Children and babies' graves among up to 85 damaged in ‘Islamophobic hate crime' at Watford cemetery
Children and babies' graves are among up to 85 desecrated at a cemetery in what the council has branded an ' Islamophobic hate crime '.
Muslim burial sites were ripped out of the ground or destroyed in Carpenders Park Lawn cemetery in Watford on Saturday, sparking grief and outrage from families and the local community.
All of the graves vandalised were in a section reserved for Muslim burials, police said as they investigate. No arrests have been made so far.
A grieving family made the distressing discovery when they went to a visit to the Hertfordshire cemetery after burying their loved one.
A spokesperson for Wadi Funeralcare said some graves were subjected to 'unspeakable acts of disrespect'.
He told The Independent: 'Their pain and anguish was deeply felt by all of us.
'We would like to extend our heartfelt thanks to the many individuals and organisations who responded swiftly and stood in solidarity with the affected families and our wider community.'
He added: 'This incident has deeply shaken our community, but the swift response and shared outrage remind us of the strength we have when we stand together.'
Cllr Muhammed Butt, Leader of Brent Council, urged anyone with information to contact police said his thoughts were with the families of those whose graves were desecrated. 'I cannot imagine how they must be feeling at this moment,' he said.
'It looks as though Muslim graves have been targeted in what appears to be an Islamophobic hate crime,' he said. 'There is absolutely no place for hate or discrimination of any kind anywhere, but particularly in London – a city where everyone is welcome and our diversity is one of our greatest strengths.'
Mr Butt said the council would reinstate the damaged name plaques 'and return Carpenders Park Lawn cemetery to a peaceful, quiet place of remembrance as quickly as possible, once the Police have finished their investigation.'
A Hertfordshire Police spokesman said that officers were on the site to continue their investigations.
Chief Superintendent Jon Simpson, from the Local Policing Command, said: 'This is an abhorrent incident and one that will understandably spark an emotive reaction in the community.
'We are continuing to work closely with our local community leaders and our partners at Brent Council, which owns the site, to identify those families who have been affected but we appreciate that this will take some time.
'At this stage, we are keeping an open mind as to the nature of this incident and in the coming days we will continue to engage with our Muslim communities to provide support and reassurance.
'We're also working with specialist officers in the constabulary to ensure we remain sensitive and respectful to the needs of the communities involved.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Mohamed Fayed 'paid spies' to discover ‘truth' about Princess Diana's death
Disgraced former Harrods owner Mohamed Fayed is said to have paid former secret service agents millions in exchange for information about the car accident that killed Princess Diana Mohamed Fayed handed foreign spies millions to try and get details about Princess Diana 's death, it is claimed. Dodi Fayed, the son of the disgraced former Harrods owner, died along with his girlfriend Diana in the Paris car crash in 1997 - and his dad spent years afterwards claiming without evidence that there had been foul play involved in their deaths. Now, new reports show the lengths that Mohamed Fayed allegedly went to try and back up his wild claims, with the tycoon said to have paid large sums to Egyptian secret service agents in exchange for information about the accident. Fayed had told one of the Egyptian operatives that he believed British intelligence services arranged the fatal crash to stop there being "a Muslim brother to the future king", a source told the Telegraph. But he was never able to provide any basis to his claims, and multiple investigations over the years have concluded that Diana and Dodi died in a car accident. The French driver, Henri Paul, was found to be over the legal alcohol limit and speeding, which contributed significantly to the fatal crash. The death of Princess Diana on August 31, 1997, sent shockwaves across the globe. All over the world, millions grieved the loss of the woman they had watched grow from a shy teenaged nursery school teacher to a glamorous celebrity who was at the forefront of the AIDS epidemic. At just 36, Diana died in a car crash in Paris, an event that would go on to change the Royal Family forever.
Spectator
a day ago
- Spectator
Will Emily Maitlis now apologise to Rupert Lowe?
The News Agents podcasters appear increasingly less focused on facts and more on taking a pop at people who hold different views to them. Ex-Reform man Rupert Lowe was a recent casualty. He was invited onto the podcast to speak to Maitlis – who wasted no time in tearing into him, going so far as to suggest the independent parliamentarian was 'racist' after he spoke about Pakistani grooming gangs. But after the publication of Baroness Casey's review this week, it would appear Maitlis is due a rather large slice of humble pie… On the episode, Maitlis asked Lowe quizzically: 'Why do you only talk about Pakistani grooming gangs? There are ten times as many white grooming gang suspects.' She then added: 'You are focusing on Pakistani grooming gangs because, probably, you're racist.' Er, right. Mr S wonders what exactly Maitlis made of Casey's review this week, then. It suggests that, where ethnicity data was logged (in around a third of the cases of group-based child sexual exploitation) there was an overrepresentation of Asian and Pakistani men. And, as Mr S has written before, Pakistani men are up to five times as likely to be responsible for child sex grooming offences than the general population, according to figures from the Hydrant Programme, which investigates child sex abuse. Around one in 73 Muslim men over 16 have been prosecuted for 'group-localised child sexual exploitation' in Rotherham, research by academics from the universities of Reading and Chichester has revealed. How very interesting… So will Maitlis now apologise to Lowe over her attack? Don't hold your breath…
Spectator
2 days ago
- Spectator
NSPCC refuses to apologise to Braverman
Baroness Casey's landmark review into Britain's grooming gangs published some truly horrific findings on Monday. The damning audit revealed that disproportionate numbers of Asian men were responsible for child sexual exploitation gangs and, shockingly, that the authorities failed to crack down on them for fear of being racist. It has prompted outrage from those who had been vilified for suggesting particular groups of people were more likely to be perpetrators than others – and Mr S is curious about whether the organisations who were quick to cry racism will now retract their criticism. It seems the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC) is not quite there yet. In May 2023, the organisation signed a joint letter – alongside 64 other groups – in which they huffed and puffed about comments made by Suella Braverman and Rishi Sunak on grooming gangs, rebutting ex-Home Secretary Braverman's claim that perpetrators of group-based offending were 'almost all British-Pakistani'. (IPSO deemed this to be misleading, but did not uphold the complaint after it accepted the Mail on Sunday's clarification, published some days later. The press regulator added: 'The Committee was not asked to, and did not, make a finding on the general issue of whether these offences are disproportionately committed by British-Pakistani men.') The letter blasted the 'misinformation, racism and division' spread by the politicians and claimed that 'partial, inaccurate or divisive claims' about child sexual abuse undermined crime prevention. The organisations fumed: We are extremely concerned that recent public communications about child sexual abuse from Government Ministers have been based on misleading information and risk creating division, rather than keeping children safe. But recent events have altered the accepted facts somewhat. The complex picture by the Casey report suggests that, where ethnicity data was logged (in around a third of the cases of group-based child sexual exploitation) there was an overrepresentation of Asian and Pakistani men. Take Manchester, for example: according to the report, over a three-year period 52 per cent of suspects involved in multi-victim, multi-offender child sexual exploitation cases were Asian compared to 38 per cent who were white. And, as Mr S has written before, Pakistani men are up to five times as likely to be responsible for child sex grooming offences than the general population, according to figures from the Hydrant Programme, which investigates child sex abuse. Around one in 73 Muslim men over 16 have been prosecuted for 'group-localised child sexual exploitation' in Rotherham, research by academics from the universities of Reading and Chichester has revealed. None of this is enough to make the NSPCC row back, however. Instead the organisation pointed Mr S towards its statement made on Monday in response to Baroness Casey's review, which said: Any child can be a victim of child sexual exploitation and adults who commit these horrific crimes come from different backgrounds and communities. Perpetrators target the most vulnerable and accessible children in society and if we narrow our focus, we risk missing those hiding in plain sight, whatever their ethnicity. When Steerpike pressed the society, it said it had no plans to put forward a retraction or apology. How very interesting. Perhaps some of the letter's other signatories may choose to distance themselves from that rather dated memo instead. Talk about aging badly, eh?
