JK Rowling's court victory over definition of a woman makes Tannie Helen turn orange with glee
After the executive order from US President Donald Trump insisting that there are only two genders (male and female), the UK obviously felt it had to keep up with the Joneses and its supreme court declared that, in law, women are to be defined in biological terms only – which is to say, really, that men and women are defined biologically.
This basically means that those who don't want to switch pronouns, or even think about which is the right pronoun for someone who isn't exactly matched as far as sex and gender go, no longer need bother to apply their minds.
Jordan Peterson, the Canadian psychologist who has been blathering on for decades about how the West had better militarise its men a bit more or face the downfall of its civilisation, will surely be pleased. He has been huffing and puffing about how onerous it is for a big, strong masculine man like him, men so confident in their masculinity that they can give advice on how to be men, to have to use they/them pronouns when referring to a person not desirous of being called he/him or she/her. Peterson is obviously very much wedded to his kind of 'Jungian' male/female binary, as well as to a highly gendered kind of grammar – imagine if the nouns and verbs don't agree! The world ends!
It is clearly an offence to his exquisitely sensitive soul to have to imagine that there are any genders beyond the standard male and female, or that biological sex might not align perfectly with gender and/or a person's inner sense of what their gender might be – see what I did there?
The stones cry out. They cry out against such grammatical and genderous aberrations! Surely Peterson, who spent several months in Russia in an induced coma to get over his opioid addiction, must, while in that limbo state, have dreamt wildly of being persecuted by creatures of genders he could not bear to contemplate.
It was, however, JK Rowling, billionaire author of the Harry Potter books, who funded the legal challenge in the UK Supreme Court. She has been campaigning strongly for some time now against trans people, particularly trans women, because in her old-fashioned form of reactionary feminism she cannot possibly see that that trans woman using ladies' toilets is anything but a man in disguise.
She may be more worried about the state of her mascara than she may be wanting to rape anyone in the toilet area with her, but as far as Rowling is concerned, she hasn't had the life experience of being a woman so she can't be a woman. Finish and klaar.
This position is tagged Terf, as in trans-exclusionary radical feminism, though in South Africa we might be more comfortable calling Rowling a teef (bitch).
Anyway, Rowling celebrated the court victory by flooding social media with pictures of her sitting on her yacht, somewhere in the Mediterranean perhaps, smoking a cigar. Never mind that a cigar is distinctly masculine-coded, so JK is doing a little trans-smoking here. What that image tells us is that what seems a fairly basic legal redefinition is a big issue for Rowling, and its significance goes beyond the surface declaration and vindicates her war on trans women.
Enter Zille
Bully for her. Or bully for the bully. More to the point, for us anyway, was the reaction in South Africa. One reaction.
Barely had Rowling lit that cigar than Helen Zille, grande dame and reigning ideologue of the DA, was furiously agreeing with her on the socials. God forbid that Tannie Helen, the face that launched 1,000 shits, should be left behind if there's an opportunity to bash the woke. This has been her stock-in-trade ever since she imported some crusty Republican talking points from the US, and gawd knows stuff that comes from the US is so much better than anything we could actually produce here on the continent of Africa.
Anyway, Zille said on the Musk propaganda platform that the judges in this case 'have protected the rights of women across the English-speaking world from a contagion as dangerous, socially, as Covid was, medically. We thank you from the Southern tip of Africa.'
Just the tip? Zille later went on to elaborate on her utterance in an ostensibly more nuanced way, or at least in a more wordy way, admitting that this trans business applies to a very tiny proportion of the population and failing to tell us why, then, it looms so large in her fevered imagination. It's clear, at any rate, that this great legal victory is not only about protecting 'women's spaces', but also about the plague of kids 'suddenly' discovering themselves as trans, a plague that has swept across the 'English-speaking world' and… what? Killed as many people as Covid?
This is getting unpleasantly Musky. Elon, as we know, has been bemoaning the transness of one of his many children (he wanted only male children, dammit), regarding her as dead and railing against the 'woke mind virus' that caused this particular transformation to happen, as though his daughter entirely lacked agency. Note the echo in his language of Zille's 'contagion', and how the disease metaphor is so favoured by people stirring up a moral panic even as they discount the effects of actual disease.
Also, that 'English-speaking world' – does Zille imagine that laws promulgated in the Scottish high court have some purchase on the southern tip of Africa? Or anywhere other than in the UK, for that matter? Is she some kind of colonialist, then, yearning for the firm hand of control as exercised by the British Empire, which as we know can do no wrong? Oh, wait…
I don't know what all the answers are to the social, familial and personal problems that arise from the upsetting of old-fashioned gender norms, but I know a bit of knee-jerk prejudice when I see it. And I know a kind of glee when it's expressed in relation to the 'other' whose existence bothers you so much, if it really bothers you and this isn't just political opportunism. I fear Zille actually believes this stuff, and/or has come to believe it as she sheds, bit by bit, all that ancient liberal stuff about the personal self-determination of the individual and so forth.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
14 hours ago
- eNCA
Canada will 'adjust' counter tariffs on US metals if no deal in 30 days
OTTAWA - Canada will "adjust" its 25 percent counter tariffs on US steel and aluminium in response to a doubling of US levies if a bilateral trade deal is not reached within 30 days, Prime Minister Mark Carney said. "Canada will adjust its existing counter tariffs on US steel and aluminium products on the 21st of July, at the end of that 30-day period," he said. Carney also announced a raft of measures to support the Canadian steel and aluminium sectors facing 50 percent US tariffs, including procurement rules that favour domestic suppliers and anti-dumping measures. Canada is the largest supplier of foreign steel and aluminium to the United States, and Carney earlier this month had denounced the doubling of US tariffs on Canadian imports of steel and aluminium, calling them "unjustified" and "illegal." At the same time, Canada and the United States launched "intensive discussions" to rewrite Canada-US trade relations. G7 leaders at the Group of Seven summit in Canada on Monday pushed US President Donald Trump to back away from his punishing trade war. After Carney and Trump met on the sidelines of the summit, the Canadian government indicated the two sides could reach a trade deal within the next 30 days. The talks are ongoing. A good outcome in those negotiations, Carney said Thursday, would be to "stabilise the trading relationship with the United States" and "ready access to US markets for Canadian companies" while "not having our hands tied in terms of our dealings with the rest of the world." Canada exported 5.95 million tonnes of steel and 3.15 million tonnes of aluminium to the United States last year, according to US government data.
The South African
a day ago
- The South African
Elon Musk suffers social media dig as JD Vance joins X rival Bluesky
US Vice President JD Vance has joined X rival Bluesky and called upon his more than four million followers to join him on the alternative social media platform. Vance signed up for Bluesky on Wednesday and shared screenshots of his post on X. 'Just set up my page on @bluesky, hope to see you guys there!' Vance wrote on X. 'Hello Bluesky, I've been told this app has become the place to go for common sense political discussion and analysis,' the vice president wrote in his first post on the platform. 'I'm thrilled to be here to engage with all of you.' But shortly after, the vice president's Bluesky account was briefly suspended, according to US media. A user on the platform – favoured by progressives opposed to President Donald Trump and seeking refuge from X's perceived toxicity and right-wing bias – gleefully posted that it was the 'quickest block ever.' Vance has not commented on the suspension, and his account was swiftly restored. A Bluesky spokesperson told Newsweek that the vice president's account was removed because their system flagged it as a potential impersonator. 'Vice President Vance's account was briefly flagged by our automated systems that try to detect impersonation attempts which have targeted public figures like him in the past,' Bluesky said, according to the US outlet. 'The account was quickly restored and verified so people can easily confirm its authenticity.' Bluesky in April introduced blue checks to accounts that have been verified to confirm users are who they claim to be. 'We welcome the Vice President to join the conversation on Bluesky,' the company added. X and Bluesky have not made public the number of active users of their platforms for several months. But according to analyst estimates and marketing data, X had around 600 million active users in early 2025, while Bluesky had about 30 million. JD Vance, whose Bluesky followers now exceed 6 000, also posted his praise of conservative Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas's recent concurring opinion on medical care for transgender youth, calling it 'quite illuminating.' The Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld a law banning gender-affirming medical treatments for transgender minors – an issue at the heart of the American culture wars. Bluesky was founded by Jack Dorsey in 2019, who co-founded and led Twitter as chief executive until its 2022 acquisition by South Africa-born billionaire Elon Musk who renamed the popular platform X. Musk, a former top advisor to Trump, has since transformed X into the go-to platform for conservatives, but the president himself remains an infrequent user, preferring his own Truth Social platform for communication. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news. By Garrin Lambley © Agence France-Presse
Eyewitness News
2 days ago
- Eyewitness News
Argentine ex-president Kirchner begins six-year term under house arrest
BUENOS AIRES - Argentina's ex-president Cristina Kirchner began serving a six-year fraud sentence under house arrest on Tuesday, after a judge granted her request to avoid prison in a case that dramatically ended her two-decade career. The Supreme Court last week upheld the 72-year-old's conviction for "fraudulent administration" while president, along with her lifelong ban on holding public office. Since the ruling, supporters of the polarizing left-winger, who has led opposition to President Javier Milei's austerity policies, had been keeping vigil outside her home in Buenos Aires, raising fears of clashes with security forces if she were jailed. Her left-wing Peronist movement and trade unions had called for major solidarity demonstrations on Wednesday. While some protests were still expected the risk of unrest appeared diminished after a federal court ruled Kirchner could serve her sentence at home with an electronic surveillance device. The court added that Kirchner's sentence began Tuesday and ordered that she "refrain from any behavior that could disturb the peace of the neighborhood and/or disturb the peaceful coexistence of its residents." She will be allowed limited visits, principally from family members, lawyers and doctors. Her legal team welcomed the decision to spare her the ignominy of being thrown behind bars. "THE LAW PREVAILED. THE PEOPLE PREVAILED," one of Kirchner's lawyers, Gregorio Dalbon, reacted on X. CLAIMS OF JUDICIAL BIAS Kirchner rose to prominence as part of a political power couple with her late husband Nestor Kirchner, who preceded her as president. After two terms at the helm herself between 2007 and 2015, she served as vice president from 2019 to 2023 in the last center-left administration before Javier Milei took power. Revered by the left, reviled by the right, she claimed the case against her was a political plot to end her career and unravel her legacy of economic and protectionism and generous social programs. Her supporters pointed to evidence of close ties between some of the judges who convicted her in lower courts and one of her arch-foes, former center-right president Mauricio Macri. Many Argentines, however, believed her conviction over the awarding of roads works tenders to one of her business associates was just. She is the second ex-leader since Argentina's transition from dictatorship to democracy in 1983 to be sentenced to prison after Carlos Saul Menem, convicted of weapons trafficking. Menem never served jail time because he had immunity as a senator.
