Indian Woman Arrested For Smuggling 1 Kg Gold At Nepal Airport: Cops
Kathmandu:
An Indian woman has been arrested with over one kilogramme of undeclared gold from Tribhuvan International Airport in Kathmandu, Nepal police said.
The airport security arrested Meena Surjeet Singh Khemani on Tuesday night with 1 kg 59 grams of gold in a semi-liquid form, on arrival from Sharjah on board an Air Arabia flight, police said.
The gold was recovered wrapped in plastic from her belongings during the security check, police added.
The police have initiated a further investigation into the matter after taking her into custody.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
36 minutes ago
- Indian Express
ED summoning counsel while investigation is legally untenable
'The first great quality of an advocate was 'to reckon everything subordinate to the interests of his client…'', the Supreme Court of India said in the late 1970s, citing an 86-year-old Lord Brougham, a Whig parliamentarian who later became Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain. In a world rife with jokes about the difference between lawyers and liars, the Indian courts have consistently maintained their emphatic holding of that day: That lawyers are in a 'highly fiduciary', 'very delicate', and 'exacting' relationship of 'confidential character' with their clients. Yet today, this would appear far from reality. Within a week, we read that two senior counsels were served with summons by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED). Both summons concern legal advice given to M/s Care Health Insurance regarding Employee Stock Ownership Plans issued to Rashmi Saluja, the former chair of Religare Enterprises. Bar associations registered their protest. 'The ED's action conflates legal advice with criminal complicity, a proposition that is constitutionally untenable and legally unjustifiable…' the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association wrote. The ED's (non-investigative) powers Of particular concern is the fact that the summons has been issued by the ED, which enforces the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. PMLA proceedings require the existence of a 'predicate' offence, such as, say, extortion, cheating, etc. Only then can the proceeds of such a crime be brought within its reach. In July 2022, a three-judge bench of the Supreme Court in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary vs Union of India famously recognised this rule. However, they also found the ED's powers of arrest, search and seizure, and the PMLA's inversion of the typical due-process principle 'innocent until proven guilty' to be constitutional. Central to the Court's reasoning was the idea that the PMLA is a regulatory and not a penal law, that the ED's powers to issue summons are towards an 'inquiry' and not an 'investigation'. Thus, the ED is not comparable to the police forces entrusted with the responsibility to investigate crimes. A review petition and other petitions requesting that this judgment be reconsidered by a larger bench are currently pending, as are petitions questioning the validity of provisions of the PMLA itself. Parallelly, the SC continues to rely on Vijay Madanlal to find that ordinary criminal justice protections that are due to those being tried under criminal law (as well as witnesses involved in such trials) do not extend to those summoned by the ED. The ambit of the PMLA has been widened through notifications issued in May 2023, which now classify professionals — such as chartered accountants and company secretaries carrying out certain types of financial transactions on behalf of their clients — as reporting entities. A reporting entity is required to maintain records of all transactions and of documents proving their clients' identities, as well as carry out due diligence on their clients. This heightened obligation imposed on professionals, albeit notably not lawyers, is under challenge before the Delhi High Court. Lawyers have remained outside such expansive powers for a reason. The attorney-client privilege Simply put, it is illegal to compel a lawyer to disclose legal advice given to their client. This proposition finds its foundation in Section 132, on 'professional communication', of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, but it goes back at least as far as 1872, when the Indian Evidence Act came into force. The specific elements of legal advice that are privileged are communication, and the contents and the condition of documents exchanged. The only way such privilege can be overridden is if the client expressly permits it. There are two exceptions to this rule. First, any communication that furthers 'any illegal purpose.' Second, observations that 'any crime or fraud has been committed since the commencement of his service.' This is to say that the lawyer must either aid or abet an illegal undertaking or be somehow complicit in an undertaking she discovers to be criminal or fraudulent in the course of her engagement with the client. An investigating authority that aims to compel disclosure of privileged information by a lawyer needs to at the very least show demonstrably one of these circumstances. The mere prospect of there being potential illegality that might later emerge, unbeknownst to the lawyer, certainly does not fall within this limited exception. This is not some kind of special privilege that lawyers enjoy to do as they like. It is far from it. The privilege is that of the client, or of every individual who may need legal assistance. The idea is to secure an independent and fair judicial process during their day in court. The only way such a judicial process may be guaranteed is if lawyers may put forth the best defence in law, which is only possible if they can elicit the full truth from their clients. Lawyers know all too well that violations of attorney-client privilege can invite unhappy consequences, not least a finding of professional misconduct. This ties up the question before us. According to the SC precedent, the ED lacks police powers, and thus it cannot do what investigating authorities typically may. Can any law then support the ED's claim to overriding attorney-client privilege on the mere prospect of there being some potential illegality — yet to be demonstrated by an investigating authority — in the affairs of the client? And if it indeed can, shouldn't everyone implicated in an ED proceeding be at the very least assured the protection of ordinary due process and criminal justice? The writer is a lawyer and constitutional law researcher working on federalism. Hariom Tiwari supported her in research
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Delhi Judge Cash Row: SC Probe Panel Report Says Misconduct Proved, Proposes Justice Varma's Removal
A Supreme Court-appointed panel has recommended the removal of Justice Yashwant Varma after finding 'clear and serious misconduct' linked to a late-night fire at his Delhi residence. The panel cited strong evidence of large amounts of burnt cash and suspicious removal of currency soon after the fire. Justice Varma's explanations and his daughter's testimony were found inconsistent. Following the report, former CJI Sanjiv Khanna had written to the President and the Prime Minister, calling for impeachment, marking a critical test of transparency in the Indian judiciary.#justiceyashwantvarma #delhihighcourt #judgeimpeachment #judicialmisconduct #burntcash #supremecourt #sanjivkhanna #impeachment #judicialintegrity #publictrust #indianjudiciary #courtscandal #legalnews #indiajustice #judicialaccountability #firecontroversy #varmafire #delhicourt #judiciaryscandal #cashscandal #highcourt #legalethics #indiajudiciary #judicialprobe #explainer #toi #toibharat Read More
United News of India
an hour ago
- United News of India
Indian student dies in Canada, reason unclear
New Delhi, June 20 (UNI) An Indian student, Tanya Tyagi, of Calgary University in Canada has died, the Indian Consulate in Vancouver said. The Consulate did not give reason for death but said it is in touch with the authorities and will provide all assistance to the bereaved family. 'We are saddened by the sudden demise of Ms. Tanya Tyagi, an Indian student at University of Calgary. The Consulate is in touch with the authorities and will provide all required assistance to the bereaved family. Our heartfelt condolences and prayers are with his family and friends of the deceased,' the Consulate said in a post on X. Tanya was pursuing her Masters in Food Safety and Quality in Canada. While the cause of her death is unknown as the Indian Consulate has not said anything, a post on X by one Ishu Tyagi (advicate) while appealing for help said Tanya had died of 'heart attack' on June 17. He said Tanya was a resident of Ṇortheast Delhi and had gone to Canada for studies. Tanya's family has appealed to the Prime Minister for bringing her body back home. Tanya's death follows several incidents involving Indian students in Canada in recent months. In April, 21 year old Vanshika Saini who had been missing for four days, was found dead near a beach in Ottawa. UNI RB GNK 1706
