Kremlin suggests 'Golden Dome' could lead to resumption of Russia-U.S. arms control contacts
MOSCOW, May 21 (Reuters) - The Kremlin indicated on Wednesday that President Donald Trump's "Golden Dome" missile shield plans could force the resumption in the foreseeable future of contacts between Moscow and Washington about nuclear arms control.
Asked about Trump's announcement that he had selected a design for the $175-billion Golden Dome missile defense shield, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said it was a sovereign matter for the United States.
The so-called "Golden Dome", inspired by Israel's land-based Iron Dome defense shield, is an ambitious project aimed at blocking threats from China and Russia, which the United States views as its two biggest geopolitical competitors.
Peskov, asked if Russia saw the project as a threat to Russia's nuclear parity with the United States, said that there was no detail about the U.S. project and many nuances remained.
"In the foreseeable future, the very course of events requires the resumption of contacts on issues of strategic stability," Peskov said.
Russia and the United States, by far the biggest nuclear powers, have both expressed regret about the disintegration of the tangle of arms control treaties which sought to slow the arms race and reduce the risk of nuclear war.
The United States blames Russia for the collapse of agreements such as the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty and the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty.
The United States formally withdrew from the INF Treaty in 2019, citing Russian violations which Moscow denied. The United State withdrew from the ABM treaty in 2002.
"Now that the legal framework in this area has been destroyed, and the validity period has expired, or deliberately, let's say, a number of documents have ceased to be valid, this base must be recreated both in the interests of our two countries and in the interests of security throughout the planet," Peskov said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economist
26 minutes ago
- Economist
The American attacks allow Netanyahu to end the wars with Iran and in Gaza, says his predecessor
THE AMERICAN attacks on Iran's three nuclear sites mark a dramatic escalation in the conflict that began on June 13th with the Israeli assault on Iran. President Donald Trump, in his characteristically unpredictable fashion, resolved to undertake an action he had eschewed for years, both during his first term in office and in recent months, despite making repeated threats against Iran.
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Israel-Iran live: 'The game is not over', Khamenei aide warns - as US officials raise terror threat alert
18:40:12 US officials raise terror threat alert The Department of Homeland Security has warned of a "heightened threat environment" in the US following Donald Trump's strikes against Iran. The National Terrorism Advisory System's bulletin says "low-level cyber attacks" against US networks by "pro-Iranian hacktivists" are likely. It adds there is a heightened threat that "the ongoing Israel-Iran conflict could motivate violent extremists and hate crime perpetrators seeking to attack targets". 18:30:01 Analysis: Iraq has a delicate balancing act in the middle of this conflict By Stuart Ramsay, chief correspondent, in northern Iraq Iraq is no different to any other country in the region - anxiously waiting to see what happens next after America's multiple bomb strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. Where it differs is that Iraq - caught bang in the middle of the war between Israel and Iran, and now the United States - has to juggle its relationships with both Tehran and Washington DC. The Shia Muslim dominated government of Iraq is close to Iran, and its influence on Iraq cannot be underestimated. Shia militia groups in Iraq, while nominally answering to Baghdad, take much of their guidance from Tehran, so their positions must be taken into consideration by the Iraqi government. At the same time, Iraq needs the US because it provides stability and support in the region, and the US military remains the most potent force in stopping terror organisations like Islamic State rejuvenating themselves. There are at least 2,500 American personnel stationed in Iraq, and the US has major interests here - as it does across the Middle East and Gulf states. That US presence itself poses problems - Iran has threatened to attack American interests and personnel across the region. 18:13:32 'The game is not over', Khamenei aide says A political advisor to Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei says the "game is not over" following US strikes on its nuclear sites. Ali Shamkhani said existing "enriched materials, local expertise and political will" all remain despite the physical damage done. He adds that the "operational initiative" is now in the "hands of the party that plays smart". 17:58:01 Iran warns of 'everlasting consequences' Despite international calls for Iran not to escalate the conflict in the Middle East, Tehran is furious following US strikes. Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi warned that the US strikes "will have everlasting consequences" and that Tehran "reserves all options" to retaliate. Speaking today, he said the US and Israel had "blown up" any chance of nuclear negotiations and asked: "How can Iran return to something it never left, let alone blew up?" He's also called for condemnation of the attacks from the UN Security Council at an emergency meeting. Levels of retaliation Iran's Revolutionary Guard has already said it launched 40 missiles at Israel this morning, including its biggest ballistic missile, the Khorramshahr-4. Missile hits were reported at sites in northern and central Israel, including in Haifa, Ness Ziona, Rishon LeZion and Tel Aviv. The Iranian parliament is also moving to close the Strait of Hormuz, according to Iranian state-owned media. This move that would have global ramifications by disrupting the flow of large amounts of oil and gas, as well as other trade. Direct retaliation against the US could include attacks on US bases, warships and aircraft in the region, though Iran's ability to launch missiles and drones has been severely degraded by Israeli strikes over the last two weeks. 17:41:03 E3 leaders urge Iran not to 'destabilise the region' The leaders of the E3 group have urged Iran not to "destabilise the region" in its response to US strikes. Sir Keir Starmer, Germany's Friedrich Merz and France's Emmanuel Macron discussed the latest developments in the Middle East earlier today, according to a statement. "We call upon Iran to engage in negotiations leading to an agreement that addresses all concerns associated with its nuclear program," the leaders say. "We stand ready to contribute to that goal in coordination with all parties. We urge Iran not to take any further action that could destabilise the region." 17:25:01 What you need to know in five bullet points If you're just joining us, here's the story at a glance: The US joined Israel's conflict with Iran last night by bombing nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan; Donald Trump said the strikes were a "spectacular military success" and warned Iran further attacks would follow if it didn't now move towards peace; The UN's nuclear watchdog said it was unclear what damage had been done at Fordow, but the Natanz site was now "completely destroyed" and Isfahan suffered "very significant damage"; Iran has branded the attacks "outrageous" and "criminal", while its parliament has reportedly suggested closing the Strait of Hormuz in response; Israel has continued its strikes in Iran following the US attacks, targeting dozens of sites across the country. 17:08:32 Before and after images show impact of US strikes at Natanz and Isfahan Before and after satellite images of Iran's Isfahan and Natanz nuclear sites show the damage after US strikes. Earlier, the head of the UN's nuclear watchdog said the Natanz facility had been "completely destroyed", while its underground halls "suffered a lot" (see 16.15 post). Israeli strikes in the last two weeks had already damaged Iran's largest uranium enrichment centre there. As you can see below, US strikes have now completely reshaped the terrain at Natanz, leaving a giant crater over the site's underground facility. IAEA chief Rafael Grossi also said the Isfahan site had suffered "very significant damage". General Dan Caine, chairman of the US joint chiefs of staff, said a US submarine launched more than two dozen Tomahawk cruise missiles at the Isfahan site. The images below show the damage at the site today, with blackened scorch marks left in place where buildings stood yesterday. To see before and after comparisons of the third site struck by US bombers - Fordow - see our 14.10 post. 16:45:01 'Great unity' in Republican Party, Trump says Donald Trump has taken to Truth Social this evening to proclaim his Republican Party is united in a way "never seen before". The US president has received plenty of support from within his own party following his decision to strike Iran's nuclear facilities. But there has also been at least two GOP politicians suggesting it was unconstitutional for him to bomb Iran without approval from Congress. Ohio representative Warren Davidson said it was "hard to conceive a rationale" that the strikes were constitutional, while Kentucky representative Thomas Massie made similar comments. Some Democrats have called for Trump to be impeached over the unapproved military action. 16:30:01 IDF hits 'furthest target to date' in Iran The Israeli military says it's struck storage facilities deep into Iran containing its long-range Khorramshahr missiles. The air force said the attack was launched "in broad daylight" and was the "furthest target we've struck to date" in Iran. It said the storage facilities were located in the Yazd area of central Iran. "We destroyed Khorramshahr missiles before they were launched at Israel and struck tunnels used to store the missiles," the update says. 16:15:53 Underground damage at Fordow site unclear - but Natanz 'completely destroyed', watchdog says The head of the UN's nuclear watchdog says he doesn't know the extent of damage at Iran's Fordow nuclear facility after US strikes. "There are clear indications of impacts," International Atomic Energy Agency chief Rafael Grossi tells CNN, "but as for the assessment for the degree of damage underground, on this we cannot pronounce ourselves." "No one could tell you how much it has been damaged," he says, adding that because of observed changes in the shape of the sites, "one cannot exclude that there is significant damage there." Grossi says that the Natanz facility has been "completely destroyed," while its underground halls "suffered a lot" because of cuts to electricity as the result of Israeli attacks. The Isfahan site has also suffered "very significant damage," he adds. Grossi will convene an emergency meeting between the IAEA's governors tomorrow "in light of the urgent situation in Iran".
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
The world is safer without a nuclear-armed Iran
During his first term as president in 2019, Donald Trump pulled back from ordering an attack on Iran even as US warships locked missiles on to their targets and bombers were in the air. The American military was 'cocked and loaded' only to be stood down with just 10 minutes to spare. The abandonment of a major operation at such a late stage was seen as emblematic of the president's deep reluctance to involve his country in another conflict in the Middle East, and what he called the region's 'forever wars'. Yet on Saturday night his reticence evaporated. He sent US stealth aircraft armed with so-called 'bunker buster' bombs to destroy Iran's nuclear weapons programme once and for all. Mr Trump declared the operation a great success, though it will be several days before it is known whether the three sites have been 'obliterated', as the president has claimed. The whole episode has been a classic Trump performance. First he issued the threat to back up Israel's assault on the Iranian nuclear weapons plants, only then appearing to retreat once more by indicating nothing would happen for a fortnight. Whether it was brought forward in order to catch the Iranian regime off guard is not clear. It is more likely that the intelligence reports of the Iranians moving their enriched uranium away from the plants expedited the mission. Dozens of lorries were seen at the Fordow site, which is buried deep in a mountain, probably removing enriched material to another location. The president may have feared that waiting another week or so risked leaving him in the same position as George W Bush, who invaded Iraq to stop Saddam Hussein's arms programme only to find the weapons of mass destruction had gone or were never present. Mr Trump was critical of that decision and his America First doctrine gave the impression he would keep the US out of any foreign conflict unless directly threatened. But he has discovered, as have past presidents all the way back to Woodrow Wilson, that things are not that simple and isolationism is very hard to sustain. As the most powerful defender of democratic values against despotisms, the US cannot, and should not, just depart the scene. The geopolitical ramifications of these strikes on Iran are profound. Mr Trump may perhaps now care to reflect on his ambivalence towards Russia's invasion of Ukraine, where similar criteria apply, of an autocracy threatening the existence of another country. Will he now be more critical of Vladimir Putin and more supportive of Nato, which is holding its annual summit in the Hague this week with an across-the-board promise to increase defence spending dramatically? If Iran has moved its enriched material, is Mr Trump prepared to order further strikes or will it be left to Israel to follow up? The president might well hope the strikes have indeed obliterated the sites and no more US help is required; but once involved in a war, it can be hard for a country to extricate itself easily from it. There is also the threat from Iran to close the Strait of Hormuz through which almost a quarter of the world's oil and gas is shipped. However, this may not be possible for Tehran, both because of the presence of a US carrier group, but also because China relies heavily on energy supplies coming through the Gulf. A blockade would be calamitous for the Chinese economy and for India's. Tehran will be keen to get both these countries into their camp in a stand-off with America. Furthermore, there is a very real risk of terrorist attacks on US assets, which include shipping and some 40,000 troops in the region. Iran will hope its proxies Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis will step up their activities against Israel, but their ability to do so has been severely degraded. It will also seek to sponsor violent action abroad. Here in the UK we have already seen how the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has targeted émigré Iranian dissidents and engaged in spying and cyber warfare. It is possible that the damage inflicted on Iran and the assassination of some key military figures will hasten the demise of the theocratic rulers and the removal of the zealots who have caused so much trouble in the region and the world for so long. Washington says it is not seeking regime change and the idea that it would be replaced by a benign, Western-style democracy of the sort never seen in Iran is fanciful. More likely is that the IRGC would take over in a military coup with unknown consequences. There are many uncertainties, but one thing is clear. Despite the calls from Sir Keir Starmer and others for 'de-escalation', the world is a safer place without a nuclear-armed Iran. As Benjamin Netanyahu put it: the most dangerous regime in the world has been denied access to the most dangerous weapons. The Israeli prime minister, who scored a diplomatic coup by convincing Mr Trump to act, believed it would usher in a period of 'peace and prosperity' for all in the region and beyond. We can but hope, but history is not a happy guide.
