government. As best as I can tell, they're not linked.
You can travel to your doctor's surgery by any method of your choosing, though you'd be wise to avoid the A96. They're still not fully dualling that.
The programme for government speech is sometimes called Holyrood's answer to the King's Speech.
It has one advantage, at least for the king, in that he's not required to be there. Nor, apparently, are SNP MSPs.
The separatist benches were, in keeping with the content of the remarks, noticeably empty.
The First Minister's annual address forgoes pomp and circumstance and outlines the legislation his government will be introducing in the coming 12 months. It's nice that he gives the Supreme Court a heads up on its future caseload.
Despite the thinness of the gruel he was slopping down, or perhaps because of it, John Swinney was a chipper wee fellow.
He assured the chamber that 'a corner has been turned', though when you U-turn as often as this government does everything becomes one big circle. It's a wonder the man doesn't get dizzy.
But he knows how to read polling numbers and sees that his government is back on track for another term in power after next year's devolved elections. (If his mob can get re-elected with this record, you have to wonder what they've devolved to.)
You could tell he was getting carried away with himself because he promised to take forward his programme in the 'same spirit' as the budget process, in which 'four parties were able to come together to negotiate in good faith'.
Swinney is not one of life's natural negotiators. If he'd been at Versailles, the treaty would still be at the draft stage. When he's boasting about compromise, it's because he figures he's already won.
Russell Findlay cut through the hubris like a bushman swinging a machete.
'No wonder one in three of his own MSPs couldn't be bothered to turn up to listen to this,' he spat.
He went right for the most attractive promise, a dramatic increase in GP consultations, reminding everyone that a similar promise was trotted out eight years ago by the Nationalists but came to nothing.
The Tory leader's rebuttal was met with snarls from across the way, especially when he objected to plans to splash more cash on 'the economic case for independence'.
'He's not going to find one because there isn't one,' he jabbed.
'I see my appeal for common ground hasn't made much headway with Russell Findlay,' the First Minister riposted, with mock discouragement.
Swinney prefers verbal brawling to all that cross-party kumbaya business and set about ripping into the 'billion-pound flaw' in Findlay's call for tax cuts.
Anas Sarwar roared to life with a thunderous volley of blows against the SNP leader. Quite why he chose this exact moment to come out swinging, I've no idea but the belated show of gumption is welcome.
'Is that it?' the Labour leader queried, letting the question linger in the air long enough to prompt some awkward shifting on the SNP benches.
Speaking of which, he also noted the sparse numbers behind Swinney, cruelly adding that although Nicola Sturgeon had turned up to Holyrood for an event that day, she wasn't in the chamber to hear her old pal's speech.
Sarwar confirmed his agreement with all the policies Swinney had 'nicked from Labour', quipping that this was 'not the borrowing powers I thought the SNP had in mind'.
He was otherwise unconvinced, remarking that: 'After nearly two decades in government, if the SNP had a good idea we'd have heard it by now.'
Savage stuff, but a pity we had to wait till Labour was so down in the doldrums to hear it.
If Swinney has grown overconfident it's because his opponents have been underperforming for too long.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Daily Record

an hour ago

• Daily Record

How the Scottish MPs voted in the assisted dying debate

Scottish MPs rejected the bill, with 29 of the 57 voting against. MPs voted by 314 to 291 - a majority of 23 - to legalise assisted dying in England and Wales last week But Scottish MPs rejected the bill, with 29 of the 57 voting against. ‌ Some 22 of the Labour MPs voted against while 15 voted for. ‌ All five Scottish Tory MPs voted against, while the SNP abstained. Two Lib Dems voted against and three voted for. One Lib Dem abstained by voting for and against the bill. The legislation doesn't apply in Scotland, as Holyrood has its own bill which is going through at the moment. But how did your MP vote? For Douglas Alexander - Lothian East, Labour Maureen Burke - Glasgow North East, Labour ‌ Irene Campbell - North Ayrshire and Arran, Labour Alistair Carmichael - Orkney and Shetland, Lib Dem Graeme Downie - Dunfermline and Dollar, Labour ‌ Alan Gemmell - Central Ayrshire, Labour Tracy Gilbert - Edinburgh North and Leith, Labour Christine Jardine - Edinburgh West, Lib Dem ‌ Chris Kane - Stirling and Strathallan, Labour Kirsty McNeill - Midlothian, Labour Chris Murray - Edinburgh East and Musselburgh, Labour ‌ Ian Murray - Edinburgh South, Labour Susan Murray - Mid Dunbartonshire, Lib Dem Pamela Nash - Motherwell, Wishaw and Carluke, Labour ‌ Gregor Poynton - Livingston, Labour Joani Reid - East Kilbride and Strathaven, Labour Euan Stainbank - Falkirk, Labour ‌ Elaine Stewart - Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock, Labour Against Zubir Ahmed - Glasgow South West, Labour Scott Arthur - Edinburgh South West, Labour ‌ Richard Baker - Glenrothes and Mid Fife, Labour Johanna Baxter - Paisley and Renfrewshire South, Labour Andrew Bowie - West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine, Conservative ‌ John Cooper - Dumfries and Galloway, Conservative Torcuil Crichton - Western Isles, Labour Harriet Cross - Gordon and Buchan, Conservative ‌ Patricia Ferguson - Glasgow West, Labour John Grady - Glasgow East, Labour Lillian Jones - Kilmarnock and Loudon, Labour ‌ John Lamont - Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk, Conservative Brian Leishman - Alloa and Grangemouth, Labour Angus MacDonald - Inverness, Skye and West Ross-shire, Lib Dem ‌ Douglas McAllister - West Dunbartonshire, Labour Martin McCluskey - Inverclyde, Labour Blair McDougall - East Renfrewshire, Labour ‌ Gordon McKee - Glasgow South, Labour Frank McNally - Coatbridge and Bellshill, Labour David Mundell - Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale and Tweeddale, Conservative ‌ Katrina Murray - Cumbernauld and Kirkintilloch, Labour Martin Rhodes - Glasgow North, Labour Michael Shanks - Rutherglen, Labour ‌ Kenneth Stevenson - Airdrie and Shotts, Labour Jamie Stone - Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross, Lib Dem Kirsteen Sullivan - Bathgate and Linlithgow, Labour ‌ Alison Taylor - Paisley and Renfrewshire North, Labour Imogen Walker - Hamilton and Clyde Valley, Labour Melanie Ward - Cowdenbeath and Kirkcaldy, Labour ‌ Abstain Kirsty Blackman - Aberdeen North, SNP Wendy Chamberlain - North East Fife, Lib Dem Dave Doogan - Angus and Perthshire Glens, SNP ‌ Stephen Flynn - Aberdeen South, SNP Stephen Gethins - Arbroath and Broughty Ferry, SNP Chris Law - Dundee Central, SNP ‌ Graham Leadbitter - Moray West, Nairn and Strathspey, SNP Brendan O'Hara - Argyll, Bute and South Lochaber, SNP

Daily Record

an hour ago

• Daily Record

The SNP has descended into civil war since the Hamilton by-election

In just four weeks, the political landscape in Scotland has shifted dramatically. This time last month, John Swinney was boasting about how well things were going for him and the SNP. 'I have healed the SNP' is what he told the people of Scotland as he talked up the SNP's chances of winning the coming Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election. He claimed Reform was the only threat to the SNP. But don't worry, full-on John was going to see them off. A month later, and the reality could not be more different. The people of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse chose a new direction with Scottish Labour – not managed decline with John Swinney. And his party – far from being healed – has descended into full-on civil war as rebels challenge John Swinney's tired and incompetent leadership. Pride comes before a fall – and John Swinney has fallen head-first into a crisis that may cost him his job. The fact is that Scots are sick and tired of SNP incompetence and failure. The people of our country know that John Swinney and his divided party are tired and out of ideas. All they offer is more failure. Take the issue of Alexander Dennis bus manufacturers. The business is set to scrap hundreds of jobs and move to England due to lack of business. But what does the SNP do? Support this Scottish business? No – it buys buses from China, leaves Scottish workers high and dry, and then tells porkies to cover up their incompetence. You don't have to oppose the SNP to see that they are a busted flush and that John Swinney is a disastrous First Minister. Even his own MSPs are rebelling. One said John Swinney has 'no energy, no fire, no boldness, no vision.' And they are right. It's no wonder one rebel MSP said John Swinney had two weeks to come up with a big idea to save his job. But what have we had? More trademark Swinney waffle. One in six Scots are on an NHS waiting list. But what's John Swinney's big plan? An app that was promised years ago and the merging of just two health quangos. Our schools are facing a behaviour crisis with teachers and pupils fearing to go to work and school. John Swinney's big plan? Laminate bullet points and stick them on the wall. We are in the midst of a housing crisis, when housing is devolved to the SNP government. John Swinney's plan? Write a letter to the Deputy Prime Minister. And when all else failed, hit the panic button and start talking about independence again. You couldn't make it up. The staggering incompetence of the SNP would be funny if working Scots weren't paying the price day in and day out. It's time to choose a new direction. To turn our backs on John Swinney and the old, failed politics of the past. And to choose a better Scotland with better leadership. New thinking, new energy and a new direction for our country. That's what I offer – join me on that journey. Nuclear power The global race towards clean power is on – and I firmly believe Scotland should be at the forefront of it. Investing in clean power will not only deliver lower bills, but will create quality jobs and strengthen our energy security so we are no longer subject to the whims of tyrants like Putin. Renewables are a large part of this, and the Labour government is driving forward investment in Scottish renewables through its publicly-owned energy company, GB Energy. But we can't limit our ambitions for Scotland's energy future. Clean nuclear power can work alongside renewables to cut emissions and deliver our climate goals – and it can bring billions of pounds of investment, thousands of high-quality jobs, and greater energy security for Scotland. Communities elsewhere in the UK are set to reap the benefits of nuclear power, but the SNP is stopping Scotland from doing the same. John Swinney could unlock this investment with the stroke of a pen by lifting his party's ideological ban on nuclear power – but he refuses. The SNP is actively blocking jobs and investment in our communities – whatever happened to stronger for Scotland? A Scottish Labour government would ditch the SNP's damaging ban and finally get Scotland the investment and energy security we deserve. Alexander Dennis In Manchester, buses from Alexander Dennis have been bought to make up the core of their publicly-owned Bee Network. But despite warnings from the company, the SNP has failed to maximise its support or use the law to help them buy busses domestically. I'll learn that lesson A Scottish Labour will put Scottish workers and businesses first.

Daily Mail​

3 hours ago

• Daily Mail​

KEMI BADENOCH: Labour's new equality law is a bureaucratic nightmare dressed up as progress

You've probably never heard of the so-called 'socio-economic duty', and nor should you have. It's a left-over clause from the Equality Act passed by Labour in 2010, which was so obviously misguided that we Conservatives blocked it from being enacted for 14 years. The clause demands that when local and public bodies make a decision, they must assess whether it increases or decreases inequality resulting from socio-economic disadvantage. It is ideological dross. Worse than that, it threatens to submerge the nation in a bureaucratic nightmare dressed up as progress. How so? It means your council obsessing over 'impact assessments' while local roads decay, schools spending money on 'equality training' instead of textbooks, government departments taking more time analysing postcodes than fixing real problems. When Labour came up with 'socio-economic duty' during its last period in government, its own ministers called it 'socialism in one clause'. They weren't joking. We know it's bad policy because it's already been enacted in Scotland and Wales. The results were exactly what you'd expect: More red tape and no constructive results. The Equality and Human Rights Commission reviewed its effectiveness north of the border and couldn't find a single tangible benefit. But this Labour government doesn't care. Looking busy matters more to it than being effective. The 'socio-economic duty' clause ticks all the boxes – literally! It gives civil servants and consultants endless forms to fill in, reports to write and new jobs in such voguish fields as 'class-equity strategy'. Your taxes will fund more consultants, more HR seminars, more circular discussions about 'lived experience' – all while frontline services are stretched to the limit. When I was Equalities Minister, I fought this sort of nonsense every day. When I tried to protect women's spaces by legislating to enforce female-only toilets, I was told by civil servants that doing so might be 'hostile' to other groups. Time and again, I found common-sense decisions were being held up by an impact assessment drawn up by a diversity officer who'd never set foot in a women's shelter. The 'socio-economic duty' is more of the same. It will paralyse our public services and hand more power to unaccountable quangos. The state needs to do less, and do it better. We need schools pushing children to achieve, not consulting on how 'class background' affects their homework. We need doctors focused on saving lives, not paperwork. We need police stopping criminals, not second-guessing who might be offended. But this government is bereft of ideas. With the economy nose-diving due to a toxic cocktail of tax rises and billions in bungs to the public sector, it is busying itself with ideological rubbish nobody asked for. Giving away British territory in the Chagos Islands while paying £30billion for the privilege. Decriminalising abortion and euthanasia. And changing its mind about how many pensioners to deprive of their winter fuel allowance. Labour has four more years to dig up every bad idea it has had and force it through Parliament. I will keep calling it out. Loudly, clearly, and without apology – because Britain deserves better than this.