
Apple failed to deliver the intelligent AI
A little less than a year ago, my wife's birthday was approaching. I was searching for a special birthday gift that is thoughtful, impressive, and useful. While window shopping and walking through virtually most of the shopping malls and centres here in Oman (let alone abroad during my short travels) and driving through the city, I could not miss seeing the new Apple iPhone 16 promoted on almost every digital screen, huge billboards inside the buildings, and outside on the highways, and the social media feeds/ads, be it on YouTube, Instagram, Snapchat or Twitter (now known as X after Elon Musk took over the helm).
Practically everywhere I looked, I saw (and continue to actually see) the new smartphone with a bold and beautiful brand/promise/tagline, the 'Apple Intelligence'. Simply, a promise from probably one of the most expensive smartphone manufacturers in the world (Apple) that the artificial intelligence (AI) will finally come to their iPhone in a way that only they could do.
Like anything I mostly do, I read, researched and consequently bought into the promise of the future (with a unique way of integrating AI into the already existing successfully touted smart mobile device). I jumped into the bandwagon, especially since I found this would be the perfect gift for my wife as an upgrade to her existing old model iPhone, but of course with the AI-powered feature apart from just the basic upgrade of the storage and memory space, the onboard camera quality and finally the processor speed. Fast forward to today, I must admit that I am quite disappointed, especially with the high price tag paid (approx. RO 580) for a promise (Apple Intelligence) that is yet to be materialised in practice (but is only available today as a concept and on paper since a year ago when it was introduced).
So what really happened? Like almost everyone else, I bought into the promise of the 'Apple Intelligence'. Yet unlike everyone else, I realised today that it's probably a gimmick. Apple made the new iPhone look like the smartest phone ever made in history, where AI would be utilised as a feature to simplify our daily tasks, manage our lives better, and even offer creative tools on top of what is already available today as consumer AI-related apps (such as ChatGPT, Gemini and the like). If you watch last year's Apple Worldwide Developers Conference (WDC 2024), you will see that an amazing experience was promised (i.e., the Apple intelligence); nevertheless, fast-forward today, that was only a concept, not even a practical real demo that you can feel and play with.
Apple, during the conference and later via the mass media, talked about how they will utilise AI across all your apps, predicting what you need, and even edit your writing like a personal assistant. All that sounded like the ideal smart device that is not only quite secure (as opposed to Android or Huawei, as it claims) but also blends better privacy, better design, and generative power, thanks to AI. In reality, the roll-out of features was very limited, and only a few of what has been promised were released (e.g., rewording, summarising and paraphrasing text), pretty much as what other generative AI apps can do (or even better too). Why did Apple do that? In my humble opinion, to remain or seem competitive in the market race for AI and also to ensure shareholders continue to gain profits from the mass sales that are done as a result. I am not happy, nor are many who realised the same.
In conclusion, the futuristic gift that I bought for my wife did not materialise to date (though she loves the phone being a loyal Apple customer). The excitement of the same continues to be a frustration instead. Most 'Apple Intelligence' features that were promised and we saw remain a dream yet to be fulfilled. I hope Apple will soon react to this fiasco of selling an expensive promise (or device per se) with a real deed that puts a smile, productivity and a real future into the hands of consumers. Until we catch up again next week, let's continue to be positive of the beautiful innovative future.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Muscat Daily
19 hours ago
- Muscat Daily
OIA posts RO1.6bn profit, ramps up local investment
Muscat – Oman Investment Authority (OIA) has reported strong financial results for 2024, announcing that its assets now exceed RO20bn, with annual profits reaching RO1.585bn. In line with its commitment to fiscal support, OIA injected RO800mn into the state budget last year. According to SWF Global, the authority is now ranked the world's eighth-best sovereign wealth fund in terms of five-year investment return rates. OIA continues to spread investment risks by diversifying geographically and across sectors. Its three portfolios – the National Development Fund (NDF), Future Generations Fund and Future Fund Oman – have exposure in more than 50 countries. Local investments accounted for the largest share at 61.3%, with North America next at 19.9%. The NDF, aligned with Oman Vision 2040, invested about RO1.9bn in local projects, exceeding its RO1.7bn target. Key projects include Duqm Refinery, Lasil and Al Baydha copper mines, Asyad Container Terminal, and Manah 1 and Manah 2 solar power plants. Internationally, the Future Generations Fund expanded its portfolio by investing in 13 global funds across technology, AI, energy, healthcare and fintech, besides backing Elon Musk's xAI initiative. Future Fund Oman, launched in January 2024, received 294 investment applications and approved 44 projects worth RO333.1mn. Major investments include the Sohar Poly Silicon plant – the largest outside China – and three new funds exceeding RO250mn in sectors like ICT, energy, agriculture, renewables, healthcare and electric vehicles. Efforts to attract foreign direct investment (FDI) brought in RO3.348bn in 2024, mainly in energy, tourism and mining. OIA also repaid RO1.846bn in debt for its companies, including early repayment of RO545mn for OQ Group loans, while government guarantees dropped from RO3.4bn to RO1.8bn. Its divestment programme exceeded set goals, with six asset exits, including the high-profile IPO of 25% of OQ Exploration & Production shares. Proceeds are being redirected to new diversification projects. OIA's local content and SME initiatives continue to expand. In 2024, it spent RO265.5mn with SMEs, including RO139mn for Riyada cardholders, making up nearly 20% of supply chain spend. It also launched a new mandatory list covering 311 local products and services and supported 38 SMEs with RO11mn. The authority created 1,393 new jobs for Omanis last year, raising the Omanisation rate to 77.7%. Abdulsalam bin Mohammed al Murshidi, President of OIA, said 2024 exceeded performance targets in job creation, local content and foreign investment, crediting the authority's achievements to the dedication of its national workforce.


Times of Oman
a day ago
- Times of Oman
Apple expands Audio Mix feature beyond Photos App with iOS 26
California: With the upcoming iOS 26 update, Apple is set to revolutionise the way users edit audio in videos on their iPhone 16 models. According to Mac Rumours, the tech giant is expanding its innovative Audio Mix feature, powered by machine learning, beyond the Photos app to third-party applications. Audio Mix offers four primary options for editing audio in videos: Standard: Plays the original audio recorded. In-Frame: Reduces sounds and voices from sources not visible in the video frame. Studio: Minimises background sounds and reverb, creating a professional studio-like effect. Cinematic: Places voices on a front-facing track and environmental noises in surround, similar to movie audio. With iOS 26, Apple is introducing additional Audio Mix options for background noise. To utilise this feature, videos must be recorded with Spatial Audio, which is automatically enabled on all iPhone 16 models when recording video. Users can adjust this setting in the Camera section of the Settings app. The introduction of Audio Mix in third-party apps will significantly enhance the audio editing capabilities of these applications. Developers can now leverage Apple's machine learning-powered Audio Mix technology to provide users with more advanced audio editing tools. In addition to iOS 26, Apple is also bringing Audio Mix controls to third-party Mac apps with macOS Tahoe. This move will enable Mac users to enjoy the same advanced audio editing capabilities as iPhone users. Apple is also enhancing audio-only apps like Voice Memos by allowing them to save audio in the QuickTime audio format QTA.


Observer
2 days ago
- Observer
The ethics of using AI to predict patient choices
I recently attended a conference on bioethics in Switzerland where professionals from different countries met to discuss recent topics in medical ethics which was the main theme of this year's conference. Among the highlights of the meeting were several talks about the inclusion of Artificial Intelligence in decision-making and its ethical impact. What caught my attention was a talk about Personalised Patient Preference Predictor, or P4, which is a tool that aims to predict an individual patient's preferences for healthcare, using machine learning. The idea is that in situations where a person is incapacitated — for example, found unconscious with no advance directive — the AI would comb through their digital footprint, including tweets, Instagram and Facebook posts, and possibly even emails, to infer their likely wishes. The system would then create a virtual copy of the individual's personality, known as a 'psychological twin,' which would communicate decisions to the medical team on the person's behalf. While this concept is technologically fascinating, it raises several pressing ethical concerns. First, it assumes that our social media presence accurately reflects our core values and long-term preferences. However, people's views are dynamic and influenced by their emotional state, life experiences, and personal growth. A sarcastic tweet or a momentary opinion shared online may not represent someone's actual end-of-life wishes. Second, the use of AI risks introducing or amplifying bias — especially against the elderly and individuals from ethnic or religious minorities. AI systems often generalise from large datasets, which can lead to 'one-size-fits-all' assumptions that disregard cultural, spiritual, or personal nuances. Another critical question is: can AI truly understand or navigate the emotional and moral complexity of disagreements among family members and healthcare providers? Would it possess the empathy required to mediate a delicate conversation, or would it deliver cold logic such as: 'Grandpa is too old, his survival chances are low, so resources would be better allocated elsewhere'? Furthermore, relying on AI for such deeply human decisions risks the deskilling of health professionals. Ethical decision-making is an essential skill developed through experience, reflection, and dialogue. If AI takes over these roles, clinicians may gradually lose the ability — or the confidence — to engage in these vital discussions. The speaker, who advocated for the use of P4, admitted he did not fully understand how the AI makes its decisions. This lack of transparency is alarming. If we are to entrust a machine with life-or-death recommendations, we must first demand clarity and accountability in its design and operation. In my opinion, while AI has a growing role in healthcare, ethical decision-making remains a human responsibility. These discussions are often fraught with disagreement, cultural sensitivity, and intense emotion — particularly when they involve questions of life and death. In my view, we are not yet ready to hand this task over to machines. We are not yet ready to hand this task over to machines.