‘You don't see us' — Cape farmworkers voice grievances about labour inspectors
Farmworkers from across the Boland and Koue Bokkeveld trotted out a litany of complaints against labour inspectors, who are meant to keep tabs on their working conditions.
'Our people sit here and die, while you earn your salary,' said activist Linda van Neel when farmworkers relayed their experiences of navigating the labour rights sector, struggling to access Unemployment Insurance Fund (UIF) benefits, the blocking of access to labour offices, and labour inspectors only speaking to employers, not employees, during site visits.
On Tuesday, activists and farmworkers gathered at Cape Town's Community House to lay bare their frustrations.
The farmworkers and activists from De Doorns, Paarl, Ceres, Wellington and Stellenbosch spoke about their experiences in the agricultural sector, which, according to Western Cape Premier Alan Winde, employs more than 200,000 people.
Surrounded by women and young people in red 'Women on Farms' T-shirts, Van Neel looked at David Esau, provincial chief inspector at the Department of Employment and Labour, and said, 'You gave us your number, but you don't pick up,' referring to unanswered calls for help.
The farmworkers, many of them now activists via training programmes with Women on Farms, spoke extensively about one of their major concerns: labour inspectors only speaking to employers and not farmworkers during site inspections.
Esau had told the crowd that one of the reasons for this was that when one of the 280 inspectors went to a farm, they had to find out whether there was a workers' union or an employees' forum and speak to the members.
The farmworkers were unhappy with this. Nicolene McGee from Paarl shouted, 'You don't see us, you go to the farmhouse and enjoy coffee on the stoep with nice scones and jam.'
After Esau told the audience that they needed to organise into worker forums so that inspectors could speak to them during farm inspections, Van Neel asked him why the same issues kept cropping up, even after they had spoken to him on previous occasions.
In 2021, Daily Maverick reported on a similar event with Women on Farms, where the then labour minister, Thulas Nxesi, said his department needed to get its house in order in terms of access to labour centres for farmworkers.
On Tuesday, Van Neel told Esau: 'Our people sit here and die while you earn your salary.'
Sarie Smit from De Doorns said, 'It is heartbreaking what happens to us in De Doorns — you can't walk past [the labour office] without someone asking for half a loaf of bread.'
She said that people often used their last money to get to the labour office so they could get assistance with UIF claims. Some slept outside the labour office to ensure they would be helped the following day.
Other problems included being told, 'The system is offline' when they tried to access the office, and security guards at labour offices in rural areas refusing to allow workers to enter if they did not have documents.
Tony Lamati, acting director at the UIF, told the farmworkers and activists that he would take the issues raised back with him to the office. He said that even if the system was offline, 'we should be taking applications manually'.
The UIF was on a hiring spree, he said, to increase staff in some sections from three to 15, and those posts would soon be advertised. Payments would be automated in a bid to prevent fraud.
Denile Samuels from Women on Farms said, 'Every year, these issues are tabled … you need to handle us with dignity. You are government officials and we are paying your salaries through our taxes — we will hold you accountable.'
The group marched through the Cape Town CBD to hand a memorandum to the Labour Department.
Demands included:
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mail & Guardian
13-06-2025
- Mail & Guardian
Editorial: A path forward at last
Victims of abuse, harassment and rape are too often confronted with obtuse bureaucrats behind the counter. (Media24/Lulama Zenzile) The reporting of sexual violence has been one of the ugliest blights of our democracy. Research throughout the years has revealed disturbing accounts of women regularly shunned at police stations. Victims of abuse, harassment and rape are too often confronted with obtuse bureaucrats behind the counter. These officers are either too lazy to file the necessary paperwork or refuse to take a woman's account seriously. The more malicious among them will flip the accusation — the archaic 'you shouldn't have been wearing that' refrain. While sexual crimes predominantly affect women and children, anecdotes of men who have faced ridicule for reporting abuse are equally harrowing. The result is a society hobbled by mistrust and trepidation of the system's processes. A report by the Human Sciences Research Council in November estimated that only one in five women who endure sexual abuse report it to the authorities. That number is chilling. Abuse begets further violence, contributing to the country's appalling femicide rates. Over the years, we have dedicated more column inches to this affliction than almost any other issue. It is thus with great interest that we watched the police service's briefing to parliament's portfolio committee on police this week. A plan was put forward that contained some compelling suggestions. These included changes to the regulatory framework, increased investigative capacity and structural improvements to police stations intended to encourage victims of sexual abuse to come forward. The obvious point is that it will take more than a PowerPoint presentation to convince a beleaguered South African that the plan will be rolled out timeously and have a measurable effect. Let alone a journalist. But we are happy to applaud any sincere effort that proposes new, creative solutions. Apathy in government has been an exacerbating factor in this crisis. For too long, officials have been drunk on a dangerous cocktail of lethargy and cognitive dissonance. It's a low bar, but acknowledging the problem and the need to do things differently is a hurdle that we have not always been able to take for granted. On the same note, our writer Umamah Bakharia has done some excellent work reporting on the sex offender register that is in limbo, awaiting amendments to legislation. We don't have all the answers on the best approach to the situation, but it is imperative that as a society we introduce frameworks that are universally considered fair. A failure to do so inflames vigilantim; people distrustful of authorities take matters into their own hands. Regrettably, it's taken 30 years of democracy, but these are the conversations we desperately need to be having.
Daily Maverick
10-06-2025
- Daily Maverick
Protecting our children: A call to honour our commitment to future generations
In May each year, South Africa pauses to reflect on one of its most urgent responsibilities: protecting its children. While many countries mark a day or a week focused on children's rights, South Africa is among the few with a dedicated Child Protection Month — a national effort that signals deep political and moral commitment. That commitment is rooted in the legacy of former president Nelson Mandela, whose words continue to echo: 'There can be no keener revelation of a society's soul than the way in which it treats its children.' The 16th of June 2025, commemorated as Youth Day in this country, and the Day of the African Child continentally, will mark 30 years since South Africa ratified the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Adopted in 1989, the convention is the most ratified human rights treaty in the world and was the first international human rights treaty ratified by South Africa under its new democratic government. And yet, despite this legacy, thousands of children in South Africa continue to face violence, exploitation and neglect. Child Protection Month is not simply a calendar event — it is a national moment to ask whether we are living up to the promise made to the children of this country. The numbers tell a grim story According to the Child Series Volume III Reported Crime Against Children by Statistics South Africa, that promise remains unfulfilled, with rape, assault and child abuse routinely high in the list of crimes reported against children. In the 2022/23 period alone, 64,533 children were victims of crime in South Africa, and each day three children are killed, 28 children are violently attacked, and 58 children are sexually violated. While the president has rightfully declared gender-based violence a pandemic, it is worth noting that child victims account for nearly 40% of the more than 21,000 sexual offences reported in South Africa in 2022/23. This is a staggering proportion, considering that children make up just over a third of the population. Given the high levels of violence against children in South Africa, it is unsurprising that this same violence resurfaces a generation later as the legacy of trauma perpetuates more harm. Both global and national data tell us that girls exposed to violence are more likely to be victims of inter-personal violence, and similarly, boys exposed to violence are more likely to become perpetuators of violence. Child Protection Week is an opportunity to amplify calls for this cycle of violence to stop. Government has responded but systemic barriers persist In recent months the government, led by the departments of Social Development and Women, Youth and Persons with Disabilities, has escalated its response by establishing a dedicated gender-based violence and femicide (GBVF) Priority Committee within the National Joint Operational and Intelligence Structure (Natjoints). Through a 90-day acceleration programme to address GBVF, national departments have committed to fast-track the implementation of prevention and response services across all nine provinces. The United Nations Children's Fund (Unicef) views this as a critical step in the right direction. But as the statistics show, these strong commitments need to translate into sustained, systemic change that lasts well beyond the allotted 90 days. Knowing how much is actually spent on preventing and responding to violence against children is a persistent issue, as budgeting for child protection is scattered across departments and seldom tracked. Moreover, at district and municipal levels — where services are closest to families — violence prevention is still not prioritised in integrated development plans. On the ground, many social workers are overstretched and tasked with statutory child removal cases, with little capacity for preventive or restorative interventions. Crucially, children themselves remain excluded from decision-making processes that directly affect their safety and dignity. From crisis to commitment To achieve the promise of safety and care for every child, Unicef proposes three urgent policy actions: Establish a dedicated public budget line for violence prevention across national and provincial departments, with regular public reporting on expenditure specific to children. Mandate the integration of child protection as a priority — including violence prevention — into district and municipal integrated development plans, with performance targets and ringfenced funding. Institutionalise child participation in policy development, programme design, and monitoring — in particular within the National Strategic Plan for GBVF — to ensure that children's realities and voices shape the systems meant to protect them. We know that violence against children is both preventable and necessary for the fostering of a healthy, happy society. Effective prevention requires moving beyond short-term responses to a focus on innovation, stronger coordination and meaningful systemic change. If South Africa is to fully honour its commitment to children — as enshrined in its globally admired Constitution and in the vision of a post-apartheid, democratic society — then we must go beyond the talk. Child Protection Month must leave a tangible legacy – a shift from crisis response to systemic prevention, lives safeguarded, futures restored and children truly heard. DM
Daily Maverick
04-06-2025
- Daily Maverick
‘We haven't recovered a cent' – private security watchdog says R129m UIF-linked training fund ‘lost'
South Africa's private security watchdog is at the centre of a multimillion-rand matter stemming from 2019, involving 'material irregularities' and the non-delivery of services. Watchdog head Manabela Chauke has told Parliament that not a cent has been recovered. The Private Security Industry Regulatory Authority (Psira) has come under fire in Parliament over a 2019 training initiative involving more than R129-million that has led to red flags being raised over 'irregularities'. MPs have also demanded to know why the situation is still dragging on and has not been fully dealt with after six years. One suggested calling for suspensions with immediate effect because the overall situation was hampering young jobseekers. Another proposed that Psira's board be relieved of its duties to make way for fresh faces. The matter involves a nearly R130-million contract linked to the Unemployment Insurance Fund (UIF), discussed in a police committee meeting on Wednesday, 4 June 2025. Setting the tone of Wednesday's meeting was what happened earlier on social media. Social media sparring Two days before, on 2 June, the police committee chair Ian Cameron took to Facebook. He posted that the committee was set to interrogate Psira 'over deeply concerning allegations involving the misuse of over R144-million in public funds.' Cameron's post continued: 'The money, allocated via the UIF's Labour Activation Programme, was intended to fund digital training for unemployed citizens through a service provider… 'What followed raises red flags… Learners listed in attendance registers have since denied participating. No training certificates have been issued. Facilitators remain unpaid. Tablets budgeted for the project were never delivered.' Psira then hit back. On its X account, Psira said it noted Cameron's Facebook post and had to 'set the record straight'. We've noted recent social media posts by the Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Police concerning PSiRA's material irregularity matter. We respect parliamentary oversight, but must set the record straight on key facts and legal process. — IG: PSiRALive (@PSiRALive) June 3, 2025 In a series of tweets, it stated: 'This matter is now under legal and forensic investigation. While Parliament is free to oversee progress, delving into the merits of the case risks violating the separation of powers and prejudicing legal proceedings. 'It is deeply concerning that a presiding Chairperson would publish judgmental statements on an active matter. Public office bearers are expected to uphold fairness and impartiality in all oversight processes. 'We've formally requested that the Chairperson recuse himself from the 04 June 2025 session in the interest of transparency and due process.' Despite Psira's social media posts and stance, Cameron chaired Wednesday's police committee meeting. 'We've recovered nothing yet' Irate MPs spoke out at the hearing. Several figures – some relating to payments Psira had made – were also discussed as the MPs tried to extract more information from the private security watchdog. At one point during the meeting, Makashule Gana of Rise Mzansi asked Psira head Manebela Chauke about how much money it had recovered. Chauke responded: 'We've just said we've appointed a forensic investigation. 'We've come up with a report, out of the report, preliminarily we've issued a letter of demand which has lapsed on the 26th of May… 'So, the answer is we've not yet recovered anything.' Gana pushed him on this point, asking him to confirm if, 'at the moment you have recovered zero.' Chauke replied: 'I'm not sure if my answer is not audible – we have not recovered a cent. We are in the process of recovery.' 'Likely financial loss' and suspensions A Psira presentation on the matter was shown at Wednesday's meeting. It said that in April 2019, Psira had signed a 'funding agreement' with the UIF to 'implement a national training initiative.' Between October 2019 and February 2022, advance payments were made 'to the appointed service provider before actual training begins as agreed and in compliance [with] Treasury regulations.' The presentation said that in March 2023, the Auditor-General of South Africa identified 'a likely financial loss due to non-delivery of services and weak contract oversight'. A few months later, in August 2023, the project resumed and 'the number of trained learners significantly' increased. The presentation said that after several other processes, a forensic report was finalised and submitted to the Auditor-General in March 2025. 'Two officials illegally accessed the forensic investigation report without authorisation,' it said. Both officials were suspended. R129m training contract An Auditor-General presentation was also shown during Wednesday's meeting and provided more details about the April 2019 agreement between Psira and the UIF. It involved the security watchdog acting as an agent and, over six months, providing 'Election Observer and End-User Computing training' for 7,071 preselected individuals on behalf of the UIF. 'The value of the contract was R129,982,657.50,' the Auditor-General's presentation said. Psira also entered into a service-level agreement with a supplier to provide the same training on behalf of the UIF. This covered April to June 2019, a date later extended, and the contract amount was valued at 'R80,062,877.00.' 'Material irregularity' The Auditor-General presentation said: 'During [the] 2021/22 financial year, Psira paid an amount of R15-million to the supplier. 'This payment was not supported by sufficient evidence to enable us to verify the occurrence of the transaction.' In 2023, a follow-up audit was done on the transaction, and it was noted that Psira made follow-up payments to the supplier. An invoice dated May 2019 reflected R2-million, another from October that year showed an amount of nearly R55-million, and an invoice from February 2022 showed R15-million. 'Through [the] audit process, we discovered that the supplier had not yet rendered services equivalent to the payments made,' the Auditor-General presentation said. 'As a result, an amount of R30,182,839.73 was made as an advance payment to the supplier before the services were rendered.' This contravened a Treasury regulation. 'This advance payment resulted in material irregularity,' the Auditor-General presentation said. According to the presentation, a progress report requested in September last year showed that 6,507 learners had been trained. It added: 'Psira terminated the contract with the supplier due to indicators of fraud and misrepresentation. 'Termination took effect from 20 May 2024.' 'Young people disadvantaged' During Wednesday's meeting, MPs were critical. The DA's Dianne Kohler Barnard pointed out that the matter was 'dragging on and on'. Lisa Schickerling, also of the DA, said: 'It cannot take six years to determine wrongdoing. There's something seriously wrong here.' She said the situation was so worrying that the police committee should request that the Psira board be relieved of its duties and a new one put in place 'to ensure that everything in Psira is running smoothly'. Schickerling said: 'We are losing money. The country is losing money. The citizens of this country are paying tax. And we are here to protect that money.' ActionSA's Dereleen James said she understood that the beneficiaries of 'these opportunities'(presumably the training initiative that Psira was involved in, and the focus of Wednesday's meeting) were usually between the ages of 18 and 35 years old. 'How does this affect our communities – what has happened here today?' she asked. 'We cannot just sit and accept that the youth of this country has been disadvantaged because of corruption and because of lack of leadership,' James said. DM
