The ICJ, Israel And The Gaza Blockade
The murder and starvation of populations in real time, subject to rolling coverage and commentary, is not usually the done thing. These are the sorts of activities kept quiet and secluded in their vicious execution. In the Gaza Strip, these actions are taking place with a confident, almost brazen assuredness.
Israel has the means, the weapons and the sheer gumption to do so, and Palestinians in Gaza find themselves with few options for survival. The strategic objectives of the Jewish state, involving, for instance, the elimination of Hamas, have been shown to be nonsensically irrelevant, given that they are unattainable. Failed policies of de facto annexation and occupation are re-entering the national security argot.
In yet another round of proceedings, this time initiated by a UN General Assembly resolution, the International Court of Justice is hearing from an array of nations and bodies (40 states and four international organisations) regarding Israel's complete blockade of Gaza since March 2. Also featuring prominently are Israel's efforts to attack the United Nations itself, notably UNRWA, the relief agency charged with aiding Palestinians.
As counsel for the Palestinians, Blinne Ní Ghrálaigh outlined the central grievances. The restrictions on 'the fundamental rights of the Palestinian people, [Israel's] attacks on the United Nations and on UN officials, property and premises, its deliberate obstruction of the organisation's work and its attempt to destroy an entire UN subsidiary organ' lacked precedent 'in the history of the organisation'. Being not only 'antithetical to a peace-loving state', such actions were 'a fundamental repudiation by Israel of its charter obligations owed both to the organisation and to all UN members and of the international rule of law'.
Israel had further closed all relevant crossings into the Strip and seemingly planned 'to annex 75 square kilometres of Rafah, one-fifth of Gaza, to [its] so-called buffer zone, permanently. This, together with Israel's continuing maritime blockade, cuts Gaza and its people off from direct aid and assistance and from the rest of the world'.
The submission by Ní Ghrálaigh went on to document the plight of Palestinian children, 15,600 of whom had perished, with tens of thousands more injured, missing or traumatised. Gaza had become 'home to the largest cohort of child amputees in the world, the largest orphan crisis in modern history, and a whole generation in danger of suffering from stunting, causing irreparable physical and cognitive impairments'.
South Africa, which already has an application before the Court accusing Israel of violating the UN Genocide Convention, pointed to the international prohibition against 'starvation as a method of warfare, including under siege or blockade'. Its representative Jaymion Hendricks insisted that Israel had 'deployed the full range of techniques of hunger and starvation' against 'the protected Palestinian population, which it holds under unlawful occupation.' The decision to expel UNRWA and relevant UN agencies should be reversed, and access to food, medicine and humanitarian aid resumed.
In a chilling submission to the Court, Zane Dangor, director general of South Africa's Department of International Relations and Cooperation, detected a scheme in the cruelty. 'The humanitarian aid system is facing total collapse. This collapse is by design.'
Israel's response, one increasingly rabid to the obligations of humanitarian and international law, was best stated by its Foreign Minister, Gideon Sa'ar. In announcing that Israel would not participate in oral proceedings derided as a 'circus', he restated the long held position that UNRWA was 'an organisation infiltrated beyond repair by terrorism.' Courts were once again being abused 'to try and force Israel to cooperate with an organisation that is infested with Hamas terrorists, and it won't happen'.
Then came an agitated flurry of accusations shamelessly evoking the message from Émile Zola's 'J'Accuse' note of 1898, penned during the convulsions of the Dreyfus Affair: 'I accuse UNRWA. I accuse the UN. I accuse the Secretary General, I accuse all those that weaponize international law and its institutions in order to deprive the most attacked country in the world, Israel, of its most basic right to defend itself.'
The continuing blackening of UNRWA was also assured by Amir Weissbrod of Israel's foreign ministry, who reiterated the claims that the organisation had employed 1,400 Palestinians with militant links. Furthermore, some had taken part in Hamas' October 7, 2023 attacks on Israel. That such a small number had participated was itself striking and should have spared the organisation the savaging it received. But Israel has longed for the expulsion of an entity that is an accusing reminder of an ongoing, profane policy of oppression and dispossession.
In her moving address to the Court, Ní Ghrálaigh urged the justices to direct Israel to allow aid to enter Gaza and re-engage the offices of UNRWA. Doing so might permit the re-mooring of international law, a ship increasingly put off course by the savage war in Gaza. The cold, somewhat fanatical reaction to these proceedings in The Hague by Israel's officials suggest that anchoring international obligations, notably concerning Palestinian civilians, is off the list.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
18 hours ago
- Scoop
Israel's Terrorist Attack On Iran: For What?
For 20 months, Israel's government and occupation forces have pursued a campaign of genocide in Gaza, interspersed with destruction and land grabs in the West Bank, Lebanon and Syria. Now Israel has indulged its long-held desire to attack Iran, a nation of 92 million people. Israel claims that this was a pre-emptive attack, a necessary act of self-defence to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. US State Department intelligence findings flatly contradict that claim. While it calls Iran a nuclear threat, Israel is the only Middle Eastern state with nuclear weapons – undeclared, uninspected, and therefore all the more dangerous. We, Jewish groups in 19 countries, believe that Israel's Prime Minister Netanyahu acted to divert attention from Israel's ongoing genocide in Gaza and its daily attacks and land seizures in the West Bank, and to extend Israel's imperial domination over more of the Middle East. He further seeks to extend his own rule (and evade jail). Netanyahu has long wanted to lure the US directly into war against Iran. Ultimately, he seeks to bring down the Iranian government, in denial of the right of the Iranian people to chart their own way forward. Shortly before it attacked Iran, the IDF virtually cut Gaza's last communications and imposed a complete siege on the West Bank. Hourly, it pursues genocide in darkness. On June 20, Al Jazeera counted over 170 Palestinians killed in Gaza this week, while they were trying to obtain the food that they have a right to obtain. It is too easy to condemn only Netanyahu, who is already on trial domestically and wanted internationally for crimes of genocide. The problem is wider. This regional war-crime spree is inherent in the logic of Zionism. Since 1947, the Zionist project has systematically expelled and murdered Palestinians. It has pursued territorial expansion and regional domination inspired by Western imperialism, while claiming victimhood as a persecuted Jewish collective. Israel's role remains dependent on the full support – diplomatic, military and economic – of Western powers. Donald Trump, ever ready to claim destruction as his own, openly refers to Israel's attack as an action 'we' undertook. The German Chancellor says that Israel is 'doing dirty work for all of us.' Global Jews for Palestine rejects Israel's atrocities and its racist narrative. This widening suffering and chaos will continue until all countries make it end. Governments must cease arming and justifying Israel's crimes, and instead they must impose effective sanctions on Israel. As the world's highest court has advised, we call on our governments to stop normalising and start bringing this disaster to its only credible end: ceasefire, accountability, and justice which realises the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination. We, Jews from around the world urge all governments to abandon the racist, reckless project of Zionism and start the urgent work of justice. We pledge to continue and intensify our efforts to end occupation, genocide and the wider military adventures which threaten to engulf us all. MORE ABOUT GLOBAL JEWS FOR PALESTINE We are Jews from many countries, who are members of local, national and international networks and organizations. We are multi-ethnic and multigenerational and our members embrace a broad range of viewpoints on Jewish religious and ethical traditions. We are connected by our involvement in the struggle for Palestinian rights, and by our determination to work for justice. We oppose Zionism and all forms of racism and colonialism. We believe that it is our particular responsibility to challenge Jewish organizations whose alliances and actions undermine Palestinian human and national rights, promote Jewish exceptionalism, and overturn Jewish social justice traditions. At the heart of our work is the fight for Palestinian liberation and the struggle for a world free of racial and ethnic hierarchy, colonial domination, and unbridled militarism.
Scoop
20 hours ago
- Scoop
Groups Representing Millions Have A Message To Those At UN Climate Talks In Bonn
June 18, 2025 Climate justice and human rights activists gather to condemn the UN climate talk's failure to end the corporate stranglehold over climate action. Climate justice groups, women and gender activists, youth, Indigenous and local community leaders, artivists, and members of the global campaign to Kick Big Polluters Out gather outside conference venue where Big Polluters and Global North governments seek to orchestrate their get out of jail free card and escape accountability for the climate crisis. Today, the climate justice movement, youth from around the world, human rights activists, women and gender groups, and members of the Kick Big Polluters Out (KBPO) coalition joined forces to protest outside of the UN climate talks taking place over these two weeks. The start of the climate talks happening in Bonn were delayed due to an agenda fight where polluting Global North governments like the EU refused to even discuss the need for them to do their fair share of climate action. While the United States– the worlds' largest historical emitter–is notably absent from these talks, their fingerprints of obstruction and undermining are all over these halls, as is the poisonous influence of the fossil fuel industry, industrial agriculture, and other polluting industries. While corporations and governments that are knowingly fueling the climate crisis and directly enabling systemic violence in Palestine, Sudan, and elsewhere act as though it's 'business as usual,' activists rallied to make clear that they refuse to be silenced. Advertisement - scroll to continue reading During the protest, people dressed up in suits as corporate executives were slowly covered in coal, oil, blood, and money–clearly illustrating Big Polluters' deadly profit-at-all-costs agenda. The protest featured visuals by the Artivists Network. 'We implore the UNFCCC to let us know who you really serve. Do you have us come from all corners of the world and all walks of life with little to no resources or support…just to be reminded that when we enter these halls, we are expected, yet again, to play your games?' said Analyah Schlaeger dos Santos of Minnesota Interfaith Power & Light. 'What sort of business are you doing behind closed doors? Our lives are not pawns for you to move around, letting us think that we come here to actualize real solutions, only for you to allow for the ones that have caused these problems to slither silently through the halls.' Civil society and protestors also called out the organizers of the talks specifically for their decades-long failures to address the undue influence of Big Polluters. For three decades, the UNFCCC has done next to nothing to protect these talks from undue influence. Even more, they invite Big Polluters to sponsor and bankroll the climate talks, and to have a heavy hand in the outcomes of the talks. This is a primary reason for the failure of global climate collaboration. According to Tom Goldtooth of the Indigenous Environmental Network: 'The UNFCCC must shift its focus away from the false solutions of the fossil fuel industry and towards centering Indigenous Peoples and our solutions. Fossil fuels as well as agribusiness and pharma have no place in these decision-making halls. The UNFCCC must be about people-centered solutions from the world's majority and not a handful of powerful executives.' The activists, who hail from all around the world, are echoing their demands for: An Accountability Framework that ends the ability of Big Polluters to write the rules of climate action. Next steps must include requiring a publicly available conflict-of-interest disclosure for all participants in climate talks, discussion between governments and civil society on how to protect these talks, and agreeing a Roadmap to Accountability that can reinstill faith and integrity of this process by ensuring Big Polluters cannot continue to undermine and obstruct. No more allowing Big Polluters to bankroll the climate talks. End Big Polluter-fueled genocide and systemic violence, including a Global Energy Embargo for Palestine. Center the lived experiences and expertise of communities on the frontlines and reset the capitalist, colonial system so it protects people and the planet. 'We are still here fighting back. We are still here to raise the voices of our communities from back home,' said Pang Delgra, Asian Peoples' Movement on Debt and Development. 'We know that if we do not hold the line, if we do not continue to speak the truth, they are going to lock us into extinction.' Note: Kick Big Polluters Out is a coalition of more than 450 organizations across the globe united in demanding an end to the ability of Big Polluters to write the rules of climate action. We stand in solidarity with the people of Palestine as well as with all those who face systemic injustice and fossil-fueled violence around the world.
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Monitoring Iran And Promoting Peaceful Nuclear Use – The IAEA's Role Explained
19 June 2025 The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) dates back to 1957 and was set up in response to global fears following the first use of nuclear and atomic weapons and alarm over the advent and spread of nuclear technology. An autonomous part of the United Nations system, it works on issues as varied as food safety, cancer control and sustainable development – and also on promoting peaceful uses of nuclear energy. Another principal responsibility, perhaps less well understood, is the agency's framework of nuclear 'safeguards' agreements. These agreements are voluntarily entered into by countries and are key to preventing the spread of nuclear weapons by independently verifying whether countries are meeting their non-proliferation commitments. As of 2024, some 182 countries have safeguards agreements with the IAEA. In a June 9 address to the agency's board, IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi laid out troubling findings, raising fresh concerns about Iran's compliance with global nuclear agreements. 'Iran has repeatedly either not answered' IAEA requests 'or not provided technically credible answers,' Mr. Grossi told the 35-nation board on Monday. Additionally, he said, Iran has sought to 'sanitise the locations,' which the agency has now concluded were part of a 'structured' nuclear programme in the early 2000s. 'Unless and until Iran assists the agency in resolving the outstanding safeguards issues, the Agency will not be in a position to provide assurance that Iran's nuclear programme is exclusively peaceful,' he said. Mr. Grossi expressed alarm at the rapid accumulation of over 400 kilogrammes of highly enriched uranium, which has serious implications (highly enriched uranium is one of the necessary components for the creation of a nuclear bomb). The statement to the board underlined the significant role the IAEA plays in Iran, which can be broken down into four main areas. 1. Monitoring The agency uses safeguard agreements under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), a key international accord designed to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons. The vast majority of safeguards agreements are those that have been concluded by the IAEA with non-nuclear-weapon States. However, safeguards are implemented in three States that are not party to the NPT – India, Pakistan and Israel – on the basis of item-specific agreements they have concluded with the IAEA. As a non-nuclear armed signatory to the treaty, Iran is banned from acquiring nuclear weapons and is required to allow the IAEA to inspect and verify all nuclear materials and activities, including at short notice, if asked. The agency regularly inspects Iran's nuclear facilities, including sites like Natanz, Fordow, and Isfahan. The aim is to ensure that nuclear materials are only used for peaceful means and are not diverted for weapons use. On 9 June, Mr. Grossi noted that man-made uranium particles had been found at three more, undeclared sites (Varamin, Marivan and Turquzabad). Iran, he said, had failed to provide 'technically credible explanations' for the presence of the particles, despite years of consultations. 2. Reporting The agency regularly reports to its Board of Governors on the nuclear activities of Iran (and other countries), using methods such as inspections, monitoring equipment, environmental sampling, and satellite imagery to gather data and prepare technical reports. In the case of countries under special scrutiny – such as Iran – these reports are typically issued every quarter. If Iran – or any non-nuclear weapon country party to the NPT – fails to comply with the IAEA's requirements (for example, by limiting access or not explaining the presence of uranium particles), the agency can report Iran to the UN Security Council, which may lead to diplomatic pressure, sanctions or calls for further negotiations. 3. Diplomatic engagement The IAEA frequently calls for diplomatic solutions and emphasises the importance of dialogue to resolve concerns about Iran's nuclear intentions. Director General Grossi has engaged directly with Iranian authorities and international stakeholders to maintain communication and transparency. Addressing the Security Council on June 13, Mr. Grossi said that his agency was in constant contact with the Iranian Nuclear Regulatory Authority to assess the status of affected facilities and determine broader impacts on nuclear safety and security. 4. Safety and security oversight This is a critical part of the IAEA's broader mission to prevent nuclear accidents, ensure that nuclear energy is used for peaceful purposes, and protect people and the environment. The IAEA works with the Iranian authorities to ensure that nuclear facilities like Natanz, Fordow, and Esfahan operate safely, by assessing the design and operation of the facilities, monitoring radiation protection measures, and evaluating emergency preparedness. After the June 2025 Israeli strikes, the IAEA confirmed that Natanz had been impacted but reported no elevated radiation levels. However, it emphasised that any military attack on nuclear facilities is a violation of international law and poses serious risks to safety and the environment.
