Deputy minister urges urgent action to combat desertification and land degradation

The Deputy Minister of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment Bernice Swarts has welcomed the need for members of the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) to do more in addressing desertification, land degradation, and drought while continuing to build strong partnerships for integrated solutions.
Image: Supplied
The Deputy Minister of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment, Bernice Swarts, has welcomed the need for members of the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) to do more in addressing Desertification, Land Degradation, and Drought (DLDD) while continuing to build strong partnerships for integrated solutions.
On Tuesday, on the first day of the four-day conference, the deputy minister delivered her keynote address to various member states and dignitaries gathered at the Radisson Blue Hotel in Sandton.
"In the next four days, we will deliberate on issues relating to desertification, land degradation, and drought. I am pleased to confirm that many faces here are not new to me, as I had an opportunity to meet many of you during the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification 16th Session of the Conference of the Parties in Saudi Arabia.
"As you may recall, the UNCCD COP16 underscored the need to mobilise additional and innovative resources to support Parties in accelerating actions and interventions on the ground to address desertification, land degradation, and drought, and synergies with other environmental issues."
Swarts said desertification, land degradation, and drought form part of the priority focus areas for South Africa's Presidency of the G20 Environment, Climate Sustainability Working Group (ECSWG).
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
"For the first time in the history of the G20 Presidency, South Africa has made a bold commitment by including DLDD issues among its G20 priorities. This commitment fosters global solidarity in addressing the drivers of DLDD while promoting the mainstreaming of Sustainable Land Management practices and approaches across key sectors.
"The main focus under the G20 ECSWG priority on DLDD is on the implementation of Land Degradation Neutrality (LDN) targets and their deliverables," she said.
Speaking on the importance of Integrated Land Use Planning (IDN – ILUP) and target setting programme of the UNCCD, Baron Jospeh from the UNCCD Secretariat stressed the need for vertical and horizontal integration strategies.
"I embrace the need for vertical and horizontal integration strategies, and the key thing is that once you fully embrace this approach, you are going to be linking various data sets. You are going to be able to better position cross collaborations," he said.
siyabonga.sithole@inl.co.za

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Daily Maverick

11-06-2025

• Daily Maverick

North West officials evade responsibility for Madikwe elephant crisis, say MPs

More than 1,000 starving elephants may have to be culled. Parliamentarians demand answers by tomorrow (Friday). In a scathing parliamentary session on Tuesday, 10 June members of the Portfolio Committee on Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment accused North West officials of gross mismanagement and evasion of responsibility for the ongoing elephant crisis in the Madikwe Game Reserve. The crisis, years in the making, has led to mass starvation and death among elephants, extensive environmental degradation and a controversial proposal to cull as many as 1,200 of them. The most damning testimony came from Douglas Wolhurter, manager of the Wildlife Protection Unit at the National Council of Societies for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (NSPCA), whose presentation laid bare a catalogue of failings by the North West Parks and Tourism Board (NWPTB) and the provincial Department of Economic Development, Environment, Conservation and Tourism. 'This is not a sudden crisis,' Wolhurter told the committee. 'It is the result of decades of inaction. The elephant population did not explode overnight – these animals breed slowly. Every warning sign was ignored.' According to the NSPCA, Madikwe Game Reserve now holds more than 1,600 elephants – more than triple the reserve's original carrying capacity of 500, and more than six times the 250-elephant maximum suggested by early management plans. The consequence has been catastrophic: at least 70 elephants have died of starvation since August 2024, with many more in advanced stages of malnutrition. The NSPCA documented suffering animals and dead elephants whose tusks had not been removed or logged in accordance with the law – a breach of the Animals Protection Act and TOPS (Threatened or Protected Species) regulations. Wolhurter's presentation triggered a sharp reaction from members of the committee. 'This is probably one of the most shocking presentations I've seen,' said DA MP Andrew de Blocq. 'It's absolute neglect. What concrete actions have been taken to hold the board and management accountable for what they themselves admit is severe mismanagement?' Questions by a number of parliamentarians cut to the heart of the crisis: why were long-term preventative measures like immunocontraception denied by NWPTB even though they were offered repeatedly for free by the Humane World for Animals – in 1998, 2020 and 2023? Why were the NSPCA, despite their legal mandate under the Animals Protection Act, excluded from the second and subsequent meetings of the provincial task team overseeing the crisis response? Why has no independent investigation been launched? The North West response was weak at best. Jonathan Denga, acting CEO of the NWPTB, confirmed that the province had known about the issue for years but offered no justification for the failure to act. 'Yes, the elephant population is a serious problem,' Denga said. 'But many of the management options have been exhausted. We are trying to bring balance.' Pressed by a number of MPs, Denga and NWPTB chairperson Khorommbi Matibe admitted that the NSPCA had not been invited to the task team as promised and gave no timeline for actual action. 'Unfortunately, we were not privy to the NSPCA's presentation beforehand,' said Matibe. 'We need time to study it before responding in detail.' That response drew a sharp rebuke from committee chairperson Nqabisa Gantsho, who issued a stern directive: 'You have three days to respond. We expect answers by Friday, June 13.' Wolhurter had previously noted that even though a draft culling plan was shared with the NSPCA in December 2024, the organisation had received no formal updates or invitations to task team meetings since then. 'We were told we'd be included as key stakeholders,' he said, 'but that never happened.' Meanwhile, public scrutiny is intensifying. A tender issued in May by the NWPTB proposes the trophy hunting of 25 elephants, two black rhinos and 10 buffalo in Madikwe – a move widely condemned by conservationists and tourism operators, who say it risks damaging the reserve's reputation and undermining non-lethal wildlife management strategies. The North West Parks tender to buy hunting and culling 'packages' for Madikwe game reduction. Although sold as a 'game reduction' strategy, critics argue that the tender was rushed, non-transparent and economically motivated. 'This is a reputational nightmare,' one lodge operator said anonymously. 'Tourism partners were not even consulted before this tender was issued.' Scientific assessments presented by the NWPTB and echoed by Wolhurter confirm that the elephant density in Madikwe – at 2.7 animals per square kilometre – is likely to be the highest of any enclosed reserve in South Africa. In contrast, the average for state-run reserves is just 0.79 elephants per square kilometre. While all sides agree that the current population is unsustainable, the divergence lies in how to respond. The NSPCA has called for immediate inclusion in the task team, independent oversight of any culling process and long-term ecological restoration – beginning with invasive species removal and veld recovery. But even the basics are missing. 'We're still waiting for a detailed ecological restoration plan,' De Blocq pointed out. 'There is nothing measurable in place to rehabilitate the veld or ensure that the reserve can sustain its intended population.' In closing, Gantsho didn't mince her words: 'This is a matter of urgency. We have seen suffering animals. We have seen death. We have seen degradation. The time for delays is over.' This week will reveal whether North West can rise to the occasion – or continue evading accountability. DM

Daily Maverick

10-06-2025

• Daily Maverick

South Africa joins 134 nations in new push for High Seas protection treaty

Environment Minister Dion George has signed the High Seas Treaty, but translating rhetoric into action requires political will and funding. South Africa has added further impetus to the establishment of a new international treaty to protect the world's often lawless High Seas. This comes after Forestry, Fisheries and Environmental Affairs Minister Dion George added his signature to the list of 134 nations who have all signalled their support for the new treaty, during a meeting of the United Nations Ocean Conference this week in the French Riviera seaside city of Nice. However, to become international law, at least 60 nations also need to ratify the treaty. So far, only 49 nations have done so – so 11 more formal ratifications are needed for it to enter into force. Due to its lengthy official title, the proposed treaty is more commonly referred to as the High Seas Treaty (or the BBNJ Agreement). (The formal title is the Agreement under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity of Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction). The High Seas (international waters that lie beyond official national maritime borderlines) cover nearly half the planet, but are seen as woefully underprotected – with only 1.5% currently safeguarded within marine protected areas. The High Seas Alliance, a partnership of more than 50 marine and environmental conservation groups helping to drive the initiative, believes the treaty will pave a path towards establishing several new High Seas marine protected areas. Treaty members would also help to assess the impact of harmful activities (such as overfishing, underwater mining and blasting) and also advance 'ocean equity' by ensuring greater support for developing countries. More details about the objectives of the agreement have been summarised in this fact sheet compiled by the High Seas Alliance. Notably, neither Russia nor Japan have signed the agreement. While the US, Canada, China and India have signed up, they have not ratified it yet. A map showing countries that have signed or ratified the new treaty. (Source: High Seas Alliance) From paper to action In a media statement on 10 June, Minister George said the decision to sign up had 'highlighted South Africa's key role in advancing equity, science-based governance and environmental stewardship in the high seas' and also underlined the country's 'long-standing commitment to strengthening the rule of law in ocean affairs'. 'The ocean is a life source – essential for climate regulation, food security, livelihoods and economic development, particularly in developing economy states. Unfortunately, the world's oceans face escalating threats from climate change, biodiversity loss and marine pollution, and these impacts demand urgent, inclusive and science-based action,' his department said. Despite this optimistic sentiment, however, several observers have noted that translating rhetoric from paper into real action is a much trickier business, requiring strong political will and funding – including major investment in basic naval and maritime patrol vessels. The High Seas Alliance further notes that signing the agreement does not establish consent for states to be bound to the treaty, 'but it does express the willingness of the signatory state to continue the treaty-making process and for it to proceed to ratification'. 'Signing also creates an obligation to refrain, in good faith, from acts that would defeat the object and the purpose of the treaty. Ratification is when nations formally consent to the new international law, and this often entails ensuring that their national laws are consistent with it. 'The speed and process to ratify varies by country. In some countries, the act of ratification is simply a leader's decree, while in others parliamentary approval is needed. 'Depositing an instrument of ratification is the formal step by which a country officially confirms its consent to be bound by an international treaty. This is the last step in the ratification process, following the domestic approval.' 'A tidal wave of hope' Rena Lee, Singapore's ambassador for international law, has emphasised the need for much broader public participation to ensure greater global buy-in and to 'give the agreement real power and effectiveness'. Rebecca Hubbard, director of the High Seas Alliance, said the 'surge' of 17 new ratifications this week marked 'a tidal wave of hope and a huge cause for celebration'. 'With just 11 more ratifications needed for entry into force, it could be just a matter of weeks before the 60 is achieved,' she suggested. The European Union and several small island nations have been among the strongest supporters of the new plan to strengthen ocean protection. European Commissioner for Oceans and Fisheries Costas Kadis declared: 'The EU is proud to have ratified the BBNJ and it calls, jointly with Palau and Seychelles, for all countries to join the High Ambition Coalition on BBNJ to support its ambitious implementation. The Australian-based Minderoo Foundation has also announced a AUD 10-million (about $6.5-million) pledge to accelerate the creation of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) in the High Seas. This latest commitment adds to the $51.7-million already committed in a joint donor pledge made in 2024, bringing the total committed by 12 funders to kickstart the development of MPAs on the high seas to $58.2-million. DM

Eyewitness News

05-06-2025

• Eyewitness News

Apartheid police may have bugged car the 'Cradock Four' travelled in, inquest hears

JOHANNESBURG - The inquest into the assassination of the "Cradock Four" has heard how apartheid police may have bugged the car that the anti-apartheid activists were travelling in. Prominent anti-apartheid activist Professor Derrick Swarts is the first witness to take the stand in the inquest. The court has spent the last two days on an in loco inspection, where significant spots related to the lives and killings of the "Cradock Four" were visited. Matthew Goniwe, Fort Calata, Sicelo Mhlauli and Sparrow Mkhonto were assassinated by the apartheid special branch police in 1985. Swarts was the general secretary of the United Democratic Front, an anti-apartheid group to which the "Cradock Four" belonged. ALSO READ: Swarts was in the same meeting as Goniwe, Calata, Mhlauli and Mkhonto in what was then Port Elizabeth. He recalls warning them as they returned to Cradock after the meeting. "He indicated that he's got to make his way back because of family pressures; they had not made the arrangements, but he agreed that he would not stop unless it would be a police car or a traffic warden stopping him." Mhlauli and his comrades would be stopped that very evening by the security branch police at the Olifantskop Pass on the N10 highway, taken back to PE and killed. When the Goniwe family lawyer, Tembeka Ncgukaitobi, pointed out how the "Cradock Four" were stopped suspiciously, matched the warning given by Swarts who said Goniwe's beige Honda Ballade could have been tapped by police. IN PICS: Gqeberha High Court Judge visits key locations linked to lives of 'Cradock Four'