Pritzker unleashes on ‘political circus'

Presented by
Good morning, Illinois, and welcome to Friday the 13th.
NEW OVERNIGHT: Israel launches strike against Iran, by POLITICO's Eric Bazail-Eimil and Nahal Toosi
TOP TALKER
AN AHA MOMENT: For much of Thursday's nearly eight-hour, contentious hearing before the U.S. House Oversight Committee, Gov. JB Pritzker sat quietly and spoke only when a question was directed his way.
He defended Illinois laws that protect immigrants and reiterated he wants undocumented criminals kicked out of the country.
The governor didn't always agree with the premise of the questions, but he tried to answer as completely and politely as possible.
When Texas Republican Rep. Brandon Gill pivoted from immigration to talk about transgender issues, a talking point for Republicans in the 2024 election, Pritzker didn't miss a beat, saying, 'So, you're admitting this is just a political circus?'
Later, Colorado Republican Rep. Lauren Boebert asked Pritzker and fellow Democratic Govs. Tim Walz and Kathy Hochul of Minnesota and New York, respectively, whether damage to property is the 'definition of a peaceful protest.'
It was a pointed question. Boebert was referring to protests in Los Angeles and across the country that are pushing back at the Trump administration's aggressive immigration enforcement.
Pritzker couldn't contain his anger. 'I find it hard to believe that you're lecturing us about peaceful protests,' he said. 'Look at what happened Jan. 6 here at the Capitol.'
Boebert tried to interrupt, but Pritzker persisted. That was 'insurrection,' he said, and pointing to the irony of her question, he said, 'It is outrageous.' Their exchange is here.
Pritzker didn't hold back after that, criticizing questions he found misleading or inaccurate, especially when they were posed by Illinois Republican Reps. Mary Miller and Darin LaHood, who joined the Oversight Committee as guests so they could question Pritzker.
Miller asked the governor if he would continue 'tying the hands of Illinois law enforcement,' a reference to Illinois law that prevents local police from assisting with federal immigration efforts.
Pritzker bristled: 'You know, Congresswoman Miller, I am not going to be lectured to by somebody who extolled the virtues of Adolf Hitler,' Pritzker said, referring to comments she made just ahead of the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol (and later apologized for). Their exchange is here.
LaHood used his time to talk about what he sees as Pritzker's failings as governor, including 'families struggling with the highest combined state and local tax burden in the country.'
Pritzker leaned in, saying, 'I'm glad to see you here. I know you were unwilling to meet with your constituents about the Medicaid cuts that you voted for.' The two then talked over each other for LaHood's remaining time. Here's a clip.
More congenial were Pritzker's exchanges with Reps. Raja Krishnamoorthi, Delia Ramirez and Danny Davis. They are all Democrats and allowed the governor to offer up more thoughtful answers.
The Padilla moment: Ramirez used her time to also call attention to a video that was posted during the hearing. It showed California Sen. Alex Padilla being forcibly removed from a Department of Homeland Security press conference in Los Angeles. Here's more, via POLITICO.
'I cannot believe the disrespect that was shown to a United States senator,' Pritzker
RELATED
— The focus was 'sanctuary' immigration policies, but GOP lawmakers used the hearing to needle Dem governors on politics, by Emily Ngo, Elena Schneider and your Playbook host
— Pritzker defends Illinois' sanctuary laws, blasts Trump administration 'abuses of power,' by WGN 9's Tahman Bradley and BJ Lutz
— It was a marathon hearing with political theatrics on full display, by Lee Enterprises' Brenden Moore
— Pritzker uses House hearing to defend Illinois' sanctuary laws and to slam Congress for not passing immigration reforms, by the Tribune's Rick Pearson and freelancer Daniel C. Vock
— How JB Pritzker's faith and Holocaust work are powering his dire warnings about Trump, by The Christian Science Monitor's Cameron Joseph
WHERE'S JB
No official public events
WHERE's BRANDON
At Chicago State University at 11 a.m. for the Metra Station groundbreaking
Where's Toni
No official public events
Have a tip, suggestion, birthday, new job or a (gasp!) complaint? Email skapos@politico.com
THE STATEWIDES
— Secretary of state's office says law enforcement using license plate reader data illegally: 'While license plate readers can be used by law enforcement to investigate violent felonies and missing person cases, the state law also prohibits use of the data for matters including aiding in the detention or investigation of a person based on their immigration status -- and it can't interfere with someone's abortion rights,' by the Tribune's Jeremy Gorner.
— Michael Madigan due in court Friday for sentencing on corruption convictions, by the Sun-Times' Jon Seidel
— Calls to the Illinois domestic violence hotline were up again in 2024, by the Sun-Times' Sophie Sherry
CHICAGO
— 100 students in a school meant for 1,000: Inside Chicago's refusal to deal with its nearly empty schools: 'Declining school enrollment has left 30% of Chicago public schools at least half-empty. The city's failure to address this problem has come at a high cost to the district — and its students,' by Chalkbeat's Mila Koumpilova and ProPublica's Jennifer Smith Richards.
— DEEP DIVE: A Black girl endured racist bullying in a mostly white Chicago school. Did CPS do enough? by the Sun-Times' Nader Issa and WBEZ's Sarah Karp
— Rideshare pay ordinance stalls — but the fight's not over: 'A scheduled vote on the ordinance [was] delayed at the request of some members of the City Council who want more information and are hesitant to support a measure that's drawn fierce opposition from the business community,' by Crain's Justin Laurence.
— Chicago Police Supt. Larry Snelling tells judge he would 'never use' snap curfew powers, by WBEZ's Mariah Woelfel
— Chicago police say they don't 'assist in immigration enforcement' but have turned over key records to feds, by the Sun-Times' Tom Schuba
— Chicagoans continue protests against Trump and ICE Thursday, by the Tribune's Caroline Kubzansky, Laura Rodríguez Presa and Nell Salzman
BUSINESS OF POLITICS
— In IL-08: Hanover Park Trustee Yasmeen Bankole has been endorsed by the International Brothers of Electrical Workers Local 701.
— SPOTTED: Cook County Commissioner and IL-08 congressional candidate Kevin Morrison drew a crowd for his annual Pride event at Sidetrack earlier this week. Among the 100 attendees were State Rep. Kelly Cassidy and Candace Gingrich, Alds. Bennett Lawson and Lamont Robinson, Judges Jesse Reyes and Ed Underhill, Kane County Board Member Alex Arroyo and MWRD Commissioners Precious Brady-Davis and Dan Pogorzelski.
— Christopher Espinoza, a District 99 school board member, is running for DuPage County Board for the 2nd District seat now held by Yeena Yoo, who is running for DuPage County treasurer. Espinoza has been endorsed by board members Greg Schwarze and Andrew Honig, among others. The full list is here.
TAKING NAMES
— Illinois Senate President Don Harmon was presented with the Simon Wiesenthal Center's Government Leadership Award on Thursday. Todd Stern, CEO of Enfield Capital Partners and Executive Vice Chairman at AccentCare, received the group's Humanitarian Award. And actress Patricia Heaton and entrepreneur Kareem K.W.O.E. Wells, known as the 'King of Mitzvahs,' were given the center's Medal of Valor.
— Lake County State's Attorney Eric Rinehart and Chief of Victim Services Jacqueline Herrera Giron were presented with Champion of Victims' Rights awards from Marsy's Law for Illinois for their work advocating for victims' rights.
Reader Digest
We asked about day games v. night games.
Clem Balanoff: 'Day games as I get older.'
Art Friedson: 'I lived five blocks from Wrigley in 1988, the year the lights went up. Ours was one of the few houses on the block without a NO LIGHTS sign. Still, nothing compares to a ball game at Wrigley on a hot summer day with a cold beverage in your hand. Nothing.'
Carlton Hull: 'Night games!'
Charles Keller: 'Night games because, you know, work. Go Cubs Go!'
Dave Lundy: 'Day games except during the work week then hate day games which they schedule too often.'
Jim Lyons: 'I wish the Cubs would play more day games. Of course, I'm retired and it will give me something to watch in the afternoons.'
Ed Mazur: 'Day games for this 82 year old. Then a long nap after the Red Line ride home.'
Steve Sheffey: 'Day games. When Lee Elia delivered his rant, he was talking about me at the time, and nothing made me prouder.'
Timothy Thomas: 'Day at Wrigley (Cubs), night at Guaranteed Rate (White Sox).'
NEXT QUESTION: In a sentence, what's your most ridiculous summer vacation story?
FROM THE DELEGATION
— Congressmen Sean Casten's (IL-06) bipartisan Mental Health in Aviation Act has been approved by the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
— Congresswoman Nikki Budzinski (IL-13) questioned U.S. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins during a House Agriculture Committee hearing, where she raised concerns about the president's budget proposal for USDA 'that suggests slashing funding for agriculture research, nutrition assistance and conservation,' according to her team. The video is here.
THE NATIONAL TAKE
— MAGA warned Trump on Iran. Now he's in an impossible position, by POLITICO's Rachael Bade
— Appeals court lets Trump keep National Guard in Los Angeles, by POLITICO's Kyle Cheney and Josh Gerstein
— House clears $9.4B in funding clawbacks requested by White House, by POLITICO's Katherine Tully-McManus and Jennifer Scholtes
— White House looks to freeze more agency funds — and expand executive power, by POLITICO's Scott Waldman and Corbin Hiar
MEDIA MATTERS
— Chicago Tribune offering newsroom buyouts: 'The newsroom's union, which ratified its first contract just seven months ago, said in a statement cutting staff as a 'short-term profit boost' is unsustainable,' by the Sun-Times' Kaitlin Washburn.
— House narrowly approves President Trump's request to cut public media funding, by the Sun-Times' Tina Sfondeles
TRANSITIONS
— Joseph Cohen is now the managing partner of Burr & Forman's Chicago office and a partner in the firm's government contracts practice. He was a partner at Fox Rothschild.
— Kyle Gann is now a partner at Norton Rose Fulbright in Chicago. He's in the business practice group and a member of its transactional and regulatory insurance team. He was a partner at Winston & Strawn.
— Rick Nowak is a partner in Mayer Brown's litigation and dispute resolution practice in Chicago. He was with Fidelity Investments.
IN MEMORIAM
— Ken Buzbee, a former state senator, died earlier this month. Details here
— Claudette Soto, founding member of Chicago UNIDOS in Construction and the group's first board president, has died. Her obit is here.
— Trude Matanky, who helped form Matanky Realty Group in 1955, has died. Services here
EVENTS
— Today at 1 p.m.: Mayor Brandon Johnson will be a guest on the Jesse Jackson Jr. radio show. Listen here
— Saturday: U.S. Reps Robin Kelly and Raja Krishnamoorthi and Lt. Gov. Juliana Stratton — all candidates for U.S. Senate — headline a discussion with Proviso Dems. Details here
TRIVIA
THURSDAY's ANSWER: Congrats to Ald. Pat Dowell and Hart Passman for correctly answering that Julius Rosenwald funded the Griffin Museum of Science and Industry back in 1932 but didn't want his name on the building.
TODAY's QUESTION: What was the University of Illinois originally called? Email skapos@politico.com
HAPPY BIRTHDAY
Today: State Rep. Dave Severin, retired Cook County Judge John Curry Jr., Cook County Judge Patricia Spratt, chief of staff to Congresswoman Robin Kelly Matt McMurray, lead development writer at the nonprofit City Bureau Tyra Bosnic, former political candidate Scott Lee Cohen, Surus Illinois Senior Account Manager Chris 'CJ' Gallo, securities trader Lee Blackwell, Democratic fundraiser Dylan Lopez, attorney Antonio Favela and former state Rep. Luis Arroyo Sr.
Saturday: President Donald Trump, Teneo Senior Adviser Peter Thompson, Chicago mayoral adviser Beniamino Capellupo, Illinois Republican Party General Counsel John Fogarty, Illinois Policy Institute's Communications Director Melanie Krakauer, career and job-search coach Celeste Wroblewski, Booth School of Business Communications Director Casey Reid, retired teacher Fred Klonsky and OnMessage Senior Copywriter Julia Cohen
Sunday: State Rep. Chris Miller, Cook County Judge Neil Cohen, Cook County Circuit Court Judge Chris Stacey, Associate Judge Martha-Victoria Jimenez, political commentator Art Friedson, University of Chicago ethics professor Laurie Zoloth and Urban Prep Foundation founder Tim King
-30-

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Associated Press

27 minutes ago

• Associated Press

Support for solar energy and offshore wind falls among Democrats and independents, AP-NORC poll says

Americans' support for green energy tax credits and renewable energies like wind and solar power has decreased in recent years, according to a new poll, driven by a softening in support from Democrats and independents. The poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research finds that U.S. adults' support for tax credits for electric vehicles and solar panels has weakened, as well as their enthusiasm for offshore wind farm expansion. While Democrats remain the strongest supporters of these initiatives, the poll reveals signs of growing cynicism within their ranks. The poll results coincide with sweeping changes President Donald Trump's Republican administration is making to regulations related to energy and climate change, including slashing the federal workforce in these departments. And although Democrats and independents have weakened their support for some green energy initiatives, there has not been an increase in support for Trump's energy policies. The poll found only about 4 in 10 U.S. adults — including only 1 in 10 Democrats and about 2 in 10 independents, along with three-quarters of Republicans — approve of the way Trump is handling climate change, which largely tracks with his overall approval rating. Democrats and independents drive decline in support for renewable energy credits About 6 in 10 Democrats, 58%, favor tax credits for purchasing an electric vehicle, down from about 7 in 10 in 2022. Among independents, support declined from 49% in 2022 to 28%. Only one-quarter of Republicans supported this policy in 2022, and that hasn't changed measurably. 'As far as the pollution goes ... the vehicles nowadays put out very little emissions to the air,' said JD Johnson, a 62-year-old Democrat from Meadowview, Virginia, who somewhat opposes tax credits to purchase an electric vehicle. That's partly because he sees the electric vehicle manufacturing process as energy intensive and believes gasoline-powered vehicles have made improvements with the pollutants they emit. The decline in favoring solar panel tax credits was across the board rather than being concentrated among Democrats. 'For solar panels, in all honesty, I don't think they're that efficient yet,' said Glenn Savage, 78, a left-leaning independent from Rock Hill, South Carolina. 'I'd rather see them pour money into research and try to get the solar panels more efficient before they start giving tax breaks to the public. I may be wrong on that, but that's just my thought.' Scientists say transitioning to renewable energies and ditching fossil fuels that release planet-warming emissions are essential to protect the planet. Billions of dollars in project grants for clean technologies awarded during President Joe Biden's Democratic administration have been canceled by the Trump administration, and the offshore wind sector has been stunted by Trump's executive order that paused approvals, permits and loans for wind energy projects. Fewer than half of U.S. adults, 44%, now say that offshore wind farms should be expanded in the U.S., down from 59% in 2022. About half favor expanding solar panel farms, while about two-thirds were in support in 2022. When people are concerned about the economy and their personal finances, environmental issues are sometimes prioritized less, said Talbot Andrews, an assistant professor in the department of government at Cornell University who was not involved in the poll. 'I think it makes people anxious to think about increased taxes or increased spending on environmental issues when the cost of eggs are going through the roof,' Andrews said. Low support for Trump's efforts to expand offshore drilling and coal mining Trump has championed the expansion of offshore oil drilling, as well as domestic coal production. Despite a decline in support for expanded renewable energies, the new poll shows that only about one-third of U.S. adults think offshore drilling for oil and natural gas should be expanded in the U.S., and only about one-quarter say this about coal mining. In both cases, Republicans are much more likely than Democrats to support expanding these energy sources. Trump has sought to open up national monuments for oil drilling, but more U.S. adults oppose than support auctioning off more public space for oil drilling. Only about one-quarter of U.S. adults favor this, while 4 in 10 are opposed. Republicans are much more likely than independents or Democrats to be in support. Bipartisan support for consumer rebates and home appliance ratings The Energy Star program that certifies appliances, such as dishwashers and refrigerators, as energy efficient recently appeared in headlines when the EPA made plans to scrap the program. The blue and white logo is well recognized, and experts say the program has long had bipartisan support until recently. The poll found three-quarters of Democrats support providing consumer rebates for efficient home appliances, compared with 6 in 10 Republicans. Patrick Buck, 54, from Chicago, describes himself as a liberal Republican and is a fan of the consumer rebates for energy-efficient appliances. 'It seems to work in terms of transforming what people have in their houses, because a lot of people have a lot of old appliances and just can't afford new ones,' he said. Safe air, water, meat and produce The poll found only about 2 in 10 U.S. adults are 'extremely' or 'very' confident in the federal government's ability to ensure the safety of their drinking water, the air they breathe and the meat, poultry, fruits and vegetables they buy in grocery stores. About 4 in 10 U.S. adults are 'somewhat' confident in the federal government's ability to ensure the safety of each of these, and about 4 in 10 are 'not very' or 'not at all' confident. The Trump administration has announced plans to roll back rules and policies related to limiting pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, such as rules that limit pollution from power plants and blocking California's efforts to phase out cars that run on gas. The federal government has also cut staff at the Food and Drug Administration, the federal agency tasked with protecting public health and ensuring food supply safety. ___ The AP-NORC poll of 1,158 adults was conducted June 5-9, using a sample drawn from NORC's probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for adults overall is plus or minus 4 percentage points. ___ The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. The AP is solely responsible for all content. Find the AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at

Yahoo

33 minutes ago

• Yahoo

Republican senators' proposed Medicaid cuts threaten to send red states ‘backwards'

Advocates are urging Senate Republicans to reject a proposal to cut billions from American healthcare to extend tax breaks that primarily benefit the wealthy and corporations. The proposal would make historic cuts to Medicaid, the public health insurance program for low-income and disabled people that covers 71 million Americans, and is the Senate version of the 'big beautiful bill' act, which contains most of Donald Trump's legislative agenda. 'With the text released earlier this week, somehow the Senate made the House's 'big, bad budget bill' worse in many ways,' said Anthony Wright, the executive director of Families USA, a consumer healthcare advocacy group, in a press call. The Senate's version makes deeper cuts to Medicaid and so-called Obamacare (Affordable Care Act) plans, 'both by expanding paperwork requirements and making it harder for states to fund Medicaid coverage for their residents', said Wright. Related: Democratic senators call on private firm to reveal how it will profit from Trump's Medicaid cuts If passed, the House-passed bill would have already made the biggest cuts to Medicaid since the program's enactment in 1965. With red tape and an expiration of additional healthcare subsidies to Obamacare, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated that the House version would leave 16 million people without health insurance by 2034. CBO has not yet released estimates, or 'scored', the impact of the Senate proposal, but advocates and experts said the cuts are more draconian, 'punish' states that expanded Medicaid, and attack Medicaid by going after its byzantine financing structures. 'If we look at the big picture of our healthcare system that's where the inefficiencies are – not in Medicaid – but in all the groups profiting off the system,' said David Machledt, a senior policy analyst at the National Health Law Program, referring to Republicans' assertions that they are targeting 'waste, fraud and abuse' with cuts. 'What these cuts are going to do is look at the most cost-efficient program and squeeze it further, and take us backwards, and put us back at a system where the people at the low end are literally dying to fund these tax cuts for rich people and businesses.' A recent study found that expanding Medicaid, as was done during the Obama administration, probably saved an additional 27,400 lives over a 12-year period, and did so cheaper than other insurance programs. The same study found that about a quarter of the difference in life expectancy between low- and high-income Americans is due to lack of health insurance. Republicans, such as Senator John Thune of South Dakota, argue that their bill 'protects' Medicaid by 'removing people who should not be on the rolls', including working-age adults, legal and undocumented immigrants; by adding work requirements and by going after a tax maneuver states use to bring in more federal Medicaid funding. Related: 'Fiscally irresponsible': Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' benefits the rich at the expense of the poor 'Removing these individuals is just basic, good governance,' said Thune. But experts and advocates argue the cuts will not only remove the targeted individuals, including many who are working but struggle to get through red tape, but will also place states in impossible situations with potentially multibillion-dollar shortfalls in their budgets. Both versions contain so-called work requirements, which analyses show will cause people to lose coverage even if they are eligible, experts said. Instead, the largest difference between the Senate and House versions of the bill is the Senate's attack on Medicaid's complex financing arrangements. Medicaid is jointly financed by states and the federal government, making it simultaneously one of states' largest expenditures and sources of revenue. The Senate's version specifically attacks two ways states finance Medicaid, through provider taxes and state-directed payments. With a provider tax, states bring in additional federal revenue by increasing payments to providers. Because the federal portion of Medicaid is based on a percentage rate, increasing payments to providers in turn increases the amount that federal officials pay the state. States then tax those same providers, such as hospitals, to bring the funding back to the state. Although this maneuver has been criticized, it has also now been used for decades. It's in place in every state except for Alaska, is legal and openly discussed. The Senate bill caps this manuever by cutting the tax rate by about half, from 6% to 3.5%, according to Machledt. [Cuts will] put us back at a system where the people at the low end are literally dying to fund these tax cuts for rich people and businesses David Machledt, National Health Law Program In a 2024 analysis, the Congressional Research Service estimated that lowering the provider tax cap to 2.5% would effectively cut $241bn from Medicaid payments to states. Although the exact impacts of the Senate tax cap are not yet known, Machledt expects it would be in the billions, which states would then be under pressure to make up. 'We took great pains to close a $1.1bn shortfall caused by rising healthcare costs,' said the Colorado state treasurer, Dave Young, in a press call. 'To protect healthcare and education, we had to cut transportation projects, maternal health programs and even $1m in aid to food banks.' Because of taxing provisions in Colorado's state constitution, Young said: 'It will be nearly impossible to raise taxes or borrow money to make up the difference.' Similarly, the Senate bill goes after 'state-directed payments'. To understand state-directed payments, it's helpful to understand a big picture, and often hidden, aspect of American healthcare – health insurance pays providers different rates for the same service. Providers are almost universally paid the worst for treating patients who have Medicaid. Medicare pays roughly the cost of providing care, although many doctors and hospitals complain it is still too little. Commercial insurance pays doctors and hospitals most handsomely. To encourage more providers to accept Medicaid, lawmakers in some states have chosen to pay providers treating Medicaid patients additional funds. In West Virginia, a federally approved plan allows the state to pay providers more for certain populations. In North Carolina, state-directed payments allow the state to pay hospitals rates equal to the average commercial insurance rate, if they agree to medical debt forgiveness provisions. The first state-directed payment plan was approved in 2018, under the first Trump administration. These kinds of payments were criticized by the Government Accountability Office during the Biden administration. Related: Trump's 'big, beautiful' spending bill, from tax cuts to mass deportations However, the Senate bill goes after these rates by tying them to Medicaid expansion – a central tenet of Obamacare – and gives stricter limits to the 41 states that expanded the program. Doing this will effectively be 'punishing them', Machledt said, referring to states that participated in this key provision of Obamacare, 'by limiting the way they can finance'. Advocates also warned of unintended knock-on effects from such enormous disruption. Medical debt financing companies are already readying new pitches to hospitals. Even people who don't lose their insurance and are not insured through Medicaid could see prices increase. When Medicaid is cut, hospital emergency rooms are still obliged to provide stabilizing care to patients, even if they can't pay. Hospitals must then make up that shortfall somewhere, and the only payers they can negotiate with are commercial: for example, the private health insurance most people in the US rely on. 'Folks who do not lose their health insurance will see increased costs,' said Leslie Frane, the executive vice-president of SEIU, a union that represents about 2 million members, including in healthcare. 'Your copays are going to go up, your deductibles are going to go up, your bills are going to go up.' Republicans hope to pass the bill by 4 July.

Hamilton Spectator

41 minutes ago

• Hamilton Spectator

What to know about debate over protesters and ICE agents wearing masks amid immigration crackdowns

CHICAGO (AP) — President Donald Trump and his allies have repeatedly called for mask-wearing at protests to be banned and for protesters whose faces are covered to be arrested, with the most recent push following demonstrations in Los Angeles over immigration raids. Legal experts told The Associated Press there are a variety of reasons people may want to cover their faces while protesting, including to protect their health, for religious reasons, to avoid government retaliation, to prevent surveillance and doxing, or to protect themselves from tear gas. With legislative action happening across the U.S., they say it's only a matter of time before the issue returns to the courts. Protesters, meanwhile, have voiced anger over footage of Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents covering their faces at immigration raids and masked officers at the Los Angeles protests, calling it a double standard. Here are some things to know about the debate over face masks: Legislative efforts target masked protesters At least 18 states and Washington, D.C., have laws that restrict masks and other face coverings in some way, said Elly Page, senior legal adviser with the International Center for Not-For-Profit Law. Since October 2023, at least 16 bills have been introduced in eight states and Congress to restrict masks at protests, according to the center. Many of these laws date back to the 1940s and '50s when many states passed anti-mask laws as a response to the Ku Klux Klan, whose members hid their identities while terrorizing victims. Amid protests against the war in Gaza and the Republican president's immigration policies, Page said there have been attempts to revive these rarely used laws to target protesters, sometimes inconsistently. Concerns over masked ICE agents Trump's calls to arrest protesters for wearing masks came as federal agents were seen donning masks while conducting raids in Los Angeles and other U.S. cities. Democratic lawmakers in California have introduced legislation aiming to stop federal agents and local police officers from wearing face masks amid concerns that ICE agents were attempting to hide their identities and avoid accountability for potential misconduct during high-profile immigration raids. The issue also came up at a congressional hearing on June 12, when Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, a Democrat, criticized ICE agents wearing masks during raids, saying: 'Don't wear masks. Identify who you are.' Republican federal officials have maintained that masks protect agents from doxing. Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin called the California bill 'despicable.' Unresolved First Amendment question Geoffrey Stone, a University of Chicago law professor, said the U.S. Supreme Court has made clear that the right to free speech includes the right to speak out anonymously. But he said how it should apply to protesters wearing masks remains 'an unresolved First Amendment question.' For Stone, that raises a key question: Why should protesters and ICE agents be subject to different rules? 'The government doesn't want them to be targeted because they engaged in their responsibilities as ICE agents,' Stone said. 'But that's the same thing as the argument as to why you want demonstrators to wear masks. They want to wear masks so they can do their 'jobs' of engaging in free speech properly. The same rationale for the officers wearing masks should apply to the protesters.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .