Business groups warn P200 wage hike may hurt MSMEs, push layoffs
Business leaders and industry groups are urging lawmakers to reassess the proposed P200 daily wage increase approved by the House of Representatives, warning of dire consequences for micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs), as well as the broader economy.
In a statement released Sunday, the Management Association of the Philippines (MAP) said it supports measures to improve the welfare of minimum-wage earners, but cautioned that a legislated P200 increase could do more harm than good.
'We call on the bicameral conference committee to conduct further consultations with all affected sectors, like employers, employees, consumers, and government agencies before reaching a decision,' MAP said.
The group emphasized the importance of considering inflation and business sustainability in policymaking, especially as many MSMEs are still struggling to recover from recent economic disruptions.
'Our basic problem is not low wages, but high costs. We urge the government to focus on reducing food, power, transportation, and housing costs to make our country more competitive,' it added.
The MAP also called on employers to share the burden, urging businesses to help workers by covering mandatory contributions and sharing at least 20% of their net income before tax.
The Philippine Retailers Association (PRA) echoed the concerns, warning that a mandated P200 daily wage hike could trigger layoffs, particularly in the MSME segment that comprises around 70% of retail employment.
'This will cause layoffs in the retail sector,' said PRA president Roberto Claudio, noting that salary distortions across company hierarchies could force businesses to increase pay beyond minimum-wage levels.
The group reiterated its support for the Philippine Chamber of Commerce and Industry's (PCCI) position to leave wage adjustments to the Regional Tripartite Wages and Productivity Boards, which are mandated to assess economic conditions across regions.
The Federation of Filipino Chinese Chambers of Commerce and Industry Inc. (FFCCCII) also raised concerns over a one-size-fits-all approach to wage increases.
'We respectfully urge policymakers to consider a more balanced, consultative, and region-sensitive approach in determining wage adjustments,' said FFCCCII president Victor Lim.
Last week, the House of Representatives approved House Bill No. 11376 on third and final reading, with 171 affirmative votes and only one dissenting. The bill mandates a P200 daily increase for all minimum wage workers in the private sector, regardless of employment status or industry.
The bill also retains the authority of the Regional Tripartite Wages and Productivity Boards to implement additional increases as needed, under the existing Wage Rationalization Act.
The Senate is expected to deliberate on the measure soon, with growing calls from the business community for a more deliberative and regionally responsive process.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
a day ago
- Middle East Eye
'Not our war': US lawmakers attempt to rein in potential strikes on Iran
Two US lawmakers in the House of Representatives have teamed up to introduce a bipartisan resolution that would compel President Donald Trump to seek congressional approval before ordering air strikes on Iran. US military engagement, alongside Israel against Iran, is largely assessed not only to lead to Iranian retaliation against US assets in the region, but also to potential US entanglement in yet another years-long war in the Middle East. Trump, in all three of his campaigns for the White House, ran on a no-to-war platform. Now, he is reportedly weighing whether to drop a 30,000-lb "bunker-buster" bomb on an Iranian nuclear facility. Republican Thomas Massie, a staunch anti-interventionist, and Democrat Ro Khanna, a progressive whose district encompasses Silicon Valley, are hoping to amass support from both parties for a vote on a war powers resolution next week. "The Constitution does not permit the executive branch to unilaterally commit an act of war against a sovereign nation that hasn't attacked the United States," Massie said in a statement. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters "Congress has the sole power to declare war against Iran. The ongoing war between Israel and Iran is not our war." In an interview with CNN on Thursday, Khanna said while he believes it's in the interest of US national security for Iran not to develop a nuclear weapon, "I don't believe that will be achieved by the United States getting dragged into a war with Iran." Both the United Nations' nuclear watchdog and the US intelligence community have said Iran is not close to developing a nuclear weapon. When pushed by CNN's Wolf Blitzer on why taking out a hidden nuclear facility - using a bomb no other country but the US has - would not be a good thing, Khanna pointed to a litany of unknowns. "We don't know how deep underground Iran actually has those bombs. We do not know how much - spread out - Iran has that capability, and we do not know how quickly they would be able to rebuild, given that they have the centrifuges and the know-how, [and] the estimates range from one to three years," Khanna said. "There has to be a diplomatic solution," he added. Trump was in the middle of a months-long negotiation with Iran towards a new nuclear deal, much like the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) that he pulled out of in 2018, when Israel began air strikes on Tehran one week ago. Some of the president's most famous and most loyal supporters on the Make America Great Again (MAGA) circuit have made it clear this week that they believe Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is trying to lure the US into a war that is none of Washington's business. 'De-escalatory vehicle' Massie and Khanna's resolution follows a similar move in the Senate by Democrat Tim Kaine, who ran for the vice presidency on the Hillary Clinton ticket in 2016. That resolution, also utilising the War Powers Act, demands a debate in the upper chamber and a vote on any US military engagement in Iran. Both votes are likely happening next week. On Thursday, Trump announced that he could take up to two weeks to decide on direct US engagement in Israel's war, but many suspect strikes could come as early as this weekend. 'We want to put every single member of Congress on public record of where they stand specifically on war with Iran' - Cavan Kharrazian, Senior policy advisor, Demand Progress The 1973 War Powers Act allows any senator to introduce a resolution to withdraw US armed forces from a conflict not authorised by Congress. The legislative branch, which acts as the country's purse, is also supposed to be the one that declares war, not the executive. But since the 9/11 attacks in particular, the foggy nature of the so-called "war on terror" has enabled the White House to call the shots, especially as Washington has carried out air strikes in countries from Somalia to Pakistan without an official declaration of war. "Presidents have consistently said that the War Powers Act is an unconstitutional infringement on the executive branch's powers," Hassan El-Tayyab, legislative director for Middle East policy with the Friends Committee on National Legislation (FCNL), told Middle East Eye. "What we've seen on the congressional side is really an unwillingness to force these votes in debates [and] use the mechanisms and procedural tools inside the War Powers Act, because it's just a little bit easier... these [lawmakers] would rather just let the executive branch do what it does and not have to be on the record," he added. Congress has recently twice been able to successfully push through a war powers motion - during the first Trump administration on Yemen in 2018, and again on Iran in 2020 - but the president vetoed the resolutions. So what's the point? "What's important with these resolutions is that we want to put every single member of Congress on public record of where they stand specifically on war with Iran," Cavan Kharrazian, senior policy advisor with Demand Progress, told MEE. Demand Progress, as well as FCNL, have been lobbying lawmakers on Capitol Hill to publicly take an anti-war stance along with other civil society organisations. "It's become extremely popular to criticise past disasters like the Iraq War... [and this vote] will now be an opportunity to show whether they're willing to act when it counts," Kharrazian said. And in spite of Trump's past vetoes, there was in fact no further escalation with Yemen or Iran at the time, making a war powers resolution a "de-escalatory vehicle that can help pump the brakes and prevent full escalation and full US involvement in a war of choice," Tayyab told MEE. Pressure A survey conducted by YouGov, an international online research data and analytics technology group, asked on 17 June whether US strikes on Iran would make America safer. The largest portion, 37 percent of the 3,471 US adults polled, said the country would be "less safe". Around a quarter of respondents each said they are "not sure" or that the country would "neither" feel safer or less safe. Only 14 percent said the US would be safer if the US joined Israel's war. Another poll published by The Washington Post on Wednesday found that almost half of the 1,008 Americans it surveyed oppose US strikes on Iran, with that figure dwarfing the number of people who do support military action. Trump is not looking at a green light from the public. Trump promised not to go to war. His most ardent supporters want him to keep his word Read More » That said, there is an undeniably influential pro-war bloc in Washington that has been pervasive regardless of the president and party affiliation. The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (Aipac) and Christians United For Israel (Cufi) are among the leaders in this regard. Since Israel attacked Iran, Aipac has pushed for House Democrats, some of whom have shown scepticism, to issue statements saying that they stand with Israel. It has also shown particular animosity toward one Republican, Massie, who put forward the resolution of the war powers in the House. Earlier this year, an Aipac affiliate group proclaimed that 'Israel, the Holy Land, [is] under attack by Iran, Hamas, Hezbollah and Congressman Tom Massie" for his numerous votes against US military aid packages for Israel. "I mean, the pressure is real. We know neoconservatives, the pro-Israel lobby, they're leaning incredibly hard in this moment. They've leaned incredibly hard on every single moment this has come up," Kharrazian told MEE. "We're not naive on the pressures that are against us [but] from [this] past election, we've seen a tidal shift in the narrative and opposition to endless wars in a way that we haven't seen before. So we're really excited for this," to build anti-war momentum, he said. Advocacy groups are also contending with Trump's billionaire donors. Among the top five is Israeli-born Miriam Adelson, whose Adelson Foundation has also bankrolled organisations such as Birthright Israel and Friends of the IDF. "One thing that's not talked about enough is just the forces of Christian Zionism," Tayyab told MEE. "I think some of those groups believe that this is part of just some end times prophecy, which, despite how you know how off the wall it seems, it is a driving force for a lot of the decisions that are being made." That sentiment was perhaps most famously on display earlier this week when former Fox News pundit Tucker Carlson asked Republican Senator Ted Cruz about why he supports Israel. "I was taught from the Bible, those who bless Israel will be blessed, and those who curse Israel will be cursed. And from my perspective, I want to be on the blessing side of things," Cruz said. Cufi is holding its annual summit in the US capital at the end of June.
Zawya
4 days ago
- Zawya
Parliament gives final approval for Egypt's FY2025/26 economic, social development plan
Arab Finance: The House of Representatives has officially approved the draft economic and social development plan for fiscal year (FY) 2025/2026 in a plenary session chaired by Hanafi Gebaly, as per a statement by the Egyptian cabinet on June 17th. The session was attended by the Minister of Planning and Economic Development, and International Cooperation Rania Al-Mashat. In her remarks following the approval, Al-Mashat expressed appreciation for the continued support of Parliament, emphasizing the importance of ongoing cooperation to advance Egypt's national interests. She noted that the plan was developed under difficult circumstances, which have since become more complex due to escalating regional developments. These changes necessitate a flexible and responsive planning approach, with the government committed to regularly reviewing performance indicators in light of shifting realities, she said. The FY 2025/2026 development plan targets an economic growth rate of approximately 4.5%, a significant increase compared to the 2.4% recorded in FY 2023/2024. The higher target reflects efforts to sustain economic recovery while managing the uncertainty stemming from geopolitical and global economic conditions. Preliminary indicators from the first nine months of the current FY 2024/2025 show improved growth trends, providing momentum for the upcoming year. The plan includes public investments amounting to EGP 1.16 trillion, compared to an expected EGP 1 trillion in FY 2024/2025. This increase is framed within efforts to rationalize public spending, reduce the burden of debt servicing, and create more space for private sector engagement in development. Private investments are projected to reach approximately EGP 1.94 trillion in FY 2025/2026, representing about 63% of total planned investments, while public investments account for 37%. The plan gives priority to high-implementation projects that support sustainable economic goals and encourage broader private sector participation. © 2020-2023 Arab Finance For Information Technology. All Rights Reserved. Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (
Zawya
4 days ago
- Zawya
Egypt's parliament approves FY 2025/26 economic plan, targets 4.5% growth
Egypt's parliament has approved the government's economic and social development plan for the fiscal year (FY) 2025/26, which targets an economic growth rate of 4.5% amid ongoing regional instability. The plan, presented to the House of Representatives by Planning Minister Rania Al-Mashat, aims for a significant recovery from the 2.4% growth recorded in the FY 2023/24. Preliminary indicators for the first nine months of the current FY 2024/25 also point to an improvement in economic growth rates, according to the government. Under the new plan, public investments are set at EGP 1.16trn, compared with an expected EGP 1trn in the current fiscal year. The government stated this div reflects a strategy to rationalise public spending, reduce the public debt burden, and provide more space for private sector participation in development efforts. Private sector investment is projected to increase to approximately EGP 1.94 trillion, contributing an expected 63% of total investments, compared to 37% from the public sector. The plan will prioritise public funds for projects with high completion rates. Speaking after the vote, Al-Mashat said the plan was formulated amid 'delicate circumstances' that have become 'more complex in light of the surrounding and accelerating regional developments.' She added that the uncertainty requires a 'flexible planning approach and continuous monitoring' of the plan's targets. The government will continue to monitor the situation and may revise indicators if conditions worsen, she said. Al-Mashat expressed her appreciation for the parliament's support and its 'serious discussions and valuable observations' on the plan. The session was chaired by the Speaker of the House, Hanafi Gebaly.
