Lawsuits accuse insurers of colluding to drop coverage in fire-prone parts of California
For free real time breaking news alerts sent straight to your inbox sign up to our breaking news emails Sign up to our free breaking news emails
Two lawsuits filed in Los Angeles allege major home insurance companies have colluded to limit coverage in California communities at high risk for wildfires and force homeowners onto the state's last-resort insurance plan that offers basic coverage and high premiums.
Insurers, including State Farm and 24 other companies that hold 75% of California's home insurance market, were part of an 'illegal scheme' in violation of California's antitrust and unfair competition laws, according to one of the lawsuits, filed last week.
The lawsuit said the companies worked together in 2023 to 'suddenly and simultaneously' drop coverage or halt writing new policies in fire-prone areas, including in neighborhoods like Pacific Palisades and Altadena that were leveled in the January wildfires that destroyed nearly 17,000 structures and killed at least 30 people. That has forced hundreds of homeowners onto the FAIR Plan that offers limited coverage capping at $3 million, leaving them underinsured and now struggling to rebuild after the fires, says the lawsuit filed by a group of homeowners who lost their houses in the LA fires.
The other lawsuit includes all policyholders who obtained the FAIR Plan after January 2023, when the conspiracy allegedly began, the suit says.
'Insurance is a product that homeowners hope never to need, but rely on for peace of mind in normal times and for critical help rebuilding after a catastrophe,' Michael J. Bidart, who represents the homeowners, said in a statement. 'The complaints allege that, by colluding to push plaintiffs and so many like them to the FAIR Plan, the defendants have reaped the benefits of high premiums while depriving homeowners of coverage that they were ready, willing, and able to purchase to ensure that they could recover after a disaster like January's wildfires.'
The lawsuits come as California is struggling to rein in an ongoing insurance crisis, where companies are boosting rates, limiting coverage or pulling out completely from regions susceptible to wildfires and other natural disasters in the era of climate change. In 2023, several major insurance companies either paused or restricted new business in the state, saying they can't truly price the risk on properties as wildfires are becoming more common and destructive in California due to climate change.
The state Department of Insurance said it is not involved in the suits but said its focus is on protecting consumers.
'Californians deserve a system that works — one where decisions are made openly, rates reflect real risk, and no one is left without options,' department spokesperson Gabriel Sanchez said in a statement.
State Farm, the largest home insurer in California with roughly a million policies, didn't immediately respond to requests for comment. Representatives from the American Property Casualty Insurance Association, the largest national trade association representing home, auto and business insurers, also did not respond for comment.
The FAIR Plan is an insurance pool that all the major private insurers pay into, and the plan then issues policies to people who can't get private insurance because their properties are deemed too risky to insure. The plan, with high premiums and basic coverage, is designed as a temporary option until homeowners can find permanent coverage, but more Californians are relying on it than ever. There were more than 555,000 home policies on the FAIR Plan as of March, more than double the number in 2020. Read More Tell 'price walkers' to take a hike
The complaints also allege that insurers were pushing policyholders onto the FAIR Plan because companies wouldn't have to shoulder all financial responsibility to sustain the plan. When the state's top insurance regulator in February ordered insurers to provide $1 billion to the FAIR Plan to help it pay out claims related to the LA wildfires, he allowed for half of the cost to be recouped from policyholders statewide. Another lawsuit was filed last week to block the cost-shifting regulation.
California has been in the process of implementing various new regulations to give insurers more latitude to raise premiums in exchange for issuing more policies in high-risk areas. That includes regulations allowing insurers to consider climate change when setting their prices and allowing them to pass on the costs of reinsurance to California consumers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Port of LA Ordered by Federal Judge to Clean Up Contaminated Wastewater
The Port of Los Angeles will comply with an order from a U.S. District Court judge to remediate environmental impacts stemming from the discharge of hazardous waste that has allegedly caused widespread contamination in the L.A. Harbor. The ruling stems from a lawsuit filed by Environment California against the City of Los Angeles, which alleged that the country's busiest port violated the federal Clean Water Act by letting untreated wastewater containing toxic copper and fecal bacteria pollute the harbor within San Pedro Bay since 2019. More from Sourcing Journal US Companies Take Trump Tariff Suit to Supreme Court Port of LA Imports Dip 9% in May After Tariff Shock Nebraska AG Sues Temu Over Alleged Consumer Protection Violations Filed last July, the suit said that more than 2,000 illegal discharges had taken place within the course of the previous five years, stemming from stormwater and contaminated groundwater that collects within a 53-acre area of the Port. Now, the Port will be required to ameliorate the issue by changing its management of stormwater and groundwater. The court's ruling states that the city will have to treat the water to remove toxic pollutants by redirecting it to the Terminal Island Water Reclamation Plant. Specific performance metrics must be achieved or the Port will face monetary penalties. Also under the settlement, the Port will be required to shell out $1.3 million to the Rose Foundation for Communities and the Environment for use in restoration projects tied to the L.A. Harbor and San Pedro Bay, with most of the money earmarked for a project designed to remove waste. The Port is mandated to pay a $130,00 civil penalty to the U.S. Treasury as well. 'Californians count on having a clean, vibrant coastline, but that's not compatible with contaminated effluent that can lap up on our world-renowned shores,' said Laura Deehan, Environment California's state director. 'This settlement is a great step toward a cleaner, safer San Pedro Bay, and it demonstrates the vital role that citizen lawsuits play in the enforcement of our federal environmental laws.' According to Deehan, the settlement has a 'double benefit' for the L.A. Harbor, namely that it will end the Port's discharge violations and also provide funding to remove waste. The National Environmental Law Center's staff attorney, Lewis DeHope, said the settlement 'promises to finally put an end to the Port's long-standing violations that have plagued the harbor for years,' adding that, 'Bacteria and copper are out; effective treatment is in.'
Business Wire
a day ago
- Business Wire
Wescom Financial Hosts Grand Opening Celebration for New Marina Branch
--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Wescom Financial: ***Media Advisory*** WHAT: Wescom Financial has been helping Californians build better lives with a full array of banking and financial services for 90+ years. The financial institution is hosting a grand opening celebration with a ribbon-cutting ceremony at its new Marina Branch, taking place Tuesday, June 24th from 5 - 7 p.m. The event, open to the public, will feature food, beverages and prizes. This marks the first new branch for Wescom in Monterey County following the merger with Central Coast Federal Credit Union (CCFCU) in 2024. The media is encouraged to attend the grand opening event and can RSVP here: WHEN: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 from 5 to 7 p.m. WHO: Wescom Financial Marina Branch team members Leinette Limtiaco, Vice President, Branch Operations, Central Coast region Community members Field representative Luis Meza from Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas' (AD-29) office Marina Mayor Bruce Delgado Marina City Council Salinas Valley Chamber of Commerce WHERE: 130 General Stilwell Drive, Suite 100, Marina, CA 93933; parking available at The Dunes on Monterey Bay – Retail Center Interview with Wescom's Adriana Welch, Senior VP Branch Operations Photos of area residents interacting with Wescom team members; ribbon-cutting ceremony; branch interior and exterior photos; photos with local city officials Expand
San Francisco Chronicle
a day ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Letters: Instead of cutting Muni service, here's what S.F. can do to balance agency's budget
Regarding 'Muni is cutting service on five S.F. bus lines. Here's when the changes go live' (San Francisco, June 18): If Muni service cuts will save only $7.2 million, how many more cuts will we have to stomach to cover the projected $322 million deficit? Muni is an essential service for thousands of San Franciscans, including me. I take Muni every single day, including on the 5 and the 31 lines, which are among the cuts. Cutting or reducing service on these lines sets a terrible precedent; how many cuts will billionaire Mayor Daniel Lurie, who's probably never had to take Muni in his life, think are acceptable to balance the budget? The new budget shows Lurie's priorities: preserving tax breaks for billionaires and corporations while cutting the essential services working people need. Increasing taxes for billionaires and corporations by just a small fraction would easily fund all Muni lines. We must not let Mayor Lurie privatize public transit and sell it back to us at a steep price. The people need affordable and reliable public transit, and we will accept nothing less. Rhys Hedges, San Francisco Suisun City forever At a time when headlines often paint California as stagnant and dysfunctional, Suisun City is showing true leadership by advancing a reimbursement agreement tied to the possible annexation of the California Forever project. This bold move signals a commitment to tackling the state's housing crisis and reviving a core California value: the ability to build. California once led the nation in dreaming big, from aerospace to Silicon Valley, and built homes to match that ambition. But in recent decades, growth has slowed due to regulatory barriers, soaring costs and resistance to change. Suisun City's decision represents more than local planning; it is a vision for a future that includes homes and space for industries like advanced manufacturing, keys to restoring the middle class and keeping young Californians close to home. The City Council acted decisively and transparently, modeling the leadership that California needs. At the California Building Industry Association, we believe this is the path forward: communities that welcome innovation, embrace responsibility and reignite the California Dream. Suisun City just showed us what real leadership looks like. Bravo. Dan Dunmoyer, president and CEO, California Building Industry Association College preference unfair AB7, which has passed the California Assembly and is being debated in the state Senate, allows college admission preference in the state to descendants of slavery in the United States. The idea of favoring African American students for college admissions over others, when California was a free state, is an affront to the rest of us who have felt the sting of discrimination, too. Yes, California upheld the Fugitive Slave Act and practiced discrimination in everything else, from housing to equal education. However, if we are being fair, we need to consider those other groups that suffered discrimination but do not represent 'America's original sin' when applying to California universities. Thousands of Japanese Americans in California were imprisoned during World War II. Mexicans had their land stolen from 1848 and the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo up to modern times in places like Chavez Ravine in Los Angeles, where a neighborhood was razed to make way for Dodger Stadium. Jews were once kept out of universities and subjected to repressive quotas at places like the USC. AB7 is a travesty and an affront to all of us who also suffered, and it needs to die in the state Senate. President for all President Donald Trump wants immigration enforcement to focus on Democratic cities like Los Angeles, New York, Chicago and, I'm sure, San Francisco. Perhaps he needs to be reminded that he is the president of the United States, not just the states that voted for him, but all of them.
