Courier readers hit out over Swallow Roundabout chaos

Readers have hit out over chaos at the Swallow Roundabout in Dundee after complaints about the traffic lights and road markings.
The Courier told on Thursday how Carse of Gowrie councillor Angus Forbes is writing to the Scottish Government to highlight people's concerns about delays and safety fears at the newly reshaped junction.
It comes as drivers have faced long queues on the A90 Dundee-bound approach to the roundabout since the lights were activated in March, while road markings are also causing confusion.
The changes were made in an attempt to accommodate extra traffic at the Dykes of Gray housing development.
Dozens of people expressed their frustration over the changes in response to our story.
On The Courier's website, user 'Shaz' said: 'Our journey time has nearly doubled at the roundabout.
'I understand why it's been done but it's not working as it should – not sure what needs done.'
'Bob' posted: 'Have you ever noticed how well the traffic flows around the train station (at Dundee Waterfront) on the odd occasion the traffic lights are not working, the same with filtering off the Tay (Road) Bridge?
'Switch the traffic lights off and watch how quickly the traffic will flow through the new layout.
'(There will be) no manufactured build-up caused by an unnecessary light change at a set of lights where no car is waiting.'
'DundeeRocks' said: 'I think they would have been better leaving the roundabout as it was and putting in slip roads for merging traffic, especially from Riverside to Perth.
'The lanes are not wide enough, they are narrow and all over the place.
'Even during non-busy times you are stuck for a while, not sure why they didn't leave it alone, Myrekirk is a disaster as well.'
The road markings, which were criticised by drivers as far back as December, are continuing to cause problems, according to some.
'One foot in the grave' said: 'Coming from Perth, the outside lane has an arrow showing straight on then changes after the lights to show right turn only.
'To continue north you would have to cross over in front of vehicles.
'When you are there car horns are going constantly. There must be so many near accidents.'
On The Courier's Facebook page, John Waller said: 'Seems to be a hobby of all councils these days, they have put lights on a few roundabouts in Dunfermline lately too and it's a total pain.
'Roundabouts were designed to ensure smooth running of roads at junctions, now it just looks like a way to waste money.'
Kenny Maclean wrote: 'It's absolutely rubbish now.
'I regularly use this roundabout and up until the improvements it ran very smoothly.
'Now it's tailbacks and very poor lane signage coming from Perth.
'I've seen quite a few having to ride round the roundabout because they were stuck in the wrong lane.
'It's definitely a step backwards.'
On the Evening Telegraph's Facebook page, Alan Jackson branded the changes a 'disaster'.
He said: 'Before the lights were installed, the signage was wrong.
'I thought, maybe when the lights were completed they would amend the signage – but they left it.
'The new road layout is incorrect. I am on it most days and constantly see drivers using the lanes incorrectly according to the new incompetent signage.'
Scotty Gorrie posted: 'The only improvement it has made is the traffic from Liff getting an opportunity to get out now.
'However, the lights should be on green much longer on the main trunk road as it's causing major tailbacks. Total shambles.'
And 'Bm Scotland' wrote: 'Why did they do this in (the) first place? The road has flowed perfectly for decades – no build-up, no accidents.'
Springfield, the housing developer that oversaw the work at the roundabout, says the design was signed off by specialists and authorities including Transport Scotland, and that the lights were 'specifically requested' by Dundee City Council.
Transport Scotland says it will respond to Mr Forbes in due course.
Dundee City Council has not replied to a request for comment.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Scotsman

a day ago

• Scotsman

The £20 car engine fine that has been dished out just once in over 3 years and is angering campaigners

Only one motorist has been penalised in more than three years with this £20 fine. Sign up for the latest news and analysis about Scottish transport Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Calls for an increase in the £20 fine for drivers leaving their engines running while parked have been rejected by ministers, angering backers of tougher measures. The decision came despite a coalition of 20 environmental, health and transport organisations and unions seeking a four-fold rise in penalties to £80 per fine. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Motorists can be fined for leaving their engines idle if they refuse to switch off | Contributed They said only one fine had been issued in Scotland over the past three-and-a-half years despite 1,158 complaints to more than 20 councils. Fines were introduced in 2003, but drivers can only be charged if they refuse to switch off their engine when asked. City of Edinburgh transport convener Stephen Jenkinson, who was among those calling for an increased deterrent, said fines were too low to change motorists' behaviour. He said: 'At this stage, the Scottish Government is not looking to allow local authorities to increase the charge, and that's a problem. The fine is not sufficient to make the behavioural change that we are looking to see. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'From the Scottish Government's perspective, when people are asked, they will change their behaviour. But I've not seen any evidence to back that up. 'You always need a little bit of stick to go with your carrot, and the fact the fine has never increased since it was introduced shows it's not really a priority for the Scottish Government.' Mr Jenkinson said enforcement was made more difficult because it could only be done by council officials with other duties like dog fouling - not by parking attendants who deal with problem parking. However, he said the council would redouble efforts to crack down on vehicle idling around schools. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A poster for the Engine Off, Every Stop campaign in London | Contributed The convener said: 'The evidence would suggest children are more affected by particulate matter from idling vehicles' emissions than adults because they are closer to it as they are lower down, and their lungs aren't developed sufficiently to handle the fumes. 'We do need to have a focus on that area. I need to encourage officers to ensure they are tackling vehicle idling predominately at our education estates as a priority.' David Hunter, convener of the Edinburgh group of pedestrian campaigners Living Streets, said: "If the Scottish Government's concern about air quality justifies the creation of low emission zones, it makes no sense whatsoever to freeze penalties for engine idling for decades. 'Penalties must be sufficiently high to make it economic for councils to enforce legislation.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad John Adeolu, community project manager of the Edinburgh Air Pollution Programme, said: 'While increasing the fine level could help deter this behaviour, it will not make the difference we need unless it is backed by visible and consistent enforcement.' Scottish Greens MSP Mark Ruskell said: 'Increasing the fine for idling is a positive step towards reducing transport emissions, but it must be part of action plans by councils to drive down pollution, including an expansion of low emission zones.' Net Zero and Energy Secretary Gillian Martin said evidence from councils 'suggest the vast majority of idling drivers switch off their engines when requested and therefore very few fixed penalties are issued'. 'With this being the case, we have no current plans to increase the level of fines for engine idling,' she said.

Daily Record

3 days ago

• Daily Record

North Ayrshire Tory claims 20mph limit is part of 'climate change madness'

He said the policy was all about pleasing the Scottish Government. Bold efforts by the North Ayrshire Tory Group to put the brakes on the Cabinet's support of the Scottish Government's National Strategy for 20mph in Urban areas and approve the implementation of 20mph speed limits stalled on Thursday. At a fiery meeting of the Audit and Scrutiny Committee, the Conservative Group asked Cabinet to: Suspend the implementation of the 20mph speed limit across all roads, pending the outcome of a full review of cost effectiveness, enforceability, and public consultation and to commission an impact assessment as well as taking feedback from a public consultation. ‌ Supporting the call-in, North Coast cllr Todd Ferguson said he had been contacted by local business and constituents concerned about the plans. ‌ He said: 'As Conservatives we fully support efforts on road safety but believe they must be targeted, evidence-based and proportionate and what is being suggested for the blanket 20mph limit simply does not meet that criteria. 'In North Ayrshire road fatalities remain consistently low although one death is one death too many. 'UK wide we see that when you change signs it limits reduction of speed by only one mile per hour and that changes to 10mph if you include traffic calming but that is not being proposed. 'We had success in Burnhouse and Gateside in getting changes to speed but it did not change behaviour - you had a driver going at 90mph in Burnhouse. We need enforcement but resources are already stretched." Tory Group Leader Cameron Inglis suggested the policy was "smoke and mirrors" and was all about pleasing the Scottish Government by persuading people to stop using their cars as "part of this climate change madness". Tony Gurney, Cabinet member for the Environment and Green Economy said: 'This is more than a transport policy - it's an investment in public safety. ‌ 'This is not a blanket, it has been consulted throughout North Ayrshire. Implementation is recommended only where we see a clear safety benefit. We will implement 20mph zones and that is an opportunity for enforcement by police. 'It is not about flowing traffic, it is about safety. According to the Department of Transport the chances of pedestrians being killed more than halves when speed is reduced to 20mph from 30mph. "A child hit by a car has a one in five chance of dying in 30mph in 20mph drops dramatically to one in 40. ‌ 'The British Medical Journal links 20mph to a 40 per cent reduction in road casualties. "Lives are saved, injuries prevented, NHS costs reduced. Lower speeds give drivers time to react. That extra second can be different between a close call and a tragedy." Independent cllr Donald L Reid said: "I was in office with the Police from 1967 to 1999 and this encompasses what it is all about, speed kills. ‌ "Anything we can do to reduce speed must be a priority. If we can keep speed down to 20mph that is sensible and with a bit of hard work we can probably achieve this. "We saw how drink driving became unacceptable, how wearing seatbelts became the norm and helmets for cyclists and motorcyclists helped save many lives, I don't see how we can't make our streets safer.' A motion to reject the call-in, allowing the policy to stand, defeated an amendment by the Tory Group to accept the call-in and send the matter back to the cabinet for further consideration by six votes to three.

Scotsman

4 days ago

• Scotsman

Level of support for A96 dualling revealed as ministers renew commitment to £5bn scheme

Bypasses of Elgin and Keith among popular priorities Sign up for the latest news and analysis about Scottish transport Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Ministers have renewed their commitment to fully dual the A96 between Aberdeen and Inverness as a consultation showed nearly two-thirds support and bypasses of Elgin and Keith seen as the priorities. However, Transport Secretary Fiona Hyslop has still to decide whether to go ahead with the full scheme or parts of it, which was largely put on hold as part of an SNP-Scottish Greens power-sharing deal in 2021, which ended last year. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 86 miles of the A96 between Aberdeen and Inverurie remain single carriageway | Google Street View The Scottish Conservatives pointed to 76 per cent dissatisfaction with a subsequent review of the scheme that included partial dualling as showing people wanted the full route upgraded. Transport Scotland published the results of a three month consultation into a range of improvements costing up to £1 billion on Thursday which attracted 1,441 responses. An 86-mile section between Inverness and south of Inverurie remains single carriageway. In November, Ms Hyslop abandoned the target of dualling it by 2030 at an estimated cost of up to £5bn. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The Scottish Government agency said 63 per cent expressed support for full dualling, although that wasn't specifically asked in the consultation questionnaire. Specific measures which received the greatest support were dual carriageway bypasses of Elgin and Keith, road safety improvements and upgrades to the Aberdeen-Inverness railway line, which runs largely parallel to the road. Ms Hyslop said: 'The position of the Scottish Government has not changed – the current favoured position is to fully dual the A96 and we are already starting the dualling process from Inverness to Nairn, including a Nairn bypass, having acquired the land for the scheme earlier this year. 'I have now received the report on the feedback gathered during the consultation and will be considering the findings alongside the review's extensive appraisal and assessment work before a decision is made on improvements to the A96 corridor. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Any decision on the way ahead for the A96 corridor will need to take into consideration the UK Government's recent Spending Review and its impact on Scottish budgets, and the forthcoming update to the Scottish Government's Infrastructure Investment Plan, expected later this year.' Scottish Conservatives North East MSP Douglas Lumsden said: 'These results categorically show what everyone wants and that's for the A96 to finally be dualled. 'It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know this needs to happen, which is why this consultation was a ploy by the SNP to kick any decision into another parliamentary term. 'This sends an emphatic message to the SNP government to stop playing games with the lives of motorists and fulfil their promise of upgrading the A96 between Aberdeen and Inverness. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'It's scandalous that 14 years after they vowed to do this, the SNP still won't commit to upgrading the Aberdeenshire section or building a bypass for Inverurie.' But Transform Scotland director Colin Howden said: "The Scottish Government's transport capital investment is already horribly skewed towards vastly expensive road projects that simply don't stand up to scrutiny.