Protesters clash with police at Palestine Action demonstration
The crowd surged towards police when officers tried to detain someone in Trafalgar Square in central London, while onlookers chanted 'let them go'.
The road at one corner of the square was completely blocked by the march, with a line of police ready to stop the participants from leaving the area.
The protest had initially been planned to take place outside the Houses of Parliament, but the location was changed early on Monday morning after the Metropolitan Police imposed an exclusion zone.
The Met commissioner Sir Mark Rowley said he was 'shocked' by the planned protest and described Palestine Action as an 'organised extremist criminal group'.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said in a statement on Monday afternoon that she has decided to proscribe Palestine Action and will lay an order before Parliament next week which, if passed, will make membership and support for the protest group illegal.
The Home Secretary is due to update Parliament further following the group's vandalism of two planes at an RAF base.
The rally started at midday and must end by 3pm, Scotland Yard said.
On Sunday, Cabinet minister Jonathan Reynolds said he could not rule out the possibility of a foreign power being behind Palestine Action
Speaking at the protest, Palestine Action spokesperson Max Geller said there had never been any evidence of such claims.
'I can't overstate how absurd and disappointing that accusation is,' he told the PA news agency.
'I want to make very clear that there has never been any evidence offered to support such a claim, and if we were allowed to be a legally recognised group, that man would be being sued right now for libel.'
Asked about Sir Mark Rowley's comments, he said: 'It's really troubling that the head of the Met would pre-empt the government and ban us from protesting (at the Houses of Parliament).
'It's a frustrating turn for democracy in this country.'
Yvette Cooper will provide MPs with more details on the move to proscribe the group, making it a criminal offence to belong to or support it, in a written ministerial statement.
Belonging to or expressing support for a proscribed organisation, along with a number of other actions, are criminal offences carrying a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison.
The decision comes after the group posted footage online showing two people inside the base at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire.
The clip shows one person riding an electric scooter up to an Airbus Voyager air-to-air refuelling tanker and appearing to spray paint into its jet engine.
Speaking on Sunday, the head of the Met said he was 'shocked and frustrated' at the protest, but that until the group is proscribed the force had 'no power in law' to prevent it taking place.
'The right to protest is essential and we will always defend it, but actions in support of such a group go beyond what most would see as legitimate protest,' he added.
'Thousands of people attend protests of a different character every week without clashing with the law or with the police. The criminal charges faced by Palestine Action members, in contrast, represent a form of extremism that I believe the overwhelming majority of the public rejects.'
Proscription will require Ms Cooper to lay an order in Parliament, which must then be debated and approved by both MPs and peers.
Some 81 organisations have been proscribed under the 2000 Act, including Islamist terrorist groups such as Hamas and al Qaida, far-right groups such as National Action, and Russian private military company the Wagner Group.
Palestine Action has staged a series of demonstrations in recent months, including spraying the London offices of Allianz Insurance with red paint over its alleged links to Israeli defence company Elbit, and vandalising Donald Trump's Turnberry golf course in South Ayrshire.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
36 minutes ago
- Spectator
How dare Sally Rooney ‘admire' Palestine Action
I'm old enough to remember when it was neo-Nazis who smashed up Jewish-owned businesses. Now it's so-called progressives. Not long ago, a Jewish business in Stamford Hill in London had its windows smashed and its doors kicked in and red paint sprayed all over its walls. Only it wasn't Combat 18 or the oafish dregs of the National Front that carried out this mini-Kristallnacht – it was Palestine Action. Israelophobia is the safest, most celebrated political position in Britain Yes, the lobby group that is gushed over by Sally Rooney in today's Guardian, and which is cheered by every bourgeois leftist with an X account, wielded its hammers against a Jewish-owned company. It was on 28 May. In the dead of night, three masked men laid waste to the offices of a landlord business in Stamford Hill, a part of London famous for its lively community of Orthodox Jews. Palestine Action says it targeted the business not because it is Jewish but because it rents out premises to Elbit Systems UK, an Israeli arms manufacturer. But the business said this isn't true. Speaking anonymously – because he feared anti-Semitic blowback – a spokesman for the company insisted it had 'no connection with Elbit'. To my mind, it's immaterial whether or not the business has connections with Elbit – Palestine Action's attack on it was disgusting regardless. You don't need a PhD in the horrors of the 20th century to understand how distressing it is for Jews in particular to see their businesses smashed to smithereens. Those shards of glass on the streets of Stamford Hill will have triggered the most traumatic memories among the local population. 'For Jewish people', this kind of destruction is 'very, very scary', said the business's spokesman. Shomrim, the Jewish neighbourhood security group, said it was horrifying to once again see 'the criminal harassment of Jewish-owned properties'. Whatever Palestine Action's political intentions might have been, the objective impact of its criminal assault on a business owned by Jews was to terrorise a Jewish population. Jews whose families came to the UK precisely to escape those 'nights of broken glass' in Russia, Germany and other nations that turned on their Jewish populations found themselves surrounded by shattered glass in Stamford Hill in 2025. Unforgivably, even the business's mezuzah – the scroll box some Jewish families attach to their front doors to remind them of their faith – ended up stained with the blood-coloured paint that Palestine Action splashed around. It's worth reminding ourselves of this woke Kristallnacht today as pompous leftists gather in Trafalgar Square to defend Palestine Action. The government has announced that it plans to proscribe the group under anti-terrorism laws following its trespassing and vandalism at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire last week. And the anti-Israel left is up in arms. Palestine Action are heroes, they say. Really? It's a shame that it is Palestine Action's incursion into Brize Norton – serious as that was – that has hogged the headlines. Because for me, its incursion into Stamford Hill was far more indicative of what a morally dubious movement this is. That horrendous attack confirmed that when the self-righteous of England's radical middle classes become feverishly obsessed with the 'evil' of the world's only Jewish state, then there's likely to be blowback for Jews here in the UK. All Palestine Action did was 'spray-paint a plane', says Sally Rooney in the Guardian. No it isn't. They also spray-painted a Jewish-owned business. They also got paint on a mezuzah. They also made Jews 'very, very scared' by smashing a shopfront in a Jewish suburb. Does she still 'admire Palestine Action wholeheartedly'? If so, then I humbly venture she is not on the right side of history in the way she seems to imagine. Independent MP Zarah Sultana has also offered her solidarity to Palestine Action. Their direct action is not a big deal, she suggests, because 'you can repair a plane, you can replace a broken window'. I sincerely hope Ms Sultana is not minimising the broken windows of Stamford Hill. I hope she is not downplaying the moral injury caused to Jews when they see the shattered glass their ancestors also saw. Perhaps she can clarify what she meant. This is important, Ms Sultana. Some are saying the clampdown on Palestine Action is an attempt to silence criticism of Israel. Get over yourselves. Hating Israel is the dinner-party prejudice du jour. It's the moral glue of the cultural establishment. You're no one in polite society unless you pull on a keffiyeh and defame the Jewish state as the most bloodthirsty state. Quit the faux-radicalism – Israelophobia is the safest, most celebrated political position in Britain right now. What worries me is its consequences. It seems unquestionable to me that when the influential single out the Jewish nation as the wickedest nation, the most twisted, genocidal 'entity' on earth, then ordinary Jews will get some heat. It's already happening. Should Palestine Action be branded a terror threat? I don't know. But I do know that, wittingly or otherwise, they terrorised the Jews of Stamford Hill last month.
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Qatar travel warning issued for British travellers
Tensions in the region were exacerbated on Sunday morning, when US bombers struck three Iranian nuclear facilities believed to contain enriched uranium. The full alert reads: "Following a US security alert for US nationals in Qatar, out of an abundance of caution, we recommend that British nationals in Qatar shelter in place until further notice. "Follow instructions from local authorities. The FCDO is in contact with local authorities and international partners, and will provide further updates as the situation develops." Meanwhile, around 4,000 British citizens living in Israel have expressed interest in returning to the UK, Foreign Secretary David Lammy has said. He told Parliament that the government's "priority remains the safety of British civilians and staff." One Briton has been injured in the conflict so far, while 63 citizens and dependents have been evacuated from Israel today. Lammy said: "The situation presents serious risks to British interests in the region. Be in no doubt, we are prepared to defend our personnel, our assets and those of our allies and partners."
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Jamaican drug dealer claims she should be allowed to remain in the UK as her six attempts to stay so far have been bad for her mental health
A Jamaican drug dealer who has applied for asylum six times says repeatedly applying for permission to stay in the UK is bad for her mental health. The woman, who has not been named, arrived in Britain in 2002 and was jailed for six years the following year for selling Class A drugs. Deportation proceedings started but she then made multiple applications to avoid being sent back to the Caribbean island. Following her last appeal, the woman - who suffers from mental health issues including schizophrenia - has been granted 'limited' leave to remain until 2026. She claimed the refusal by the Home Office to grant her indefinite permission to stay was a breach of her human rights and a demanded a judicial review of the decision. The Upper Tribunal of the Immigration and Asylum Chamber denied her request after hearing that Home Secretary Yvette Cooper is already reconsidering her application. The hearing was told that the drug dealer, known only as AXS, was sentenced to six years in prison for supplying Class A drugs in 2003, following which deportation proceedings began. Her asylum claim was initially denied but in May 2008 but she successfully appealed under the European Convention on Human Rights claiming she was at risk of torture or degrading treatment if she was returned to the Caribbean island. A First-tier Tribunal found she would be at risk of ill-treatment in Jamaica on account of her sexual orientation. She made further successful claims in 2010, 2012, 2015, 2019 and 2023, when she was on each occasion granted limited leave to remain. In 2015 her son was allowed to enter the country, with the judge in that case observing that his mother was likely to remain in the UK for the rest of her life. Before the 2023 application, the woman applied for indefinite right to leave but that was refused, with a further limited leave granted until 2026. This decision is now being reviewed by the government, the hearing was told. The tribunal, held in May in London, heard that she had suffered sexual abuse and rape in Jamaica, had been sectioned and was a paranoid schizophrenic. She has an IQ of 61 - classed as mild mental disability. Dr Rachel Thomas, consultant clinical psychologist, deemed that the 'repeated act of applying for further leave was retraumatising the applicant and damaging her mental health'. Dr Thomas was of the opinion that the her mental health was unlikely to improve, and in fact likely to deteriorate significantly, unless she was permitted to remain permanently in the UK, the tribunal heard. Upper Tribunal Judge Mark Blundell decided that there had been no issues with the judicial process in refusing her indefinite leave. He said the tribunal should not intervene until the Home Office has made a new decision when the Secretary of State may 'decide that the impact of refusing ILR would have such a serious impact on her mental health that it cannot now be justified by any relevant countervailing considerations'. Judge Blundell concluded: 'The facts remain very much in dispute, particularly as regards the impact of the denial of IRL (Indefinite Right to Leave) on the applicant's mental health. 'The absence of an extant decision from the Secretary of State is significant, and it is not appropriate, even in this human rights context, for the tribunal to act as the primary decision maker. I accept that these delays are regrettable in a case involving a person with mental health problems.'
