
Lawsuits accuse insurers of colluding to drop coverage in fire-prone parts of California
Two lawsuits filed in Los Angeles allege major home insurance companies have colluded to limit coverage in California communities at high risk for wildfires and force homeowners onto the state's last-resort insurance plan that offers basic coverage and high premiums.
Insurers, including State Farm and 24 other companies that hold 75% of California's home insurance market, were part of an 'illegal scheme' in violation of California's antitrust and unfair competition laws, according to one of the lawsuits, filed last week.
The lawsuit said the companies worked together in 2023 to 'suddenly and simultaneously' drop coverage or halt writing new policies in fire-prone areas, including in neighborhoods like Pacific Palisades and Altadena that were leveled in the January wildfires that destroyed nearly 17,000 structures and killed at least 30 people. That has forced hundreds of homeowners onto the FAIR Plan that offers limited coverage capping at $3 million, leaving them underinsured and now struggling to rebuild after the fires, says the lawsuit filed by a group of homeowners who lost their houses in the LA fires.
The other lawsuit includes all policyholders who obtained the FAIR Plan after January 2023, when the conspiracy allegedly began, the suit says.
' Insurance is a product that homeowners hope never to need, but rely on for peace of mind in normal times and for critical help rebuilding after a catastrophe,' Michael J. Bidart, who represents the homeowners, said in a statement. 'The complaints allege that, by colluding to push plaintiffs and so many like them to the FAIR Plan, the defendants have reaped the benefits of high premiums while depriving homeowners of coverage that they were ready, willing, and able to purchase to ensure that they could recover after a disaster like January's wildfires.'
The lawsuits come as California is struggling to rein in an ongoing insurance crisis, where companies are boosting rates, limiting coverage or pulling out completely from regions susceptible to wildfires and other natural disasters in the era of climate change. In 2023, several major insurance companies either paused or restricted new business in the state, saying they can't truly price the risk on properties as wildfires are becoming more common and destructive in California due to climate change.
The state Department of Insurance said it is not involved in the suits but said its focus is on protecting consumers.
'Californians deserve a system that works — one where decisions are made openly, rates reflect real risk, and no one is left without options,' department spokesperson Gabriel Sanchez said in a statement.
State Farm, the largest home insurer in California with roughly a million policies, didn't immediately respond to requests for comment. Representatives from the American Property Casualty Insurance Association, the largest national trade association representing home, auto and business insurers, also did not respond for comment.
The FAIR Plan is an insurance pool that all the major private insurers pay into, and the plan then issues policies to people who can't get private insurance because their properties are deemed too risky to insure. The plan, with high premiums and basic coverage, is designed as a temporary option until homeowners can find permanent coverage, but more Californians are relying on it than ever. There were more than 555,000 home policies on the FAIR Plan as of March, more than double the number in 2020.
The complaints also allege that insurers were pushing policyholders onto the FAIR Plan because companies wouldn't have to shoulder all financial responsibility to sustain the plan. When the state's top insurance regulator in February ordered insurers to provide $1 billion to the FAIR Plan to help it pay out claims related to the LA wildfires, he allowed for half of the cost to be recouped from policyholders statewide. Another lawsuit was filed last week to block the cost-shifting regulation.
California has been in the process of implementing various new regulations to give insurers more latitude to raise premiums in exchange for issuing more policies in high-risk areas. That includes regulations allowing insurers to consider climate change when setting their prices and allowing them to pass on the costs of reinsurance to California consumers.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
14-06-2025
- Daily Mail
Red state hit with huge influx of MILLIONAIRES fleeing woke, crime-ridden California
The desert state once known for cheap buffets and neon-lit dreams is now bursting at the seams with California 's richest refugees fleeing the chaos of the Golden State. But they're not just bringing suitcases. They're bringing millions. According to a new study that looked at data from the US Census Bureau the number of millionaire households in the Las Vegas Valley has surged an eye-popping 166 percent since 2019. That's 879 millionaire households in 2023, up from just 331 before the pandemic. Many of these new millionaires are homeowners, bucking national trends where even the ultra-rich are increasingly looking to rent. The real estate boom has been driven in no small part by Californians, particularly those weary of cities' crime, homelessness, high taxes and what some describe as the state's 'hostile' regulatory climate. Nevada is so attractive to the monied because the state levies no taxes on corporate income or shares. It also doesn't have taxes on personal income, franchises, inheritances, gifts or estates In 2024 alone, nearly 39,000 Californians traded palm trees for desert heat, handing over their driver's licenses at Nevada DMVs in record numbers, and reigniting fears that the Silver State may soon resemble the Golden State - politically and economically. 'It's no surprise to see the number of millionaire households in Las Vegas tripling since 2019. We've felt that momentum firsthand. The city has transformed into a magnet for high-net-worth individuals who want more space, better quality of life, and the energy of a city that's constantly evolving,' said Las Vegas-based luxury real estate broker Ivan Sher to the Las Vegas Review-Journal. Some high profile business leaders who have left California for the bright lights of Vegas include billionaire spouses Andrew and Peggy Cherng, the co-founders of Panda Express, and David Chao, cofounder and general partner of multibillion-dollar venture firm DCM. Even some celebrities - Mark Wahlberg and Dean Cain among them - have been drawn to the bright lights of Vegas over the last two years in the wake of California's mansion tax. Teddy Liaw, the founder of NexRep marketplace, relocated to Southern Nevada a few years ago after becoming 'disenchanted' with the San Francisco Bay Area. Liaw explained how he is pitching to California's tech entrepreneurs, millionaires, billionaires and CEO's how Nevada is 'pro-business.' 'There's a reason they're leaving California in the first place: the politics and the regulatory environment,' Liaw said. 'They are seeing the allure here in terms of access and quality of life and the opportunities we have here.' Liaw founded the Vegas Tech Summit, where tech entrepreneurs can discuss the business landscape of the region with one other each October. He described Nevada's pro-business culture was like a breath of fresh, tax-free air.' They are seeing the allure here in terms of access and quality of life and the opportunities we have here. At the end of the day California has lost population, this is a big deal.' Kent Yoshimura, co-founder of NeuroGum, a company that makes gum with caffeine in to boost memory and focus. Yoshimura moved the multimillion-dollar business from Los Angeles to Las Vegas and said the choice to relocate his company and part of his staff to Summerlin was about more than just money but about clarity. 'When you don't have to think about that excess stuff as much, it makes life much easier and it allows you to maintain a higher level of focus,' Yoshimura said. 'I probably see more people now being in Vegas than I did in LA, because everybody wants to come visit here.' Yoshimura spoke at the third annual Vegas Tech Summit, an increasingly elite event that has drawn tech millionaires, CEOs, and investors to the city's most exclusive neighborhoods like the Summit Club, a far cry from Silicon Valley's increasingly grim tech scene. 'The employment laws are a lot easier here, the affordability of a house, transportation,' Yoshimura said, adding, 'I live in Summerlin and it's 20 miles to my office and it takes 20 minutes. … When I was in downtown [Los Angeles] to Koreatown where my office was, it was only 8 miles away and it took me 45 minutes.' Billionaire Cherng, meanwhile, quietly moved his Panda Express base of operations to Nevada in recent years. He joins a growing exodus of wealth from California's crumbling urban centers to the business-friendly, regulation-light promise of the Mojave. And while Hollywood types recently suffered a setback when a bill to attract movie studios to southern Nevada failed, local leaders like luxury broker Ivan Sher remain bullish. For years, California's natural beauty, elite universities, and deep tech economy were enough to hold its wealthy residents in place but the situation has changed. Homelessness is spiraling, taxes are soaring, crime appears to be creeping into once-safe enclaves and pandemic-era restrictions which were among some of the strictest in the country, pushed many over the edge. California has indeed been losing hundreds of thousands of people since 2019, before posting a moderate gain in 2023. Nearly 158,000 Californians moved to Nevada between 2020 and 2023, making up 43% of all new residents, according to Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles data. But with wealth comes pressure and Las Vegas is feeling the squeeze. Housing prices are pushing record highs, and Nevada Treasurer Zach Conine is warning of a housing crisis if action isn't taken soon. 'We are spending a lot of time talking about housing right now, affordable housing, attainable housing, housing for all,' Conine said. 'Housing instability is economic instability, if we do not have a housing market that works it makes it harder for people to start businesses, it makes it harder for kids to do well in school, nothing is easy when we have a housing problem.' That hasn't slowed the flood. At last year's Vegas Tech Summit, the mood was electric. On stage, former Olympic gold medalist Apolo Ohno, now a Miami-based entrepreneur, hinted he might make the move himself. 'Vegas has got a special vibration to it right now,' he said. For all the optimism, some locals fear the very migrants fleeing California's dysfunction could eventually turn Nevada into its mirror image. The message from business leaders is clear: don't California our Nevada. That means no income tax, no bloated regulations and no 'woke' politics.


The Independent
12-06-2025
- The Independent
California insurance regulator launches investigation into State Farm over claims from LA fires
California 's top insurance regulator on Thursday launched an investigation into State Farm over the company's handling of claims from the January Los Angeles-area wildfires. The investigation comes after survivors of the Palisades and Eaton fires said that the state's largest home insurer was delaying and mishandling claims regarding damage to their homes and possible contamination from smoke. The blazes destroyed thousands of buildings around Los Angeles, killed 30 people and displaced thousands of others. They were estimated to be among the costliest natural disasters in U.S. history. California Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara said the investigation will review whether the company complied with state consumer protection and claim-handling laws. 'Californians deserve fair and comprehensive treatment from their insurance companies," the Democrat said in a statement. "No one should be left in uncertainty, forced to fight for what they are owed, or face endless delays that often lead consumers to give up.' Survivors of the Eaton fire in Altadena have raised concerns about possible lead, asbestos and heavy metal contamination in their homes because of smoke. State Sen. Sasha Renée Pérez, a Democrat representing Pasadena, in April called on Lara to launch a probe into the alleged mishandling of claims. 'The survivors of the Los Angeles County fires are experiencing financial and emotional hardships due to State Farm's delays and denials of their valid insurance claims," she and other lawmakers said at the time. "Despite years of faithfully paying premiums, they have been met with excessive documentation demands, denial of claims despite clear evidence, a convoluted and arduous claims process, and silence when seeking help after the disaster.' State Farm has about 1 million home insurance customers in California. Insurers including State Farm had difficulty doing business in California even before the wildfires. In 2023, State Farm and others stopped issuing residential policies because of the wildfire risk. Last year, Lara unveiled regulations aimed at giving insurers more latitude to raise premiums in exchange for more policies in high-risk areas. State Farm said at the time the company was struggling. The wildfires, which destroyed more than 16,000 buildings, made matters even worse. In May, state regulators allowed State Farm to raise premiums 17% statewide for its California home insurance customers to help the company rebuild its capital after the costly wildfires. State Farm initially sought a 22% rate increase for homeowners but revised it down a recent hearing before an administrative judge. The new rates in effect this month include a 38% hike for rental owners and 15% for tenants. People who lost homes in the fires sued in April, alleging State Farm and other insurers colluded to 'suddenly and simultaneously' drop coverage or halt writing new policies in fire-prone areas, including areas that burned. That left the homeowners underinsured and struggling to rebuild, the lawsuit alleges. The American Property Casualty Insurance Association, the largest national trade association representing home, auto and business insurers, called the lawsuits meritless, saying it monitors to ensure its members comply with the state's antitrust laws. ___ Associated Press writer Mead Gruver reported from Cheyenne, Wyoming. ___


Reuters
05-06-2025
- Reuters
Amazon settles State Farm lawsuit alleging it stole elder care technology
June 5 (Reuters) - Amazon (AMZN.O), opens new tab has settled a lawsuit by insurance company State Farm accusing the e-commerce giant of copying its patented technology to develop elder care services for Amazon's virtual assistant Alexa, according to a filing in Delaware federal court. The companies asked the court, opens new tab on Wednesday to dismiss the case with prejudice, which means it cannot be refiled. State Farm said in a statement on Thursday that the case had been settled under confidential terms. Spokespersons and attorneys for Amazon did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Thursday. Bloomington, Illinois-based State Farm sued Amazon in 2022, in what the insurance company said was its first-ever patent infringement lawsuit. According to the complaint, State Farm met with Amazon in 2019 and 2020 about incorporating its Sundial senior-care assistance technology into Alexa-enabled devices. The lawsuit had accused Amazon of copying patented Sundial features, including its "circle of friends" for coordinating caregiver responsibilities, a chatbot for seniors to interact with the platform, and check-in and monitoring services. Amazon had denied the allegations and argued that the patents were invalid. The case is State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Inc, U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, No. 1:22-cv-01447. For State Farm: Michael De Vries, Adam Alper, Akshay Deoras, Kat Li and Leslie Schmidt of Kirkland & Ellis For Amazon: Doug Lumish of Latham & Watkins, Adam Greenfield of White & Case Read more: State Farm lawsuit says Amazon stole elder-care technology