Glasgow tourist tax given go-ahead by councillors

Glasgow's new tourist tax has been given the go-ahead this morning – with visitors to be charged on average £4.83 per night.
The visitor levy due to be introduced on January, 25, 2027 will see people pay 5% of their accommodation bill for every night of their entire stay.
It is expected the fee could bring in about £16m annually after costs and will apply to hotels, hostels, guest houses, B&Bs and self-catering accommodation.
Speaking at the city administration committee on Thursday, city treasurer Ricky Bell said he and leader Susan Aitken 'had been lobbying the Scottish Government for some time to give us more powers to be able to raise our own revenues and this is the start of what I hope will be a continuation of those powers being devolved to local government.'
It is proposed that hotel operators keep 1.5% of the amount collected to make up for any costs incurred. Organisations who don't comply would face penalties.
Councillors approved the visitor levy at the city administration committee this morning.
Cash generated would go towards the look and feel of the city with investment in infrastructure and the 'built and natural environment' as well as culture and events and marketing of the city as a destination to grow visitors.
A visitor levy forum is also to be set up to provide advice to the council relating to the scheme and it is proposed those involved in the visitor sector and representatives from communities would have a key role.
Employees are to be appointed at Glasgow City Council to handle the process and annual costs are estimated to be about £750,000 to £950,000 – with initial set up expected to be £400,000.
Scottish Green councillors moved an amendment at the committee relating to accommodation provider costs stating that they 'may only retain money under this rebate scheme for three years' and providing more details on penalties if they don't pay.
The amendment was rejected by Labour, the SNP and a Conservative councillor.
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Daily Record

an hour ago

• Daily Record

MPs back assisted dying for England and Wales in crunch Westminster vote

MPs voted by 314 to 291 - a majority of 23 - in favour of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill. MPs have voted for assisted dying to become legal in England and Wales. After a highly charged debate, MPs voted by 314 to 291 - a majority of 23 - in favour of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill. ‌ Terminally ill adults in England and Wales with less than six months to live will soon be able to apply for an assisted death. This would need to be approved by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. ‌ The bill does not apply in Scotland as separate legislation is going through Holyrood at the moment. It has now passed in the House of Commons and will move onto the House of Lords. The Scottish legislation has passed its first vote but will have to go through another stage to become law. It is led by Liberal Democrat MSP Liam McArthur. This is a breaking news story - we'll bring you updates, pictures and video as it happens. ‌ Follow us on Twitter @Record_Politics and get updates from the team: @paulhutcheon, @andrewJQuinn97 and @dennynews. We're also on Facebook - your must-see news, features, videos and pictures throughout the day from the Daily Record, Sunday Mail and Record Online. Get all the big headlines, pictures, analysis, opinion and video on the stories that matter to you. We also have a weekly politics podcast, Planet Holyrood, which you can listen to Spotify or Apple music, or watch it on the Daily Record youtube channel. Don't forget to follow us on instagram and Tiktok for the best bits of the podcast.

The National

an hour ago

• The National

Plans for sauna in Loch Ness pub owned by Anders Holch Povlsen

Danish billionaire Anders Holch Povlsen's estate management company WildLand purchased the Dores Inn on Loch Ness last year. It is located in the village of Dores, around 10 miles south of Inverness. In plans outlined to Highland Council, and reported by the BBC, WildLand has proposed renovating and expanding the inn, as well as revamping its car park and public toilets. READ MORE: Labour MP calls for Palestine Action to be banned under terror law after RAF break in The proposals include a sauna, beach cafe, bakery, shop, public toilets, car parking, a service building, landscaping and paths. Holch Povlsen, the majority shareholder in online fashion giant Asos, is recognised as the richest person in Scotland. He is estimated to be worth almost £8 billion, according to The Sunday Times Rich List. His company WildLand already owns the nearby 300-year-old Aldourie Castle, as well as 500 acres of grounds and woodland. The National previously told how WildLand said the inn is expected to reopen in 2026/2027 following restoration work. A full planning application is expected to be submitted to Highland Council before the end of the year. The company is set to hold public exhibitions on its plans at the inn on June 27 and 28. READ MORE: Man dies after wild swimming off coast of Scottish island WildLand chief executive Tim Kirkwood said: "The Dores Inn sits at the heart of a much-loved community setting. "As we explore options for its restoration and long-term operation, we're committed to involving the community from the outset." Lavinia Turner, head of region at WildLand Loch Ness, said: "The Dores Inn has always been more than a pub – it's a gathering place, a gateway to the loch, and an important part of local life. "We want to restore that role and build on it, creating something that works year-round for the area."

Glasgow Times

an hour ago

• Glasgow Times

Update on finance firm's case against Rangers in Court of Session

Lawyers for the 'Gers and Reputation Exchange PLC told judge Lord Sandison that they have reached an agreement in the action 'in principle.' The news emerged during proceedings at the Court of Session on Friday. It is the latest hearing in an action brought by Reputation Exchange PLC who are seeking to recover undisclosed but 'significant compensation' from the Glasgow club. The company, known as REPX, believes the 'Gers owe it money over an aborted agreement between the two sides. REPX says Rangers wanted it to develop a 'customised payment card' which would have allowed fans to buy products associated with it. However, the business claims that Rangers stopped the card from coming into operation. It says it was provided with legal advice from 'Scottish legal counsel' saying the club breached an agreement. The firm also claims that the alleged breach means it is entitled to compensation - it says that it invested a large amount of its own money into developing the card, and it should be compensated for the sum it spent. On Friday, Rangers' lawyer Timothy Young told Lord Sandison of the latest development in the case. READ NEXT: Man arrested after woman and four horses die in crash The court had earlier heard from REPX's advocate Ross Anderson, who said that the agreement between the two sides still needed to be finalised. Mr Young said: 'I would echo what Mr Anderson has said about parties having reached an agreement in principle, subject to entering into the settlement agreement. 'As my learned friend indicated - it's not so much that the agreement hasn't been reached. It's simply that implementation of that agreement will take some time. According to REPX's website, the firm describes itself as being a 'fintech company' that is 'disrupting' traditional banking. It states: 'REPX is creating for celebrities, influencers, sport teams, brands, iconic cities, the opportunity to monetise their fan base with unique co-branded prepaid cards, debit cards, and patented digital products catered to their loyal legions of followers and fans' It started working with Rangers to design a prepaid card after making similar products for Italian sides AC Milan and Torino. In the firm's strategic report for the year ending December 31 2023, the company talks of initiating a legal action against a football club which it doesn't name. READ NEXT: CCTV released of man in football top after Glasgow train incident The report states: 'The company initiated legal action against a football club to recover the advance paid to acquire the right to issue branded prepaid cards, as well as to recover the loss of profit and/or cost of investments made to develop an app customised to the wishes of the club itself. 'Below are some key extracts from the letter sent by our lawyers to the other side, anticipating that proceedings will be commenced against the football club without further delay should it not be possible to resolve the claims in the early course. "Our Client has also had the benefit of advice from senior counsel on Clause 12 of the contract.'Our Client (REPX) has suffered significant losses as a result of your client's breaches of contract. Our Client maintains claims against Your Client under the following heads.' It states the failed scheme created losses of £1.5million on top of £500,000 in 'aborted costs', including design work. They say this is on top of further £120,000 in cash they had paid the club as part of an agreement to launch the card in August 2023 before the plan was shelved. Bosses are also claiming a further £20,000 for 'costs and wasted management time'. In a letter sent to the council of the Cyprus Stock Exchange on December 27 2024, REPX directors state that 'the company has started a costly lawsuit against the Scottish club Rangers FC, who had a customised payment card created to their specifications.' READ NEXT: Glasgow firms named and shamed for 'deliberate' unpaid tax It further states: 'REPX invested several hundred thousand GBP in technology and one year of development) and then effectively blocked the issuance of the card on instrumental grounds that even the Scottish Legal Counsel (which carries significant weight in Scotland), who provided us with the prior legal advice to start the legal process, dismissed as unfounded. 'In fact, the Scottish Legal Counsel invited us to assert our right to a substantial refund of the amount invested on the basis of the Scottish club's claims. we "We believe we should be entitled to receive significant compensation.' On Friday, Mr Anderson said: 'The parties have reached a commercial settlement.' Lord Sandison expressed concern about the state of the settlement agreement. He said that he wasn't content to end the action at the close of Friday's hearing because of the lack of detail provided to the court. He said that unless parties could finalise the details of the agreement, they would be expected to come to court to participate in a proof - the Scottish legal term used to describe the main hearing in civil cases - next month. Lord Sandison told the two advocates: 'I'm not asking you in any way to disclose the terms of the settlement agreement. 'But let us hypothesise that it might be that one party is going to pay some money to the other party. 'What's going to happen to the agreement - I pose this question rhetorically - if that money is not paid on the day that it is supposed to be paid? 'Is there a settlement or is there not? If there is, then there is no need to postpone the disposal of this action until implemented because you have got a binding agreement - which you can just come right back to court and say 'here's a binding agreement: it hasn't been performed, we want it to be performed.' 'I can assure you that in sort of situation the court rapidly expedites the disposal of such actions.' READ NEXT: Man dies on Scottish beach in Saltcoats after 'taking unwell' Lord Sandison also said that if the matter is settled today, then the dates allocated by the court to the two sides could have been allocated to another party who is taking legal action. He added: 'I think it's very common knowledge that I don't discharge diets - substantive diets - on the promise of a settlement one day.' He urged the two sides to finalise the agreement. He added: 'I've hoped I've made it perfectly clear. I can't imagine that I haven't. Either this action settles before the start of the proof diet, or it proceeds on the proof diet - loud and clear?' The proof is scheduled to be heard at the Court of Session between July 8 and July 11 2025.