Mission Impossible - The Final Reckoning Review: Tom Cruise Gives Ethan Hunt A Brilliant Send-Off

Last Updated:
Mission Impossible - The Final Reckoning Movie Review: The Final Reckoning is the most fitting, heart-racing, gut-wrenching finale Tom Cruise's Ethan Hunt could've asked for.
Mission Impossible – The Final Reckoning Movie Review: There's a reason Mission: Impossible has survived eight long films, and that reason is Tom freaking Cruise. In The Final Reckoning, Cruise doesn't just run, jump off cliffs, hang from planes or defy gravity in some ridiculous fashion. This time, he bleeds, he reflects, he aches, and does he go out in style.
The Final Reckoning is many things from explosive to emotional, and sometimes flat-out bonkers, but above all, it's a love letter to the legend of Ethan Hunt and the cinematic legacy that Cruise has built over nearly three decades.
Directed by Christopher McQuarrie, the eighth and final installment doesn't just wrap things up but launches them off a cliff (literally) and lands them squarely in our adrenaline-fuelled hearts. This isn't just another action film. It's a curtain call with purpose. Yes, the action is outrageous. Well, it wouldn't be Mission: Impossible without at least one sequence that makes you scream 'HOW IS HE EVEN ALIVE?" But what really makes this film soar is its soul. For once, Hunt isn't just chasing the mission. He's questioning it. And in those quieter, haunted moments, you see a man who's tired, not of saving the world, but of what it's cost him.
Ethan and his fractured IMF family must stop a rogue AI 'The Entity" which has already begun manipulating nuclear protocols and global alliances. But McQuarrie makes it feel fresh by focusing on the human cost of these high-tech battles. When your enemy is everywhere and no one can be trusted, who do you become?
Cruise delivers a career-high performance equal parts physically punishing and emotionally raw. There's a vulnerability here we rarely see in action stars. He's not just a man on a mission anymore, he's a man on the verge. You feel every fall, every heartbreak, every impossible choice. It's his most human performance as Hunt yet.
Daniel Bruhl is terrifyingly brilliant as Klaus Richter. He is calm, calculating and far more dangerous because of how real he feels. He's no cartoon evil; he's quietly, insidiously terrifying. And it works.
The supporting cast shines. Rebecca Ferguson returns with that cool assassin mystique. Hayley Atwell brings spark and smarts. Simon Pegg's Benji continues to be the emotional glue, and Ving Rhames's Luther is a grounding force in the chaos. Everyone gets their moment. Everyone earns it.
Talking about the set pieces, one minute you're deep-sea diving into a wrecked submarine, the next you're hanging off a jet mid-air. Practical effects and Cruise's need-for-speed insanity make every sequence pulse with tension. There's something delightfully retro about how real the danger feels.
But what truly sets The Final Reckoning apart is its tone. It's not just an action blockbuster. It's an elegy. A goodbye. A thank-you. And somehow, despite all the chaos, it's also a reckoning with legacy, with sacrifice, with what it really means to be a hero when the world keeps moving the goalpost.
The Final Reckoning is the most fitting, heart-racing, gut-wrenching finale Ethan Hunt could've asked for. If this really is the last mission, then hats off, Mr. Cruise. You didn't just complete it. You aced it.
First Published:

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Hindustan Times

an hour ago

• Hindustan Times

Tom Cruise to receive honorary Oscar: Is a competitive win still possible?

Tom Cruise will finally be receiving an Oscar after decades in the film industry. The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences had announced earlier this week that he would be given an Honorary Oscar at the 2025 Governors Awards in November, celebrating his lifetime contributions to cinema, Deadline reported. The Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning actor, who at 62 is still one of Hollywood's most bankable and enduring stars, has never taken home a competitive Oscar despite being nominated four times. Tom Cruise to receive honorary Oscar by the Academy.(Vianney Le Caer/Invision/AP) The Academy said that the honorary recognition is for Cruise's 'extraordinary distinction in lifetime achievement', particularly for his commitment to enriching theatrical experience, to the filmmaking and stunt communities. Cruise will be honored alongside production designer Wynn Thomas, choreographer and actor Debbie Allen, and Dolly Parton, who will receive the Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award. Also Read: Mission accomplished? Tom Cruise is finally getting an Oscar but its not for any of his films Although Cruise is being bestowed with the honorary recognition, the big question remains: Will this end the Mission: Impossible actor's chances of winning a competitive Academy Award? Well, history suggests otherwise. Past Oscar winners prove an honorary award doesn't end the race As per Deadline, actors like Paul Newman and Henry Fonda both received honorary Oscars before they won Best Actor in the very next year. Additionally, Laurence Olivier, who won an Honorary Oscar in 1947, clinched Best Actor two years later. Harold Russell took home both an Honorary and a competitive Oscar in the same year. Some stars like Peter O'Toole initially resisted the gesture in fear that the honorary accolade was a consolation; they went on to receive further nominations. Moreover, figures outside of acting, like Ennio Morricone and Spike Lee also turned their honorary recognition into competitive wins later. The Deadline report added that the timing for Tom Cruise may be auspicious, too. The actor is currently filming a project with Oscar-winning director Alejandro G. Iñárritu. The Birdman filmmaker's next project is expected to release next year, which places it squarely in the running for the 99th Academy Awards. Tom Cruise could still find himself holding the elusive golden statue if the performance matches the prestige. So, while November's honorary award marks long-overdue recognition, it doesn't close the curtain on Cruise's Oscar journey. It might just be the prelude to his biggest role yet, an Oscar winner. FAQs Why didn't Tom Cruise win the Oscar? Despite four nominations, Tom Cruise has faced tough competition each time. His performances were critically acclaimed, but others edged him out during award season. Why is Tom Cruise getting an honorary Oscar? The Academy is recognizing Cruise for his lifetime contribution to cinema, including his work as an actor, producer, and champion of theatrical experience. Has Tom Cruise ever been up for an Oscar? Yes. He has been nominated four times: twice for Best Actor (Born on the Fourth of July, Jerry Maguire), once for Best Supporting Actor (Magnolia), and once as a producer for Best Picture (Top Gun: Maverick).

Pink Villa

3 hours ago

• Pink Villa

How Did Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sánchez's Wedding Spark New Tension Between Katy Perry and Orlando Bloom? Find Out

Katy Perry and Orlando Bloom are reportedly going through a difficult period in their relationship, with Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sánchez's upcoming wedding adding to the strain. The couple, who have been together since 2016 and engaged since 2019, are facing disagreements on multiple fronts, including Perry's recent space trip and who will attend the Bezos-Sánchez wedding in Venice on June 24. According to Daily Mail sources, Perry was left hurt after Bloom dismissed her spaceflight with Blue Origin as 'cringeworthy' and 'embarrassing'. The April 2025 flight was organized by Lauren Sánchez, and although Perry had hoped Bloom would support the experience, he reportedly said, 'The whole thing looked ridiculous.' An insider from Perry's side added, 'Imagine going to space, motherf****** space, and your partner isn't impressed.' Why is Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sánchez's wedding causing tension? Now, as Bloom gets ready to attend the three-day Bezos-Sánchez wedding celebration, Perry is noticeably absent from the guest list. TMZ reports that Perry has 'prior commitments', as she continues her world tour in Australia. However, a source revealed, 'It goes deeper than that.' 'Katy feels like they're really her friends more than his,' the insider said. 'And yet he's the one going to the wedding. She feels like it's a 'f*** you' to her from him.' Another point of tension is the fact that Bezos and Sánchez made the Blue Origin space trip possible for Katy Perry. 'He complains about her going to space and then wants to go to the wedding of the people who made it happen,' the source added. They added that it's difficult for her to accept. The couple is also struggling with career-related issues. Perry's latest album 143, received poor reviews, with critics calling it 'reductive' and 'AI-generated'. A source told PEOPLE the album has caused tension in her relationship with Bloom. Her Lifetimes world tour is also seeing slow ticket sales in some regions, leading to increased online criticism. Adding to the stress, Perry recently shared personal photos and stories about their relationship online, including topless snaps of Bloom, despite their past agreement to keep things private. This has reportedly frustrated Bloom, who feels Perry is using their personal life to manage public backlash. A second source close to Orlando Bloom shared that he feels Katy has changed over the past year and that he's grown frustrated. According to the source, Bloom had advised her against releasing the album, taking the space trip, and going on tour, but she chose to go ahead with all of it. From his perspective, he fell in love with who she truly is, but believes this past year has brought out a side of her that he finds difficult. He simply wants her to be happy, authentic, and to take a moment to enjoy the life she has built.

Indian Express

13 hours ago

• Indian Express

Can AI quicken the pace of math discovery?

Artificial intelligence can write a poem in the style of Walt Whitman, provide dating advice and suggest the best way to cook an artichoke. But when it comes to mathematics, large language models like OpenAI's immensely popular ChatGPT have sometimes stumbled over basic problems. Some see this as an inherent limitation of the technology, especially when it comes to complex reasoning. A new initiative from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency seeks to account for that shortfall by enlisting researchers in finding ways to conduct high-level mathematics research with an AI 'co-author.' The goal of the new grant-making program, Exponentiating Mathematics, is to speed up the pace of progress in pure (as opposed to applied) math — and, in doing so, to turn AI into a superlative mathematician. 'Mathematics is this great test bed for what is right now the key pain point for AI systems,' said Patrick Shafto, a Rutgers University mathematician and computer scientist who now serves as a program manager in DARPA's information innovation office, known as I20. 'So if we overcome that, potentially, it would unleash much more powerful AI.' He added, 'There's huge potential benefit to the community of mathematicians and to society at large.' Shafto spoke from his office at DARPA's headquarters, an anonymous building in northern Virginia whose facade of bluish glass gives little indication that it houses one of the most unusual agencies in the federal government. Inside the building's airy lobby, visitors surrender their cellphones. Near a bank of chairs, a glass display shows a prosthetic arm that can be controlled by the wearer's brain signals. 'By improving mathematics, we're also understanding how AI works better,' said Alondra Nelson, who served as a top science adviser in President Joe Biden's administration and is a faculty member at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey. 'So I think it's kind of a virtuous cycle of understanding.' She suggested that, down the road, math-adept AI could enhance cryptography and aid in space exploration. Started after World War II to compete with the Soviet Union in the space race, DARPA is most famous for fostering the research that led to the creation of ARPANET, the precursor to the internet we use today. At the agency's small gift store, which is not accessible to the public, one can buy replicas of a cocktail napkin on which someone sketched out the rudimentary state of computer networks in 1969. DARPA later funded the research that gave rise to drones and Apple's digital assistant, Siri. But it is also responsible for the development of Agent Orange, the potent defoliant used to devastating effect during the Vietnam War. 'I'm sure this isn't 100% innocent,' Andrew Granville, a mathematician at the University of Montreal, said of DARPA's math initiative, although he emphasized that he was only speculating about eventual outcomes. DARPA is, after all, part of the Pentagon, even if it has traditionally operated with enviable independence. The U.S. military is rapidly incorporating AI into its operations, with the aim of not losing out to China and its People's Liberation Army or to Russia, which has been testing out new technologies on the battlefield in Ukraine. At the same time, Granville praised the endeavor, which comes as the Trump administration is cutting funding for scientific research. 'We are in disastrous times for U.S. science,' Granville said. 'I'm very pleased that DARPA is able to funnel money to academia.' A surfer and skateboarder in his free time, Shafto, 49, sat in a sparse conference room one recent afternoon, imagining a future when AI would be as good at solving multistep problems as it is at trying to glean meaning from huge troves of texts, which it does through the use of probability theory. Despite the unseasonably raw weather, Shafto seemed dressed for the beach in a blue-and-white Hawaiian-style shirt, white flannel trousers and sandals, with a trilby hat on the table before him. His vibe was, on the whole, decidedly closer to that of Santa Cruz than of Capitol Hill, largely in keeping with DARPA's traditional disregard for the capital's slow, bureaucratic pace. (The agency sets priorities and funds outside scientists but does not do research on its own; academics like Shafto spend an average of four years as program managers.) 'There are great mathematicians who work on age-old problems,' Shafto said. 'That's not the kind of thing that I'm particularly interested in.' Instead, he wanted the discipline to move more quickly by using AI to save time. 'Problems in mathematics take decades or centuries, sometimes, to solve,' he said in a recent presentation at DARPA's headquarters on the Exponentiating Mathematics project, which is accepting applications through mid-July. He then shared a slide showing that, in terms of the number of papers published, math had stagnated during the last century while life and technical sciences had exploded. In case the point wasn't clear, the slide's heading drove it home: 'Math is sloooowwww. …' The kind of pure math Shafto wants to accelerate tends to be 'sloooowwww' because it is not seeking numerical solutions to concrete problems, the way applied mathematics does. Instead, pure math is the heady domain of visionary theoreticians who make audacious observations about how the world works, which are promptly scrutinized (and sometimes torn apart) by their peers. 'Proof is king,' Granville said. Math proofs consist of multiple building blocks called lemmas, minor theorems employed to prove bigger ones. Whether each Jenga tower of lemmas can maintain integrity in the face of intense scrutiny is precisely what makes pure math such a 'long and laborious process,' acknowledged Bryna R. Kra, a mathematician at Northwestern University. 'All of math builds on previous math, so you can't really prove new things if you don't understand how to prove the old things,' she said. 'To be a research mathematician, the current practice is that you go through every step, you prove every single detail.' Lean, a software-based proof assistant, can speed up the process, but Granville said it was 'annoying, because it has its own protocols and language,' requiring programming expertise. 'We need to have a much better way of communication,' he added. Could artificial intelligence save the day? That's the hope, according to Shafto. An AI model that could reliably check proofs would save enormous amounts of time, freeing mathematicians to be more creative. 'The constancy of math coincides with the fact that we practice math more or less the same: still people standing at a chalkboard,' Shafto said. 'It's hard not to draw the correlation and say, 'Well, you know, maybe if we had better tools, that would change progress.'' AI would benefit, too, Shafto and others believe. Large language models like ChatGPT can scour the digitized storehouses of human knowledge to produce a half-convincing college essay on the Russian Revolution. But thinking through the many intricate steps of a mathematical problem remains elusive. 'I think we'll learn a lot about what the capabilities of various AI protocols are from how well we can get them to generate material that's of interest,' said Jordan S. Ellenberg, a mathematician at the University of Wisconsin-Madison who is part of a team applying for an Exponentiating Mathematics grant. 'We have no intuition yet about which problems are going to be hard and which problems are easy. We need to learn that.' One of the more disconcerting truths about artificial intelligence is that we do not entirely understand how it works. 'This lack of understanding is essentially unprecedented in the history of technology,' Dario Amodei, CEO of the artificial intelligence company Anthropic, wrote in a recent essay. Ellenberg somewhat downplayed that assertion, pointing out that electricity was widely used before its properties were fully understood. Then again, with some AI experts worrying that artificial intelligence could destroy the world, any clarity into its operations tends to be welcome. Nelson, the former White House adviser, acknowledged 'legitimate' concerns about the rapid pace at which artificial intelligence is being integrated into seemingly every sector of society. All the more reason, she argued, to have DARPA on the case. 'There's a much higher benchmark that needs to be reached than whether or not your chatbot is hallucinating if you ask it a question about Shakespeare,' she said. 'The stakes are much higher.'