College football star LaNorris Sellers ignores $8M transfer deal to stay at South Carolina
Image Source: Getty
South Carolina quarterback LaNorris Sellers just showed that even in a college football landscape enriched by nine‑figure collectives and portal wheeling and dealing, a player's word can still trump an eight‑figure offer.
The 19‑year‑old rising sophomore declined a reported two‑year, $ 8 million Name‑Image‑and‑Likeness deal from an undisclosed program and announced he will be remaining in Columbia and chasing titles with the Gamecocks, multiple outlets reported Wednesday.
LaNorris Sellers' transfer offer saga underscores NIL volatility
LaNorris Sellers' father, Norris, told
The Athletic
that '
the family was hit with all kinds of crazy numbers,
' including the headline $8 million bid, yet the quarterback never seriously considered uprooting. '
We didn't come here to make money,
' Norris said. '
We came here to get our degree, play ball.
' LaNorris echoed that mindset, citing the relationships he has built at South Carolina and asking bluntly,
'Why start over?'
— BruceFeldmanCFB (@BruceFeldmanCFB)
This decision comes down right in the middle of an ever-inflating NIL marketplace. Surely, former Texas star QuinnEwers considered a $ 6 million offer last winter, and former Georgia signal‑caller CarsonBeck was tied to a $ 4 million Miami deal before staying put, but what if Walker took home a deal and a few other players tagged along? That made for an even more notable Sellers offer, particularly with nobody in the portal — a prime example of the grey‑area tampering critics say the upcoming NCAA House settlement needs to address.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
What She Did Mid-Air Left Passengers Speechless
medalmerit
Learn More
Undo
South Carolina Gamecocks quarterback stays focused on legacy
The feeding frenzy is partly explained by Sellers' on‑field resume. He took Shane Beamer's squad to a 9‑4 record as a red‑shirt freshman, passing for 2,534 yards and 18 touchdowns and rushing for 674 yards and seven more scores — all of which have already put him into the 2026 NFL draft conversation.
Also Read:
'Guys just go anywhere': Former Tide player Daron Payne reflects on evolution of college football landscape
And here, Beamer — who described Sellers as "
the heartbeat of our locker room
" — says the quarterback's commitment can revive a program hungry for its first College Football Playoff bid. It was a move that fans took to social media to celebrate, casting Sellers as the anti-mercenary face of a sport few recognize as their own. But if the Gamecocks can parlay that goodwill into a second double‑digit‑win season, the decision made by the sophomore to turn away $ 8 million could be worth far more to the school's legacy than it ever could have been to his bank balance.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
Legal battle erupts as Wisconsin and Big Ten sue Miami for tampering and poaching college football player under contract
Xavier Lucas (Image Source: On3) The University of Wisconsin–Madison and the Big Ten Conference have initiated a lawsuit against the University of Miami, alleging that the Hurricanes have tampered with former Wisconsin defensive back Xavier Lucas. He promoted the breaking of a revenue-sharing agreement. Lawsuit Associated With NIL Contracts The lawsuit is one of the first major challenges to the enforceability of NIL-related contracts and alongside their associated logic of the ability of universities to hold on to athletes in the evolving landscape of college sports. Why Wisconsin says Miami overstepped Lucas signed a two-year NIL revenue-sharing agreement with the university on Dec. 2, 2024, according to the Wisconsin state court complaint. Wisconsin then refused to allow him to enter the NCAA transfer portal a few weeks later, arguing the agreement was binding. The university alleges Miami personnel and boosters subsequently contacted Lucas and his family to promise a more lucrative NIL deal if he went from Wisconsin to Miami, but without following proper transfer procedures. According to Wisconsin, Lucas was never processed into the NCAA portal but rather dropped out of classes, exited campus, and registered to attend Miami in January 2025. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo They allege that this would break NCAA rules that require schools to get within two business days of receiving portal requests. They are also seeking damages and a court order forcing Miami to reveal its communications with Lucas, saying the alleged tampering threatens the integrity and balance of the college football ecosystem. What is the future of college football after this controversy? It could serve as a legal precedent in the sense that this is one of the first such instances with a Power Five school suing another for NIL-related tampering. And it also illustrates how revenue-share deals work. This is a whole new territory after the House v. NCAA settlement, which might be superior in law. The Big Ten has since backed up Wisconsin, saying that the alleged interference "jeopardizes the integrity of intercollegiate athletics." Also Read: CFP mandates player availability reports beginning next season in push for transparency In response, an attorney for Lucas has argued that Wisconsin's NIL deal was "merely a memorandum of understanding" and not completely enforceable. The commissioner also contended that the school practically kept Lucas 'hostage' by refusing to set Lucas' name in the portal. In turn, the NCAA has cemented that student-athletes will be free to transfer and compete wherever they choose as long as they are not still enrolled at their original school (as is the case with no portal entry). If this lawsuit becomes one for the history books it will likely do so as NIL deals continue to become more formalized and legally binding. It will challenge the enforceability of contracts between athletes and universities and reshape how schools recruit, pay, and retain student athletes in the ever more professionalized world of college sports. Game On Season 1 kicks off with Sakshi Malik's inspiring story. Watch Episode 1 here
Hindustan Times
10 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Coastal Carolina all in on keeping baseball program a national power in new era of college sports
OMAHA, Neb. — Though many athletic programs outside the power four conferences are expected to drop off competitively when scholarship limits are removed and revenue sharing begins July 1, College World Series finalist Coastal Carolina is committed to continue playing with the big boys in baseball. HT Image Rosters will be capped at 34 in Division I baseball going forward, and first-year athletic director Chance Miller told The Associated Press all 34 at Coastal Carolina would receive full scholarships and be in line for direct rev-share payments. Miller said he also believes the Chanticleers' opportunities for name, image and likeness earnings will compare favorably with those for power conference baseball teams within two years. Baseball is Coastal Carolina's flagship sport. The Chanticleers have played in 21 NCAA Tournaments since 1991, won the 2016 CWS for their first national championship in any sport, and they'll take a 26-game win streak into the best-of-three finals against LSU starting Saturday night. Coach Kevin Schnall said the athletic administration's support 'at the highest level' is a big reason the Chanticleers are back in Omaha. 'What I mean by that is they enabled us to hire an elite coaching staff that would rival any coaching staff in the entire country,' Schnall said. 'They give us the resources to put our players in the best position to become the best players that they can be. And it's an absolute team effort.' Miller said the budget has been restructured to allocate more money for scholarships without asking for additional institutional support. He said a significant portion of the revenue sharing for 2025-26 comes from donors, including a 'transformational gift' from one who wished to remain anonymous. A fundraising dinner in Omaha last week brought in $1 million, he said. Coastal Carolina's baseball players are earning about $200,000 combined in third-party NIL deals this year; retired coach Gary Gilmore noted, 'LSU has that much in just one guy.' Miller said NIL numbers for the next year will be inflated at a lot of power four schools. That's because many NIL deals were paid up front rather than having payments spread out. Athletes and their agents wanted to avoid having to get those valued at $600-plus vetted by the NIL clearinghouse, as required after June 6 when the House settlement was approved. 'We talked to one of the collectives from a power four school I know very well, and right now they're spending $2.5 million on the team and next year they're going to spend $3 million because they frontloaded a lot of NIL money from their collective," Miller said. "The year after that, they're going to drop down to $500,000. So that's a drastic drop.' Miller's charge, like his predecessor's, is to keep Coastal Carolina in the top tier of college baseball. 'The mentality of our program — all the way back to Coach Gilmore's early days in the late 90s — was geared to reach Omaha," said Matt Hogue, who retired as athletic director last year to become director of Coastal Carolina's Center for Sports Broadcasting. 'The way we financially invested, how we scheduled, infrastructure. We always viewed the CWS as the expectation, not a novelty.' LSU coach Jay Johnson said if there's one non-power conference baseball program able to keep competing for trips to Omaha in the new era of college athletics, it's Coastal Carolina. 'Gonzaga basketball, Boise State football. The ones sustainable for decades, that's who they are,' he said. 'This is no surprise to me we're playing them. As long as coach Schnall's there, they're not going anywhere for a long time.' college sports: /hub/college-sports This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
CFP mandates player availability reports beginning next season in push for transparency
Image Source: Getty The College Football Playoff (CFP) is set to require official availability reports for players beginning with the 2025–26 season in a decision that brings college football closer to professional levels of transparency and scrutiny. CFP has launched a program designed to increase transparency and preserve the integrity of its games that will provide weekly and pregame updates on the status of all players participating in CFP games. It follows in the footsteps of the SEC and Big Ten, where similar protocols had already been installed, and it is a big departure from an era when programs dished out injury and participation information without much penalty. Transparency in CFP injury reports and game-day updates Playoff teams, per the new CFP mandate, will be required to report injuries mid-week, with each player denoted as 'available,' 'questionable,' or 'out.' Following a system similar to the NFL and SEC, the reports will be published publicly and updated again prior to kickoff at 90 minutes. The intent is to reduce ambiguity about player availability and to level out the playing field for all CFP participants by, for example, standardizing information that previously had come out on different levels or had not been revealed at all. The premise of increased transparency is also part of an effort to curb the growing impact of sports betting in college sports. The CFP believes its plan, with player statuses publicly available in centralized reports, will diminish the incentive to leak information from insiders and also cut off the unfair advantages enjoyed by those with access to such information behind the scenes. This is a forward-thinking move to safeguard not only the sport but the players from outside influences. Compliance, enforcement, and impact on college football betting As a result, accurate injury updates have become integral to fairness and credibility as sports betting has seen a significant rise in legalization. Organizers of CFPs will fall under enforcement models along the lines currently used by the SEC, where penalties begin at $25,000 for non-compliance and climb with repeat offenses. This framework for accountability is intended to discourage teams or coaches from concealing critical player information or providing false updates, tactics that could manipulate betting lines and competitive balance. Also Read: Boston College gives first official look at new football uniforms for 2025 season The CFP is shining a brighter light on this and assisting the sports world with increased transparency by requiring an official availability report to keep pace with this ever-increasing gambling environment. Rather, system features are already being trumpeted by people such as Kirby Smart, who said the system "relieves pressure on our kids," who frequently hear from gamblers or media outsiders. How the CFP handles this will probably be unprecedented for postseason football and might also set a precedent in the rest of the NCAA landscape. Game On Season 1 kicks off with Sakshi Malik's inspiring story. Watch Episode 1 here
