Egyptian Candidate for Unesco's Top Spot Stresses Agency's Role in Times of Crisis
The Japan News
Khaled El-Enany speaks during an interview with The Japan News at the Egyptian Embassy in Tokyo on May 26.
Khaled El-Enany, a former minister of tourism and antiquities for Egypt and now a candidate for director general of UNESCO, stressed the role the U.N. organization has played in times of crisis and the need to strengthen its funding in a recent interview with The Japan News in Tokyo. A written response was also provided after the interview.
Recent conflicts around the world, including in Ukraine and the Gaza Strip, have damaged and destroyed numerous cultural properties, while also seriously impacting many children's ability to get an education. El-Enany argued that the destruction of cultural heritage is 'no longer a tragic by-product of war' but is now rather 'a deliberate strategy … to erase identity.'
As for the children who lose access to education, he said they 'miss the values needed to thrive in their societies,' which can put an entire generation at risk 'of marginalization, of vulnerability, sometimes of radicalization.' The affected children need 'pragmatic solutions,' such as distance-learning tools, as well as psychological support.
UNESCO, said El-Enany, has neither the power nor the mandate to stop wars. That means it should be focused on its roles at three levels — preventing conflicts by 'fostering a culture of peace and fighting against hate'; protecting institutions and cultural assets during conflicts; and prioritizing reconstruction of 'heritage sites and schools' after conflicts.
In February, the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump announced it would reconsider U.S. membership in UNESCO because the agency has 'demonstrated anti-Israel sentiment over the past decade,' among other reasons. The United States withdrew from the organization in 2018 during the first Trump administration and was readmitted in 2023 during the Biden administration. Nicaragua recently announced it intends to withdraw over issues related to free speech.
El-Enany expressed regret over these developments, which he said present a serious problem for funding and mean the loss of U.S. expertise. That is why UNESCO must 'do everything to keep the United States,' he asserted. 'The idea behind UNESCO is inclusivity, and we have to have everyone, even countries who disagree politically.'
He added that UNESCO 'can offer [a] very important platform' for discussion of contentious issues.
In light of these problems, he called for strengthening UNESCO's funding to make it more diverse, flexible and sustainable, so that the organization can minimize the possible impact of withdrawals and 'focus on its strategic priorities rather than constantly adapting to fragmented project-based logic.' To this end, there needs to be stronger 'partnerships with the private sector and philanthropic foundations.'
UNESCO's next director general election will be appointed by the General Conference in October. Currently, two other candidates are also in the running.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NHK
5 hours ago
- NHK
SDF planes head for Djibouti for possible Israel, Iran evacuations
Two Air Self-Defense Force aircraft have left for Djibouti to prepare for a possible evacuation of Japanese nationals in Israel and Iran. The C-2 transport planes left the Miho Air Base in Tottori Prefecture, western Japan, on Saturday. Defense Minister Nakatani Gen on Thursday ordered the dispatch of the aircraft to the African country to be on standby amid the conflict between Israel and Iran. The Defense Ministry says it will work closely with the foreign and other relevant ministries with a strong sense of urgency to do everything it can to secure the safety of Japanese citizens abroad. The Japanese government has been helping its citizens and their families in Israel and Iran leave by land. The government had assisted about 90 people as of Friday.
Yomiuri Shimbun
10 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
From ‘Evacuate Tehran' to ‘Two Weeks': Behind Trump's Shift on Iran
Four days after President Donald Trump abruptly left a summit of global leaders in Canada, calling on civilians to 'evacuate Tehran' and stoking global talk of war, the president on Friday said he still wanted more time to decide. Trump said he was waiting to see 'whether or not people come to their senses.' He also would not commit to calling for a ceasefire as negotiations continue. Speaking to reporters as he headed to his New Jersey golf club for a fundraiser for his super PAC, the president reiterated the threat posed by Iran's nuclear program but said he was 'not going to talk about' what a hypothetical U.S. response would look like. Indeed, besides a brief gaggle after exiting Air Force One, Trump spent much of the day Friday trying to shift public attention to anything but Iran. He and his White House team posted on social media about the need to pass his One Big Beautiful Bill. Trump called for a special prosecutor to investigate the 2020 election, posted repeatedly about the charges that the Justice Department under President Joe Biden had brought against him and wrote that he expected a federal settlement with Harvard University soon. In recent days, a relentless battle for Trump's ear has swirled around the president. As he often does, Trump has picked up the phone for – and received advice from – prominent voices pushing opposing views, according to people with knowledge of his conversations who, like others in this story, spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the president's process. The advice – some solicited, others not – from prominent donors, right-wing media figures and elected officials played on Trump's own conflicting impulses on Iran. On the one side, Trump resolutely has stuck to his long-held belief that Iran must be stopped from developing a nuclear weapon. On the other, he has tried to avoid war – an approach that is a major element of his political movement. On Thursday, Trump responded as he often has when faced with difficult options: He bought himself time, declaring that he would wait up to two weeks to make a decision. So far, those cautioning the president to avoid authorizing a strike – and holding out for diplomatic negotiations – appear to be breaking through. On Thursday, Trump had lunch with Stephen K. Bannon, his former adviser who remains a leading voice among the hard-line MAGA wing of the Republican Party. Bannon arrived at the White House after skipping the 11 a.m. hour of his two-hour morning show, 'War Room.' He opened the first hour by decrying the faux 'urgency' that pro-Israel hawks were pressing upon Trump. Bannon and Jack Posobiec, a right-wing influencer who joined 'War Room' on Thursday morning, likened those speaking to Trump and advocating for a U.S. attack on Iran to used car salesmen, who make an 'upsell' by telling buyers that they only have limited time to decide. Bannon has been excoriating Rupert Murdoch and the hosts on his Fox network, accusing them of fomenting war talk. Shortly after Trump's lunch with Bannon drew to a close, press secretary Karoline Leavitt stepped onto the podium in the White House press briefing room to read a statement she said was 'directly from the president.' The message was that Trump was going to let negotiations play out longer. 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks,' Trump instructed Leavitt to read. The statement had already been in the works before the lunch with Bannon, according to a person with knowledge of the day's events. But Trump's meeting with Bannon at the White House was notable, at a time when the former adviser has been particularly outspoken as a leader of the MAGA movement's anti-intervention faction. A day earlier, Charlie Kirk, the influential right-wing commentator and another skeptic about an attack, had also visited Trump at the White House, according to two people with knowledge of the meeting, which has not been previously reported or publicly acknowledged by Kirk. The 31-year-old activist has emphasized to his millions of followers that he trusts Trump's instincts, while insisting that getting involved in fighting against Iran could lead to a war that is much more drawn out than the U.S. intends. Anna Kelly, a White House spokesperson, said in a statement that 'President Trump has never wavered in his stance that Iran cannot obtain a nuclear weapon and repeated that promise to the American people during and after his successful campaign. The President is a great foreign policy mind who listens to many perspectives, but ultimately makes the decisions he feels are best for the country.' The drumbeat of MAGA opposition to the U.S. joining Israel in its conflict with Iran stands in contrast to the chorus of hawkish Republicans urging Trump to strike and even seek regime change. That opposition has been complemented over the past two days by European efforts to negotiate with Iran. A Friday meeting in Geneva of the top diplomats of Iran, Britain, France, Germany and the European Union ended with no breakthrough, with the Europeans pressing Iran to agree to limits on its nuclear program and the Iranian delegation saying it would not negotiate until Israel stops its strikes. They agreed to keep talking. Referring to the meeting in Geneva, a White House official told The Washington Post on Friday that the president 'supports diplomatic efforts from our allies that could bring Iran closer to taking his deal.' Trump had a more downbeat assessment. When asked how effective the European talks were, he told reporters on the New Jersey tarmac that 'Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us.' 'Europe is not going to be able to help on this one,' he said. Trump also said for the second time this week that his director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, was 'wrong' in her assessment in the spring that there was no evidence Iran was building a nuclear weapon. His position on Friday, however, still revealed interest in letting the diplomatic process play out, whether it's with Europe or the United States, and Trump reiterated that U.S. officials have 'been speaking with Iran.' Steve Witkoff, Trump's special envoy to the Middle East, did not travel to Geneva for the talks, Leavitt told The Post, but has remained in 'correspondence' with Iranian officials. That willingness to continue talks stood in contrast to the sense of urgency Trump had telegraphed at the start of the week. On Monday night, as the president prepared to leave the Group of Seven summit in Canada to return to the White House earlier than planned, pro-intervention voices were pushing the president to seize the moment. They advised him to not only take out Iran's nuclear facilities but also its government. Trump, meanwhile, posted on social media instructing people to 'evacuate Tehran,' and he told reporters on Air Force One that he wanted to see a 'real end' to the problem. That night, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) appeared on Sean Hannity's Fox News show and called for Trump to 'be all in' to help Israel take on Iran, asking, 'Wouldn't the world be better off if the Ayatollahs went away and were replaced by something better? Wouldn't Iran be better off?' A day earlier on the same network, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) said it would be in the U.S.'s interest to 'see regime change' in Iran. Trump arrived back in Washington near 5 a.m. Tuesday. Later in the day, he met with advisers and reviewed options for an attack. That evening, he told aides that he was okay with the potential attack plans he had reviewed but that he was holding off on giving final approval to see if Iran would budge. By Wednesday, Trump expressed annoyance as he was asked by reporters about his thinking on Iran, mocking one such question by suggesting he should tell reporters when he would be bombing Iran so they could be there to watch. He offered glimpses into his thinking throughout the day, however, telling The Post he had issued the 'ultimate ultimatum' to Iran, but conceding that he had not yet made up his mind whether to strike. On Wednesday afternoon, he held another meeting with advisers in the White House Situation Room. By Thursday, however, the focus had shifted to attempts at negotiations with Iran. British Foreign Secretary David Lammy met with Witkoff and Secretary of State Marco Rubio in Washington to coordinate ahead of Lammy's participation in Friday's talks in Geneva. And in a call Thursday evening between Rubio and France's minister for Europe and foreign affairs, Jean-Noël Barrot, the two men discussed the Europeans' planned approach and agreed to follow up after the Friday meeting to continue coordinating on negotiations, according to a French diplomat. As he stood on the tarmac of Morristown Municipal Airport on Friday, Trump told reporters he wasn't sure how long he would allow the negotiations to continue with Iran. 'We're going to see what that period of time is, but I'm giving them a period of time,' Trump said. 'And I would say two weeks would be the maximum.'
Yomiuri Shimbun
10 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
For Democrats, Handcuffs Are the Latest Symbol of Resistance to Trump
A growing number of Democratic officials are being arrested in tense situations with federal agents over immigration, raising their profiles in a party angry with President Donald Trump's policies. Images of Democratic officials bound in handcuffs, jostling in scrums with immigration officers or standing defiantly on courthouse steps have ricocheted across the internet in recent weeks, creating some new political battle lines in Trump's second term. New York City Comptroller Brad Lander, a mayoral candidate, was the latest Democratic elected official to be arrested after he tried to escort a defendant from his appearance at an immigration court this week. While many Democrats contend the frequency of these confrontations reflects the Trump administration's harsh law enforcement tactics, party lawmakers and strategists also say they show how leaders are responding to Democratic voters' desire for a robust resistance that goes beyond staid speeches and statements. 'In this moment of time, we have to find our political courage,' Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-New Jersey), who was indicted last month for allegedly assaulting two federal agents during a fracas outside an immigration detention facility, said in an interview. 'If we let this get so out of control and let so much space for what this president is doing with no resistance, we are going to find ourselves in a place that we will not even be able to recognize this country anymore.' Yet some in the party are uneasy with the clashes, suggesting the politics may work against them on issues of immigration and law enforcement, which have tended to favor Republicans. Addressing the scrum that led to McIver's indictment, Rep. Jared Golden (D-Maine) told Axios this week, 'Where I come from, if you shove a police officer, you're probably getting arrested.' McIver has denied any wrongdoing. Since that May 9 dustup in New Jersey, at least three other Democratic elected officials and a judge have been detained, arrested or indicted for allegedly interfering with Trump's mass deportation effort. With more and more of them finding themselves – and at times placing themselves – in standoffs with federal agents, party leaders are navigating the combustible politics of a more visibly contentious dynamic with a president they have denounced as tyrannical. 'The currency right now in the anti-Trump coalition is: Who is ready to fight? Who is willing to fight? And who knows how to fight?' said Democratic strategist Joel Payne. 'The Democratic politicians who are being punished right now are the ones who are being careful and plodding and fighting a 21st century war with 20th century tactics. The ones who are being rewarded are the ones throwing caution to the wind.' In recent weeks, Trump has endorsed the idea of arresting the sitting governor of California, threatened to target Democratic inner cities with deportation raids, deployed National Guard troops and active duty Marines to Los Angeles against the wishes of local officials and used the Alien Enemies Act to deport migrants without a court hearing. Since taking office, he has signed executive orders calling on the Justice Department to investigate a wide range of political foes, including law firms, Democratic fundraising organizations and even his predecessor, Joe Biden. Against that backdrop, Democratic officials have expressed a growing willingness to be seen putting their freedom on the line as a response to Trump's actions. 'Arrest me! Let's go,' California Gov. Gavin Newsom said last week on MSNBC, responding to threats from Tom Homan, Trump's border czar. Homan has warned that any one who interferes with immigration enforcement will be arrested. Newsom later told the Atlantic that his staff recently held an all-hands meeting to plan how to respond if the governor of the nation's most populous state is detained by federal authorities. Trump and his allies are ramping up their 'law-and-order' political emphasis, accusing Democrats of committing crimes to score political points. The officials who end up in handcuffs, the White House says, are appropriately suffering the consequences of their actions. 'Here's the real story: why do so many Democrat officials feel emboldened to brazenly break the law and then complain when they are held accountable?' White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said in a statement suggesting Democrats were to blame for an increase in assaults against immigration officers. Democrats and some legal scholars have raised concerns about the trend of public officials being detained, arguing it could have a chilling effect on prominent administration critics. In particular, the administration's willingness to arrest members of Congress marks a 'terribly unhealthy' departure from past norms, said Russell Riley, a presidential historian at the University of Virginia's Miller Center. 'This kind of treatment of the membership was quite literally unthinkable for the framers of the Constitution,' he said. 'What's happening today would have been as jarring to their imaginations as this is to our own.' The clash between the president and his political opponents escalated earlier this month when demonstrators took to the streets in Los Angeles to protest immigration raids. Trump responded by federalizing thousands of the state's National Guard members and sending in hundreds of Marines to quell the unrest. He told reporters that he would arrest Newsom if he were Homan, calling the prospect of locking up the California governor 'great.' Newsom set the tone for the emerging Democratic response with a June 10 speech describing a 'perilous moment' and calling for all Americans to 'stand up' and reject silence and complicity. 'This is about all of us. This is about you. California may be first, but it clearly will not end here. Other states are next,' he said in the speech, which won plaudits from others in the party. 'Democracy is next. Democracy is under assault right before our eyes, this moment we have feared has arrived.' In the following days, Sen. Alex Padilla (D-California) and Lander were manhandled and handcuffed by law enforcement after embracing more confrontational approaches to challenging federal officials over Trump's immigration crackdown. Padilla was forcibly removed, pushed onto the ground and placed in handcuffs after he interrupted a June 12 news conference held by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi L. Noem. Padilla had identified himself as a senator and tried to question Noem about deportations when Secret Service and FBI agents forced him out of the room and handcuffed him. He was not charged or arrested, but Department of Homeland Security spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin accused him of 'disrespectful political theater' and alleged without evidence that he had 'lunged toward Secretary Noem.' McLaughlin similarly accused Lander, who has been trailing in the polls ahead of New York's primary next week, of endangering the safety of law enforcement safety 'to get a viral moment.' 'No one is above the law,' she said in a statement, using a phrase that Democrats repeatedly levied against Trump last year as he faced a series of criminal prosecutions. 'And if you lay a hand on a law enforcement officer, you will face consequences.' Trump's allies have reveled in the spate of Democrats being detained, arrested or charged with crimes, noting the change in fortunes after Trump's legal troubles during the 2024 presidential campaign. But just as Trump used his prosecutions to raise loads of money and rally support from his party, many Democrats are seeing political benefits as they cast themselves as political prisoners standing up to a dictatorial president. Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, who saw a trespassing charge against him dropped, surged to finish second in the state's gubernatorial primary last week and has been floated as a top contender for lieutenant governor. He has sued the interim U.S. attorney in New Jersey and the head of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's Newark field office for false arrest. Padilla and Lander each catapulted onto the national stage after being placed in handcuffs, with their allies using the moments to drive fundraising and support. During a speech on the Senate floor Tuesday, Padilla referred to Trump as a 'tyrant.' Beyond the Trump administration, other Republicans have decried Democrats' actions as self-promotional gimmicks. 'To all of my colleagues in government – just because you have a title, does not give license to touch, assault, resist, or interfere with law enforcement,' Rep. Michael Lawler (R-New York) wrote on X after Lander's arrest. 'Furthermore, stop using this as a means of self promotion in an effort to make yourself relevant in advance of an election.' Lander was ultimately released without charges. While Democrats have largely rallied around their arrested colleagues, some have suggested that the party may be mishandling the politics of immigration or misreading the optics of the moment. 'I don't think politics as theater is what our job is here,' Golden said in his interview with Axios last week, referring to the incidents involving McIver and Padilla. McIver, who called Golden's comments 'unfortunate,' said she has watched the recent string of Democratic arrests with a mix of disbelief and resolve. She is accused of assaulting two officers as they attempted to arrest Baraka outside an immigration detention center. McIver and two other members of Congress had been attempting to conduct oversight at the facility last month when a scuffle erupted between the lawmakers and masked law enforcement agents. Prosecutors say she slammed her forearms into the bodies of the officers while trying to protect Baraka. McIver, who was pushed from the back during the scrum, plans to plead not guilty. She has said her indictment is an attempt to intimidate Democrats from speaking out against Trump. 'I wake up every day, and I'm like, 'What the hell, with this administration?'' she said. 'It's just truly, truly a sad time for me and a sad time for many Americans.' Members of Congress have the right to make unannounced visits at ICE facilities, but DHS recently issued a new policy limiting lawmakers' access to certain detention centers. McIver is charged with two felony and one misdemeanor count of assaulting, resisting, impeding and interfering with a federal officer, according to the indictment, which was unveiled by Alina Habba, the interim U.S. attorney for New Jersey. Habba is a close ally of Trump and his former personal defense attorney. McIver faces up to eight years in prison on each of the two felony charges should she be convicted and up to a year if found guilty of the misdemeanor. Wisconsin Judge Hannah Dugan is also set to face trial next month after Justice Department lawyers accused her of interfering with an immigration arrest. She has pleaded not guilty. DHS agents entered the Manhattan office of Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-New York) last month, briefly handcuffing one of his aides. In a video of the incident published by the news outlet Gothamist, the aide can be seen crying while an agent detains her. She was later released without charges.
