‘A huge moment': Martin Jarmond discusses UCLA's plans after House settlement
Like a quarterback who completed offseason workouts, spring practices and fall training camp, Martin Jarmond had been preparing for this moment for nearly a year.
On Saturday came the big unveiling.
The UCLA athletic director discussed with the Times the plans for his department's operations in the new college sports world created by the House settlement agreement with the NCAA that will allow schools to pay athletes directly for the first time starting July 1.
The big takeaways: UCLA will distribute $20.5 million in revenue sharing — the maximum allowed under the settlement — while keeping its Olympic sports programs and athletic department staff intact. The school will also preserve scholarship limits at their current levels for at least one year in order to distribute more revenue sharing money to each player.
'This is a pivotal moment in collegiate athletics and we have to continue to invest in our athletics program to compete at the highest level,' Jarmond said. 'That's why student-athletes come to UCLA, to get the best education and compete at the highest level, and we must invest in our student-athletes to provide that championship-level experience.'
While Jarmond would not divulge the specifics of his revenue-sharing arrangement, it's expected that UCLA will follow other Power Four conference schools in using U.S. District Court Judge Claudia Wilken's back-payment formula as a model for current athletes. Under this formula, which will distribute $2.8 billion to athletes who competed from 2016 to 2024 to compensate them for lost name, image and likeness opportunities, roughly 75% of the money will be shared with football players, 15% with men's basketball players, 5% with women's basketball players and 5% with all remaining athletes.
'We've worked really hard to look at the House settlement, along with other factors,' Jarmond said, 'to determine how we were going to split up the revenue share.'
Jarmond told The Times last year that he anticipated a bigger share of revenue going to football and men's basketball players because they were 'responsible for more of the revenue based on the House settlement and the back pay for NIL and all those things.' Payments will rise each year as part of the 10-year settlement agreement.
Even though roster limits could eventually rise to 105 for football and 15 for men's basketball as part of the settlement, keeping scholarship limits at their current levels — 85 for football, 13 for men's basketball — will allow UCLA to provide each player on scholarship a bigger share of revenue. As part of the settlement agreement, any money used for scholarships (which have an estimated value of $65,000 per athlete at UCLA) comes out of the revenue sharing pot. Jarmond said his department would re-evaluate this arrangement in a year to ensure it was best serving the school's athletes.
UCLA is also committed to preserving its Olympic sports that have provided the lion's share of NCAA championships in an athletic department widely regarded as one of the best in the nation. Jarmond said there would be no staffing cuts, but some personnel might be reassigned to better serve the athletic department.
'We are looking at reallocating staff,' Jarmond said, 'to positions that better meet our needs in a changing landscape.'
The ability to pay players directly could help UCLA in ways that go beyond compensating its athletes. Revenue sharing arrangements could help narrow the resource gap between the Bruins and other Big Ten Conference schools that had more deep-pocketed NIL collectives engaging in pay-for-play practices.
Now, all new NIL deals exceeding $600 must be approved by NIL Go, a clearinghouse created by the College Sports Commission to analyze deals to ensure they serve a valid business purpose and provide fair market value.
It's expected that all existing college NIL collectives — including UCLA's Men of Westwood (which serves men's basketball), Bruins for Life (football) and Champion of Westwood (women's basketball, Olympic sports) — will essentially become marketing agencies that try to find endorsement deals for athletes.
Jarmond said UCLA was seeking a third-party partner to help secure so-called true NIL opportunities. Being based in Los Angeles should provide Bruins athletes with a clear advantage in securing marketing deals, Jarmond said.
Other challenges remain. Having traveled to Washington, D.C., to lobby for federal NIL legislation, Jarmond said he believed it was necessary to eliminate the imbalance that exists with more than 30 states having their own NIL laws.
While distributing $20.5 million in revenue will be another financial blow to an athletic department that has run $219.5 million in the red over the last six fiscal years — though the entire debt has been covered by the university, bringing the balance to zero — Jarmond said he has long championed athletes being paid and believes the move is long overdue. As part of the settlement involving back pay to athletes, UCLA's share of NCAA revenue will be reduced by more than $1 million annually for the next 10 years.
UCLA's finances could soon improve under a College Football Playoff revenue sharing agreement that is expected to provide Big Ten schools an additional $8 million to $12 million annually beginning in 2026. That's on top of media rights deals tilted heavily in favor of Big Ten and Southeastern Conference schools, giving the Bruins another infusion of much-needed cash.
The athletic department has a new ally in chancellor Julio Frenk, who signaled his intention to be closely involved with the school's sports programs during a recent interview with The Times.
'Chancellor Frenk has been extremely supportive of athletics and the impact that it has on our community,' Jarmond said. 'He has been supportive of our efforts every step of the way. He hit the ground running during a pivotal time not just for athletics but the university, and he has demonstrated support at a high level and I'm grateful for his leadership at such a pivotal time for athletics.'
While acknowledging that UCLA athletics needed to be more creative with revenue generation as part of what he called 'a huge moment' that would forever change the trajectory of college sports, Jarmond said the school's commitment to sports was unwavering.
'We have to be bold and innovative in this new world,' Jarmond said. 'UCLA has always been on the forefront and been a leader and that's not going to change. We will embrace this new era and we will continue to support our student-athletes at a championship level.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why OU athletic director Joe Castiglione feels Sooners are prepared for House settlement
ARDMORE — Joe Castiglione was settling into his car after dinner last Friday in Kansas City when his son delivered a message. 'It just broke,' Joe Castiglione Jr. said to his dad. 'What broke?' the elder Castiglione asked. Advertisement 'The judge's decision,' Castiglione Jr. told him. Last Friday evening was a 'remember where you were' moment for plenty of people involved in college athletics. The decision was the approval of The House vs. NCAA settlement, which paves the way for schools to pay athletes directly. 'We feel very prepared,' Castiglione said. 'That being said, it's still an ever-evolving landscape in college athletics. … It's a very different world moving forward.' OU baseball transfer portal tracker: Who has left, joined Skip Johnson's Sooners? OU President Joseph Harroz Jr. was having a beer — one Guinness, he noted — in New York City as he worked to get his son settled into an internship there. Advertisement At Thursday's meeting of the OU Board of Regents at the Noble Research Institute, Harroz called the settlement's approval a 'tectonic' shift for college athletics, while Castiglione called it 'an entirely new frontier.' 'One that we are really now prepared to launch into and really serve our athletes properly,' Castiglione said. Schools can start direct payment to athletes July 1, with each school being able to pay approximately $20.5 million per school initially and increasing every year. 'That's not very far from now, so we're going to be really busy between now and then,' Harroz said. 'And we're going to see …. Will the A4 conferences put in place the rules necessary for this settlement to hold and for college athletics to be preserved? That's what's at stake right now.' Advertisement Castiglione has said OU would pay out the full revenue-sharing amount. Castiglione said those payments would be made to athletes in six sports — football, men's and women's basketball, women's gymnastics, softball and baseball. The percentage breakdown for those has not been finalized, but Castiglione and Harroz said the school would release the percentages by sport once they were. Castiglione noted that they would be in line with other SEC programs, some of which have announced their split percentages. The payment to former athletes will be split 75% to football, 15% for men's basketball, 5% for women's basketball and 5% for other sports. Advertisement More: ESPN sets OU football kickoff windows for 2025 SEC regular-season games OU athletic director Joe Castiglione has said the Sooners would pay out the full revenue-sharing amount to six sports. The challenge to the settlement on the grounds it violates Title IX law will pause the NCAA's plan to pay former athletes, but won't slow down payment to current athletes. 'I feel like in a very uncertain world, we gained some certainty last Friday night with the House settlement coming down,' Harroz said. 'Now it's up to us in the conferences to enforce it and make it stick. 'The greatest burden and obligation for us in the conferences right now is to make the House settlement be functional and to not engage in cheating around it.' Advertisement Castiglione, who was in Kansas City for his niece's wedding, said after he returned to his hotel after his brisket dinner at Joe's Kansas City BBQ that he spent a couple hours on the phone making sure the plans the department had in place in anticipation of the settlement were being put into motion. 'We had already had many aspects of this already put in place to launch at any time,' Castiglione said. 'We were all aware that the decision could come at any time, just making sure everything could be implemented as we planned.' Harroz said the move to the SEC, which officially happened nearly a year ago, put the department in a much better position to reach its two primary objectives — continue operating without using student or state money to fund the athletic department and competing for and winning championships. 'The level of confidence we can meet these marks is high,' Harroz said. Advertisement In May, the school announced a 5% cut of full-time athletic department employees, though Castiglione and Harroz categorized those moves as a redistribution of resources. Castiglione said he was hopeful further cuts wouldn't be necessary, but noted the landscape would continue to shift. 'I don't want to try to speculate how the ecosystem's going to continue to evolve,' Castiglione said. 'It's safe to say without a permanent structure it's impossible to speculate with any true accuracy. But suffice to say, we haven't seen the last of the economic shifts. What our strategy has been is to continue to fund the sports we sponsor. It starts there. … 'We're still self-sustaining. It's been tougher, no doubt about it.' SEC commissioner Greg Sankey, center, talks with OU President Joseph Harroz Jr., left, and OU athletic director Joe Castiglione after a press conference before a celebration for OU joining the Southeastern Conference in Norman, Okla., Monday, July 1, 2024. OU didn't receive a full revenue share percentage in its first year in the SEC but will receive a full share beginning this fiscal year, bringing an estimated additional $32 million in revenue. Advertisement Harroz said the school was committed to supporting women's sports as a whole and other sports that aren't a part of the revenue-sharing model. 'We're also able to support women's sports and all the Olympic sports,' Harroz said. 'That's the essence of college athletics.' There figures to be plenty of other changes coming to college athletics, both said. 'House settles a lot,' Harroz said. 'House doesn't settle everything. There will be additional challenges, but now it's up to the conferences to step and the individual schools not to act in short-term best interest to try to gain an advantage for one year but actually live into it.' Advertisement Also at the meeting, the regents approved several contracts and contract changes: New contracts Lake Dawson, senior assistant general manager for football, two-year contract at $290,000 annually Jonathan Gress, head athletic trainer for football, two-year contract at $210,000 annually. Pauline Love, women's basketball assistant, one-year contract at $230,000 annually. Taylor Redd, assistant general manager for football, two-year contract at $230,000 annually. Justin Scott, men's basketball assistant, one-year contract at $385,000 annually. OU softball transfer portal tracker: Who has left, joined Patty Gasso's Sooners? Revised contracts Lou Ball, women's gymnastics assistant, raised $6,750 annually to $246,000 annually. Jennie Baranczyk, women's basketball coach, extended through June 30, 2031. Nicholas Crowell, men's tennis coach, raised $5,600 annually to $195,600 per year. Clay Custer, men's basketball assistant, extended through June 30, 2026, and raised $10,000 to $295,000 annually. Veronique Drouin-Luttrell, women's golf coach, raised $5,000 annually to $165,000 annually. Shannon Gage, women's basketball assistant, raised $6,000 to $206,000 annually. Thomas Haley, women's gymnastics assistant, raised $6,750 to $246,000 annually. Ryan Humphrey, men's basketball assistant, raised $14,000 to $480,000 annually. Ryan Hybl, men's golf coach, extended through June 30, 2029. K.J. Kindler, women's gymnastics coach, extended through June 30, 2032. Brock Morris, men's basketball assistant, title changed to Assistant Coach/Sports Professional III from Assistant Coach/Sports Professional II and given a contract of $425,000 annually. Michael Neal, women's basketball assistant, extended through June 30, 2026, and increased $5,000 to $145,000 annually. Sarah Trowbridge, women's rowing coach, extended through June 30, 2029, and raised $7,000 to $210,000 annually. This article originally appeared on Oklahoman: OU AD Joe Castiglione feels Sooners are prepared for House settlement
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Highly Touted Playmaker Expected to Have Unfortunate Change of Heart on Georgia
Highly Touted Playmaker Expected to Have Unfortunate Change of Heart on Georgia originally appeared on Athlon Sports. The Georgia Bulldogs have three wide receivers committed in the 2026 recruiting class. However, they may lose the most highly-regarded wideout. Advertisement On3's Jake Rowe reported Friday that four-star receiver Vance Spafford is "unlikely to sign with the Bulldogs" despite giving the program a verbal commitment last November. "The 5-foot-9 wideout is a west-coast kid who probably isn't going to leave the time zone," Rowe wrote. "That leaves Georgia, for now, with the well-rounded Ryan Mosley, who is a four-star prospect, and the explosive Brady Marchese, who is also a four-star." "Georgia checks off some important boxes with those two guys." Rowe focused on the positive -- the Bulldogs still have receivers Brady Marchese and Ryan Mosley committed for 2026. Advertisement But based on the 247Sports rankings, Marchese and Mosley are just three-star prospects. Spafford is the No. 12-ranked receiver in the 2026 class. Georgia Bulldogs football head coach Kirby Smart© Joshua L. Jones / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images But recruiting experts have predicted that Spafford could back out of his commitment with Georgia. On3's Chad Simmons reported on June 13 that the UCLA Bruins and Washington Huskies were both trying to poach the receiver. Rowe made no mention of any other specific programs. But UCLA and Washington are obviously on the west coast, which is where Rowe expects the receiver to play in college. In addition to being the No. 12 receiver, Spafford is the 17th-ranked California prospect in the 2026 class according to the 247Sports Composite rankings. The wideout is also the No. 124 overall recruit in the class. Advertisement Related: Coveted Playmaker Delivers Unclear Message on Georgia Ahead of SEC Visit This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 21, 2025, where it first appeared.
Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Senate official rejects food aid cuts proposed by Republicans in megabill
A top Senate official on Friday night rejected a bid by Republicans to slash federal food aid payments as part of their sweeping legislation carrying President Donald Trump's domestic agenda, sending party leaders scrambling to find another way to help offset the massive cost of the bill. The measure passed by the House last month and on track to be considered in the Senate next week would cover part of the cost of extending and expanding large tax cuts by cutting social safety net programs including Medicaid and nutrition programs, including SNAP, formerly known as food stamps. Republicans are moving the bill through Congress using special rules that shield it from a filibuster, depriving Democrats of the ability to block it. But to qualify for that protection, the legislation must comply with a rigorous set of budgetary restrictions meant to ensure that it will not add to the deficit. And the Senate parliamentarian, an official appointed by the chamber's leaders to enforce its rules and precedents, must evaluate such measures to ensure that every provision meets those requirements. Elizabeth MacDonough, the parliamentarian, ruled that the SNAP measure, which would push some of the costs of nutrition assistance onto the states, did not. That sent Republicans back to the drawing board to find another strategy for covering tens of billions of dollars of the bill's cost. She also said Republicans could not include a provision that would bar immigrants who are not citizens or lawful permanent residents from receiving SNAP benefits, according to Sen. Jeff Merkley of Oregon, the top Democrat on the Budget Committee. The House-passed bill would require all states to pay at least 5% of SNAP benefit costs, and more if they reported a high rate of errors in underpaying or overpaying recipients. That provision was estimated to save roughly $128 billion. Senate Republicans were unsettled by that plan, arguing it would tee up insurmountable budget shortfalls for their states. They softened it, advancing a lower share for states to shoulder than that set forward by the House proposal. On Saturday, Sen. John Boozman, R-Ark., the chair of the Agriculture Committee, said GOP senators would continue to try to find a way to cut food assistance that complied with Senate rules. 'To rein in federal spending and protect taxpayer dollars, the committee is pursuing meaningful reforms to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program to improve efficiency, accountability and integrity,' Boozman said in a statement. He said he was looking at options 'to ensure SNAP serves those who truly need it while being responsible stewards of taxpayer dollars.' Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, the top Democrat on the Agriculture Committee, cheered the parliamentarian's decision, saying she had 'made clear that Senate Republicans cannot use their partisan budget to shift major nutrition assistance costs to the states that would have inevitably led to major cuts.' Several fiscal hawks in the House and Senate have complained that the legislation does not do enough to cut federal spending. With the parliamentarian's ruling, Republicans will have to find another way to slash a huge sum of money that their members also feel comfortable voting for. The ruling was just one piece of a broader review the parliamentarian is conducting of the Republican-written legislation. She was expected to work through the weekend evaluating the measure and instructing Republicans to strip out any provision she deems out of order. Should they fail to do so, Democrats could challenge the bill on the floor, forcing Republicans to muster 60 votes to advance it, which would effectively kill it since Democrats are solidly opposed. The parliamentarian also will determine whether Republicans can keep a provision that would block states from regulating artificial intelligence for a decade, and whether they can use a budget trick that would make extending the 2017 tax cuts appear to be free. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Copyright 2025
