Why Ben Stokes was RIGHT to bowl first against India even though England took just three wickets on day one, writes NASSER HUSSAIN
If evidence was required that it wasn't an easy decision for Ben Stokes at the toss, it came from India 's new captain Shubman Gill who confirmed he was also going to bowl.
Fifteen years ago, if you'd seen the blue sky and that pitch, of course you would have batted first, but recent history tells you Headingley is a bowl-first ground.
The last six Test matches here have resulted in the side bowling first winning, and the statistics over this past decade show that through every day of a five-day match, the pitch pretty much gets better to bat on.
Think of Stokes's extraordinary, unbeaten hundred in the 2019 Ashes, of a Shai Hope-inspired West Indies knocking off a target of 322 five down eight years ago or England scoring at 5.4 runs per over to chase down 296 against New Zealand in 2022.
To be fair, the ball did a bit in the morning session too, swinging much earlier than usual. It normally takes 12-15 overs for the lacquer to come off, but here it was swinging after half an hour. England just got their lines and their lengths wrong and India's batsmen could leave comfortably.
At Headingley, your length needs to be immaculate as a bowler for two reasons. One, it's the place in England you have to bowl fullest to hit the top of the stumps.
Chris Woakes feels the heat as England struggle for breakthroughs on a flat Headingley pitch
It's also a very quick-scoring ground because of its lightning outfield, so if you err slightly, and the margin really is minuscule, you go for runs.
England's seamers were either too full or too short when they over corrected and fabulous players like Yashasvi Jaiswal, KL Rahul and Shubman Gill will punish you in those situations.
It was also a sign of the attack not having bowled here much. Brydon Carse and Josh Tongue had not played a first-class match in Leeds between them.
Neither had Shoaib Bashir, but the off-spinner performed nicely, offering good control and giving the ball some air in a bid to get it to drop.
When you're playing against world-class players like the two young centurions Jaiswal and Gill, and the pace of the pitch is good, you'll get hit around a bit, but at times, I'd like to have seen more control from other members of the attack.
For all the skill Jimmy Anderson provided — in swing, out swing, wobble seam — he gave you that.
Stokes was the pick of England's bowlers but he was let down by the rest of his pace attack
Offspinner Shoaib Bashir offered good control and did a good job on an unresponsive wicket
I know this is a side that likes to attack and Stokes has asked them to find ways to get wickets, but when it is flat the seamers have to combine with Bashir.
It came down to Stokes himself to do that on day one, keeping the run rate down and waiting for a mistake — as happened for the dismissal of Jaiswal.
Stokes was England's best bowler. Sensibly, he limited his first spell to six overs and got the ball moving more than the rest of England's seam attack as the day progressed.
By its end, India were well and truly in the ascendancy and of course the decision by Stokes eight hours earlier looked dubious — but recent history explains his reasoning.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Leeds 'interested in former Arsenal star with £20m release clause but face competition from shock Champions League club'
Leeds United are considering a move for a former Arsenal star this summer. The player has a £20million release clause but a potential move is unlikely to be straightforward. There is interest in the individual from other high-profile teams, including a surprise Champions League club. Although he suffered relegation from the Premier League last season, the player is still very highly rated. Leeds are looking to strengthen their squad following their return to the top flight. Daniel Farke 's side have already made one signing this summer, bringing in forward Lucas Nmecha from Wolfsburg. As reported by The Times, Leeds are pursuing a potential move for Southampton goalkeeper Aaron Ramsdale. Ramsdale made 30 appearances in the Premier League for the Saints last season following his move from Arsenal. The 27-year-old's relegation release clause has now come into effect, which has also alerted Galatasaray. With the Turkish club having secured their place in the Champions League league phase for next season they could be an attractive option for Ramsdale. Galatasaray won the Turkish Super Lig last campaign, finishing eleven points ahead of their closest challengers Fenerbahce. Fernando Muslera, 39, is leaving Galatasaray this summer, with Ramsdale one of the candidates to replace him. Ramsdale joined Arsenal in 2021 having previously played for Sheffield United and Bournemouth. There have been suggestions that Ilan Meslier could leave Leeds this summer, which could explain their interest in Ramsdale. Ramsdale has five caps for England, although he wasn't included in Thomas Tuchel's most recent squad.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Haunted Harry Brook treads the fine line between greatness and sporting tragedy, writes OLIVER HOLT
In the corridors of the stand above the Kirkstall Lane End, Stuart Broad managed a wry smile when I told him I was trying to find Michael Atherton to ask him about the time he was run out on 99 against Australia at Lord's in 1993. 'I'm sure he'd be delighted to be reminded about that again,' Broad said. Atherton is a reluctant expert on the subject. He was also dismissed for 99, caught and bowled by South Africa 's Brian McMillan, here at Headingley, in August 1994. Only he and MJK Smith, among England players, have achieved the unwanted distinction of twice being dismissed one run short in a Test. I tracked Atherton down in the end. He was sitting on the back row of the press box, welcoming Harry Brook in print to the list of unfortunates who have fallen one short of cricket's magic number. Atherton was phlegmatic. 'You are consumed by the one you missed rather than the 99 you scored,' he said. It will be like that for Brook, whose batting had lit up a grey, blustery third day of this first Test. His crestfallen, horrified visage when he pulled a short ball from Prasidh Krishna straight into the clutches of Shardul Thakur at deep backward square, dismissed one run adrift of his century, testified to that. Suddenly, it did not seem to matter that he had just played an innings of savage beauty, that he had smoked the India attack all around the ground, clubbing its bowlers into submission with 11 fours and two towering sixes, dragging England back into this match. All that mattered was that he was out for 99. His dismissal made him the 81st player dismissed for 99 in Test cricket, the 14th Englishman and the first anywhere for three years since Travis Head fell for Australia against the West Indies in Perth. Jonny Bairstow had been the last England player to meet that fate, trapped lbw against South Africa at Old Trafford in August 2017. Brook's removal, by such an obvious, familiar old bowling trap, was part of a pattern of England players giving away their wickets unwisely here, and was made worse by the fact Headingley is his home ground. Maybe the chance to score a Test century here in front of fans that adore him will come again to a player as prodigiously talented as he is. Maybe it won't. A century is such a random target in so many ways. And yet the difference between three figures and two bestows greatness on an innings and falling one short confers sporting tragedy upon it, as if it would have been better to have fallen far earlier than to have just missed the mark. But cricket loves numbers. It obsesses about them. Not just in its statistics and its averages but in its staging posts. They say 111, a Nelson, is unlucky because it resembles three stumps. The Australians regard 87 with unease because it is 13 short of a century. Zero is never good, either. Ninety-nine, though, is cricket's number of the beast. Perhaps it is also because it gives an opponent so much succour. It is almost better than getting someone out cheaply. Getting a batsman out for 99 is a cause for unrestrained glee in the ranks of the opposition. It is as if there is great sustenance to be had from feasting on a player's crushing disappointment. It is as if a humiliation has been visited upon the batsman, even though he has just spent several hours getting the better of a group of bowlers. It is wrapped up in the idea that when the prize that is coveted so much was there for the taking, the batsman lost his nerve and showed weakness. Some find dark humour in the unfortunate's fate. When Shane Warne slog-swept a ball from Daniel Vettori into the air and into the hands of Mark Richardson at the WACA in 2001, Richardson bowed theatrically to the crowd and Ricky Ponting admitted some of the Aussies were 'laughing into their lockers'. Warne never did score a Test century. It is too early for Brook to see the light side of what happened at Headingley, though he may reflect that things could have been worse. It seemed briefly on Saturday that he had been caught in the deep for a duck before it became clear the umpire had ruled Jasprit Bumrah's delivery a no-ball. He rode his luck on Sunday, too. He was dropped twice. His aberration on 99 levelled things up, though Brook may not have thought of it that way as India's players rushed to congratulate Krishna and Thakur sprinted in from the boundary to join the celebrations. Brook's face was a mask of incredulity at the shot he had just played. He had watched the ball, first with trepidation and then despair, as he tracked its flight. When the catch was taken, he looked as if he could barely walk back to the pavilion. It is probably cricket's longest walk, the walk of the man dismissed for 99, and Brook's seemed to last an eternity. The word 'trudge' was made for Brook's walk. He looked like the embarrassed duck that Australian broadcasters flash up when a batsman is dismissed without scoring. At one point he even dropped his bat as he walked, as if he were losing his senses. Rishabh Pant, India's wicketkeeper, gave him a consoling pat as he ran to join his team-mates but Brook did not notice. Brydon Carse, the next batsman in, crossed with him near the boundary rope and half put an arm round him in consolation. Brook did not notice that, either. He is in the club now, like it or not. Clem Hill, the first man to be dismissed for 99 in a Test against England at Melbourne in 1902, scored 98 and 97 in the next Test at Adelaide. Good for the average, good for the team, but poison to that pursuit of three figures that consumes Brook and every batsman who has followed Hill to the crease since.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Premier League questions Chelsea over ‘unauthorised ticket seller' co-owned by Todd Boehly
The Premier League has demanded answers from Chelsea over the 'unauthorised' reselling of Premier League tickets by a website co-owned by Todd Boehly. In an open letter, the Chelsea Supporters' Trust requested in March that the English top tier act 'swiftly' in investigating club chairman Boehly's involvement in Vivid Seats. Richard Masters, the league's chief executive, has now confirmed at a Football Supporters' Association event that the competition had written to the club. According to minutes of the recent FSA event, Masters 'confirmed the PL [Premier League] had written to Chelsea to seek clarification on the club's position with the matter ongoing. RM [Masters] advised the PL would reply to CST [Chelsea Supporters' Trust] once the PL had concluded its discussions with the club.' Telegraph Sport first reported in February how Vivid Seats, a US-based online marketplace of which Boehly is both an investor and director, was allowing foreign-based users to buy and sell Premier League tickets for up to tens of thousands of pounds. Boehly has not been accused of any wrongdoing. CST had asked the league to 'act and investigate' the situation which they believe is both a 'breach of trust' and 'a clear conflict of interest'. The trust has also submitted evidence against the American company to the Government's Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS). Chelsea recently pledged to take action on ticket touting but did not name Vivid Seats or other ticket resellers. Vivid does not allow fans based in Britain to buy or sell tickets – the latter of which would be illegal – but its business model does raise the prospect of Chelsea co-owner Boehly profiting from the kind of activity his own club have repeatedly denounced. The CST wrote in its March letter to Masters: 'We have received a significant amount of correspondence from concerned CST members and supporters from the wider Chelsea FC fan base on this issue that cannot be ignored.' Boehly has not commented but Vivid Seats previously said in a statement: 'As a global business, we are always respectful and cognisant of local regulatory policies and procedures that are in place in any market to ensure we are compliant. As such, our policy restricts the sale of EPL tickets from UK sellers. We can confirm that we do not have any UK sellers listing EPL inventory on our marketplace. Additionally, Vivid Seats does not and has never directly marketed or advertised Premier League tickets to UK customers.' Boehly, a director and investor in Vivid, described as an 'unauthorised ticket seller' by the league, also owns a 13 per cent stake in Chelsea.
