Japan spots Chinese ships near disputed isles for record 216 straight days
TOKYO: Japan spotted Chinese vessels sailing near disputed islets in the East China Sea for a record 216 consecutive days, Tokyo's coast guard said Sunday.
The Tokyo-administered islands, known as the Diaoyu in China and Senkaku in Japan, have long been a sore point between the neighbours.
On Sunday, Japan said it observed four Chinese coast guard vessels sailing in the 'contiguous' zone, referring to a 12-nautical-mile band that extends beyond Japan's territorial waters.
Last year, Chinese vessels sailed near the Tokyo-administered island chain a record 355 times, including for a period of 215 consecutive days, a Japanese coast guard spokesman told AFP.
Japanese officials regularly protest the presence of the Chinese coast guard and other vessels in the waters surrounding the remote, disputed islands.
Relations between Japan and China were strained by Tokyo's decision to 'nationalise' some of the islands in 2012.
On Friday, Japan's coast guard and its US and Filipino counterparts staged joint training drills off Japan's southwest shore -- the second time the countries' coast guards have held training drills together, and the first in Japan.
Territorial disputes with China have pushed Japan to forge deeper ties with the Philippines and the United States.
Earlier this month, Tokyo and Beijing traded barbs over close encounters between their military planes over the Pacific high seas.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
12 minutes ago
- The Star
Why Filipinos see politicians as the top source of disinformation
MANILA (The Straits Times/ANN): A study that found that Filipinos see politicians as the top source of disinformation online has underlined the rise in distrust towards the country's leaders, amid intensifying rivalry between the Marcos and Duterte camps. The 2025 Reuters Institute Digital News Report released on June 17 found that Filipinos are more likely than people in other countries to blame politicians for the spread of false information online. According to the survey, 55 per cent of Filipino respondents identified politicians as major sources of disinformation, ahead of online influencers (48 per cent), activists (38 per cent), journalists (37 per cent), foreign governments (34 per cent), and others. This is higher than the global average, where respondents generally identified both politicians and influencers as the biggest culprits in spreading disinformation, at 47 per cent each. The Reuters report polled 97,055 people in 48 territories in total, including 2,014 Filipinos. The report noted that disinformation 'surged in the Philippines over the past year – fuelled by the widening political rift between President Ferdinand Marcos Jr and Vice-President Sara Duterte'. 'The fallout peaked with Duterte's impeachment in February, followed a month later by the arrest of her father, former president Rodrigo Duterte, who faces charges of crimes against humanity before the International Criminal Court (ICC) over his bloody war on drugs,' it said. Associate Professor Danilo Arao, who teaches journalism at the University of the Philippines, told The Straits Times that Filipinos may have grown weary of what he described as a 'sustained, organised' operation of disinformation networks, which often parrot statements made by Filipino politicians. He cited a probe by local newspaper The Philippine Star in March, which found that about 20 seemingly unconnected Facebook accounts had posted identical text framing former president Rodrigo Duterte's arrest by the ICC as 'kidnapping'. These were similar to the statements made by Mr Duterte's children, several of whom hold elected posts in the Philippines. 'Of course, this went beyond the period of review of the Digital News Report, but these are continuing patterns of disinformation,' Prof Arao said. 'And when you have the government, especially certain government officials, spreading disinformation, then naturally, people will become disappointed.' The Reuters survey, conducted from mid-January to late February in 2025, coincided with the start of the campaign period for the May midterm elections in the Philippines. The percentage of Filipinos concerned about disinformation has gone up, the survey found, from 63 per cent in 2024 to 67 per cent in 2025. The use of artificial intelligence-generated content to spread disinformation is a particular cause for concern. On June 15, two Duterte allies – Senator Ronald dela Rosa and Davao City Mayor Sebastian Duterte, the Vice-President's brother – both shared on social media a video showing supposed interviews with male students condemning the moves of Marcos-allied lawmakers to impeach Ms Duterte. But Mr dela Rosa later drew flak from social media users after fact-checkers from Philippine newsrooms such as Rappler and found evidence that the video he shared was a deepfake generated by AI. Defending himself, he said on June 16: 'I don't care if this post is AI-generated... because I am not after the messenger. I am after the message.' This is part of a worrying trend in the Philippines, where politicians may not understand the perils of sharing AI-generated content, said political scientist Jean Encinas-Franco from the University of the Philippines. 'My sense is that very few politicians really understand what AI is all about. It's a little bit worrisome that they're not very concerned about the impact of how AI is used,' she said. Also contributing to public anxiety over disinformation in the Philippines, noted Prof Arao and Dr Franco, are narratives backing Beijing's position in the maritime dispute over the South China Sea, where both the Philippines and China have competing claims. In recent months, Philippine defence officials have raised concerns over alleged Chinese malign influence operations, including disinformation campaigns and suspected espionage activities in the country. In April, Filipino Senator Francis Tolentino accused the Chinese Embassy in Manila of orchestrating a 'hidden and sinister' disinformation campaign to influence public opinion with pro-Beijing narratives, targeting not only the South China Sea dispute but also midterm election candidates critical of Beijing's claims. China has denied the allegations. 'We're dealing with sovereignty issues, and it's also very emotional because it's intricately linked with patriotism and sense of nationhood,' Dr Franco said. 'If you're a Filipino, and you see fake news articles that are pro-Beijing, you'll get mad about these things.' Prof Arao said some Filipino content creators known to support the Dutertes often echo pro-China views, a holdover from the time Mr Duterte made a pivot towards Beijing during his presidency from 2016 to 2022. Still, both analysts said domestic disinformation fuelled by local politicians and their supporters remains a bigger concern than foreign influence for now. Mr Marcos has called for vigilance against disinformation amid his heated political rivalry with the Dutertes. Yet, a 2022 study by researchers at the Philippine Media Monitoring Laboratory also found years-long disinformation attempts on social media to whitewash abuses during the nine brutal years of martial law under Mr Marcos' father, the late strongman Ferdinand Marcos Sr. The same researchers said Mr Marcos himself benefited from these disinformation efforts when he ran successfully for president in 2022. Prof Arao and Dr Franco said Filipinos have to be more discerning of the information they consume on social media. They said newsrooms should continue fact-checking efforts. Prof Arao also suggested a revision of the school curriculum to integrate lessons on media literacy and fact-checking for students. 'We need critical thinking. We have to ensure that critical pedagogy will not be compromised and will not be discouraged in our educational system. That's how we fight disinformation,' he said. - The Straits Times/ANN
The Star
12 minutes ago
- The Star
Central banks in Asia are becoming wary of currency intervention
MANILA (The Straits Times/ANN): A study that found that Filipinos see politicians as the top source of disinformation online has underlined the rise in distrust towards the country's leaders, amid intensifying rivalry between the Marcos and Duterte camps. The 2025 Reuters Institute Digital News Report released on June 17 found that Filipinos are more likely than people in other countries to blame politicians for the spread of false information online. According to the survey, 55 per cent of Filipino respondents identified politicians as major sources of disinformation, ahead of online influencers (48 per cent), activists (38 per cent), journalists (37 per cent), foreign governments (34 per cent), and others. This is higher than the global average, where respondents generally identified both politicians and influencers as the biggest culprits in spreading disinformation, at 47 per cent each. The Reuters report polled 97,055 people in 48 territories in total, including 2,014 Filipinos. The report noted that disinformation 'surged in the Philippines over the past year – fuelled by the widening political rift between President Ferdinand Marcos Jr and Vice-President Sara Duterte'. 'The fallout peaked with Duterte's impeachment in February, followed a month later by the arrest of her father, former president Rodrigo Duterte, who faces charges of crimes against humanity before the International Criminal Court (ICC) over his bloody war on drugs,' it said. Associate Professor Danilo Arao, who teaches journalism at the University of the Philippines, told The Straits Times that Filipinos may have grown weary of what he described as a 'sustained, organised' operation of disinformation networks, which often parrot statements made by Filipino politicians. He cited a probe by local newspaper The Philippine Star in March, which found that about 20 seemingly unconnected Facebook accounts had posted identical text framing former president Rodrigo Duterte's arrest by the ICC as 'kidnapping'. These were similar to the statements made by Mr Duterte's children, several of whom hold elected posts in the Philippines. 'Of course, this went beyond the period of review of the Digital News Report, but these are continuing patterns of disinformation,' Prof Arao said. 'And when you have the government, especially certain government officials, spreading disinformation, then naturally, people will become disappointed.' The Reuters survey, conducted from mid-January to late February in 2025, coincided with the start of the campaign period for the May midterm elections in the Philippines. The percentage of Filipinos concerned about disinformation has gone up, the survey found, from 63 per cent in 2024 to 67 per cent in 2025. The use of artificial intelligence-generated content to spread disinformation is a particular cause for concern. On June 15, two Duterte allies – Senator Ronald dela Rosa and Davao City Mayor Sebastian Duterte, the Vice-President's brother – both shared on social media a video showing supposed interviews with male students condemning the moves of Marcos-allied lawmakers to impeach Ms Duterte. But Mr dela Rosa later drew flak from social media users after fact-checkers from Philippine newsrooms such as Rappler and found evidence that the video he shared was a deepfake generated by AI. Defending himself, he said on June 16: 'I don't care if this post is AI-generated... because I am not after the messenger. I am after the message.' This is part of a worrying trend in the Philippines, where politicians may not understand the perils of sharing AI-generated content, said political scientist Jean Encinas-Franco from the University of the Philippines. 'My sense is that very few politicians really understand what AI is all about. It's a little bit worrisome that they're not very concerned about the impact of how AI is used,' she said. Also contributing to public anxiety over disinformation in the Philippines, noted Prof Arao and Dr Franco, are narratives backing Beijing's position in the maritime dispute over the South China Sea, where both the Philippines and China have competing claims. In recent months, Philippine defence officials have raised concerns over alleged Chinese malign influence operations, including disinformation campaigns and suspected espionage activities in the country. In April, Filipino Senator Francis Tolentino accused the Chinese Embassy in Manila of orchestrating a 'hidden and sinister' disinformation campaign to influence public opinion with pro-Beijing narratives, targeting not only the South China Sea dispute but also midterm election candidates critical of Beijing's claims. China has denied the allegations. 'We're dealing with sovereignty issues, and it's also very emotional because it's intricately linked with patriotism and sense of nationhood,' Dr Franco said. 'If you're a Filipino, and you see fake news articles that are pro-Beijing, you'll get mad about these things.' Prof Arao said some Filipino content creators known to support the Dutertes often echo pro-China views, a holdover from the time Mr Duterte made a pivot towards Beijing during his presidency from 2016 to 2022. Still, both analysts said domestic disinformation fuelled by local politicians and their supporters remains a bigger concern than foreign influence for now. Mr Marcos has called for vigilance against disinformation amid his heated political rivalry with the Dutertes. Yet, a 2022 study by researchers at the Philippine Media Monitoring Laboratory also found years-long disinformation attempts on social media to whitewash abuses during the nine brutal years of martial law under Mr Marcos' father, the late strongman Ferdinand Marcos Sr. The same researchers said Mr Marcos himself benefited from these disinformation efforts when he ran successfully for president in 2022. Prof Arao and Dr Franco said Filipinos have to be more discerning of the information they consume on social media. They said newsrooms should continue fact-checking efforts. Prof Arao also suggested a revision of the school curriculum to integrate lessons on media literacy and fact-checking for students. 'We need critical thinking. We have to ensure that critical pedagogy will not be compromised and will not be discouraged in our educational system. That's how we fight disinformation,' he said. - The Straits Times/ANN
The Star
12 minutes ago
- The Star
US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites sparks worldwide condemnation
This handout satellite picture provided by Maxar Technologies and taken on June 22, 2025, shows Iran's Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant (FFEP), northeast of the city of Qom, after US strikes on the site. President Donald Trump said US air strikes early on Sunday, June 22 "totally obliterated" Iran's main nuclear sites, as Washington joined Israel's war with Tehran in a flashpoint moment for the Middle East. -- Photo by Satellite image ©2025 Maxar Technologies / AFP KUALA LUMPUR, June 22 (Bernama) -- A wave of condemnation has followed the United States' recent airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, with global powers and regional states warning of a widening conflict and urging an immediate return to diplomacy. According to Anadolu Ajansi (AA), China strongly condemned the US for targeting Iranian nuclear sites safeguarded by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). In an official statement, the Foreign Ministry said the strikes "seriously violate the purposes and principles of the UN Charter' and have intensified tensions in the Middle East. Beijing called for dialogue and restraint from all parties. Saudi Arabia voiced deep concern, describing the attack as a violation of Iran's sovereignty. In a statement, the Foreign Ministry urged all parties to pursue de-escalation and called on the international community to intensify efforts toward a political resolution. Oman said the strikes constituted a "serious violation of international law and the UN Charter.' The Foreign Ministry stressed Iran's right to develop peaceful nuclear energy under international supervision and warned that continued escalation could widen the conflict. Lebanese President Joseph Aoun said the attacks risk expanding tensions that threaten stability across the region. He called for restraint and serious negotiations, stressing Lebanon's unwillingness to bear the cost of further conflict. Iraq condemned the US strikes, calling them an act of escalation that "goes beyond the borders of any country.' Government spokesman Basim al-Awadi warned that military solutions would only lead to destruction and instability. Qatar expressed deep concern, warning that further escalation could lead to "catastrophic consequences' for the region. It called for an immediate halt to hostilities and urged renewed diplomatic engagement. Egypt warned of grave consequences resulting from the escalation, with its Foreign Ministry calling for respect for international law and a peaceful resolution to the crisis. Latin American leaders from Chile, Cuba, Venezuela, Colombia, and Bolivia condemned the US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, describing them as violations of international law and a threat to global stability. Pakistan condemned the strikes as a violation of international norms and reaffirmed Iran's right to defend itself under the UN Charter. Islamabad expressed concern over the deteriorating situation and called for restraint. France expressed concern over the US attacks, with Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot stating on X that Paris was not involved in the operation. He urged all parties to avoid widening the conflict and to prioritise diplomatic solutions. Bahrain shifted to online learning and remote work in response to rising tensions, advising citizens to avoid unnecessary travel. The Interior Ministry cited public safety concerns amid heightened regional risks. European Council President Antonio Costa urged restraint and compliance with international law, stating that diplomacy is the only viable path to peace. He warned against actions that could endanger nuclear safety. Switzerland called for an immediate return to negotiations and full respect for the UN Charter. The Swiss Foreign Ministry said the escalating conflict poses a serious threat to civilian lives and infrastructure. Ireland's Deputy Prime Minister Simon Harris warned that the risk of a wider Iran-Israel conflict is "more real than ever.' He stressed the need for de-escalation and highlighted the safety of Irish peacekeepers in Lebanon. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz called on Iran to begin immediate talks with the US and Israel to avoid further bloodshed. He urged a diplomatic solution to prevent broader conflict. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi spoke with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and urged "immediate' de-escalation. Modi reiterated that diplomacy remains the only path toward regional peace and stability. Turkiye said it is deeply concerned over the consequences of the US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. The Foreign Ministry emphasised that peace must be sought through dialogue, not armed confrontation. - Bernama
