Pasir Mas teacher denies charge of stabbing 11-year-old son with vegetable knife
The court fixed June 10 for mention and document submission.PASIR MAS, May 15 — A teacher pleaded not guilty in the Sessions Court here today to a charge of attempting to murder his son by stabbing him with a vegetable knife earlier this month.
A Singaporean man who was driving a luxury Maserati pleaded not guilty at the Magistrates' Court today to a charge of causing the death of a road user on the Malaysia-Singapore Second Link Expressway (Linkedua) last week.
The accused, Muhammad Irshad Abdul Hameed, 27, a civil servant in the republic, entered the plea after the charge was read before Magistrate Nur Fatin Mohamad Farid.
He was charged with driving a Maserati in a dangerous manner, which allegedly resulted in the death of A Vasanthraj, 32.
The offence was alleged to have taken place at 6.40pm at KM0.6 of the Linkedua Expressway on May 9.
The charge was framed under Section 41(1) of the Road Transport Act 1987, which carries a maximum penalty of 10 years' imprisonment and a fine of up to RM50,000 upon conviction.
The accused may also face disqualification from holding or obtaining a driving licence for a minimum period of five years from the date of conviction, in addition to having his licence endorsed by the court.
The case was prosecuted by deputy public prosecutor Amirah Tasnim Saleh, while the accused was represented by lawyers Baharudin Baharim and Zarina Ismail Tom.
The court granted the accused bail of RM12,000 with two local sureties.
He is also required to report to the nearest police station once a month and has had his driving licence suspended.
Asrolfandi Mohd Ab Suki, 47, entered the plea after the charge was read before Judge Zulkpli Abdullah.
He was charged with stabbing his 11-year-old son twice with a knife and seriously injuring him at their home in Kampung Banggol Che Dol, Pohon Tanjung, at 8.55am on May 2.
The charge was framed under Section 307 of the Penal Code, which provides for a jail term of up to 20 years upon conviction.
Deputy public prosecutor Siti Aiysha Na'ilah Harizan did not offer bail, and the accused was unrepresented.
The court set June 15 for case mention to obtain forensic and psychiatric observation reports from Hospital Bahagia in Perak. — Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Police hunt trio after machete-wielding robbery at Teluk Intan entertainment outlet
IPOH, June 21 — Police have mounted a manhunt for three male suspects involved in an armed robbery at an entertainment outlet along Jalan Changkat Jong, Teluk Intan, on June 15. Hilir Perak police chief ACP Dr Bakri Zainal Abidin said one of the suspects has been identified as a 37-year-old local man with a prior criminal record. 'This suspect has also been placed on the wanted list, and efforts to track down all three individuals are being intensified,' he said in a statement today. He added that the Forensic Unit from the Perak contingent police headquarters (IPK) visited the scene and collected several pieces of evidence, including bloodstains, two fingerprints, broken glass fragments, and closed-circuit television (CCTV) footage. Earlier, a 30-second video went viral on social media, showing three masked men exiting a Honda car and brandishing machetes at individuals at an entertainment outlet. Bakri said a police report on the incident was lodged at 1.02 am on June 15 at the Hilir Perak district police headquarters by a 42-year-old security guard employed at the premises. He said that the three suspects had stormed into the premises, damaged property, and fled with an iPhone 14 Pro belonging to an employee, along with RM2,000 in cash taken from the counter. He added that the suspects also injured two customers with the machetes and smashed the windows of four vehicles parked near the premises. Police have opened an investigation paper under Section 395/397 of the Penal Code for armed robbery and Section 427 of the Penal Code for mischief involving damage to public property. — Bernama
Malay Mail
3 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Costly click: Facebook investment scam drains Johor retiree of RM535,000 in three months
JOHOR BARU, June 21 — A private sector retiree lost RM535,766 after allegedly falling victim to an online investment scam promoted via an advertisement on the Facebook application. Seri Alam District Police chief ACP Mohd Sohaimi Ishak said the police received a report from a 57-year-old local man on Tuesday, who claimed losses exceeding RM500,000. He said the victim had come across a share investment advertisement on Facebook on March 13 that promised lucrative returns within a short time, and clicked on the provided link out of interest. 'Subsequently, the victim made 26 payment transactions into five different bank accounts between March 13 and June 5, totalling RM535,766. The victim was also asked to make additional payments to withdraw the so-called 'investment profits', but those requests were never fulfilled,' he said in a statement today. Mohd Sohaimi said the victim only realised he had been duped after repeated attempts to recover the investment funds proved futile. 'Preliminary checks via the CCID's 'Semak Mule' platform found that all five accounts involved had a total of 22 police reports linked to investment scams,' he said. The case is being investigated under Section 420 of the Penal Code for cheating, and police are also looking into the possible involvement of mule account holders. — Bernama
Malay Mail
3 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Najib DNAA: Time for the attorney general to act and deliver reform — Dzulkifli Ahmad
JUNE 21 — The recent decision by the High Court to grant a discharge not amounting to acquittal (DNAA) to Dato' Seri Najib Razak in the SRC International money laundering case has reignited urgent concerns over the integrity, professionalism and accountability of prosecutorial decisions in Malaysia. The charges, filed in 2019 under then attorney general Tan Sri Tommy Thomas, involved RM27 million under the Anti-Money Laundering Act (AMLA). Yet, as of 2025, the prosecution has acknowledged that it is still not ready to proceed. This is more than a delay — it is a failure of prosecutorial governance that demands immediate reform. Why this matters 1. Why charge if the case isn't ready?Prosecutions should only be brought forward when sufficient, admissible evidence is available and the prosecution is trial-ready. Anything less violates due process and undermines public trust in the legal system. 2. What happened under two successive attorneys general?Under the tenure of Tan Sri Idrus Harun and Tan Sri Ahmad Terriruddin Mohd Salleh, the case stalled with no meaningful review or resolution, pointing to a breakdown in internal accountability. 3. Does this violate constitutional rights?Yes. The prolonged delay infringes Article 5(1) — the right to a fair and expeditious trial — and Article 8(1) of the Federal Constitution, which guarantees equality before the law. Selective delays and prolonged inaction are constitutionally indefensible. 4. What does a DNAA mean?A DNAA is neither an acquittal nor a conviction — it suspends proceedings indefinitely, leaving both the accused and the public in legal and moral limbo, without resolution or closure. Lawyer,Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah speaks to reporters on his client Datuk Seri Najib Razak's DNAA at the Kuala Lumpur High Court Complex on June 20,2025. — Picture by Yusof Mat Isa What must be done Under the leadership of Tan Sri Mohd Dusuki Mokhtar, the Attorney General's Chambers (AGC) must take bold, decisive steps to restore institutional credibility and uphold the rule of law: Ensure all future charges are based on sufficient, admissible evidence and are trial-ready from the outset. Institutionalise internal review mechanisms to monitor and resolve long-pending or high-profile cases. Drive critical reform: separate the roles of attorney general and public prosecutor to eliminate conflicts of interest and strengthen prosecutorial independence. A justice system that works — not one that waits Justice cannot be charged today, delayed for years, and then justified later. For public confidence in the legal system to be sustained, justice must be transparent, efficient and independent. Malaysia cannot afford a justice system where high-profile cases are charged for headlines but never tried in court. This is not the time for institutional silence. This is the time for action. Reform must begin with a professional, principled and prepared prosecutorial authority — and the attorney general must lead that charge without fear or favour. * Tan Sri Dzulkifli Ahmad was a former Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) chief commissioner. ** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
