Why Gilgit-Baltistan protesters have blocked highway linking Pakistan with China

Protests have intensified in Pakistan-occupied Gilgit-Baltistan, as local traders blocked the Karakoram Highway for a third day on Sunday. The demonstrators are protesting the suspension of trade between Pakistan and China at Khunjerab Pass since December last year. This is not the first time locals have taken to the streets over the government's policies read more
Gilgit-Baltistan locals blocked the Karakoram Highway during a protest over Pakistan's trade policy. File Image/Reuters
Protests have erupted in Pakistan-occupied Gilgit-Baltistan against the Shehbaz Sharif-led government's trade policies. As agitation escalated, demonstrators blocked the Karakoram Highway (KKH), a key artery of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), on Sunday (June 1).
Several protests have been reported in Gilgit-Baltistan in recent months, including over the power crisis. But why are locals protesting now?
We will explain.
Locals protest in Gilgit-Baltistan
Local importers and exporters have been staging protests, backed by political parties, in Pakistan-occupied Gilgit-Baltistan . The sit-in entered its third day on Sunday when protesters blocked the Karakoram Highway, disrupting traffic, as per a Dawn report.
The 1,300 km Karakoram Highway connects the Hasan Abdal city near Pakistan's Islamabad to Kashgar in China's autonomous Xinjiang region through the Khunjerab Pass.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Thousands of passengers and tourists were stranded on both sides of the highway for hours on Sunday, as long queues of vehicles were reported due to the protests.
The Pak-China Traders Action Comm­it­tee, a group consisting of the Gilgit-Baltistan Impor­ters and Exporters Asso­ciation, Gilgit-Nagar Cham­ber of Commerce, and small trade associations from Nagar, Hunza and Gilgit, called the sit-in protest. Traders, scholars, and civil society members from these areas participated in the weekend agitation.
Protesters have threatened to keep blocking the road linking Pakistan to China until their demands are met.
Why are locals protesting?
Protesters in Gilgit-Baltistan have taken to the streets against 'exploitative policies' of Pakistan's Federal Board of Revenue (FBR), reported Dawn.
Traders are demonstrating against the suspension of trade between Pakistan and China for the past six months.
The protest leaders claim more than 200 consignments imported from China are stuck at the Sost Dry port in Gilgit-Baltistan, with items worth billions of rupees already expired.
Traders are calling for their clearance under a 'one-time amnesty scheme', citing losses.
They allege the policies of FBR and Customs at Sost Dry Port have 'economically murdered' locals.
The protesters said the trade between China and Pakistan through the Khunjerab Pass was the biggest source of income for locals, adding that the suspension of trade has rendered them unemployed.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Stranded trucks stand along the Karakoram Highway, blocked by residents during a sit-in protest against power outages in Khaplu city, in Pakistan-occupied Gilgit-Baltistan region, on January 7, 2025. File Photo/AFP
Local traders have to pay all taxes and customs duties on imported goods despite the disputed status of Gilgit-Baltistan .
The president of PML-N Nagar chapter, Javed Hussain, slammed the Pakistan government, alleging it was 'not serious in settling the issue'. As per Dawn, he said trade policies at other ports in Pakistan were eased beca­use 'people of those areas have representation in parliament'.
'GB people have been paying all taxes, yet the FBR is reluctant to clear their consignments.
'The government of Pakistan even gave amnesty to high-profile terrorists. So, giving a one-time amnesty to clear 250 consignments after paying taxes was not a big demand,' Hussain reportedly said.
The Gilgit-Baltistan government told the protesters their demands were 'genuine', but the issue concerned the federal government led by Sharif.
Recent protests in Gilgit-Baltistan
In April, Gilgit-Baltistan witnessed widespread protests over land and mineral grabs and power outages.
Hundreds of locals hit the streets against the Pakistan Army and government. They denounced the proposed Mines and Minerals Bill, saying it would enable the seizure of their land and minerals.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'The mountains, rivers, and minerals are ours. We are the custodians of this land, and we will not allow exploitation without our consent,' a protester said at the time, as per India Today.
In January, hundreds of trucks with goods were stranded at the CPEC dry port as the Karakoram Highway was closed due to a sit-in protest against long power cuts.
Last September, protests emerged in Gilgit-Baltistan as locals opposed the government's plan to reduce the quantity of subsidised wheat flour and eventually put an end to the subsidy.
With inputs from agencies

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Hindustan Times

33 minutes ago

• Hindustan Times

Jagan slams CM Naidu over 'restrictions' during Rentapalla visit

Amaravati, YSRCP supremo YS Jagan Mohan Reddy on Monday questioned Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu on why the TDP-led NDA government allegedly imposed restrictions on his recent visit to Rentapalla to ensure that "people would not turn up." Jagan slams CM Naidu over 'restrictions' during Rentapalla visit On June 18, Reddy visited Rentapalla village in Palnadu district to call on the family members of a party leader who had died by suicide a year ago due to alleged "harassment by TDP leaders and police." Though police gave permission for a limited number of vehicles and only about 100 people for this visit, many vehicles joined Reddy's convoy, and thousands of people swarmed all along the way from Tadepalli to Rentapalla. Further, a YSRCP supporter, C Singayya, allegedly fell under a vehicle and died in that melee at Etuku Cross. Guntur district superintendent of police S Satish initially said that Singayya fell under a private vehicle, but not under Reddy's convoy. However, on Sunday night, he said that Singayya was actually "run over" by the vehicle being used by Reddy, leading to the registration of a police case against Reddy and others. Amidst this backdrop, the former CM questioned if the erstwhile YSRCP government had imposed such restrictions during the visits of Naidu and Janasena chief Pawan Kalyan between 2019 and 2024. 'Chandrababu, why did you impose restrictions on my tour to ensure that nobody would turn up? Did we impose these kinds of restrictions when you and Pawan Kalyan were touring?' Reddy asked in a post on 'X'. Reddy questioned why opposition leaders like him are allegedly being stopped from visiting their party workers and expressing solidarity with farmers and citizens. Though he "followed all the rules" and gave prior information about his visit to the authorities, Reddy alleged that the state failed to provide the necessary security arrangements. Reddy emphasised that Z security for a former chief minister is not a favour but a protocol-based right, adding that just as it applied to Naidu in the past, it should apply to anyone in the future. "Why were there no pilot vehicles or rope parties deployed during my visit, which are part of the standard Z security protocol?" asked the YSRCP chief. If the security arrangements were in place, Reddy questioned, "How could anyone have come under his vehicle," and demanded clarity. "Did the government fail to provide security, or is the claim that someone was run over false?" he asked. Alleging that the government did not provide a bulletproof vehicle, which is mandatory under protocol, Reddy said he arranged one for himself at his own expense. Further, the opposition leader referred to Guntur SP's initial statement on Singayya's incident and demanded to know "why the narrative was later changed and politicised." He accused the ruling coalition of using this tragic incident as a distraction from their governance failures. Observing that he had only held a press conference to expose the alleged "unfulfilled promises, corruption, and financial damage done by the current regime," Reddy alleged that the NDA alliance government has launched diversionary tactics instead of responding with accountability. On learning about Singayya's death, Reddy said he immediately instructed his party leaders to provide help, along with ₹ 10 lakh compensation to the victim's family. He reminded that another supporter had also died due to a heart attack during the same tour, and similar support was extended to that family as well. Reddy asserted that these actions show the value he places on his supporters and questioned Naidu's response in similar situations. He criticised the TDP for allegedly spreading lies and questioned their moral authority to speak about humanity and ethics. Moreover, Reddy called on Naidu to mend his ways, act with responsibility, and "stop using political power to suppress the opposition." Meanwhile, Home Minister Vangalapudi Anitha accused Reddy of continuing his tour even after two people had lost their lives. The police had informed YSRCP leaders that the road was only 10 feet wide and that security could be provided for only 100 people, including his convoy and three vehicles, she said. Despite intelligence reports suggesting that the YSRCP was mobilising cadres, police extended maximum security, keeping in mind Reddy's Z status, said the Home Minister. "No one who commits a crime in the state will escape the law under any circumstances," she added. She further alleged that Reddy's supporter in Rentapalla village had died a year ago due to gambling, questioning the need for his visit. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

Indian Express

37 minutes ago

• Indian Express

Statistics ministry to conduct first-ever household income survey in 2026

The Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MoSPI) will conduct the first-ever Household Income Survey in 2026, with a Technical Expert Group (TEG) being set up to guide the ministry on the method of estimation and other aspects of the survey. In addition to measuring household income, the proposed survey will also try to assess the impact of adoption of technology on wages, the statistics ministry said on Monday. The survey will be MoSPI's latest attempt to measure household income in India, with pilots conducted in the past not resulting in a nationwide survey due to difficulties in collecting reliable income data, the ministry said. These past attempts date back to the 1950s, when it tried to collect information on income as part of its consumer expenditure surveys on an experimental basis. Further attempts were made in the 1960s as part of the Integrated Household Survey. 'However, these efforts were not continued as it was found that the estimates of income were lower than the estimates of consumption and savings put together,' MoSPI said. In the 1980s, it was again explored if it was operationally feasible to collect household income data, but it did not lead to a national survey. 'Recently, NSS (National Sample Survey) has taken a number of initiatives to plug-in the data gaps in different spheres of social and economic interests… The household income survey is another important initiative of the Ministry to generate vital information for deriving income distribution and welfare thereof,' MoSPI said. It added that there was an 'urgent need' for a dedicated income distribution survey 'to better understand the profound structural changes that have occurred in the Indian economy over the past 75 years'. According to MoSPI's latest Gross Domestic Product (GDP) data, India's per capita gross national income in 2024-25 was Rs 2.31 lakh in current prices, up 8.7 per cent from 2023-24. Surjit Bhalla-led expert group The expert group constituted on Monday will be chaired by economist Surjit Bhalla, formerly India's Executive Director at the International Monetary Fund and a part-time member of the Economic Advisory Council to the Prime Minister. In addition to Bhalla and officials from MoSPI and other government ministries, the expert group comprises of Aloke Kar, former professor at Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, Sonalde Desai of National Council of Applied Economic Research, Praveen Jha from Jawaharlal Nehru University's Centre for Economic Studies and Planning, Srijit Mishra from University of Hyderabad's School of Economics, National Stock Exchange of India Chief Economist Tirthankar Patnaik, People Research on India's Consumer Economy Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer Rajesh Shukla, and Ram Singh, Director of Delhi School of Economics and an external member of the Reserve Bank of India's Monetary Policy Committee. 'The Expert Group will provide guidance with regard to finalisation of concepts and definitions, preparation of the survey method and instruments, sampling design and method of estimation, and incorporate best country practices as adopted across the world… The TEG will also provide guidance for finalisation of the survey results and report for release,' MoSPI said. MoSPI, over the last couple of years, has conducted a variety of surveys to shed light on different parts of the Indian economy in addition to the regular ones that are used to compile key macroeconomic indicators such as GDP, Consumer Price Index, and Index of Industrial Production. These include annual surveys on unincorporated enterprises, the service sector, a forward-looking survey on private sector capital expenditure, and domestic travel and tourism, among others. Last month, the ministry released the result of its maiden monthly Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS), which had so far been conducted only on a quarterly basis for urban areas and annually for rural areas. The revamped monthly PLFS also seeks details about households' usual monthly income from rent, pension, interest, and remittances. However, the findings related to these details have so far not been released. Some of the key surveys whose results will be released over the next few months include the Annual Survey of Industries for 2023-24 and Household Social Consumption: Health. Siddharth Upasani is a Deputy Associate Editor with The Indian Express. He reports primarily on data and the economy, looking for trends and changes in the former which paint a picture of the latter. Before The Indian Express, he worked at Moneycontrol and financial newswire Informist (previously called Cogencis). Outside of work, sports, fantasy football, and graphic novels keep him busy. ... Read More

NDTV

an hour ago

• NDTV

Ayatollah Khamenei Asks Putin To Do More For Iran After US Air Strikes

Iran's Supreme Leader sent his foreign minister to Moscow on Monday to ask President Vladimir Putin for more help from Russia after the biggest US military action against the Islamic Republic since the 1979 revolution over the weekend. US President Donald Trump and Israel have publicly speculated about killing Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and about regime change, a step Russia fears could sink the Middle East into the abyss. While Putin has condemned the Israeli strikes, he is yet to comment on the US attacks on Iranian nuclear sites, though he last week called for calm and offered Moscow's services as a mediator over the nuclear programme. A senior source told Reuters that Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi was due to deliver a letter from Khamenei to Putin, seeking the latter's support. Iran has not been impressed with Russia's support so far, Iranian sources told Reuters, and the country wants Putin to do more to back it against Israel and the United States. The sources did not elaborate on what assistance Tehran wanted. The Kremlin said that Putin would receive Araqchi but did not say what would be discussed. Araqchi was quoted by the state TASS news agency as saying that Iran and Russia were coordinating their positions on the current escalation in the Middle East. Putin has repeatedly offered to mediate between the United States and Iran, and said that he had conveyed Moscow's ideas on resolving the conflict to them while ensuring Iran's continued access to civil nuclear energy. The Kremlin chief last week refused to discuss the possibility that Israel and the United States would kill Khamenei. Putin said that Israel had given Moscow assurances that Russian specialists helping to build two more reactors at the Bushehr nuclear power plant in Iran would not be hurt in air strikes. Russia, a longstanding ally of Tehran, plays a role in Iran's nuclear negotiations with the West as a veto-wielding U.N. Security Council member and a signatory to an earlier nuclear deal Trump abandoned during his first term in 2018. But Putin, whose army is fighting a major war of attrition in Ukraine for the fourth year, has so far shown little appetite in public for diving into a confrontation with the United States over Iran just as Trump seeks to repair ties with Moscow.