Musk's X sues New York state over social media hate speech law

SAN FRANCISCO — Elon Musk's X has challenged a New York state law that requires social media companies to disclose how they monitor hate speech, extremism, and other contentious content.
In a lawsuit filed on Tuesday, the social media platform, formerly known as Twitter, argues that the law forces companies to disclose "highly sensitive and controversial speech" that is protected under the constitution's First Amendment.
New York Attorney General Letitia James, who is in charge of enforcing this law, is the named defendant in X's lawsuit.
Social media sites have become the main source of news for Americans, with majority consuming it on networks like X, according to a new research from the Reuters Institute.
Deciding what content is acceptable on social media platforms "engenders considerable debate among reasonable people about where to draw the correct proverbial line," X said. "This is not a role that the government may play."
The Stop Hiding Hate Act, passed in December, requires social media companies to disclose steps they take to eliminate hate on their platforms, and to report their progress.
In a statement on Tuesday, the two New York state lawmakers who sponsored the Stop Hiding Hate Act called social media companies like X "cesspools of hate speech" and said the law did not violate the First Amendment.
Social media platforms, including X, "have consistently failed to inform the public about their policies regarding hatred and misinformation", Senator Brad Hoylman-Sigal and Assemblymember Grace Lee said.
Neither New York Attorney General Letitia James nor X replied to the BBC's request for comment on Tuesday.
X's lawsuit against New York state comes nine months after the company successfully blocked a California law that required large social media companies to submit reports about their content-moderation policies.
The company extensively cited its earlier victory in its Tuesday's lawsuit and criticised New York lawmakers for failing to revisit the legislation's language even after the California law was largely struck down.
Musk, who acquired X in 2022, has dramatically scaled back the rules that govern what content and behaviours are acceptable on the platform, according to Professor Laura Edelson, who teaches computer science at Northeastern University.
He has "also significantly reduced the resources the platform puts into enforcing even the rules it does still have," she said. "This is why, even though rules around spam haven't changed on X, there is so much more floating around than there used to be."
Last year, a federal judge dismissed a lawsuit brought by Musk against a research group that documented an uptick in hate speech on the site. — BBC

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Arab News

9 hours ago

• Arab News

BBC threatens legal action against AI startup Perplexity over content scraping

LONDON: The BBC has threatened legal action against Perplexity, accusing the AI startup of training its 'default AI model' using BBC content, the Financial Times reported on Friday, making the British broadcaster the latest news organisation to accuse the AI firm of content scraping. The BBC may seek an injunction unless Perplexity stops scraping its content, deletes existing copies used to train its AI systems, and submits 'a proposal for financial compensation' for the alleged misuse of its intellectual property, FT said, citing a letter sent to Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas. The broadcaster confirmed the FT report on Friday. Perplexity has faced accusations from media organizations, including Forbes and Wired, for plagiarizing their content but has since launched a revenue-sharing program to address publisher concerns. Last October, the New York Times sent it a 'cease and desist' notice, demanding the firm stop using the newspaper's content for generative AI purposes. Since the introduction of ChatGPT, publishers have raised alarms about chatbots that comb the internet to find information and create paragraph summaries for users. The BBC said that parts of its content had been reproduced verbatim by Perplexity and that links to the BBC website have appeared in search results, according to the FT report. Perplexity called the BBC's claims 'manipulative and opportunistic' in a statement to Reuters, adding that the broadcaster had 'a fundamental misunderstanding of technology, the internet and intellectual property law.' Perplexity provides information by searching the internet, similar to ChatGPT and Google's Gemini, and is backed by (AMZN.O) founder Jeff Bezos, AI giant Nvidia (NVDA.O), and Japan's SoftBank Group (9984.T). The startup is in advanced talks to raise $500 million in a funding round that would value it at $14 billion, the Wall Street Journal reported last month.

Saudi Gazette

16 hours ago

• Saudi Gazette

US joining Israeli strikes would cause hell, says Iranian minister

LONDON — The US joining Israeli strikes would cause "hell for the whole region", Iran's deputy foreign minister has told the BBC. Saeed Khatibzadeh said this is "not America's war" and if US President Donald Trump does get involved, he will always be remembered as "a president who entered a war he doesn't belong in". He said US involvement would turn the conflict into a "quagmire", continue aggression and delay an end to the "brutal atrocities". His comments came after the Soroka hospital in southern Israel was hit during an Iranian missile attack. Iranian state media reported that the strike targeted a military site next to the hospital, and not the facility itself. Israel's Ministry of Health said 71 people were injured during the attack on the Soroka Medical Center. Meanwhile, Israel's military said it had targeted Iran's nuclear sites including the "inactive" Arak heavy water reactor and Natanz has not given an update on casualties in Iran from Israeli latest attacks come at a critical time. On Thursday, the White House said Trump would decide whether or not the US gets directly involved in the conflict within the next two to the BBC, Khatibzadeh insisted that "of course, diplomacy is the first option", but said but while bombardment continues "we cannot start any negotiation".He repeatedly called Iran's attacks on Israel "self defence under Article 51 of the UN Charter" and said "we were in the middle of diplomacy" when in a major escalation of the conflict on 13 June, Israel launched attacks on Iranian nuclear sites, killing several top generals and nuclear deputy foreign minister called the conflict "unprovoked" and "unnecessary".Responding to Trump's repeated comments that the conflict could have been avoided if Iran had accepted a nuclear deal, Khatibzadeh said they were negotiating until Israel "sabotaged" discussions by launching attacks Iran."We were planning to have the sixth round of nuclear talks in Muscat, and we were actually on the verge of reaching an agreement," he said."President Trump knows better than anybody else that we were on the verge of reaching an agreement."He also criticized Trump's "confusing and contradictory" social media posts and interviews, which he said indicated "that Americans have been aware and have participated" in the special envoy Steve Witkoff and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi have reportedly spoken on the phone several times since Friday, in a bid to find a diplomatic end to the crisis, Reuters to three diplomats who spoke to the news agency and asked not to be identified due to the sensitivity of the matter, Araqchi said Tehran would not return to negotiations unless Israel stopped the has alleged Iran has recently "taken steps to weaponise" its enriched uranium stockpile, which can be used for power plants or nuclear bombs. Iran has always claimed that its nuclear program is entirely Friday, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) — the UN's nuclear watchdog - said Iran had amassed enough uranium enriched up to 60% purity - a short technical step away from weapons grade, or 90% — to potentially make nuclear bombs."This is nonsense," Khatibzadeh said in response. "You cannot start a war based on speculation or intention."If we wanted to have a nuclear bomb, we would have had it way before."Iran has never developed any program for nuclear weaponization of peaceful nuclear activities. Bottom line."IAEA chief Rafael Grossi said that nuclear facilities "must never be attacked, regardless of the context or circumstances, as it could harm both people and the environment".Khatibzadeh also discussed potential diplomatic channels after a G7 summit in said: "What we are hearing from Europeans is that they would like to get back to diplomacy at a ministerial level"."They are going to have a meeting in Geneva and we are very much happy that finally they have to come and talk at the table about the issues at hand." — BBC

Leaders

a day ago

• Leaders

Americans Protest against US Involvement in Iran-Israel Conflict

Dozens of Americans demonstrated across several US cities, protesting against potential involvement in Israel's war on Iran, according to multiple news outlets. Since Israel launched a military operation against Iran on June 13, 2025, small demonstrations took place across many cities in the US, rejecting Washington's intervention in the war. On Tuesday, protests took place in San Jose, California. Some demonstrators waved Iranian flags, while others held up signs saying 'Hands Off Iran.' The San Jose Peace and Justice group organized the demonstration, Newsweek reported citing local news outlets. Milwaukee in Wisconsin saw demonstrations on Monday, where hundreds showed up for a 'hands-off Iran' protest. They also called for imposing an arms embargo on Israel. The protest was organized by the Milwaukee Anti-War Coalition. Similarly, the Bronx Anti-War group held a 'Solidarity with Iran' protest in New York City. Moreover, the Associated Press (AP) reported a protest in Los Angeles on Wednesday rejecting the US potential intervention in the conflict. A video showed demonstrators carrying signs reading 'Refuse Unlawful Orders,' 'No US-Israel War on Iran' and 'We Won't Let You Drag US into Global War!' Anti-war demonstrators also gathered in front of the White House on Wednesday, calling for an arms embargo on Israel, according to CBS News. The US President, Donald Trump, has left open the possibility of joining Israel in its war on Iran, raising controversy among his Make America Great Again (MAGA) base. During his presidential campaign, Trump promised to keep the US away from foreign wars, under his 'America First' promises. However, Trump's stance on the Iran-Israel conflict has drawn criticism from some prominent conservative commentators, including Tucker Carlson and Steve Bannon, who refuse US military action against Iran. Furthermore, the independent US Senator, Bernie Sanders, urged Trump not to drag the US into Israel's war. Short link : Post Views: 24