Lammy says he told Iran it would be a mistake to blockade Strait of Hormuz

The Foreign Secretary said it would be a 'catastrophic mistake' for Tehran to fire at US bases in the region, after an American attack on Iran's nuclear programme over the weekend.
Questions are being asked about whether the shipping channel or oil exports through it could be blocked amid the tensions.
Important discussion with @SecRubio this evening on the situation in the Middle East.
We will continue to work with our allies to protect our people, secure regional stability and drive forward a diplomatic solution.
— David Lammy (@DavidLammy) June 22, 2025
Speaking to BBC Breakfast on Monday morning, Mr Lammy said he had been 'crystal clear' that 'it would be a huge, catastrophic mistake to fire at US bases in the region at this time. We have forces in the region at this time.
'It would be a catastrophic mistake. It would be a mistake to blockade the Strait of Hormuz.'
He said he thinks his counterpart 'gets that and understands that'.
The UK has been pressing for Iran to engage in negotiations and diplomacy over the issues, and Mr Lammy told the same programme: 'Let's take the diplomatic off-ramp. Let's get serious and calm this thing down.'
Mr Lammy is expected to address MPs in the Commons about the situation on Monday.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer warned on Sunday that there is a risk of the crisis escalating beyond the Middle East, telling reporters 'that's a risk to the region. It's a risk beyond the region, and that's why all our focus has been on de-escalating, getting people back around to negotiate what is a very real threat in relation to the nuclear programme.'
Sir Keir spoke to US President Donald Trump on Sunday, and Downing Street said the leaders agreed Tehran must not be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and called for Iran to return to negotiations.
The conversation came after the air raid by American B-2 stealth bombers and a salvo of submarine-launched missiles hit Iran's nuclear facilities.
'They discussed the actions taken by the United States last night to reduce the threat and agreed that Iran must never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon,' Downing Street said.
'They discussed the need for Iran to return to the negotiating table as soon as possible and to make progress on a lasting settlement.'
pic.twitter.com/wu9mMkxtUg
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 21, 2025
Mr Lammy suggested on Monday that the action by Mr Trump 'may well have set back Iran several years'.
He told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that the US President's rhetoric was 'strong' but that strikes had been 'targeted' to 'deal with Iran's nuclear capability'.
The Foreign Secretary later added: 'Donald Trump made a decision to act to degrade that capability. It may well have set back Iran by several years. That was a decision that he took.'
Mr Lammy has also spoken to his Iranian and Israeli counterparts 'to stress the need for de-escalation'.
'I urged a diplomatic, negotiated solution to end this crisis,' he said over the weekend.
Overnight, Mr Trump called the future of the Iranian regime into question, posting on his TruthSocial platform: 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???'
It appeared to be a different approach to that of his defence secretary Pete Hegseth, who had said on Sunday that 'this mission was not and has not been about regime change'.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Daily Mirror

31 minutes ago

• Daily Mirror

'Miscalculated Iran revenge move on US could spark all-out war in Middle East'

As the world braces for an escalation in the Middle East war and hopes US strikes on Iran will not spark a bigger conflict nobody can predict the outcome. An escalation is likely before diplomacy prevails but it is certain that the US attacks will affect the region for years. And that escalation is when world leaders become nervous, desperately trying to hold back the tit-fot-tat march towards all out war and trying to stop other countries joining. Here we examine the possible outcomes of this latest outbreak between the US and Iran, as Israel continues to hammer Israel and threatens revenge against the US. The worst possible outcome is least likely and that involves Iran declaring all-out war on America and Israel. This would happen if the Iranian regime miscalculated and goes too far when it makes a revenge gesture of reply to the United States. The problem is that US President Donald Trump has warned Tehran will be hit by far worse if it does hit US interests so that starts a cycle of escalating violence. I believe if Iran does something below the threshold for war then America may be forced to let it pass and give Iran that off-ramp, saving face and avoiding all-out war. That would involve a much wider conflict, sucking in US allies such as the UK and Europe, leaving Iran to persuade China, North Korea and Russia to come to its aid. The best possible outcome is Iran backing off and starting negotiations again, relative peace even though it means Iran would continue its occasional campaign of terror against America. Extremely careful diplomatic handling could mean Iran makes a gesture of defiance against the US, perhaps hitting a building or a site and not killing anyone. This would play to the nationalists screaming for revenge back home and if no American is killed then Iran may get away with it. But it is unthinkable that Iran will let the US strikes pass without a gesture of violence in return - and precisely what that will be will determine the next few years for the Middle East. There is a tsunami of back-channel negotiations buzzing away in the background between the US, Israel and Iran and the wider region. This may include Iran learning what it can and cannot get away with. Iran could opt to let this costly conflict rumble on for months even though each side is rapidly running out of missiles. I believe this is a possible outcome and will mean escalating Mossad assassinations and other covert operations against Iran, with Tehran hitting back with terror. Despite a huge security clampdown Israel could be badly-hit with terror attacks such as suicide bombs, other terror attacks and even kidnappings. This could involve mass casualty incidents and very easily could spread towards Israel's allikes such as the US and UK. This is perhaps a grey zone war fought in the shadows and would be terrifying for civilians in the west. Iran is very experienced at exporting terror on the orders of the shadowy Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. And it is equally good at persuading third parties to act on their behalf.

Daily Mail​

39 minutes ago

• Daily Mail​

Pentagon insiders set up decoy flights amid fears Trump's Truth Social posts could reveal Iran strike plans

While U.S. military planners were hard at work preparing strikes on Iran, they also worried that the commander-in-chief was giving away their top-secret operation online. In fact, President Donald Trump 's social media habit was the 'biggest threat to opsec,' or operational security, that the plan faced, a military official told the New York Times. Trump posted repeatedly about the intensifying war between Iran and Israel last week while mulling whether to push forward with the U.S. strikes now known as Operation Midnight Hammer. 'Everyone should evacuate Tehran,' Trump wrote last Monday. The next day, the president departed from the G7 in Canada early, telling reporters he had to do something 'much bigger' than a ceasefire deal. 'Stay tuned,' he added. The president had reportedly made up his mind to strike around that time, but inside the Pentagon and U.S. Central Command, military officials worried that Trump's social media posts were tipping his hand to Tehran, the Times reports. So to throw the Iranians off the scent, the commanders hatched a scheme to distract the world with a decoy. Two fleets of B-2 bombers would leave Missouri at the same time flying in different directions, one heading east and the other soaring west. The president and some of his Cabinet members in the Situation Room while Operation Midnight Hammer was ongoing The two B-2s heading west kept on their flight transponders, meaning they could be spotted by commercial and military trackers. The seven B-2s that headed east kept their transponders off. Those were the ones carrying the 14 GBU-57 bunker buster bombs that would drop on Iran's nuclear sites. Trump's social media posts may have also been a ruse. Trump posted on Thursday that he would decide on U.S. military involvement in Iran 'within the next two weeks,' a often-used phrase that was widely ridiculed by his critics. However, the strikes came just two days later on Saturday. 'Our B-2s went in and out and back without the world knowing at all,' Pentagon Sec. Pete Hegseth said at a Sunday morning press conference. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Dan Caine told reporters the western-bound flights were a 'deception effort.' 'Part of the package proceeded to the west and into the Pacific as a decoy, a deception effort known only to an extremely small number of climbers and key leaders here in Washington,' Caine said Sunday. The surprise was so thorough that U.S. forces did not see any Iranian military jets take off to intercept the bombers. Not a single shot was fired at U.S. forces during the operation, Caine said. Over 125 U.S. aircraft participated in the mission, including bombers, fighters, and refueling tankers, the chairman added. Approximately 75 precision-guided weapons were deployed in the attacks, including Tomahawk missiles fired from submarines.

The Independent

39 minutes ago

• The Independent

Greek police arrest man on southern island of Crete on suspicion of espionage

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.